* Is test_offload.py supposed to work?
@ 2020-11-20 15:46 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-20 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-20 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-11-20 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, Jiri Pirko; +Cc: bpf, netdev
Hi Jakub and Jiri
I am investigating an error with XDP offload mode, and figured I'd run
'test_offload.py' from selftests. However, I'm unable to get it to run
successfully; am I missing some config options, or has it simply
bit-rotted to the point where it no longer works?
[root@(none) bpf]# ./test_offload.py
Test destruction of generic XDP...
Test TC non-offloaded...
Test TC non-offloaded isn't getting bound...
Test TC offloads are off by default...
FAIL: Missing or incorrect netlink extack message
File "./test_offload.py", line 836, in <module>
check_extack(err, "TC offload is disabled on net device.", args)
File "./test_offload.py", line 657, in check_extack
fail(not comp, "Missing or incorrect netlink extack message")
File "./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
Commenting out that line gets me a bit further:
[root@(none) bpf]# ./test_offload.py
Test destruction of generic XDP...
Test TC non-offloaded...
Test TC non-offloaded isn't getting bound...
Test TC offloads are off by default...
Test TC offload by default...
Test TC cBPF bytcode tries offload by default...
Test TC cBPF unbound bytecode doesn't offload...
Test non-0 chain offload...
FAIL: Missing or incorrect netlink extack message
File "./test_offload.py", line 876, in <module>
check_extack(err, "Driver supports only offload of chain 0.", args)
File "./test_offload.py", line 657, in check_extack
fail(not comp, "Missing or incorrect netlink extack message")
File "./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
And again, after which I gave up:
[root@(none) bpf]# ./test_offload.py
Test destruction of generic XDP...
Test TC non-offloaded...
Test TC non-offloaded isn't getting bound...
Test TC offloads are off by default...
Test TC offload by default...
Test TC cBPF bytcode tries offload by default...
Test TC cBPF unbound bytecode doesn't offload...
Test non-0 chain offload...
Test TC replace...
Test TC replace bad flags...
Test spurious extack from the driver...
Test TC offloads work...
FAIL: Missing or incorrect message from netdevsim in verifier log
File "./test_offload.py", line 920, in <module>
check_verifier_log(err, "[netdevsim] Hello from netdevsim!")
File "./test_offload.py", line 671, in check_verifier_log
fail(True, "Missing or incorrect message from netdevsim in verifier log")
File "./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Is test_offload.py supposed to work?
2020-11-20 15:46 Is test_offload.py supposed to work? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-11-20 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-23 10:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-20 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-20 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: Jiri Pirko, bpf, netdev
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:46:51 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hi Jakub and Jiri
>
> I am investigating an error with XDP offload mode, and figured I'd run
> 'test_offload.py' from selftests. However, I'm unable to get it to run
> successfully; am I missing some config options, or has it simply
> bit-rotted to the point where it no longer works?
Yeah it must have bit rotted, there are no config options to get
wrong there AFAIK.
It shouldn't be too hard to fix tho, it's just a python script...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Is test_offload.py supposed to work?
2020-11-20 15:46 Is test_offload.py supposed to work? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-20 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-20 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-23 10:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-11-20 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Cc: Jakub Kicinski, Jiri Pirko, bpf, Networking
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:49 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub and Jiri
>
> I am investigating an error with XDP offload mode, and figured I'd run
> 'test_offload.py' from selftests. However, I'm unable to get it to run
> successfully; am I missing some config options, or has it simply
> bit-rotted to the point where it no longer works?
>
See also discussion in [0]
[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg697523.html
> [root@(none) bpf]# ./test_offload.py
> Test destruction of generic XDP...
> Test TC non-offloaded...
> Test TC non-offloaded isn't getting bound...
> Test TC offloads are off by default...
> FAIL: Missing or incorrect netlink extack message
> File "./test_offload.py", line 836, in <module>
> check_extack(err, "TC offload is disabled on net device.", args)
> File "./test_offload.py", line 657, in check_extack
> fail(not comp, "Missing or incorrect netlink extack message")
> File "./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
> tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
>
>
> Commenting out that line gets me a bit further:
>
> [root@(none) bpf]# ./test_offload.py
> Test destruction of generic XDP...
> Test TC non-offloaded...
> Test TC non-offloaded isn't getting bound...
> Test TC offloads are off by default...
> Test TC offload by default...
> Test TC cBPF bytcode tries offload by default...
> Test TC cBPF unbound bytecode doesn't offload...
> Test non-0 chain offload...
> FAIL: Missing or incorrect netlink extack message
> File "./test_offload.py", line 876, in <module>
> check_extack(err, "Driver supports only offload of chain 0.", args)
> File "./test_offload.py", line 657, in check_extack
> fail(not comp, "Missing or incorrect netlink extack message")
> File "./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
> tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
>
>
> And again, after which I gave up:
>
> [root@(none) bpf]# ./test_offload.py
> Test destruction of generic XDP...
> Test TC non-offloaded...
> Test TC non-offloaded isn't getting bound...
> Test TC offloads are off by default...
> Test TC offload by default...
> Test TC cBPF bytcode tries offload by default...
> Test TC cBPF unbound bytecode doesn't offload...
> Test non-0 chain offload...
> Test TC replace...
> Test TC replace bad flags...
> Test spurious extack from the driver...
> Test TC offloads work...
> FAIL: Missing or incorrect message from netdevsim in verifier log
> File "./test_offload.py", line 920, in <module>
> check_verifier_log(err, "[netdevsim] Hello from netdevsim!")
> File "./test_offload.py", line 671, in check_verifier_log
> fail(True, "Missing or incorrect message from netdevsim in verifier log")
> File "./test_offload.py", line 86, in fail
> tb = "".join(traceback.extract_stack().format())
>
> -Toke
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Is test_offload.py supposed to work?
2020-11-20 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-23 10:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-11-23 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: Jiri Pirko, bpf, netdev
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:46:51 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Hi Jakub and Jiri
>>
>> I am investigating an error with XDP offload mode, and figured I'd run
>> 'test_offload.py' from selftests. However, I'm unable to get it to run
>> successfully; am I missing some config options, or has it simply
>> bit-rotted to the point where it no longer works?
>
> Yeah it must have bit rotted, there are no config options to get
> wrong there AFAIK.
>
> It shouldn't be too hard to fix tho, it's just a python script...
Right, I'll take a stab at fixing it, just wanted to make sure I wasn't
missing something obvious; thanks!
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Is test_offload.py supposed to work?
2020-11-20 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2020-11-23 10:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-11-23 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: Jakub Kicinski, Jiri Pirko, bpf, Networking
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:49 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jakub and Jiri
>>
>> I am investigating an error with XDP offload mode, and figured I'd run
>> 'test_offload.py' from selftests. However, I'm unable to get it to run
>> successfully; am I missing some config options, or has it simply
>> bit-rotted to the point where it no longer works?
>>
>
> See also discussion in [0]
>
> [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg697523.html
Ah, right, thanks for the pointer :)
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-23 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-20 15:46 Is test_offload.py supposed to work? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-20 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-23 10:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-20 20:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-23 10:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.