All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: guangming.cao@mediatek.com
Cc: benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org, bo.song@mediatek.com,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com, labbott@redhat.com,
	libo.kang@mediatek.com, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, lmark@codeaurora.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, michael.j.ruhl@intel.com,
	mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, yf.wang@mediatek.com,
	caoguangming34@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:48:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLW5uEZCGHGk3rYoiOGzN5XMKb39JzoPB1iEX9k3UsiT-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120033450.90164-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM <guangming.cao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
> Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size should be
> always less than the total DRAM size on system heap.
> And it can prevent consuming too much time for invalid allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> index 23a7e74ef966..bd6f255620e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,13 @@ static struct dma_buf *system_heap_allocate(struct dma_heap *heap,
>         struct page *page, *tmp_page;
>         int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> +       /*
> +        * Size check. The "len" should be less than totalram since system_heap
> +        * memory is comes from system. Adding check here can prevent consuming
> +        * too much time for invalid allocations.
> +        */
> +       if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())
> +               return -EINVAL;

Thanks so much for revising and sending this along! It looks good to me.

Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

thanks again
-john

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: guangming.cao@mediatek.com
Cc: benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org, bo.song@mediatek.com,
	 christian.koenig@amd.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com, labbott@redhat.com,
	libo.kang@mediatek.com,  linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, lmark@codeaurora.org,
	 matthias.bgg@gmail.com, michael.j.ruhl@intel.com,
	mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com,  sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, yf.wang@mediatek.com,
	 caoguangming34@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:48:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLW5uEZCGHGk3rYoiOGzN5XMKb39JzoPB1iEX9k3UsiT-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120033450.90164-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM <guangming.cao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
> Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size should be
> always less than the total DRAM size on system heap.
> And it can prevent consuming too much time for invalid allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> index 23a7e74ef966..bd6f255620e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,13 @@ static struct dma_buf *system_heap_allocate(struct dma_heap *heap,
>         struct page *page, *tmp_page;
>         int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> +       /*
> +        * Size check. The "len" should be less than totalram since system_heap
> +        * memory is comes from system. Adding check here can prevent consuming
> +        * too much time for invalid allocations.
> +        */
> +       if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())
> +               return -EINVAL;

Thanks so much for revising and sending this along! It looks good to me.

Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

thanks again
-john

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: guangming.cao@mediatek.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, caoguangming34@gmail.com,
	lmark@codeaurora.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	michael.j.ruhl@intel.com, yf.wang@mediatek.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, libo.kang@mediatek.com,
	benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org, bo.song@mediatek.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, labbott@redhat.com,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:48:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLW5uEZCGHGk3rYoiOGzN5XMKb39JzoPB1iEX9k3UsiT-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120033450.90164-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM <guangming.cao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
> Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size should be
> always less than the total DRAM size on system heap.
> And it can prevent consuming too much time for invalid allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> index 23a7e74ef966..bd6f255620e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,13 @@ static struct dma_buf *system_heap_allocate(struct dma_heap *heap,
>         struct page *page, *tmp_page;
>         int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> +       /*
> +        * Size check. The "len" should be less than totalram since system_heap
> +        * memory is comes from system. Adding check here can prevent consuming
> +        * too much time for invalid allocations.
> +        */
> +       if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())
> +               return -EINVAL;

Thanks so much for revising and sending this along! It looks good to me.

Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

thanks again
-john

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: guangming.cao@mediatek.com
Cc: benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org, bo.song@mediatek.com,
	 christian.koenig@amd.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com, labbott@redhat.com,
	libo.kang@mediatek.com,  linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, lmark@codeaurora.org,
	 matthias.bgg@gmail.com, michael.j.ruhl@intel.com,
	mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com,  sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, yf.wang@mediatek.com,
	 caoguangming34@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: Add a size check for allocation
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:48:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLW5uEZCGHGk3rYoiOGzN5XMKb39JzoPB1iEX9k3UsiT-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120033450.90164-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM <guangming.cao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> From: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
>
> Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size should be
> always less than the total DRAM size on system heap.
> And it can prevent consuming too much time for invalid allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guangming <Guangming.Cao@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> index 23a7e74ef966..bd6f255620e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,13 @@ static struct dma_buf *system_heap_allocate(struct dma_heap *heap,
>         struct page *page, *tmp_page;
>         int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> +       /*
> +        * Size check. The "len" should be less than totalram since system_heap
> +        * memory is comes from system. Adding check here can prevent consuming
> +        * too much time for invalid allocations.
> +        */
> +       if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages())
> +               return -EINVAL;

Thanks so much for revising and sending this along! It looks good to me.

Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

thanks again
-john

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-20  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17  9:41 [PATCH] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size limitation for allocation guangming.cao
2021-12-17  9:41 ` guangming.cao
2021-12-17  9:41 ` guangming.cao
2021-12-17  9:41 ` guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51 ` [PATCH v2] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check " guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51   ` guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51   ` guangming.cao
2021-12-27  9:51   ` guangming.cao
2022-01-03 18:57   ` John Stultz
2022-01-03 18:57     ` John Stultz
2022-01-03 18:57     ` John Stultz
2022-01-03 18:57     ` John Stultz
2022-01-04  7:47     ` Christian König
2022-01-04  7:47       ` Christian König
2022-01-04  7:47       ` Christian König
2022-01-04  7:47       ` Christian König
2022-01-04  8:44       ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-04  8:44         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-04  8:44         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-05  6:36       ` guangming.cao
2022-01-05  6:36         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-05  6:36         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-05  6:36         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 10:50         ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 10:50           ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 10:50           ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 10:50           ` Sumit Semwal
2022-01-13 12:34           ` [PATCH v3] " guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:34             ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:34             ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:34             ` guangming.cao
2022-01-13 12:57             ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 12:57               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 12:57               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 12:57               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00               ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00                 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00                 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:00                 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-01-13 13:05                 ` Christian König
2022-01-13 13:05                   ` Christian König
2022-01-13 13:05                   ` Christian König
2022-01-13 13:05                   ` Christian König
2022-01-13 23:26                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-13 23:26                     ` John Stultz
2022-01-13 23:26                     ` John Stultz
2022-01-13 23:26                     ` John Stultz
2022-01-14  7:16                     ` Christian König
2022-01-14  7:16                       ` Christian König
2022-01-14  7:16                       ` Christian König
2022-01-14  7:16                       ` Christian König
2022-01-14 12:05                       ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-14 12:05                         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-14 12:05                         ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-15  1:17                         ` John Stultz
2022-01-15  1:17                           ` John Stultz
2022-01-15  1:17                           ` John Stultz
2022-01-15  1:17                           ` John Stultz
2022-01-19  9:59                           ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19  9:59                             ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19  9:59                             ` Guangming.Cao
2022-01-19 20:37                             ` John Stultz
2022-01-19 20:37                               ` John Stultz
2022-01-19 20:37                               ` John Stultz
2022-01-19 20:37                               ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:34                               ` [PATCH v4] dma-buf: system_heap: " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:34                                 ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:34                                 ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:34                                 ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  3:48                                 ` John Stultz [this message]
2022-01-20  3:48                                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:48                                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  3:48                                   ` John Stultz
2022-01-20  7:08                                   ` [PATCH v5] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  7:08                                     ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  7:08                                     ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  7:08                                     ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:27                                     ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:27                                       ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:27                                       ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:27                                       ` Christian König
2022-01-20  8:52                                       ` [PATCH v6] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:52                                         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:52                                         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20  8:52                                         ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                         ` [PATCH v6 RESEND] " guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                           ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                           ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:00                                           ` guangming.cao
2022-01-20 10:22                                           ` Christian König
2022-01-20 10:22                                             ` Christian König
2022-01-20 10:22                                             ` Christian König
2022-01-20 10:22                                             ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALAqxLW5uEZCGHGk3rYoiOGzN5XMKb39JzoPB1iEX9k3UsiT-A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=bo.song@mediatek.com \
    --cc=caoguangming34@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=guangming.cao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=libo.kang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yf.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.