From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Tim Hartrick <tim@edgecast.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Repeated fork() causes SLAB to grow without bound Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:03:24 +0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CALYGNiP_zqAucmN=Gn75Mm2wK1iE6fPNxTsaTRgnUbFbFE7C-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <546DFFA1.4030700@redhat.com> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >> I'm thinking about limitation for reusing anon_vmas which might >> increase performance without breaking asymptotic estimation of >> count anon_vma in the worst case. For example this heuristic: allow >> to reuse only anon_vma with single direct descendant. It seems >> there will be arount up to two times more anon_vmas but >> false-aliasing must be much lower. > > It may even be possible to not create a child anon_vma for the > first child a parent forks, but only create a new anon_vma once > the parent clones a second child (alive at the same time as the > first child). > > That still takes care of things like apache or sendmail, but > would not create infinite anon_vmas for a task that keeps forking > itself to infinite depth without calling exec... But this scheme is still exploitable. Malicious software easily could create sequence of forks and exits which leads to infinite chain of anon_vmas. > > - -- > All rights reversed > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUbf+hAAoJEM553pKExN6DxhQH/1QL+9GdhaSx7EQnRcbDRcHi > GuEfMU0g9Kv4ad+oPSQnH/L7vJMJAYeh5ZJGH+rOykWHp3sGReqDZOnzpXRAe11z > 1cSC1BJsndzrv9wX8niFpuKpYbF0IP+ckv3qaEzWtm5yCRyhHVZfr6b794Y4K9jF > z2EPPu1vAAldbkx1VlYTwofBA5lESL5UmrFvH4ouI7BeWYSEe6BgVCbvK+K5fANT > ketdA5R08xyUAcXDa+28qpBYkdWnxNhwqseDoXCW8SOFNwWbLDI6GRfrsCNku13i > Gi41h3uEuIAGDf+AU/GMjiymgwutCOGq+cfZlszELaRvHmDpNGYdPv1llghNg7Q= > =Vk+H > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Tim Hartrick <tim@edgecast.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Repeated fork() causes SLAB to grow without bound Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:03:24 +0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CALYGNiP_zqAucmN=Gn75Mm2wK1iE6fPNxTsaTRgnUbFbFE7C-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <546DFFA1.4030700@redhat.com> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/20/2014 09:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > >> I'm thinking about limitation for reusing anon_vmas which might >> increase performance without breaking asymptotic estimation of >> count anon_vma in the worst case. For example this heuristic: allow >> to reuse only anon_vma with single direct descendant. It seems >> there will be arount up to two times more anon_vmas but >> false-aliasing must be much lower. > > It may even be possible to not create a child anon_vma for the > first child a parent forks, but only create a new anon_vma once > the parent clones a second child (alive at the same time as the > first child). > > That still takes care of things like apache or sendmail, but > would not create infinite anon_vmas for a task that keeps forking > itself to infinite depth without calling exec... But this scheme is still exploitable. Malicious software easily could create sequence of forks and exits which leads to infinite chain of anon_vmas. > > - -- > All rights reversed > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUbf+hAAoJEM553pKExN6DxhQH/1QL+9GdhaSx7EQnRcbDRcHi > GuEfMU0g9Kv4ad+oPSQnH/L7vJMJAYeh5ZJGH+rOykWHp3sGReqDZOnzpXRAe11z > 1cSC1BJsndzrv9wX8niFpuKpYbF0IP+ckv3qaEzWtm5yCRyhHVZfr6b794Y4K9jF > z2EPPu1vAAldbkx1VlYTwofBA5lESL5UmrFvH4ouI7BeWYSEe6BgVCbvK+K5fANT > ketdA5R08xyUAcXDa+28qpBYkdWnxNhwqseDoXCW8SOFNwWbLDI6GRfrsCNku13i > Gi41h3uEuIAGDf+AU/GMjiymgwutCOGq+cfZlszELaRvHmDpNGYdPv1llghNg7Q= > =Vk+H > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-20 15:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-08-16 2:46 Repeated fork() causes SLAB to grow without bound Daniel Forrest 2012-08-16 18:58 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-16 18:58 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-18 0:03 ` Daniel Forrest 2012-08-18 0:03 ` Daniel Forrest 2012-08-18 3:46 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-18 3:46 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-18 4:07 ` Daniel Forrest 2012-08-18 4:07 ` Daniel Forrest 2012-08-18 4:10 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-18 4:10 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-20 8:00 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-08-20 8:00 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-08-20 9:39 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-20 9:39 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-20 11:11 ` Andi Kleen 2012-08-20 11:11 ` Andi Kleen 2012-08-20 11:17 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-20 11:17 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-20 11:53 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-20 11:53 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-20 19:11 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-20 19:11 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-22 3:20 ` [RFC PATCH] " Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-22 3:20 ` Michel Lespinasse 2012-08-22 3:29 ` Rik van Riel 2012-08-22 3:29 ` Rik van Riel 2013-06-03 19:50 ` Daniel Forrest 2013-06-03 19:50 ` Daniel Forrest 2013-06-04 10:37 ` Rik van Riel 2013-06-04 10:37 ` Rik van Riel 2013-06-05 14:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli 2013-06-05 14:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli 2014-11-14 16:30 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Forrest 2014-11-14 16:30 ` Daniel Forrest 2014-11-18 0:02 ` Andrew Morton 2014-11-18 0:02 ` Andrew Morton 2014-11-18 1:41 ` Daniel Forrest 2014-11-18 1:41 ` Daniel Forrest 2014-11-18 2:41 ` Rik van Riel 2014-11-18 2:41 ` Rik van Riel 2014-11-18 20:19 ` Andrew Morton 2014-11-18 20:19 ` Andrew Morton 2014-11-18 22:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-18 22:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-18 23:02 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-18 23:50 ` Vlastimil Babka 2014-11-18 23:50 ` Vlastimil Babka 2014-11-19 14:36 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-19 14:36 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-19 16:09 ` Vlastimil Babka 2014-11-19 16:09 ` Vlastimil Babka 2014-11-19 16:58 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-19 16:58 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-19 23:14 ` Michel Lespinasse 2014-11-19 23:14 ` Michel Lespinasse 2014-11-20 14:42 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-20 14:42 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-20 14:50 ` Rik van Riel 2014-11-20 14:50 ` Rik van Riel 2014-11-20 15:03 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message] 2014-11-20 15:03 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-24 7:09 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-25 10:59 ` Michal Hocko 2014-11-25 10:59 ` Michal Hocko 2014-11-25 12:13 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov 2014-11-25 15:00 ` Michal Hocko 2014-11-25 15:00 ` Michal Hocko 2014-11-26 17:35 ` Michal Hocko 2014-11-26 17:35 ` Michal Hocko 2014-12-05 15:44 ` Jerome Marchand 2014-11-20 15:27 ` Michel Lespinasse 2014-11-20 15:27 ` Michel Lespinasse 2014-11-19 2:48 ` Rik van Riel 2014-11-19 2:48 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CALYGNiP_zqAucmN=Gn75Mm2wK1iE6fPNxTsaTRgnUbFbFE7C-g@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=koct9i@gmail.com \ --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=hughd@google.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ --cc=tim@edgecast.com \ --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \ --cc=walken@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.