All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: cpufreq: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:34:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jfd6JsnSsk2SPv3AT=gjMyWFby3q32YcJrMuCK1ZoK8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171218115943.GL19815@vireshk-i7>

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 18-12-17, 12:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Well, if SCHED_CPUFRREQ_CLEAR means "this CPU is going to enter the
>> idle loop" really, then it is better to call it
>> SCHED_CPUFRREQ_ENTER_IDLE, for example.
>>
>> SCHED_CPUFRREQ_CLEAR meaning basically "you should clear these flags
>> now" doesn't seem to convey any information to whoever doesn't
>> squirrel the flags in the first place.
>
> Right, but when all the flags are cleared, then we can infer that we
> are going to idle in the most probable case.
>
> Anyway, I will implement RT and DL clear flags as you suggested in the
> next version.

Cool, thanks!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13  9:53 [PATCH 0/4] sched: cpufreq: Track util update flags Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Initialize sg_cpu->flags to 0 Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:13   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 11:22     ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-10 12:15   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpufreq: " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: cpufreq: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:26   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 11:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-16 16:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-16 16:47     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-17  0:19       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18  4:59         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 11:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 11:59             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 12:14               ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-19  3:12                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:18                   ` Joel Fernandes
2017-12-19  3:22                     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:26                       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:30                         ` Joel Fernandes
2017-12-19  3:41                           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19 10:44                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 17:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-12-19 19:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20  4:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20  8:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20  9:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 12:55         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 13:28           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:31             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 14:52               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-20 15:01                 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 14:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-20 14:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 17:27               ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't pass flags to sugov_set_iowait_boost() Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:28   ` Juri Lelli
2018-01-10 12:15   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpufreq: " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get_util() unnecessarily Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:34   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 12:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:26   ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0jfd6JsnSsk2SPv3AT=gjMyWFby3q32YcJrMuCK1ZoK8w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.