All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	xemul@parallels.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-cgroup tcp buffer limitation
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:56:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHH2K0aOHPW2xqb86sN4A3xBwZKU0qgnZ05cn-3XKES392tftg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6E39DD.2040102@parallels.com>

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 02:03 AM, Paul Menage wrote:
>> I definitely think that there was no consensus reached on unified
>> versus split charging - but I think that we can work around that and
>> keep everyone happy, see below.
>
> I think at this point there is at least consensus that this could very well
> live in memcg, right ?

Yes, I think it should live in memcg.

>> On the subject of filesystems specifically, see Greg Thelen's proposal
>> for using bind mounts to account on a bind mount to a given cgroup -
>> that could apply to dentries, page tables and other kernel memory as
>> well as page cache.
>
> Care to point me to it ?

http://marc.info/?t=127749867100004&r=1&w=2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	xemul@parallels.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-cgroup tcp buffer limitation
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:56:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHH2K0aOHPW2xqb86sN4A3xBwZKU0qgnZ05cn-3XKES392tftg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6E39DD.2040102@parallels.com>

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 02:03 AM, Paul Menage wrote:
>> I definitely think that there was no consensus reached on unified
>> versus split charging - but I think that we can work around that and
>> keep everyone happy, see below.
>
> I think at this point there is at least consensus that this could very well
> live in memcg, right ?

Yes, I think it should live in memcg.

>> On the subject of filesystems specifically, see Greg Thelen's proposal
>> for using bind mounts to account on a bind mount to a given cgroup -
>> that could apply to dentries, page tables and other kernel memory as
>> well as page cache.
>
> Care to point me to it ?

http://marc.info/?t=127749867100004&r=1&w=2

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-13  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-06  2:35 [PATCH] per-cgroup tcp buffer limitation Glauber Costa
2011-09-06  2:35 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 10:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-06 10:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-06 15:28   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 15:28     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 15:28     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 22:52   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 22:52     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 22:52     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 16:08 ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-06 16:08   ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-06 16:16   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 16:16     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 16:16     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 22:12     ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-06 22:12       ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-06 22:37       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 22:37         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-06 22:37         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07 21:35         ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-07 21:35           ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-08  4:44           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-08  4:44             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-08  4:44             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-08 21:53             ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-08 21:53               ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-09  4:17               ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-09  4:17                 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-09  4:17                 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-09 23:38                 ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-09 23:38                   ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-12 16:30                   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-12 16:30                     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-12 16:30                     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-12  5:03                 ` Paul Menage
2011-09-12  5:03                   ` Paul Menage
2011-09-12 16:57                   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-12 16:57                     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-12 16:57                     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-13  6:56                     ` Greg Thelen [this message]
2011-09-13  6:56                       ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-13 18:09                     ` Paul Menage
2011-09-13 18:09                       ` Paul Menage
2011-09-13 18:11                       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-13 18:11                         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-13 18:11                         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-13 18:46                         ` Paul Menage
2011-09-13 18:46                           ` Paul Menage
2011-09-13 19:08                           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-13 19:08                             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-13 19:08                             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07  2:38       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-07  2:38         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-07  2:38         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-07  1:08 ` Paul Menage
2011-09-07  1:08   ` Paul Menage
2011-09-07  1:09   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07  1:09     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07  1:09     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07  1:29     ` Paul Menage
2011-09-07  1:29       ` Paul Menage
2011-09-07  1:32       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07  1:32         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-07  1:32         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-09  0:18 ` Rick Jones
2011-09-09  0:18   ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHH2K0aOHPW2xqb86sN4A3xBwZKU0qgnZ05cn-3XKES392tftg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.