From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QWcRbUPqY5dhEp00p0HKx_vaH-Hbn7gfoaQrjLvPt01=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDFFEF8.9000609@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Asias He <asias@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 06:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> As long as the latency is decreasing that's good. But It's worth
>> keeping in mind that these percentages are probably wildly different
>> on real storage devices and/or qemu-kvm. What we don't know here is
>> whether this bottleneck matters in real environments - results with
>> real storage and with qemu-kvm would be interesting.
>
>
> Yes. Here is the performance data on a Fusion-IO SSD device.
>
> Fio test is performed in a 8 vcpu guest with Fusion-IO based guest using kvm
> tool.
>
> Short version:
> With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
> IOPS boost : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10%
> Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%
Nice, I'm glad the improvement shows on real hardware.
Stefan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QWcRbUPqY5dhEp00p0HKx_vaH-Hbn7gfoaQrjLvPt01=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDFFEF8.9000609@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Asias He <asias@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 06:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> As long as the latency is decreasing that's good. But It's worth
>> keeping in mind that these percentages are probably wildly different
>> on real storage devices and/or qemu-kvm. What we don't know here is
>> whether this bottleneck matters in real environments - results with
>> real storage and with qemu-kvm would be interesting.
>
>
> Yes. Here is the performance data on a Fusion-IO SSD device.
>
> Fio test is performed in a 8 vcpu guest with Fusion-IO based guest using kvm
> tool.
>
> Short version:
> With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
> IOPS boost : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10%
> Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%
Nice, I'm glad the improvement shows on real hardware.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 6:53 [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 2:02 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 2:02 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 8:03 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 8:03 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:05 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 10:05 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 11:14 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-18 11:14 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-18 11:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-18 11:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-19 2:51 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 2:51 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 6:21 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-19 6:21 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-20 4:46 ` Asias He
2012-06-20 4:46 ` Asias He
2012-06-21 9:49 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-21 9:49 ` Dor Laor
2012-07-01 23:54 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-02 2:45 ` Asias He
2012-07-02 2:45 ` Asias He
2012-07-02 6:41 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-02 6:41 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-03 0:39 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 0:39 ` Asias He
2012-07-04 2:40 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-04 2:40 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-06 1:03 ` Asias He
2012-07-06 1:03 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 13:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-03 13:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-03 14:02 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 14:02 ` Asias He
2012-07-01 23:54 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-03 14:22 ` Ronen Hod
2012-07-03 14:22 ` Ronen Hod
2012-07-03 14:28 ` Dor Laor
2012-07-03 14:28 ` Dor Laor
2012-07-04 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-04 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-18 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 2:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 2:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-18 10:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-19 2:21 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 2:21 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 9:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 10:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-18 10:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-18 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-19 2:30 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 2:30 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 9:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 9:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 10:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-19 4:24 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 4:24 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2012-06-19 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJSP0QWcRbUPqY5dhEp00p0HKx_vaH-Hbn7gfoaQrjLvPt01=g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.