All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: keescook@chromium.org
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v4 23/32] selinux: Remove boot parameter
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 08:12:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQjMfH6Q+Tif8nBknZojgxrb6x+oDz4vHRiZN8rb8MZ5Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002005505.6112-24-keescook@chromium.org>

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:04 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> Since LSM enabling is now centralized with CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE and
> "lsm.enable=...", this removes the LSM-specific enabling logic from
> SELinux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  9 ------
>  security/selinux/Kconfig                      | 29 -------------------
>  security/selinux/hooks.c                      | 15 +---------
>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index cf963febebb0..0d10ab3d020e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -4045,15 +4045,6 @@
>                         loaded. An invalid security module name will be treated
>                         as if no module has been chosen.
>
> -       selinux=        [SELINUX] Disable or enable SELinux at boot time.
> -                       Format: { "0" | "1" }
> -                       See security/selinux/Kconfig help text.
> -                       0 -- disable.
> -                       1 -- enable.
> -                       Default value is set via kernel config option.
> -                       If enabled at boot time, /selinux/disable can be used
> -                       later to disable prior to initial policy load.

No comments yet on the rest of the patchset, but the subject line of
this patch caught my eye and I wanted to comment quickly on this one
...

Not a fan unfortunately.

Much like the SELinux bits under /proc/self/attr, this is a user
visible thing which has made its way into a lot of docs, scripts, and
minds; I believe removing it would be a big mistake.

>         serialnumber    [BUGS=X86-32]
>
>         shapers=        [NET]
> diff --git a/security/selinux/Kconfig b/security/selinux/Kconfig
> index 8af7a690eb40..86936528a0bb 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/selinux/Kconfig
> @@ -8,35 +8,6 @@ config SECURITY_SELINUX
>           You will also need a policy configuration and a labeled filesystem.
>           If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
>
> -config SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM
> -       bool "NSA SELinux boot parameter"
> -       depends on SECURITY_SELINUX
> -       default n
> -       help
> -         This option adds a kernel parameter 'selinux', which allows SELinux
> -         to be disabled at boot.  If this option is selected, SELinux
> -         functionality can be disabled with selinux=0 on the kernel
> -         command line.  The purpose of this option is to allow a single
> -         kernel image to be distributed with SELinux built in, but not
> -         necessarily enabled.
> -
> -         If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
> -
> -config SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE
> -       int "NSA SELinux boot parameter default value"
> -       depends on SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM
> -       range 0 1
> -       default 1
> -       help
> -         This option sets the default value for the kernel parameter
> -         'selinux', which allows SELinux to be disabled at boot.  If this
> -         option is set to 0 (zero), the SELinux kernel parameter will
> -         default to 0, disabling SELinux at bootup.  If this option is
> -         set to 1 (one), the SELinux kernel parameter will default to 1,
> -         enabling SELinux at bootup.
> -
> -         If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer 1.
> -
>  config SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE
>         bool "NSA SELinux runtime disable"
>         depends on SECURITY_SELINUX
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 71a10fedecb3..8f5eea097612 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -120,20 +120,7 @@ __setup("enforcing=", enforcing_setup);
>  #define selinux_enforcing_boot 1
>  #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM
> -int selinux_enabled = CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE;
> -
> -static int __init selinux_enabled_setup(char *str)
> -{
> -       unsigned long enabled;
> -       if (!kstrtoul(str, 0, &enabled))
> -               selinux_enabled = enabled ? 1 : 0;
> -       return 1;
> -}
> -__setup("selinux=", selinux_enabled_setup);
> -#else
> -int selinux_enabled = 1;
> -#endif
> +int selinux_enabled __lsm_ro_after_init;
>
>  static unsigned int selinux_checkreqprot_boot =
>         CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_CHECKREQPROT_VALUE;
> --
> 2.17.1
>


-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-02 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-02  0:54 [PATCH security-next v4 00/32] LSM: Explict LSM ordering Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 01/32] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 02/32] vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 03/32] LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 04/32] LSM: Remove initcall tracing Kees Cook
2018-10-02 21:14   ` James Morris
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 05/32] LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 06/32] vmlinux.lds.h: Move LSM_TABLE into INIT_DATA Kees Cook
2018-10-02 21:15   ` James Morris
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 07/32] LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM() Kees Cook
2018-10-02 21:16   ` James Morris
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 08/32] LSM: Record LSM name in struct lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 09/32] LSM: Provide init debugging infrastructure Kees Cook
2018-10-02 21:17   ` James Morris
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 10/32] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures Kees Cook
2018-10-02 21:20   ` James Morris
2018-10-02 21:38     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 11/32] LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 12/32] LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 13/32] LoadPin: Rename "enable" to "enforce" Kees Cook
2018-10-02  1:06   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-10-02  4:47     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 14/32] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 15/32] LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMs Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 16/32] LSM: Prepare for arbitrary LSM enabling Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 17/32] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 18/32] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 19/32] LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logic Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 20/32] LSM: Refactor "security=" in terms of enable/disable Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 21/32] LSM: Finalize centralized LSM enabling logic Kees Cook
2018-10-02  1:18   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-10-02  4:49     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 22/32] apparmor: Remove boot parameter Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 23/32] selinux: " Kees Cook
2018-10-02 12:12   ` Paul Moore [this message]
2018-10-02 13:42     ` Stephen Smalley
2018-10-02 14:44       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 14:58         ` Stephen Smalley
2018-10-02 16:33           ` Jordan Glover
2018-10-02 16:54             ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 18:33               ` Stephen Smalley
2018-10-02 19:02                 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 18:57               ` John Johansen
2018-10-02 19:17                 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 19:47                   ` John Johansen
2018-10-02 20:29                     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 21:11                       ` John Johansen
2018-10-02 22:06                   ` James Morris
2018-10-02 23:06                     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 23:46                       ` John Johansen
2018-10-02 23:54                         ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03  0:05                           ` John Johansen
2018-10-03  0:12                             ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 13:15                               ` John Johansen
2018-10-03 13:39                           ` Stephen Smalley
2018-10-03 17:26                             ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 19:43                               ` Stephen Smalley
2018-10-04  5:38                               ` John Johansen
2018-10-04 16:02                                 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-08 14:25                                 ` Paul Moore
2018-10-03 18:17                         ` James Morris
2018-10-03 18:20                           ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 18:28                             ` James Morris
2018-10-03 20:10                               ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 20:36                                 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 21:19                                   ` James Morris
2018-10-04  5:56                                   ` John Johansen
2018-10-04 16:18                                     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-04 17:40                                       ` Jordan Glover
2018-10-04 17:42                                         ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 21:34                                 ` James Morris
2018-10-03 23:55                                   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-03 23:59                                     ` Randy Dunlap
2018-10-04  0:03                                       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-04  6:22                                       ` John Johansen
2018-10-04  6:18                                     ` John Johansen
2018-10-04 17:49                                     ` James Morris
2018-10-05  0:05                                       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-05  4:58                                         ` James Morris
2018-10-05 16:29                                           ` James Morris
2018-10-05 16:35                                           ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02 23:28                     ` John Johansen
2018-10-02 16:34           ` Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 24/32] LSM: Build ordered list of ordered LSMs for init Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 25/32] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:54 ` [PATCH security-next v4 26/32] LSM: Introduce "lsm.order=" for boottime ordering Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:55 ` [PATCH security-next v4 27/32] LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSM Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:55 ` [PATCH security-next v4 28/32] Yama: " Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:55 ` [PATCH security-next v4 29/32] LSM: Introduce enum lsm_order Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:55 ` [PATCH security-next v4 30/32] capability: Initialize as LSM_ORDER_FIRST Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:55 ` [PATCH security-next v4 31/32] LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM Kees Cook
2018-10-02  0:55 ` [PATCH security-next v4 32/32] LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initialization Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHC9VhQjMfH6Q+Tif8nBknZojgxrb6x+oDz4vHRiZN8rb8MZ5Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.