* use-after-free in sctp_do_sm
@ 2015-11-24 9:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev
Cc: syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin,
Eric Dumazet
Hello,
The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm:
// autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
#include <syscall.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdint.h>
int main()
{
long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0);
long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul,
0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul);
memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4,
"\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64",
28);
long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0);
memcpy((void*)0x20000faa,
"\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3",
94);
memcpy((void*)0x2000033a,
"\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00",
128);
long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul,
0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul);
return 0;
}
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8
Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664
=============================================================================
BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664
[< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707
[< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0
[< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0
[< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802
[< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641
[< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651
[< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662
[< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841
[< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862
[< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664
[< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211
[< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250
[< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630
[< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60
[< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0
[< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790
[< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471
[< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416
[< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321
[< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601
[< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188
[< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265
[< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84
[< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20
[< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42
[< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76
[< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168
[< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618
[< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669
[< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697
[< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878
[< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985
INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000
flags=0x100000000004080
INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668
CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00
ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784
ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40
[<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60
[<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0
[<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790
[<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471
[<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416
[< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321
[<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601
[<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188
[<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265
[<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84
[<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20
[< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42
[< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76
[< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168
[< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618
[< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669
[< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697
[<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878
[<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985
[<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002
[<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
==================================================================
I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22).
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread* use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-24 9:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev Cc: syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet Hello, The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) #include <syscall.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdint.h> int main() { long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", 28); long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", 94); memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", 128); long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); return 0; } ================================= BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 ======================================BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 flags=0x100000000004080 INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a ================================= I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 9:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 9:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev Cc: syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > Hello, > > The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: > > // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) > #include <syscall.h> > #include <string.h> > #include <stdint.h> > > int main() > { > long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); > long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, > 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); > memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, > "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", > 28); > long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); > memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, > "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", > 94); > memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, > "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", > 128); > long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, > 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); > return 0; > } > > > ================================================================== > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 > Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 > ============================================================================= > BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664 > [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 > [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 > [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 > [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 > [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 > [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 > [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 > [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 > [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 > [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > > INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664 > [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 > [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 > [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 > [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 > [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > > INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 > flags=0x100000000004080 > INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 > CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 > ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 > ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 > > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 > [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > ================================================================== > > > I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). > > > Thanks strace output for your convenience: socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_SEQPACKET|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_IP) = 3 mmap(0x20000000, 65536, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x20000000 bind(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(13287), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::1", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=1640996331, sin6_scope_id=1686685893}, 28) = 0 sendto(3, "\233\1}\315\270j\307=\t:\7\0\247\304\351\356\n\326\354\336&u_\"\256N3\0\260v\20p"..., 94, MSG_OOB|MSG_EOR, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(13282), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 128) = 94 exit_group(0) = ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-24 9:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev Cc: syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > Hello, > > The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: > > // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) > #include <syscall.h> > #include <string.h> > #include <stdint.h> > > int main() > { > long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); > long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, > 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); > memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, > "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", > 28); > long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); > memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, > "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", > 94); > memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, > "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", > 128); > long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, > 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); > return 0; > } > > > ================================= > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 > Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 > ======================================> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 > [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 > [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 > [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 > [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 > [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 > [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 > [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 > [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 > [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 > [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > > INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 > [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 > [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 > [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 > [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 > [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > > INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 > flags=0x100000000004080 > INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 > CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 > ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 > ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 > > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 > [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > ================================= > > > I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). > > > Thanks strace output for your convenience: socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_SEQPACKET|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_IP) = 3 mmap(0x20000000, 65536, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x20000000 bind(3, {sa_family¯_INET6, sin6_port=htons(13287), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::1", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo\x1640996331, sin6_scope_id\x1686685893}, 28) = 0 sendto(3, "\233\1}\315\270j\307=\t:\7\0\247\304\351\356\n\326\354\336&u_\"\256N3\0\260v\20p"..., 94, MSG_OOB|MSG_EOR, {sa_family¯_INET, sin_port=htons(13282), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 128) = 94 exit_group(0) = ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 9:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 10:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev Cc: syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: >> >> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) >> #include <syscall.h> >> #include <string.h> >> #include <stdint.h> >> >> int main() >> { >> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); >> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, >> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); >> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, >> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", >> 28); >> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); >> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, >> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", >> 94); >> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, >> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", >> 128); >> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, >> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); >> return 0; >> } >> >> >> ================================================================== >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 >> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 >> ============================================================================= >> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664 >> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 >> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 >> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 >> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 >> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 >> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 >> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 >> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >> >> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664 >> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 >> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 >> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 >> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 >> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >> >> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 >> flags=0x100000000004080 >> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 >> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 >> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 >> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 >> >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 >> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >> ================================================================== >> >> >> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). The right commit is: commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c Author: Rainer Weikusat Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-24 10:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev Cc: syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: >> >> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) >> #include <syscall.h> >> #include <string.h> >> #include <stdint.h> >> >> int main() >> { >> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); >> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, >> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); >> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, >> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", >> 28); >> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); >> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, >> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", >> 94); >> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, >> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", >> 128); >> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, >> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); >> return 0; >> } >> >> >> ================================= >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 >> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 >> ======================================>> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 >> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 >> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 >> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 >> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 >> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 >> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 >> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 >> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >> >> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 >> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 >> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 >> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 >> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 >> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >> >> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 >> flags=0x100000000004080 >> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 >> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 >> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 >> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 >> >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 >> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >> ================================= >> >> >> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). The right commit is: commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c Author: Rainer Weikusat Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 10:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Neil Horman @ 2015-11-24 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: > >> > >> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) > >> #include <syscall.h> > >> #include <string.h> > >> #include <stdint.h> > >> > >> int main() > >> { > >> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); > >> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, > >> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); > >> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, > >> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", > >> 28); > >> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); > >> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, > >> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", > >> 94); > >> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, > >> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", > >> 128); > >> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, > >> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> > >> ================================================================== > >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 > >> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 > >> ============================================================================= > >> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664 > >> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 > >> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 > >> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 > >> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 > >> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 > >> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 > >> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 > >> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > >> > >> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664 > >> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 > >> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 > >> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 > >> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 > >> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > >> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > >> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > >> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > >> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > >> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > >> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > >> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > >> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > >> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > >> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > >> > >> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 > >> flags=0x100000000004080 > >> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 > >> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 > >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > >> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 > >> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 > >> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 > >> > >> Call Trace: > >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > >> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > >> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > >> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 > >> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > >> ================================================================== > >> > >> > >> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). > > The right commit is: > > commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c > Author: Rainer Weikusat > Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 > unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue This commit doesn't seem to exist Neil > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Neil Horman @ 2015-11-24 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: > >> > >> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) > >> #include <syscall.h> > >> #include <string.h> > >> #include <stdint.h> > >> > >> int main() > >> { > >> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); > >> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, > >> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); > >> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, > >> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", > >> 28); > >> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); > >> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, > >> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", > >> 94); > >> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, > >> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", > >> 128); > >> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, > >> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> > >> ================================= > >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 > >> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 > >> ======================================> >> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 > >> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 > >> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 > >> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 > >> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 > >> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 > >> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 > >> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 > >> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > >> > >> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 > >> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 > >> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 > >> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 > >> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 > >> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > >> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > >> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > >> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > >> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > >> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > >> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > >> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > >> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > >> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > >> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > >> > >> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 > >> flags=0x100000000004080 > >> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 > >> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 > >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > >> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 > >> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 > >> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 > >> > >> Call Trace: > >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > >> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > >> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > >> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 > >> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > >> ================================= > >> > >> > >> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). > > The right commit is: > > commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c > Author: Rainer Weikusat > Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 > unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue This commit doesn't seem to exist Neil > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman @ 2015-11-24 21:08 ` Eric Dumazet -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-11-24 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Horman Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: > > >> > > >> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) > > >> #include <syscall.h> > > >> #include <string.h> > > >> #include <stdint.h> > > >> > > >> int main() > > >> { > > >> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); > > >> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, > > >> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); > > >> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, > > >> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", > > >> 28); > > >> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); > > >> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, > > >> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", > > >> 94); > > >> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, > > >> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", > > >> 128); > > >> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, > > >> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); > > >> return 0; > > >> } > > >> > > >> > > >> ================================================================== > > >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 > > >> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 > > >> ============================================================================= > > >> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664 > > >> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 > > >> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 > > >> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 > > >> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 > > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 > > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 > > >> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 > > >> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 > > >> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 > > >> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > > >> > > >> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664 > > >> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 > > >> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 > > >> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 > > >> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 > > >> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > > >> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > > >> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > > >> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > > >> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > > >> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > > >> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > > >> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > > >> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > > >> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > > >> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > > >> > > >> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 > > >> flags=0x100000000004080 > > >> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 > > >> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 > > >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > > >> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 > > >> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 > > >> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 > > >> > > >> Call Trace: > > >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > > >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > > >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > > >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > > >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > > >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > > >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > > >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > > >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > > >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > > >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > > >> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > > >> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > > >> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 > > >> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > > >> ================================================================== > > >> > > >> > > >> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). > > > > The right commit is: > > > > commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c > > Author: Rainer Weikusat > > Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 > > unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue > This commit doesn't seem to exist > It does, in David Miller net tree : commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c Author: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-24 21:08 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-11-24 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Horman Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: > > >> > > >> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) > > >> #include <syscall.h> > > >> #include <string.h> > > >> #include <stdint.h> > > >> > > >> int main() > > >> { > > >> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); > > >> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, > > >> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); > > >> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, > > >> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", > > >> 28); > > >> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); > > >> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, > > >> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", > > >> 94); > > >> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, > > >> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", > > >> 128); > > >> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, > > >> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); > > >> return 0; > > >> } > > >> > > >> > > >> ================================= > > >> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 > > >> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 > > >> ======================================> > >> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 > > >> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 > > >> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 > > >> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 > > >> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 > > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 > > >> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 > > >> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 > > >> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 > > >> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 > > >> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > > >> > > >> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 > > >> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 > > >> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 > > >> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 > > >> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 > > >> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > > >> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > > >> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > > >> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > > >> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > > >> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > > >> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > > >> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > > >> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > > >> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > > >> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > > >> > > >> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 > > >> flags=0x100000000004080 > > >> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 > > >> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 > > >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > > >> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 > > >> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 > > >> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 > > >> > > >> Call Trace: > > >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > > >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > > >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > > >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > > >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > > >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > > >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > > >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > > >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > > >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > > >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > > >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > > >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > > >> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 > > >> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 > > >> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 > > >> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 > > >> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 > > >> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 > > >> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 > > >> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 > > >> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a > > >> ================================= > > >> > > >> > > >> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). > > > > The right commit is: > > > > commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c > > Author: Rainer Weikusat > > Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 > > unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue > This commit doesn't seem to exist > It does, in David Miller net tree : commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c Author: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman @ 2015-11-24 21:12 ` David Miller -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2015-11-24 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: nhorman Cc: dvyukov, vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin, edumazet, maze From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:45:54 -0500 >> The right commit is: >> >> commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c >> Author: Rainer Weikusat >> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 >> unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue > This commit doesn't seem to exist It's in the 'net' tree. Which hasn't been pulled into 'net-next' for a few days. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-24 21:12 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2015-11-24 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: nhorman Cc: dvyukov, vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin, edumazet, maze From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:45:54 -0500 >> The right commit is: >> >> commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c >> Author: Rainer Weikusat >> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 >> unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue > This commit doesn't seem to exist It's in the 'net' tree. Which hasn't been pulled into 'net-next' for a few days. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman @ 2015-11-25 15:12 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-11-25 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Horman, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On 11/24/2015 03:45 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: >>>> >>>> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) >>>> #include <syscall.h> >>>> #include <string.h> >>>> #include <stdint.h> >>>> >>>> int main() >>>> { >>>> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); >>>> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, >>>> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); >>>> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, >>>> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", >>>> 28); >>>> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); >>>> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, >>>> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", >>>> 94); >>>> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, >>>> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", >>>> 128); >>>> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, >>>> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> ================================================================== >>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 >>>> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 >>>> ============================================================================= >>>> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664 >>>> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 >>>> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 >>>> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 >>>> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 >>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 >>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 >>>> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 >>>> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 >>>> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 >>>> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>> >>>> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664 >>>> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 >>>> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 >>>> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 >>>> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 >>>> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>> >>>> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 >>>> flags=0x100000000004080 >>>> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 >>>> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 >>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >>>> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 >>>> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 >>>> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 >>>> >>>> Call Trace: >>>> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >>>> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >>>> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 >>>> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>> ================================================================== >>>> >>>> >>>> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). >> >> The right commit is: >> >> commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c >> Author: Rainer Weikusat >> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 >> unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue > This commit doesn't seem to exist I don't think this matters... I think what's happening is that a close is happening on a socket still in connection initialization phase and we've never handled that particularly well... Net-next kernel with mem debugging hangs on boot for me with a ton of printks suppressed. Will try the net kernel to see if that's better -vlad > > Neil > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-25 15:12 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-11-25 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Horman, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On 11/24/2015 03:45 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: >>>> >>>> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) >>>> #include <syscall.h> >>>> #include <string.h> >>>> #include <stdint.h> >>>> >>>> int main() >>>> { >>>> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); >>>> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, >>>> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); >>>> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, >>>> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", >>>> 28); >>>> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); >>>> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, >>>> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", >>>> 94); >>>> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, >>>> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", >>>> 128); >>>> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, >>>> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> ================================= >>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 >>>> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 >>>> ======================================>>>> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 >>>> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 >>>> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 >>>> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 >>>> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 >>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 >>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 >>>> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 >>>> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 >>>> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 >>>> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>> >>>> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 >>>> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 >>>> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 >>>> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 >>>> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 >>>> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>> >>>> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 >>>> flags=0x100000000004080 >>>> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 >>>> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 >>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >>>> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 >>>> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 >>>> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 >>>> >>>> Call Trace: >>>> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >>>> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >>>> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 >>>> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>> ================================= >>>> >>>> >>>> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). >> >> The right commit is: >> >> commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c >> Author: Rainer Weikusat >> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 >> unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue > This commit doesn't seem to exist I don't think this matters... I think what's happening is that a close is happening on a socket still in connection initialization phase and we've never handled that particularly well... Net-next kernel with mem debugging hangs on boot for me with a ton of printks suppressed. Will try the net kernel to see if that's better -vlad > > Neil > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-25 15:12 ` Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-11-28 15:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-28 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: syzkaller Cc: Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/24/2015 03:45 PM, Neil Horman wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: >>>>> >>>>> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) >>>>> #include <syscall.h> >>>>> #include <string.h> >>>>> #include <stdint.h> >>>>> >>>>> int main() >>>>> { >>>>> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); >>>>> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, >>>>> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); >>>>> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, >>>>> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", >>>>> 28); >>>>> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); >>>>> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, >>>>> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", >>>>> 94); >>>>> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, >>>>> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", >>>>> 128); >>>>> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, >>>>> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); >>>>> return 0; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ================================================================== >>>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 >>>>> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 >>>>> ============================================================================= >>>>> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pid=5664 >>>>> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 >>>>> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 >>>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 >>>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 >>>>> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 >>>>> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 >>>>> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 >>>>> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=14 cpu=1 pid=5664 >>>>> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>>> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>>> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>>> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>>> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>>> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>>> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>>> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>>> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>>> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 >>>>> flags=0x100000000004080 >>>>> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 >>>>> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 >>>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >>>>> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 >>>>> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 >>>>> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 >>>>> >>>>> Call Trace: >>>>> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >>>>> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >>>>> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>>> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>>> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>>> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>>> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>>> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>>> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>>> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>>> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>>> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>>> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>>> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 >>>>> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>>> ================================================================== >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). >>> >>> The right commit is: >>> >>> commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c >>> Author: Rainer Weikusat >>> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 >>> unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue >> This commit doesn't seem to exist > > I don't think this matters... I think what's happening is that a close is happening on a > socket still in connection initialization phase and we've never handled that particularly > well... > > Net-next kernel with mem debugging hangs on boot for me with a ton of printks suppressed. > Will try the net kernel to see if that's better This also seems to lead the the following WARNINGS: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 at kernel/jump_label.c:77 __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120() jump label: negative count! Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 Comm: executor Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc2+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 00000000ffffffff ffff88006083f660 ffffffff82719fc6 ffff88006083f6d0 ffff88003bbf8000 ffffffff85a612e0 ffff88006083f6a0 ffffffff81244ec9 ffffffff8152c54b ffffed000c107ed6 ffffffff85a612e0 000000000000004d Call Trace: [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [<ffffffff82719fc6>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50 [<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460 [<ffffffff81244fd9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:472 [<ffffffff8152c54b>] __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120 kernel/jump_label.c:76 [<ffffffff8152c5c1>] static_key_slow_dec+0x51/0x90 kernel/jump_label.c:100 [<ffffffff84962d9b>] net_disable_timestamp+0x3b/0x50 net/core/dev.c:1709 [<ffffffff84914d43>] sock_disable_timestamp+0x93/0xb0 net/core/sock.c:444 [<ffffffff8491f82c>] sk_destruct+0xec/0x440 net/core/sock.c:1457 [<ffffffff8491fbd7>] __sk_free+0x57/0x200 net/core/sock.c:1476 [<ffffffff8491fdb0>] sk_free+0x30/0x40 net/core/sock.c:1487 [< inline >] sock_put include/net/sock.h:1623 [<ffffffff854c8a18>] sctp_close+0x628/0x790 net/sctp/socket.c:1546 [<ffffffff84d4b3ed>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [<ffffffff84e70240>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 [<ffffffff84909bbd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 [<ffffffff84909d16>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [<ffffffff81663a00>] __fput+0x220/0x770 fs/file_table.c:208 [<ffffffff81663fd5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [<ffffffff8129f673>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [<ffffffff8124d9e9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2ae0 kernel/exit.c:750 [<ffffffff8124fe38>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 [<ffffffff81271df7>] get_signal+0x597/0x1630 kernel/signal.c:2307 [<ffffffff8114c77f>] do_signal+0x7f/0x18e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709 [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 [<ffffffff8100616f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 [<ffffffff85955362>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 ---[ end trace 3e42717665ff2020 ]--- These WARNINGS always go with the original use-after-free reports. And I was not able to reproduce this WARNING with commented out sctp_association_destroy. For the reference here is syzkaller program that triggers the WARNING. r0 = socket(0xa, 0x1, 0x84) mmap(&(0x7f0000000000)=nil, (0x10000), 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0) bind(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)="0a0033e049d02e70000000000000000000000000000000014c37ffc4", 0x1c) connect(r0, &(0x7f0000001000)="020033d97f000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", 0x80) setsockopt$sock_int(r0, 0x1, 0x1d, &(0x7f0000001000+0x336)=0x1, 0x4) listen(r0, 0xbb3) r1 = accept(r0, &(0x7f0000003000+0xfd6)=nil, &(0x7f0000004000-0x2)=nil) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-11-28 15:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-11-28 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: syzkaller Cc: Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/24/2015 03:45 PM, Neil Horman wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> The following program triggers use-after-free in sctp_do_sm: >>>>> >>>>> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) >>>>> #include <syscall.h> >>>>> #include <string.h> >>>>> #include <stdint.h> >>>>> >>>>> int main() >>>>> { >>>>> long r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x80805ul, 0x0ul, 0, 0, 0); >>>>> long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, >>>>> 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); >>>>> memcpy((void*)0x20002fe4, >>>>> "\x0a\x00\x33\xe7\xeb\x9d\xcf\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xc5\xc8\x88\x64", >>>>> 28); >>>>> long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20002fe4ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); >>>>> memcpy((void*)0x20000faa, >>>>> "\x9b\x01\x7d\xcd\xb8\x6a\xc7\x3d\x09\x3a\x07\x00\xa7\xc4\xe9\xee\x0a\xd6\xec\xde\x26\x75\x5f\x22\xae\x4e\x33\x00\xb0\x76\x10\x70\xd6\xca\x19\xbc\x15\x83\xcf\x2e\xbc\x99\x0c\x5e\x83\x89\xc1\x44\x9c\x6e\x74\xd8\x5d\x5d\xd0\xf0\xdf\x47\xc0\x00\x71\x0b\x55\x4c\xab\xf0\xd8\x90\xd5\x92\x8c\x6e\x33\x22\x15\x5b\x19\xfb\xed\xdd\xa6\xac\xcb\x60\xcf\xe2\xde\xed\xdb\x95\x5c\xaa\x20\xa3", >>>>> 94); >>>>> memcpy((void*)0x2000033a, >>>>> "\x02\x00\x33\xe2\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", >>>>> 128); >>>>> long r6 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20000faaul, 0x5eul, >>>>> 0x81ul, 0x2000033aul, 0x80ul); >>>>> return 0; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ================================= >>>>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 at addr ffff880036fa80a8 >>>>> Read of size 4 by task a.out/5664 >>>>> ======================================>>>>> BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 age=8 cpu=1 pidV64 >>>>> [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cf/0x220 ./mm/slab.c:3707 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1ea0 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_sendmsg+0x1954/0x28e0 >>>>> [< none >] inet_sendmsg+0x316/0x4f0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:802 >>>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg_nosec ./net/socket.c:641 >>>>> [< inline >] __sock_sendmsg ./net/socket.c:651 >>>>> [< none >] sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 ./net/socket.c:662 >>>>> [< none >] SYSC_sendto+0x208/0x350 ./net/socket.c:1841 >>>>> [< none >] SyS_sendto+0x40/0x50 ./net/socket.c:1862 >>>>> [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age\x14 cpu=1 pidV64 >>>>> [< none >] kfree+0x199/0x1b0 ./mm/slab.c:1211 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x498/0x630 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0xd8b/0x4f60 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>>> [< none >] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>>> [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>>> [< none >] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>>> [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>>> [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>>> [< none >] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>>> [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>>> [< none >] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>>> [< none >] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>>> [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Slab 0xffffea0000dbea00 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880036fa8000 >>>>> flags=0x100000000004080 >>>>> INFO: Object 0xffff880036fa8000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880036fad668 >>>>> CPU: 1 PID: 5664 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #81 >>>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >>>>> 00000000ffffffff ffff880061d6f700 ffffffff825d3336 ffff88003e806d00 >>>>> ffff880036fa8000 ffff880036fa8000 ffff880061d6f730 ffffffff81618784 >>>>> ffff88003e806d00 ffffea0000dbea00 ffff880036fa8000 0000000000000000 >>>>> >>>>> Call Trace: >>>>> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >>>>> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >>>>> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >>>>> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >>>>> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >>>>> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >>>>> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >>>>> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >>>>> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >>>>> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >>>>> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >>>>> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >>>>> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 >>>>> [< inline >] list_add_tail ./include/linux/list.h:76 >>>>> [< inline >] list_move_tail ./include/linux/list.h:168 >>>>> [< inline >] reparent_leader ./kernel/exit.c:618 >>>>> [< inline >] forget_original_parent ./kernel/exit.c:669 >>>>> [< inline >] exit_notify ./kernel/exit.c:697 >>>>> [<ffffffff812505d9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2b90 ./kernel/exit.c:878 >>>>> [<ffffffff81252ad8>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 ./kernel/exit.c:985 >>>>> [<ffffffff81252d0d>] SyS_exit_group+0x1d/0x20 ./kernel/exit.c:1002 >>>>> [<ffffffff84bf0c36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a >>>>> ================================= >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am on commit 90b55590c43258a157a2a143748455dcc50fbb53 of net-next (Nov 22). >>> >>> The right commit is: >>> >>> commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c >>> Author: Rainer Weikusat >>> Date: Fri Nov 20 22:07:23 2015 +0000 >>> unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue >> This commit doesn't seem to exist > > I don't think this matters... I think what's happening is that a close is happening on a > socket still in connection initialization phase and we've never handled that particularly > well... > > Net-next kernel with mem debugging hangs on boot for me with a ton of printks suppressed. > Will try the net kernel to see if that's better This also seems to lead the the following WARNINGS: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 at kernel/jump_label.c:77 __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120() jump label: negative count! Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 Comm: executor Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc2+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 00000000ffffffff ffff88006083f660 ffffffff82719fc6 ffff88006083f6d0 ffff88003bbf8000 ffffffff85a612e0 ffff88006083f6a0 ffffffff81244ec9 ffffffff8152c54b ffffed000c107ed6 ffffffff85a612e0 000000000000004d Call Trace: [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [<ffffffff82719fc6>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50 [<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460 [<ffffffff81244fd9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:472 [<ffffffff8152c54b>] __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120 kernel/jump_label.c:76 [<ffffffff8152c5c1>] static_key_slow_dec+0x51/0x90 kernel/jump_label.c:100 [<ffffffff84962d9b>] net_disable_timestamp+0x3b/0x50 net/core/dev.c:1709 [<ffffffff84914d43>] sock_disable_timestamp+0x93/0xb0 net/core/sock.c:444 [<ffffffff8491f82c>] sk_destruct+0xec/0x440 net/core/sock.c:1457 [<ffffffff8491fbd7>] __sk_free+0x57/0x200 net/core/sock.c:1476 [<ffffffff8491fdb0>] sk_free+0x30/0x40 net/core/sock.c:1487 [< inline >] sock_put include/net/sock.h:1623 [<ffffffff854c8a18>] sctp_close+0x628/0x790 net/sctp/socket.c:1546 [<ffffffff84d4b3ed>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [<ffffffff84e70240>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 [<ffffffff84909bbd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 [<ffffffff84909d16>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [<ffffffff81663a00>] __fput+0x220/0x770 fs/file_table.c:208 [<ffffffff81663fd5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [<ffffffff8129f673>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [<ffffffff8124d9e9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2ae0 kernel/exit.c:750 [<ffffffff8124fe38>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 [<ffffffff81271df7>] get_signal+0x597/0x1630 kernel/signal.c:2307 [<ffffffff8114c77f>] do_signal+0x7f/0x18e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709 [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 [<ffffffff8100616f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 [<ffffffff85955362>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 ---[ end trace 3e42717665ff2020 ]--- These WARNINGS always go with the original use-after-free reports. And I was not able to reproduce this WARNING with commented out sctp_association_destroy. For the reference here is syzkaller program that triggers the WARNING. r0 = socket(0xa, 0x1, 0x84) mmap(&(0x7f0000000000)=nil, (0x10000), 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0) bind(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)="0a0033e049d02e70000000000000000000000000000000014c37ffc4", 0x1c) connect(r0, &(0x7f0000001000)="020033d97f000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", 0x80) setsockopt$sock_int(r0, 0x1, 0x1d, &(0x7f0000001000+0x336)=0x1, 0x4) listen(r0, 0xbb3) r1 = accept(r0, &(0x7f0000003000+0xfd6)=nil, &(0x7f0000004000-0x2)=nil) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-28 15:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 16:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > This also seems to lead the the following WARNINGS: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 at kernel/jump_label.c:77 > __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120() > jump label: negative count! > Modules linked in: > CPU: 3 PID: 21734 Comm: executor Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc2+ #3 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > 00000000ffffffff ffff88006083f660 ffffffff82719fc6 ffff88006083f6d0 > ffff88003bbf8000 ffffffff85a612e0 ffff88006083f6a0 ffffffff81244ec9 > ffffffff8152c54b ffffed000c107ed6 ffffffff85a612e0 000000000000004d > Call Trace: > [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 > [<ffffffff82719fc6>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50 > [<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460 > [<ffffffff81244fd9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:472 > [<ffffffff8152c54b>] __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120 kernel/jump_label.c:76 > [<ffffffff8152c5c1>] static_key_slow_dec+0x51/0x90 kernel/jump_label.c:100 > [<ffffffff84962d9b>] net_disable_timestamp+0x3b/0x50 net/core/dev.c:1709 > [<ffffffff84914d43>] sock_disable_timestamp+0x93/0xb0 net/core/sock.c:444 > [<ffffffff8491f82c>] sk_destruct+0xec/0x440 net/core/sock.c:1457 > [<ffffffff8491fbd7>] __sk_free+0x57/0x200 net/core/sock.c:1476 > [<ffffffff8491fdb0>] sk_free+0x30/0x40 net/core/sock.c:1487 > [< inline >] sock_put include/net/sock.h:1623 > [<ffffffff854c8a18>] sctp_close+0x628/0x790 net/sctp/socket.c:1546 > [<ffffffff84d4b3ed>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 > [<ffffffff84e70240>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 > [<ffffffff84909bbd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 > [<ffffffff84909d16>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 > [<ffffffff81663a00>] __fput+0x220/0x770 fs/file_table.c:208 > [<ffffffff81663fd5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 > [<ffffffff8129f673>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 kernel/task_work.c:115 > [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 > [<ffffffff8124d9e9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2ae0 kernel/exit.c:750 > [<ffffffff8124fe38>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 > [<ffffffff81271df7>] get_signal+0x597/0x1630 kernel/signal.c:2307 > [<ffffffff8114c77f>] do_signal+0x7f/0x18e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709 > [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 > arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 > [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 > [<ffffffff8100616f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 > arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 > [<ffffffff85955362>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 > ---[ end trace 3e42717665ff2020 ]--- > > > These WARNINGS always go with the original use-after-free reports. And > I was not able to reproduce this WARNING with commented out > sctp_association_destroy. > > For the reference here is syzkaller program that triggers the WARNING. > > r0 = socket(0xa, 0x1, 0x84) > mmap(&(0x7f0000000000)=nil, (0x10000), 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0) > bind(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)="0a0033e049d02e70000000000000000000000000000000014c37ffc4", > 0x1c) > connect(r0, &(0x7f0000001000)="020033d97f000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", > 0x80) > setsockopt$sock_int(r0, 0x1, 0x1d, &(0x7f0000001000+0x336)=0x1, 0x4) > listen(r0, 0xbb3) > r1 = accept(r0, &(0x7f0000003000+0xfd6)=nil, &(0x7f0000004000-0x2)=nil) These two are unrelated, actually. Do you know if this accept() returned something? Seems so. Seems to be originated on sctp_v6_create_accept_sk() -> sctp_copy_sock(): void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc) { struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk); struct inet_sock *newinet; newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; <--- As it enabled SO_TIMESTAMP on listening socket, this flag will be copied and will trigger the second net_disable_timestamp() by the time the second socket is destroyed, because it never had its enable counterpart called. This also happens via sctp peeloff operation. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 16:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > This also seems to lead the the following WARNINGS: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 at kernel/jump_label.c:77 > __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120() > jump label: negative count! > Modules linked in: > CPU: 3 PID: 21734 Comm: executor Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc2+ #3 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > 00000000ffffffff ffff88006083f660 ffffffff82719fc6 ffff88006083f6d0 > ffff88003bbf8000 ffffffff85a612e0 ffff88006083f6a0 ffffffff81244ec9 > ffffffff8152c54b ffffed000c107ed6 ffffffff85a612e0 000000000000004d > Call Trace: > [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 > [<ffffffff82719fc6>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50 > [<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460 > [<ffffffff81244fd9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:472 > [<ffffffff8152c54b>] __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120 kernel/jump_label.c:76 > [<ffffffff8152c5c1>] static_key_slow_dec+0x51/0x90 kernel/jump_label.c:100 > [<ffffffff84962d9b>] net_disable_timestamp+0x3b/0x50 net/core/dev.c:1709 > [<ffffffff84914d43>] sock_disable_timestamp+0x93/0xb0 net/core/sock.c:444 > [<ffffffff8491f82c>] sk_destruct+0xec/0x440 net/core/sock.c:1457 > [<ffffffff8491fbd7>] __sk_free+0x57/0x200 net/core/sock.c:1476 > [<ffffffff8491fdb0>] sk_free+0x30/0x40 net/core/sock.c:1487 > [< inline >] sock_put include/net/sock.h:1623 > [<ffffffff854c8a18>] sctp_close+0x628/0x790 net/sctp/socket.c:1546 > [<ffffffff84d4b3ed>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 > [<ffffffff84e70240>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 > [<ffffffff84909bbd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 > [<ffffffff84909d16>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 > [<ffffffff81663a00>] __fput+0x220/0x770 fs/file_table.c:208 > [<ffffffff81663fd5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 > [<ffffffff8129f673>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 kernel/task_work.c:115 > [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 > [<ffffffff8124d9e9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2ae0 kernel/exit.c:750 > [<ffffffff8124fe38>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 > [<ffffffff81271df7>] get_signal+0x597/0x1630 kernel/signal.c:2307 > [<ffffffff8114c77f>] do_signal+0x7f/0x18e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709 > [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 > arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 > [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 > [<ffffffff8100616f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 > arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 > [<ffffffff85955362>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 > ---[ end trace 3e42717665ff2020 ]--- > > > These WARNINGS always go with the original use-after-free reports. And > I was not able to reproduce this WARNING with commented out > sctp_association_destroy. > > For the reference here is syzkaller program that triggers the WARNING. > > r0 = socket(0xa, 0x1, 0x84) > mmap(&(0x7f0000000000)=nil, (0x10000), 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0) > bind(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)="0a0033e049d02e70000000000000000000000000000000014c37ffc4", > 0x1c) > connect(r0, &(0x7f0000001000)="020033d97f000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", > 0x80) > setsockopt$sock_int(r0, 0x1, 0x1d, &(0x7f0000001000+0x336)=0x1, 0x4) > listen(r0, 0xbb3) > r1 = accept(r0, &(0x7f0000003000+0xfd6)=nil, &(0x7f0000004000-0x2)=nil) These two are unrelated, actually. Do you know if this accept() returned something? Seems so. Seems to be originated on sctp_v6_create_accept_sk() -> sctp_copy_sock(): void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc) { struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk); struct inet_sock *newinet; newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; <--- As it enabled SO_TIMESTAMP on listening socket, this flag will be copied and will trigger the second net_disable_timestamp() by the time the second socket is destroyed, because it never had its enable counterpart called. This also happens via sctp peeloff operation. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 16:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 17:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:51:33PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > This also seems to lead the the following WARNINGS: > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 at kernel/jump_label.c:77 > > __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120() > > jump label: negative count! > > Modules linked in: > > CPU: 3 PID: 21734 Comm: executor Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc2+ #3 > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > > 00000000ffffffff ffff88006083f660 ffffffff82719fc6 ffff88006083f6d0 > > ffff88003bbf8000 ffffffff85a612e0 ffff88006083f6a0 ffffffff81244ec9 > > ffffffff8152c54b ffffed000c107ed6 ffffffff85a612e0 000000000000004d > > Call Trace: > > [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 > > [<ffffffff82719fc6>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50 > > [<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460 > > [<ffffffff81244fd9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:472 > > [<ffffffff8152c54b>] __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120 kernel/jump_label.c:76 > > [<ffffffff8152c5c1>] static_key_slow_dec+0x51/0x90 kernel/jump_label.c:100 > > [<ffffffff84962d9b>] net_disable_timestamp+0x3b/0x50 net/core/dev.c:1709 > > [<ffffffff84914d43>] sock_disable_timestamp+0x93/0xb0 net/core/sock.c:444 > > [<ffffffff8491f82c>] sk_destruct+0xec/0x440 net/core/sock.c:1457 > > [<ffffffff8491fbd7>] __sk_free+0x57/0x200 net/core/sock.c:1476 > > [<ffffffff8491fdb0>] sk_free+0x30/0x40 net/core/sock.c:1487 > > [< inline >] sock_put include/net/sock.h:1623 > > [<ffffffff854c8a18>] sctp_close+0x628/0x790 net/sctp/socket.c:1546 > > [<ffffffff84d4b3ed>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 > > [<ffffffff84e70240>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 > > [<ffffffff84909bbd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 > > [<ffffffff84909d16>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 > > [<ffffffff81663a00>] __fput+0x220/0x770 fs/file_table.c:208 > > [<ffffffff81663fd5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 > > [<ffffffff8129f673>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 kernel/task_work.c:115 > > [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 > > [<ffffffff8124d9e9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2ae0 kernel/exit.c:750 > > [<ffffffff8124fe38>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 > > [<ffffffff81271df7>] get_signal+0x597/0x1630 kernel/signal.c:2307 > > [<ffffffff8114c77f>] do_signal+0x7f/0x18e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709 > > [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 > > arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 > > [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 > > [<ffffffff8100616f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 > > arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 > > [<ffffffff85955362>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 > > ---[ end trace 3e42717665ff2020 ]--- > > > > > > These WARNINGS always go with the original use-after-free reports. And > > I was not able to reproduce this WARNING with commented out > > sctp_association_destroy. > > > > For the reference here is syzkaller program that triggers the WARNING. > > > > r0 = socket(0xa, 0x1, 0x84) > > mmap(&(0x7f0000000000)=nil, (0x10000), 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0) > > bind(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)="0a0033e049d02e70000000000000000000000000000000014c37ffc4", > > 0x1c) > > connect(r0, &(0x7f0000001000)="020033d97f000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", > > 0x80) > > setsockopt$sock_int(r0, 0x1, 0x1d, &(0x7f0000001000+0x336)=0x1, 0x4) > > listen(r0, 0xbb3) > > r1 = accept(r0, &(0x7f0000003000+0xfd6)=nil, &(0x7f0000004000-0x2)=nil) > > These two are unrelated, actually. > > Do you know if this accept() returned something? Seems so. > Seems to be originated on > sctp_v6_create_accept_sk() -> sctp_copy_sock(): > > void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, > struct sctp_association *asoc) > { > struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk); > struct inet_sock *newinet; > > newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; > newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; > newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; <--- > > As it enabled SO_TIMESTAMP on listening socket, this flag will be copied and > will trigger the second net_disable_timestamp() by the time the second > socket is destroyed, because it never had its enable counterpart called. > > This also happens via sctp peeloff operation. Vlad, others, It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is not very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the application to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; in the above. What do you think? Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 17:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:51:33PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > This also seems to lead the the following WARNINGS: > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21734 at kernel/jump_label.c:77 > > __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120() > > jump label: negative count! > > Modules linked in: > > CPU: 3 PID: 21734 Comm: executor Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc2+ #3 > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > > 00000000ffffffff ffff88006083f660 ffffffff82719fc6 ffff88006083f6d0 > > ffff88003bbf8000 ffffffff85a612e0 ffff88006083f6a0 ffffffff81244ec9 > > ffffffff8152c54b ffffed000c107ed6 ffffffff85a612e0 000000000000004d > > Call Trace: > > [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 > > [<ffffffff82719fc6>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50 > > [<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460 > > [<ffffffff81244fd9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:472 > > [<ffffffff8152c54b>] __static_key_slow_dec+0xfb/0x120 kernel/jump_label.c:76 > > [<ffffffff8152c5c1>] static_key_slow_dec+0x51/0x90 kernel/jump_label.c:100 > > [<ffffffff84962d9b>] net_disable_timestamp+0x3b/0x50 net/core/dev.c:1709 > > [<ffffffff84914d43>] sock_disable_timestamp+0x93/0xb0 net/core/sock.c:444 > > [<ffffffff8491f82c>] sk_destruct+0xec/0x440 net/core/sock.c:1457 > > [<ffffffff8491fbd7>] __sk_free+0x57/0x200 net/core/sock.c:1476 > > [<ffffffff8491fdb0>] sk_free+0x30/0x40 net/core/sock.c:1487 > > [< inline >] sock_put include/net/sock.h:1623 > > [<ffffffff854c8a18>] sctp_close+0x628/0x790 net/sctp/socket.c:1546 > > [<ffffffff84d4b3ed>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 > > [<ffffffff84e70240>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 > > [<ffffffff84909bbd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 > > [<ffffffff84909d16>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 > > [<ffffffff81663a00>] __fput+0x220/0x770 fs/file_table.c:208 > > [<ffffffff81663fd5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 > > [<ffffffff8129f673>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 kernel/task_work.c:115 > > [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 > > [<ffffffff8124d9e9>] do_exit+0x809/0x2ae0 kernel/exit.c:750 > > [<ffffffff8124fe38>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 > > [<ffffffff81271df7>] get_signal+0x597/0x1630 kernel/signal.c:2307 > > [<ffffffff8114c77f>] do_signal+0x7f/0x18e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:709 > > [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 > > arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 > > [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 > > [<ffffffff8100616f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 > > arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 > > [<ffffffff85955362>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 > > ---[ end trace 3e42717665ff2020 ]--- > > > > > > These WARNINGS always go with the original use-after-free reports. And > > I was not able to reproduce this WARNING with commented out > > sctp_association_destroy. > > > > For the reference here is syzkaller program that triggers the WARNING. > > > > r0 = socket(0xa, 0x1, 0x84) > > mmap(&(0x7f0000000000)=nil, (0x10000), 0x3, 0x32, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0) > > bind(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)="0a0033e049d02e70000000000000000000000000000000014c37ffc4", > > 0x1c) > > connect(r0, &(0x7f0000001000)="020033d97f000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", > > 0x80) > > setsockopt$sock_int(r0, 0x1, 0x1d, &(0x7f0000001000+0x336)=0x1, 0x4) > > listen(r0, 0xbb3) > > r1 = accept(r0, &(0x7f0000003000+0xfd6)=nil, &(0x7f0000004000-0x2)=nil) > > These two are unrelated, actually. > > Do you know if this accept() returned something? Seems so. > Seems to be originated on > sctp_v6_create_accept_sk() -> sctp_copy_sock(): > > void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, > struct sctp_association *asoc) > { > struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk); > struct inet_sock *newinet; > > newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; > newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; > newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; <--- > > As it enabled SO_TIMESTAMP on listening socket, this flag will be copied and > will trigger the second net_disable_timestamp() by the time the second > socket is destroyed, because it never had its enable counterpart called. > > This also happens via sctp peeloff operation. Vlad, others, It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is not very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the application to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; in the above. What do you think? Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 17:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Vlad, others, > > It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 > ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is not > very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to > keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. > > I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only > SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the application > to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: > > - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; > + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; > > in the above. > > What do you think? I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) #define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Vlad, others, > > It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 > ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is not > very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to > keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. > > I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only > SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the application > to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: > > - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; > + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; > > in the above. > > What do you think? I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) #define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 18:06 ` Marcelo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo @ 2015-12-03 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Vlad Yasevich, syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov Em 3 de dezembro de 2015 15:59:10 BRST, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> escreveu: >On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> Vlad, others, >> >> It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 >> ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is >not >> very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to >> keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. >> >> I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only >> SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the >application >> to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: >> >> - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; >> + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; >> >> in the above. >> >> What do you think? > >I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) > >#define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 Oops, indeed! Idea persists. Thx! -- Sent from mobile. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 18:06 ` Marcelo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo @ 2015-12-03 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Vlad Yasevich, syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov Em 3 de dezembro de 2015 15:59:10 BRST, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> escreveu: >On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> Vlad, others, >> >> It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 >> ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is >not >> very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to >> keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. >> >> I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only >> SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the >application >> to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: >> >> - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; >> + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; >> >> in the above. >> >> What do you think? > >I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) > >#define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 Oops, indeed! Idea persists. Thx! -- Sent from mobile. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 18:06 ` Marcelo @ 2015-12-03 18:35 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-03 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo, Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/03/2015 01:06 PM, Marcelo wrote: > > > Em 3 de dezembro de 2015 15:59:10 BRST, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> escreveu: >> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>> Vlad, others, >>> >>> It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 >>> ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is >> not >>> very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to >>> keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. >>> >>> I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only >>> SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the >> application >>> to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: >>> >>> - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; >>> + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; >>> >>> in the above. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) >> >> #define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 > > Oops, indeed! > Idea persists. > Thx! > Hmm... sk_clone_lock() appears to copy the flags as well, so it would appear the tcp accept() sockets would also have timestamping set. I can see how we probably shouldn't being copying sk_flags as there isn't much there that need to be set. -vlad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 18:35 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-03 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo, Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/03/2015 01:06 PM, Marcelo wrote: > > > Em 3 de dezembro de 2015 15:59:10 BRST, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> escreveu: >> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>> Vlad, others, >>> >>> It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 >>> ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is >> not >>> very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to >>> keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. >>> >>> I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only >>> SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the >> application >>> to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: >>> >>> - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; >>> + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; >>> >>> in the above. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) >> >> #define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 > > Oops, indeed! > Idea persists. > Thx! > Hmm... sk_clone_lock() appears to copy the flags as well, so it would appear the tcp accept() sockets would also have timestamping set. I can see how we probably shouldn't being copying sk_flags as there isn't much there that need to be set. -vlad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 18:35 ` Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-03 18:43 ` Marcelo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo @ 2015-12-03 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:35:37PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > On 12/03/2015 01:06 PM, Marcelo wrote: > > > > > > Em 3 de dezembro de 2015 15:59:10 BRST, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> > >>> Vlad, others, > >>> > >>> It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 > >>> ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is > >> not > >>> very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to > >>> keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. > >>> > >>> I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only > >>> SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the > >> application > >>> to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: > >>> > >>> - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; > >>> + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; > >>> > >>> in the above. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >> > >> I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) > >> > >> #define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 > > > > Oops, indeed! > > Idea persists. > > Thx! > > > > Hmm... sk_clone_lock() appears to copy the flags as well, so it would > appear the tcp accept() sockets would also have timestamping set. Ahh right, through a memcpy. I completely missed that. And later on it does: if (sock_needs_netstamp(sk) && newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) net_enable_timestamp(); > I can see how we probably shouldn't being copying sk_flags as there isn't > much there that need to be set. I take that back then, we can enable timestamp like the above instead. I'll test and post a patch soon. Thanks, Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 18:43 ` Marcelo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo @ 2015-12-03 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Neil Horman, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:35:37PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > On 12/03/2015 01:06 PM, Marcelo wrote: > > > > > > Em 3 de dezembro de 2015 15:59:10 BRST, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:43 -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> > >>> Vlad, others, > >>> > >>> It's been a long time but this was introduced by commit 914e1c8b6980 > >>> ("sctp: Inherit all socket options from parent correctly."). This is > >> not > >>> very consistent with how other protocols work and it will be hard to > >>> keep tracking a negative mask of flags that we can't copy. > >>> > >>> I reviewed the list of options and I'm thinking that only > >>> SO_BINDTODEVICE is worth copying, leaving the others for the > >> application > >>> to re-set, as it is for other protocols. So I'm thinking on simply: > >>> > >>> - newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; > >>> + newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags & SO_BINDTODEVICE; > >>> > >>> in the above. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >> > >> I think SO_BINDTODEVICE is not a flag ;) > >> > >> #define SO_BINDTODEVICE 25 > > > > Oops, indeed! > > Idea persists. > > Thx! > > > > Hmm... sk_clone_lock() appears to copy the flags as well, so it would > appear the tcp accept() sockets would also have timestamping set. Ahh right, through a memcpy. I completely missed that. And later on it does: if (sock_needs_netstamp(sk) && newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) net_enable_timestamp(); > I can see how we probably shouldn't being copying sk_flags as there isn't > much there that need to be set. I take that back then, we can enable timestamp like the above instead. I'll test and post a patch soon. Thanks, Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 0/3] sctp: packet timestamp fixes 2015-12-03 18:43 ` Marcelo @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov Hi, These a couple of fixes regarding sctp/packet timestamps. Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> reported the counter leak on missing net_enable_timestamp() (2nd patch) and further testing here revealed the other two issues. Please consider these to -stable. Thanks! Marcelo Ricardo Leitner (3): sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ net/core/sock.c | 2 -- net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 4 ++-- net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++++ 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 0/3] sctp: packet timestamp fixes @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov Hi, These a couple of fixes regarding sctp/packet timestamps. Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> reported the counter leak on missing net_enable_timestamp() (2nd patch) and further testing here revealed the other two issues. Please consider these to -stable. Thanks! Marcelo Ricardo Leitner (3): sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ net/core/sock.c | 2 -- net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 4 ++-- net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++++ 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 1/3] sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov SCTP echoes a cookie o INIT ACK chunks that contains a timestamp, for detecting stale cookies. This cookie is echoed back to the server by the client and then that timestamp is checked. Thing is, if the listening socket is using packet timestamping, the cookie is encoded with ktime_get() value and checked against ktime_get_real(), as done by __net_timestamp(). The fix is to sctp also use ktime_get_real(), so we can compare bananas with bananas later no matter if packet timestamping was enabled or not. Fixes: 52db882f3fc2 ("net: sctp: migrate cookie life from timeval to ktime") Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c index 763e06a55155b2a9e0a9d918ecc1fe2dd6d9e0c0..5d6a03fad3789a12290f5f14c5a7efa69c98f41a 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static sctp_cookie_param_t *sctp_pack_cookie(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, /* Set an expiration time for the cookie. */ cookie->c.expiration = ktime_add(asoc->cookie_life, - ktime_get()); + ktime_get_real()); /* Copy the peer's init packet. */ memcpy(&cookie->c.peer_init[0], init_chunk->chunk_hdr, @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ no_hmac: if (sock_flag(ep->base.sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)) kt = skb_get_ktime(skb); else - kt = ktime_get(); + kt = ktime_get_real(); if (!asoc && ktime_before(bear_cookie->expiration, kt)) { /* -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 1/3] sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov SCTP echoes a cookie o INIT ACK chunks that contains a timestamp, for detecting stale cookies. This cookie is echoed back to the server by the client and then that timestamp is checked. Thing is, if the listening socket is using packet timestamping, the cookie is encoded with ktime_get() value and checked against ktime_get_real(), as done by __net_timestamp(). The fix is to sctp also use ktime_get_real(), so we can compare bananas with bananas later no matter if packet timestamping was enabled or not. Fixes: 52db882f3fc2 ("net: sctp: migrate cookie life from timeval to ktime") Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c index 763e06a55155b2a9e0a9d918ecc1fe2dd6d9e0c0..5d6a03fad3789a12290f5f14c5a7efa69c98f41a 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static sctp_cookie_param_t *sctp_pack_cookie(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, /* Set an expiration time for the cookie. */ cookie->c.expiration = ktime_add(asoc->cookie_life, - ktime_get()); + ktime_get_real()); /* Copy the peer's init packet. */ memcpy(&cookie->c.peer_init[0], init_chunk->chunk_hdr, @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ no_hmac: if (sock_flag(ep->base.sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)) kt = skb_get_ktime(skb); else - kt = ktime_get(); + kt = ktime_get_real(); if (!asoc && ktime_before(bear_cookie->expiration, kt)) { /* -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 1/3] sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 20:31 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/04/2015 12:14 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > SCTP echoes a cookie o INIT ACK chunks that contains a timestamp, for > detecting stale cookies. This cookie is echoed back to the server by the > client and then that timestamp is checked. > > Thing is, if the listening socket is using packet timestamping, the > cookie is encoded with ktime_get() value and checked against > ktime_get_real(), as done by __net_timestamp(). > > The fix is to sctp also use ktime_get_real(), so we can compare bananas > with bananas later no matter if packet timestamping was enabled or not. > > Fixes: 52db882f3fc2 ("net: sctp: migrate cookie life from timeval to ktime") > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > index 763e06a55155b2a9e0a9d918ecc1fe2dd6d9e0c0..5d6a03fad3789a12290f5f14c5a7efa69c98f41a 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static sctp_cookie_param_t *sctp_pack_cookie(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > > /* Set an expiration time for the cookie. */ > cookie->c.expiration = ktime_add(asoc->cookie_life, > - ktime_get()); > + ktime_get_real()); > > /* Copy the peer's init packet. */ > memcpy(&cookie->c.peer_init[0], init_chunk->chunk_hdr, > @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ no_hmac: > if (sock_flag(ep->base.sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)) > kt = skb_get_ktime(skb); > else > - kt = ktime_get(); > + kt = ktime_get_real(); > > if (!asoc && ktime_before(bear_cookie->expiration, kt)) { > /* > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 1/3] sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on @ 2015-12-04 20:31 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/04/2015 12:14 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > SCTP echoes a cookie o INIT ACK chunks that contains a timestamp, for > detecting stale cookies. This cookie is echoed back to the server by the > client and then that timestamp is checked. > > Thing is, if the listening socket is using packet timestamping, the > cookie is encoded with ktime_get() value and checked against > ktime_get_real(), as done by __net_timestamp(). > > The fix is to sctp also use ktime_get_real(), so we can compare bananas > with bananas later no matter if packet timestamping was enabled or not. > > Fixes: 52db882f3fc2 ("net: sctp: migrate cookie life from timeval to ktime") > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > index 763e06a55155b2a9e0a9d918ecc1fe2dd6d9e0c0..5d6a03fad3789a12290f5f14c5a7efa69c98f41a 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ static sctp_cookie_param_t *sctp_pack_cookie(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > > /* Set an expiration time for the cookie. */ > cookie->c.expiration = ktime_add(asoc->cookie_life, > - ktime_get()); > + ktime_get_real()); > > /* Copy the peer's init packet. */ > memcpy(&cookie->c.peer_init[0], init_chunk->chunk_hdr, > @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ no_hmac: > if (sock_flag(ep->base.sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)) > kt = skb_get_ktime(skb); > else > - kt = ktime_get(); > + kt = ktime_get_real(); > > if (!asoc && ktime_before(bear_cookie->expiration, kt)) { > /* > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 2/3] sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov Dmitry Vyukov reported that SCTP was triggering a WARN on socket destroy related to disabling sock timestamp. When SCTP accepts an association or peel one off, it copies sock flags but forgot to call net_enable_timestamp() if a packet timestamping flag was copied, leading to extra calls to net_disable_timestamp() whenever such clones were closed. The fix is to call net_enable_timestamp() whenever we copy a sock with that flag on, like tcp does. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ net/core/sock.c | 2 -- net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 52d27ee924f47867026d8f65c65551a9137219d3..b1d475b5db6825e13df3e3e147fed8654e1cf086 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -740,6 +740,8 @@ enum sock_flags { SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE, /* Wake select on error queue */ }; +#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) + static inline void sock_copy_flags(struct sock *nsk, struct sock *osk) { nsk->sk_flags = osk->sk_flags; diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index e31dfcee1729aa23bdd2ed692fda1b90bd75afb8..d01c8f42dbb2f040fd48009b2767bd4e80aea8ab 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -433,8 +433,6 @@ static bool sock_needs_netstamp(const struct sock *sk) } } -#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) - static void sock_disable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, unsigned long flags) { if (sk->sk_flags & flags) { diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 03c8256063ec6355fcce034366aa5d005d75b5f7..4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -7199,6 +7199,9 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, newinet->mc_ttl = 1; newinet->mc_index = 0; newinet->mc_list = NULL; + + if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) + net_enable_timestamp(); } static inline void sctp_copy_descendant(struct sock *sk_to, -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 2/3] sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov Dmitry Vyukov reported that SCTP was triggering a WARN on socket destroy related to disabling sock timestamp. When SCTP accepts an association or peel one off, it copies sock flags but forgot to call net_enable_timestamp() if a packet timestamping flag was copied, leading to extra calls to net_disable_timestamp() whenever such clones were closed. The fix is to call net_enable_timestamp() whenever we copy a sock with that flag on, like tcp does. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ net/core/sock.c | 2 -- net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 52d27ee924f47867026d8f65c65551a9137219d3..b1d475b5db6825e13df3e3e147fed8654e1cf086 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -740,6 +740,8 @@ enum sock_flags { SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE, /* Wake select on error queue */ }; +#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) + static inline void sock_copy_flags(struct sock *nsk, struct sock *osk) { nsk->sk_flags = osk->sk_flags; diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index e31dfcee1729aa23bdd2ed692fda1b90bd75afb8..d01c8f42dbb2f040fd48009b2767bd4e80aea8ab 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -433,8 +433,6 @@ static bool sock_needs_netstamp(const struct sock *sk) } } -#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) - static void sock_disable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, unsigned long flags) { if (sk->sk_flags & flags) { diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 03c8256063ec6355fcce034366aa5d005d75b5f7..4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -7199,6 +7199,9 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, newinet->mc_ttl = 1; newinet->mc_index = 0; newinet->mc_list = NULL; + + if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) + net_enable_timestamp(); } static inline void sctp_copy_descendant(struct sock *sk_to, -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 2/3] sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/04/2015 12:14 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov reported that SCTP was triggering a WARN on socket destroy > related to disabling sock timestamp. > > When SCTP accepts an association or peel one off, it copies sock flags > but forgot to call net_enable_timestamp() if a packet timestamping flag > was copied, leading to extra calls to net_disable_timestamp() whenever > such clones were closed. > > The fix is to call net_enable_timestamp() whenever we copy a sock with > that flag on, like tcp does. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ > net/core/sock.c | 2 -- > net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index 52d27ee924f47867026d8f65c65551a9137219d3..b1d475b5db6825e13df3e3e147fed8654e1cf086 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -740,6 +740,8 @@ enum sock_flags { > SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE, /* Wake select on error queue */ > }; > > +#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) > + > static inline void sock_copy_flags(struct sock *nsk, struct sock *osk) > { > nsk->sk_flags = osk->sk_flags; > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index e31dfcee1729aa23bdd2ed692fda1b90bd75afb8..d01c8f42dbb2f040fd48009b2767bd4e80aea8ab 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -433,8 +433,6 @@ static bool sock_needs_netstamp(const struct sock *sk) > } > } > > -#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) > - > static void sock_disable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, unsigned long flags) > { > if (sk->sk_flags & flags) { > diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c > index 03c8256063ec6355fcce034366aa5d005d75b5f7..4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c > @@ -7199,6 +7199,9 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, > newinet->mc_ttl = 1; > newinet->mc_index = 0; > newinet->mc_list = NULL; > + > + if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) > + net_enable_timestamp(); > } > > static inline void sctp_copy_descendant(struct sock *sk_to, > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 2/3] sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets @ 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/04/2015 12:14 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov reported that SCTP was triggering a WARN on socket destroy > related to disabling sock timestamp. > > When SCTP accepts an association or peel one off, it copies sock flags > but forgot to call net_enable_timestamp() if a packet timestamping flag > was copied, leading to extra calls to net_disable_timestamp() whenever > such clones were closed. > > The fix is to call net_enable_timestamp() whenever we copy a sock with > that flag on, like tcp does. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ > net/core/sock.c | 2 -- > net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index 52d27ee924f47867026d8f65c65551a9137219d3..b1d475b5db6825e13df3e3e147fed8654e1cf086 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -740,6 +740,8 @@ enum sock_flags { > SOCK_SELECT_ERR_QUEUE, /* Wake select on error queue */ > }; > > +#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) > + > static inline void sock_copy_flags(struct sock *nsk, struct sock *osk) > { > nsk->sk_flags = osk->sk_flags; > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index e31dfcee1729aa23bdd2ed692fda1b90bd75afb8..d01c8f42dbb2f040fd48009b2767bd4e80aea8ab 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -433,8 +433,6 @@ static bool sock_needs_netstamp(const struct sock *sk) > } > } > > -#define SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP ((1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMP) | (1UL << SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)) > - > static void sock_disable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, unsigned long flags) > { > if (sk->sk_flags & flags) { > diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c > index 03c8256063ec6355fcce034366aa5d005d75b5f7..4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c > @@ -7199,6 +7199,9 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, > newinet->mc_ttl = 1; > newinet->mc_index = 0; > newinet->mc_list = NULL; > + > + if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) > + net_enable_timestamp(); > } > > static inline void sctp_copy_descendant(struct sock *sk_to, > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 3/3] sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov As we are keeping timestamps on when copying the socket, we also have to copy sk_tsflags. This is needed since b9f40e21ef42 ("net-timestamp: move timestamp flags out of sk_flags"). Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/socket.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398..1a32ecdb8bae98de2e76591f0f5ffee1441ff04d 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -7167,6 +7167,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; + newsk->sk_tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags; newsk->sk_no_check_tx = sk->sk_no_check_tx; newsk->sk_no_check_rx = sk->sk_no_check_rx; newsk->sk_reuse = sk->sk_reuse; -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net 3/3] sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket @ 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov As we are keeping timestamps on when copying the socket, we also have to copy sk_tsflags. This is needed since b9f40e21ef42 ("net-timestamp: move timestamp flags out of sk_flags"). Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/socket.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398..1a32ecdb8bae98de2e76591f0f5ffee1441ff04d 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -7167,6 +7167,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; + newsk->sk_tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags; newsk->sk_no_check_tx = sk->sk_no_check_tx; newsk->sk_no_check_rx = sk->sk_no_check_rx; newsk->sk_reuse = sk->sk_reuse; -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 3/3] sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/04/2015 12:14 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > As we are keeping timestamps on when copying the socket, we also have to > copy sk_tsflags. > > This is needed since b9f40e21ef42 ("net-timestamp: move timestamp flags > out of sk_flags"). > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > net/sctp/socket.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c > index 4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398..1a32ecdb8bae98de2e76591f0f5ffee1441ff04d 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c > @@ -7167,6 +7167,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, > newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; > newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; > newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; > + newsk->sk_tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags; > newsk->sk_no_check_tx = sk->sk_no_check_tx; > newsk->sk_no_check_rx = sk->sk_no_check_rx; > newsk->sk_reuse = sk->sk_reuse; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 3/3] sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket @ 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: Neil Horman, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Maciej Żenczykowski, Dmitry Vyukov On 12/04/2015 12:14 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > As we are keeping timestamps on when copying the socket, we also have to > copy sk_tsflags. > > This is needed since b9f40e21ef42 ("net-timestamp: move timestamp flags > out of sk_flags"). > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > net/sctp/socket.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c > index 4c9282bdd06790a0cca7f7c33986e7eb6c541398..1a32ecdb8bae98de2e76591f0f5ffee1441ff04d 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c > @@ -7167,6 +7167,7 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, > newsk->sk_type = sk->sk_type; > newsk->sk_bound_dev_if = sk->sk_bound_dev_if; > newsk->sk_flags = sk->sk_flags; > + newsk->sk_tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags; > newsk->sk_no_check_tx = sk->sk_no_check_tx; > newsk->sk_no_check_rx = sk->sk_no_check_rx; > newsk->sk_reuse = sk->sk_reuse; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 0/3] sctp: packet timestamp fixes 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-06 3:24 ` David Miller -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2015-12-06 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: marcelo.leitner Cc: netdev, vyasevich, nhorman, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, kcc, glider, sasha.levin, maze, dvyukov From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:14:02 -0200 > These a couple of fixes regarding sctp/packet timestamps. > > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> reported the counter leak on missing > net_enable_timestamp() (2nd patch) and further testing here revealed the > other two issues. > > Please consider these to -stable. Thanks for this, applied and queued up for -stable. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net 0/3] sctp: packet timestamp fixes @ 2015-12-06 3:24 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2015-12-06 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: marcelo.leitner Cc: netdev, vyasevich, nhorman, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, kcc, glider, sasha.levin, maze, dvyukov From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:14:02 -0200 > These a couple of fixes regarding sctp/packet timestamps. > > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> reported the counter leak on missing > net_enable_timestamp() (2nd patch) and further testing here revealed the > other two issues. > > Please consider these to -stable. Thanks for this, applied and queued up for -stable. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-11-24 9:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15:57AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 By any chance, did you have the pr_debug()s enabled? Because that would trigger a use-after-free on debug_post_sfx() macro expansion when the asoc is freed: #define debug_post_sfx() \ pr_debug("%s[post-sfx]: error:%d, asoc:%p[%s]\n", __func__, error, \ asoc, sctp_state_tbl[(asoc && sctp_id2assoc(ep->base.sk, \ sctp_assoc2id(asoc))) ? asoc->state : SCTP_STATE_CLOSED]) Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: vyasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15:57AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 > [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 > [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 > [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 > [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 > [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 > [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 > [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 > [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 > [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 > [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 > [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 > [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 By any chance, did you have the pr_debug()s enabled? Because that would trigger a use-after-free on debug_post_sfx() macro expansion when the asoc is freed: #define debug_post_sfx() \ pr_debug("%s[post-sfx]: error:%d, asoc:%p[%s]\n", __func__, error, \ asoc, sctp_state_tbl[(asoc && sctp_id2assoc(ep->base.sk, \ sctp_assoc2id(asoc))) ? asoc->state : SCTP_STATE_CLOSED]) Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 13:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: syzkaller Cc: Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15:57AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > > By any chance, did you have the pr_debug()s enabled? > Because that would trigger a use-after-free on debug_post_sfx() > macro expansion when the asoc is freed: > > #define debug_post_sfx() \ > pr_debug("%s[post-sfx]: error:%d, asoc:%p[%s]\n", __func__, error, \ > asoc, sctp_state_tbl[(asoc && sctp_id2assoc(ep->base.sk, \ > sctp_assoc2id(asoc))) ? asoc->state : SCTP_STATE_CLOSED]) No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 13:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: syzkaller Cc: Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Eric Dumazet On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:15:57AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff8162131e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 >> [<ffffffff8475ac76>] sctp_do_sm+0x42f6/0x4f60 >> [<ffffffff847b50e9>] sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN+0xa9/0xd0 >> [<ffffffff847a1426>] sctp_close+0x616/0x790 >> [<ffffffff8409bb0d>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 ./net/ipv4/af_inet.c:471 >> [<ffffffff84192cc0>] inet6_release+0x50/0x70 ./net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:416 >> [< inline >] constant_test_bit ././arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:321 >> [<ffffffff83dc78cd>] sock_release+0x8d/0x200 ./net/socket.c:601 >> [<ffffffff83dc7a56>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 ./net/socket.c:1188 >> [<ffffffff81662f5d>] __fput+0x21d/0x6e0 ./fs/file_table.c:265 >> [<ffffffff816634a5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 ./fs/file_table.c:84 >> [<ffffffff812a33d3>] task_work_run+0x163/0x1f0 ./include/trace/events/rcu.h:20 >> [< inline >] __list_add ./include/linux/list.h:42 > > By any chance, did you have the pr_debug()s enabled? > Because that would trigger a use-after-free on debug_post_sfx() > macro expansion when the asoc is freed: > > #define debug_post_sfx() \ > pr_debug("%s[post-sfx]: error:%d, asoc:%p[%s]\n", __func__, error, \ > asoc, sctp_state_tbl[(asoc && sctp_id2assoc(ep->base.sk, \ > sctp_assoc2id(asoc))) ? asoc->state : SCTP_STATE_CLOSED]) No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 13:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin > > No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk > in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. Hmm. pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. Can you double check ? Thanks ! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin > > No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk > in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. Hmm. pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. Can you double check ? Thanks ! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 15:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >> >> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. > > Hmm. > > pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set > > On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. > > Can you double check ? Thanks ! Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much explicitly makes it not a nop... Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: debug_post_sfx(); ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d return error; } ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 15:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >> >> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. > > Hmm. > > pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set > > On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. > > Can you double check ? Thanks ! Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much explicitly makes it not a nop... Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: debug_post_sfx(); ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d return error; } ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 15:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 16:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:55:44PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk > >> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. > > > > Hmm. > > > > pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set > > > > On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. > > > > Can you double check ? Thanks ! > > > Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much > explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: Oups. I was under that impression too, that it would do sanity-check while being optimized out. I'll think on a fix for this. Thanks, Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 16:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-03 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:55:44PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk > >> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. > > > > Hmm. > > > > pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set > > > > On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. > > > > Can you double check ? Thanks ! > > > Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much > explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: Oups. I was under that impression too, that it would do sanity-check while being optimized out. I'll think on a fix for this. Thanks, Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 15:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >> >> Hmm. >> >> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >> >> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >> >> Can you double check ? Thanks ! > > > Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much > explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: > > debug_post_sfx(); > ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax > ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax > ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je > ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> > ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi > ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax > ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) > ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi > ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq > ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> > ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d > > return error; > } > ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp > ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax > ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx > ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 > ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 > ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 > ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 > ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp > ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches converting traditional #ifdef DEBUG # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ #else # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() #endif On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as time flies. It is definitely a nop for many cases. +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) +{ + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", + __func__, sk); +} -> 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 4745: 55 push %rbp 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // atomic_read() but nothing follows 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 474f: 5d pop %rbp 4750: c3 retq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >> >> Hmm. >> >> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >> >> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >> >> Can you double check ? Thanks ! > > > Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much > explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: > > debug_post_sfx(); > ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax > ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax > ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je > ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> > ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi > ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax > ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) > ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi > ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq > ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> > ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d > > return error; > } > ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp > ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax > ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx > ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 > ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 > ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 > ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 > ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp > ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches converting traditional #ifdef DEBUG # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ #else # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() #endif On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as time flies. It is definitely a nop for many cases. +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) +{ + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", + __func__, sk); +} -> 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 4745: 55 push %rbp 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // atomic_read() but nothing follows 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 474f: 5d pop %rbp 4750: c3 retq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-03 17:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>> >>> Hmm. >>> >>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>> >>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>> >>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >> >> >> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >> explicitly makes it not a nop... >> >> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >> >> return error; >> } >> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq > > This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches > converting traditional > > #ifdef DEBUG > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ > #else > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() > #endif > > On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. > > It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people > actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, > like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as time flies. > > It is definitely a nop for many cases. > > +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) > +{ > + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) > + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", > + __func__, sk); > +} > > -> > > 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: > 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> > 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 > 4745: 55 push %rbp > 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // > atomic_read() but nothing follows > 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 474f: 5d pop %rbp > 4750: c3 retq I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and doesn't use the result). But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 17:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>> >>> Hmm. >>> >>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>> >>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>> >>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >> >> >> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >> explicitly makes it not a nop... >> >> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >> >> return error; >> } >> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq > > This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches > converting traditional > > #ifdef DEBUG > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ > #else > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() > #endif > > On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. > > It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people > actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, > like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as time flies. > > It is definitely a nop for many cases. > > +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) > +{ > + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) > + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", > + __func__, sk); > +} > > -> > > 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: > 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> > 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 > 4745: 55 push %rbp > 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // > atomic_read() but nothing follows > 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 474f: 5d pop %rbp > 4750: c3 retq I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and doesn't use the result). But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 17:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-03 18:52 ` Aaron Conole -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Aaron Conole @ 2015-12-03 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Joe Perches Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> writes: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>>> >>>> Hmm. >>>> >>>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or >>>> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>>> >>>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>>> >>>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >>> >>> >>> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >>> explicitly makes it not a nop... Because it was until commit 5264f2f75d8. It also violates my reading of the following from printk.h: * All of these will print unconditionally, although note that pr_debug() * and other debug macros are compiled out unless either DEBUG is defined * or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set. >>> >>> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >>> >>> debug_post_sfx(); >>> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >>> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >>> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >>> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >>> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >>> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >>> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >>> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >>> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >>> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >>> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >>> >>> return error; >>> } >>> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >>> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >>> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >>> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >>> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >>> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >>> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >>> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >>> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq >> >> This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches >> converting traditional +1 >> #ifdef DEBUG >> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ >> #else >> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() >> #endif >> >> On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. >> >> It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. +1 >> We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people >> actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, >> like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as >> time flies. >> >> It is definitely a nop for many cases. >> >> +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) >> +{ >> + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) >> + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", >> + __func__, sk); >> +} >> >> -> >> >> 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: >> 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> >> 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 >> 4745: 55 push %rbp >> 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // >> atomic_read() but nothing follows >> 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp >> 474f: 5d pop %rbp >> 4750: c3 retq > > > > I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have > side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most > likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the > load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and > doesn't use the result). > But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove > otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls > when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for > volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc This isn't 100% true. As you state, in order to reach the return 0, all side effects must be evaluated. Load generally does not have side effects, so it can be safely elided, but function() must be emitted. However, that is _not_ required to get the desired warning emission on a printf argument function, see http://pastebin.com/UHuaydkj for an example. I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h index 9729565..cd24d2d 100644 --- a/include/linux/printk.h +++ b/include/linux/printk.h @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold; printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) #else #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \ - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) + ({ if(0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0;}) #endif /* ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 18:52 ` Aaron Conole 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Aaron Conole @ 2015-12-03 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Joe Perches Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> writes: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>>> >>>> Hmm. >>>> >>>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or >>>> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>>> >>>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>>> >>>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >>> >>> >>> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >>> explicitly makes it not a nop... Because it was until commit 5264f2f75d8. It also violates my reading of the following from printk.h: * All of these will print unconditionally, although note that pr_debug() * and other debug macros are compiled out unless either DEBUG is defined * or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set. >>> >>> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >>> >>> debug_post_sfx(); >>> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >>> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >>> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >>> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >>> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >>> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >>> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >>> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >>> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >>> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >>> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >>> >>> return error; >>> } >>> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >>> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >>> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >>> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >>> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >>> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >>> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >>> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >>> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq >> >> This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches >> converting traditional +1 >> #ifdef DEBUG >> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ >> #else >> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() >> #endif >> >> On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. >> >> It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. +1 >> We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people >> actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, >> like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as >> time flies. >> >> It is definitely a nop for many cases. >> >> +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) >> +{ >> + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) >> + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", >> + __func__, sk); >> +} >> >> -> >> >> 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: >> 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> >> 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 >> 4745: 55 push %rbp >> 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // >> atomic_read() but nothing follows >> 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp >> 474f: 5d pop %rbp >> 4750: c3 retq > > > > I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have > side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most > likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the > load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and > doesn't use the result). > But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove > otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls > when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for > volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc This isn't 100% true. As you state, in order to reach the return 0, all side effects must be evaluated. Load generally does not have side effects, so it can be safely elided, but function() must be emitted. However, that is _not_ required to get the desired warning emission on a printf argument function, see http://pastebin.com/UHuaydkj for an example. I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h index 9729565..cd24d2d 100644 --- a/include/linux/printk.h +++ b/include/linux/printk.h @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold; printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) #else #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \ - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) + ({ if(0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0;}) #endif /* ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 18:52 ` Aaron Conole @ 2015-12-03 19:06 ` Joe Perches -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov, Andrew Morton Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 13:52 -0500, Aaron Conole wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> writes: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk > > > > > > in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm. > > > > > > > > > > pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or > > > > > CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set > > > > > > > > > > On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. > > > > > > > > > > Can you double check ? Thanks ! > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much > > > > explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Because it was until commit 5264f2f75d8. It also violates my reading of > the following from printk.h: > > * All of these will print unconditionally, although note that pr_debug() > * and other debug macros are compiled out unless either DEBUG is defined > * or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set. > > > > > > > > > Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: > > > > > > > > debug_post_sfx(); > > > > ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax > > > > ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax > > > > ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je > > > > ffffffff8229f286 > > > > ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi > > > > ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax > > > > ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) > > > > ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi > > > > ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq > > > > ffffffff822b1af0 > > > > ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d > > > > > > > > return error; > > > > } > > > > ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp > > > > ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax > > > > ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx > > > > ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 > > > > ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 > > > > ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 > > > > ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 > > > > ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp > > > > ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq > > > > > > This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches > > > converting traditional > > +1 > > > > #ifdef DEBUG > > > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ > > > #else > > > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() > > > #endif > > > > > > On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. > > > > > > It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > +1 > > > > We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people > > > actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, > > > like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as > > > time flies. > > > > > > It is definitely a nop for many cases. > > > > > > +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) > > > +{ > > > + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) > > > + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", > > > + __func__, sk); > > > +} > > > > > > -> > > > > > > 0000000000004740 : > > > 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 > > > 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 > > > 4745: 55 push %rbp > > > 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // > > > atomic_read() but nothing follows > > > 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > > > 474f: 5d pop %rbp > > > 4750: c3 retq > > > > > > > > I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have > > side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most > > likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the > > load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and > > doesn't use the result). > > But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove > > otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls > > when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for > > volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc > > This isn't 100% true. As you state, in order to reach the return 0, all > side effects must be evaluated. Load generally does not have side > effects, so it can be safely elided, but function() must be emitted. > > However, that is _not_ required to get the desired warning emission on a > printf argument function, see http://pastebin.com/UHuaydkj for an > example. > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, but am > unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (cc'd) > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h > index 9729565..cd24d2d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/printk.h > +++ b/include/linux/printk.h > @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold; > printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > #else > #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \ > - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > + ({ if(0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0;}) More common is to use do {} while (0) instead of a statement expression. I think it'd be good to change pr_debug and variants to do { if (0) no_printk(...) } while (0) or some other form that completely eliminates all the side-effects/function evaluations. I think the same should be true when CONFIG_PRINTK is not enabled. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 19:06 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov, Andrew Morton Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 13:52 -0500, Aaron Conole wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> writes: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk > > > > > > in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm. > > > > > > > > > > pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or > > > > > CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set > > > > > > > > > > On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. > > > > > > > > > > Can you double check ? Thanks ! > > > > > > > > > > > > Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much > > > > explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Because it was until commit 5264f2f75d8. It also violates my reading of > the following from printk.h: > > * All of these will print unconditionally, although note that pr_debug() > * and other debug macros are compiled out unless either DEBUG is defined > * or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set. > > > > > > > > > Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: > > > > > > > > debug_post_sfx(); > > > > ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax > > > > ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax > > > > ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je > > > > ffffffff8229f286 > > > > ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi > > > > ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax > > > > ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) > > > > ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi > > > > ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq > > > > ffffffff822b1af0 > > > > ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d > > > > > > > > return error; > > > > } > > > > ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp > > > > ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax > > > > ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx > > > > ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 > > > > ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 > > > > ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 > > > > ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 > > > > ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp > > > > ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq > > > > > > This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches > > > converting traditional > > +1 > > > > #ifdef DEBUG > > > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ > > > #else > > > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() > > > #endif > > > > > > On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. > > > > > > It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > +1 > > > > We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people > > > actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, > > > like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as > > > time flies. > > > > > > It is definitely a nop for many cases. > > > > > > +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) > > > +{ > > > + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) > > > + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", > > > + __func__, sk); > > > +} > > > > > > -> > > > > > > 0000000000004740 : > > > 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 > > > 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 > > > 4745: 55 push %rbp > > > 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // > > > atomic_read() but nothing follows > > > 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > > > 474f: 5d pop %rbp > > > 4750: c3 retq > > > > > > > > I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have > > side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most > > likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the > > load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and > > doesn't use the result). > > But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove > > otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls > > when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for > > volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc > > This isn't 100% true. As you state, in order to reach the return 0, all > side effects must be evaluated. Load generally does not have side > effects, so it can be safely elided, but function() must be emitted. > > However, that is _not_ required to get the desired warning emission on a > printf argument function, see http://pastebin.com/UHuaydkj for an > example. > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, but am > unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (cc'd) > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h > index 9729565..cd24d2d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/printk.h > +++ b/include/linux/printk.h > @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold; > printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > #else > #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \ > - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > + ({ if(0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0;}) More common is to use do {} while (0) instead of a statement expression. I think it'd be good to change pr_debug and variants to do { if (0) no_printk(...) } while (0) or some other form that completely eliminates all the side-effects/function evaluations. I think the same should be true when CONFIG_PRINTK is not enabled. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 18:52 ` Aaron Conole @ 2015-12-03 19:32 ` Jason Baron -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Joe Perches On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> writes: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm. >>>>> >>>>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or >>>>> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>>>> >>>>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>>>> >>>>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >>>> >>>> >>>> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >>>> explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Because it was until commit 5264f2f75d8. It also violates my reading of > the following from printk.h: > > * All of these will print unconditionally, although note that pr_debug() > * and other debug macros are compiled out unless either DEBUG is defined > * or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set. > >>>> >>>> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >>>> >>>> debug_post_sfx(); >>>> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >>>> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >>>> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >>>> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >>>> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >>>> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >>>> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >>>> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >>>> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >>>> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >>>> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >>>> >>>> return error; >>>> } >>>> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >>>> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >>>> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >>>> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >>>> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >>>> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >>>> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >>>> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >>>> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq >>> >>> This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches >>> converting traditional > > +1 > >>> #ifdef DEBUG >>> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ >>> #else >>> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() >>> #endif >>> >>> On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. >>> >>> It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > +1 > >>> We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people >>> actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, >>> like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as >>> time flies. >>> >>> It is definitely a nop for many cases. >>> >>> +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) >>> +{ >>> + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) >>> + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", >>> + __func__, sk); >>> +} >>> >>> -> >>> >>> 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: >>> 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> >>> 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 >>> 4745: 55 push %rbp >>> 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // >>> atomic_read() but nothing follows >>> 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp >>> 474f: 5d pop %rbp >>> 4750: c3 retq >> >> >> >> I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have >> side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most >> likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the >> load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and >> doesn't use the result). >> But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove >> otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls >> when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for >> volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc > > This isn't 100% true. As you state, in order to reach the return 0, all > side effects must be evaluated. Load generally does not have side > effects, so it can be safely elided, but function() must be emitted. > > However, that is _not_ required to get the desired warning emission on a > printf argument function, see http://pastebin.com/UHuaydkj for an > example. > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, but am > unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic 'really_no_printk()' macro. Thanks, -Jason > > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h > index 9729565..cd24d2d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/printk.h > +++ b/include/linux/printk.h > @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold; > printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > #else > #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \ > - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > + ({ if(0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0;}) > #endif > > /* > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 19:32 ` Jason Baron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, Joe Perches On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> writes: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm. >>>>> >>>>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or >>>>> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>>>> >>>>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>>>> >>>>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >>>> >>>> >>>> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >>>> explicitly makes it not a nop... > > Because it was until commit 5264f2f75d8. It also violates my reading of > the following from printk.h: > > * All of these will print unconditionally, although note that pr_debug() > * and other debug macros are compiled out unless either DEBUG is defined > * or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is set. > >>>> >>>> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >>>> >>>> debug_post_sfx(); >>>> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >>>> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >>>> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >>>> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >>>> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >>>> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >>>> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >>>> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >>>> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >>>> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >>>> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >>>> >>>> return error; >>>> } >>>> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >>>> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >>>> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >>>> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >>>> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >>>> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >>>> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >>>> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >>>> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq >>> >>> This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches >>> converting traditional > > +1 > >>> #ifdef DEBUG >>> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ >>> #else >>> # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() >>> #endif >>> >>> On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. >>> >>> It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > +1 > >>> We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people >>> actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, >>> like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as >>> time flies. >>> >>> It is definitely a nop for many cases. >>> >>> +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) >>> +{ >>> + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) >>> + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", >>> + __func__, sk); >>> +} >>> >>> -> >>> >>> 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: >>> 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> >>> 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 >>> 4745: 55 push %rbp >>> 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // >>> atomic_read() but nothing follows >>> 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp >>> 474f: 5d pop %rbp >>> 4750: c3 retq >> >> >> >> I would expect that it is nop when argument evaluation does not have >> side-effects. For example, for a load of a variable compiler will most >> likely elide it (though, it does not have to elide it, because the >> load is spelled in the code, so it can also legally emit the load and >> doesn't use the result). >> But if argument computation has side-effect (or compiler can't prove >> otherwise), it must emit code. It must emit code for function calls >> when the function is defined in a different translation unit, and for >> volatile accesses (most likely including atomic accesses), etc > > This isn't 100% true. As you state, in order to reach the return 0, all > side effects must be evaluated. Load generally does not have side > effects, so it can be safely elided, but function() must be emitted. > > However, that is _not_ required to get the desired warning emission on a > printf argument function, see http://pastebin.com/UHuaydkj for an > example. > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, but am > unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic 'really_no_printk()' macro. Thanks, -Jason > > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h > index 9729565..cd24d2d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/printk.h > +++ b/include/linux/printk.h > @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold; > printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > #else > #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \ > - no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > + ({ if(0) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); 0;}) > #endif > > /* > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 19:32 ` Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:03 ` Joe Perches -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): [] > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > 'really_no_printk()' macro. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 20:03 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): [] > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > 'really_no_printk()' macro. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 20:03 ` Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:10 ` Jason Baron -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > [] >> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >> 'really_no_printk()' macro. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > I don't see this in the tree. Also maybe we should just convert no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. So we can convert all users with this change? Thanks, -Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 20:10 ` Jason Baron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > [] >> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >> 'really_no_printk()' macro. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > I don't see this in the tree. Also maybe we should just convert no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. So we can convert all users with this change? Thanks, -Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 20:10 ` Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:24 ` Joe Perches -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > > [] > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > > I don't see this in the tree. It never got applied. > Also maybe we should just convert > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. Some of them at least. > So we can convert all users with this change? I don't think so, I think there are some function evaluation/side effects that are required. I believe some do hardware I/O. It'd be good to at least isolate them. I'm not sure how to find them via some automated tool/mechanism though. I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 20:24 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > > [] > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > > I don't see this in the tree. It never got applied. > Also maybe we should just convert > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. Some of them at least. > So we can convert all users with this change? I don't think so, I think there are some function evaluation/side effects that are required. I believe some do hardware I/O. It'd be good to at least isolate them. I'm not sure how to find them via some automated tool/mechanism though. I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 20:24 ` Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:42 ` Jason Baron -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>> [] >>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >> >> I don't see this in the tree. > > It never got applied. > >> Also maybe we should just convert >> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. > > Some of them at least. > >> So we can convert all users with this change? > > I don't think so, I think there are some > function evaluation/side effects that are > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. > > It'd be good to at least isolate them. > > I'm not sure how to find them via some > automated tool/mechanism though. > > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 > Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely upon hidden in a printk(). Just convert them and see what breaks :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 20:42 ` Jason Baron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>> [] >>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >> >> I don't see this in the tree. > > It never got applied. > >> Also maybe we should just convert >> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. > > Some of them at least. > >> So we can convert all users with this change? > > I don't think so, I think there are some > function evaluation/side effects that are > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. > > It'd be good to at least isolate them. > > I'm not sure how to find them via some > automated tool/mechanism though. > > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 > Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely upon hidden in a printk(). Just convert them and see what breaks :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 20:42 ` Jason Baron @ 2015-12-03 20:51 ` Joe Perches -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov, Andrew Morton, LKML Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > > > > [] > > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. > > > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > > > > > > I don't see this in the tree. > > > > It never got applied. > > > > > Also maybe we should just convert > > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. > > > > Some of them at least. > > > > > So we can convert all users with this change? > > > > I don't think so, I think there are some > > function evaluation/side effects that are > > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. > > > > It'd be good to at least isolate them. > > > > I'm not sure how to find them via some > > automated tool/mechanism though. > > > > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this > > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 > > > > Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely > upon hidden in a printk(). Yup. > Just convert them and see what breaks :) I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. Try it and see what happens. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-03 20:51 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-03 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Dmitry Vyukov, Andrew Morton, LKML Cc: Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > > > > [] > > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. > > > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > > > > > > I don't see this in the tree. > > > > It never got applied. > > > > > Also maybe we should just convert > > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. > > > > Some of them at least. > > > > > So we can convert all users with this change? > > > > I don't think so, I think there are some > > function evaluation/side effects that are > > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. > > > > It'd be good to at least isolate them. > > > > I'm not sure how to find them via some > > automated tool/mechanism though. > > > > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this > > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 > > > > Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely > upon hidden in a printk(). Yup. > Just convert them and see what breaks :) I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. Try it and see what happens. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 20:51 ` Joe Perches @ 2015-12-04 10:40 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >> > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >> > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >> > > > [] >> > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >> > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >> > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >> > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. >> > > > >> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >> > > >> > > I don't see this in the tree. >> > >> > It never got applied. >> > >> > > Also maybe we should just convert >> > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >> > >> > Some of them at least. >> > >> > > So we can convert all users with this change? >> > >> > I don't think so, I think there are some >> > function evaluation/side effects that are >> > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >> > >> > It'd be good to at least isolate them. >> > >> > I'm not sure how to find them via some >> > automated tool/mechanism though. >> > >> > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >> > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >> > >> >> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >> upon hidden in a printk(). > > Yup. > >> Just convert them and see what breaks :) > > I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. > Try it and see what happens. Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 10:40 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >> > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >> > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >> > > > [] >> > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >> > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >> > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >> > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. >> > > > >> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >> > > >> > > I don't see this in the tree. >> > >> > It never got applied. >> > >> > > Also maybe we should just convert >> > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >> > >> > Some of them at least. >> > >> > > So we can convert all users with this change? >> > >> > I don't think so, I think there are some >> > function evaluation/side effects that are >> > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >> > >> > It'd be good to at least isolate them. >> > >> > I'm not sure how to find them via some >> > automated tool/mechanism though. >> > >> > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >> > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >> > >> >> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >> upon hidden in a printk(). > > Yup. > >> Just convert them and see what breaks :) > > I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. > Try it and see what happens. Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 10:40 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 12:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Joe Perches, Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) > > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > >> > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > >> > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > >> > > > [] > >> > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > >> > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > >> > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > >> > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. > >> > > > > >> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > >> > > > >> > > I don't see this in the tree. > >> > > >> > It never got applied. > >> > > >> > > Also maybe we should just convert > >> > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. > >> > > >> > Some of them at least. > >> > > >> > > So we can convert all users with this change? > >> > > >> > I don't think so, I think there are some > >> > function evaluation/side effects that are > >> > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. > >> > > >> > It'd be good to at least isolate them. > >> > > >> > I'm not sure how to find them via some > >> > automated tool/mechanism though. > >> > > >> > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this > >> > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 > >> > > >> > >> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely > >> upon hidden in a printk(). > > > > Yup. > > > >> Just convert them and see what breaks :) > > > > I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. > > Try it and see what happens. > > > Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this > particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives > invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And > maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. Agreed. I'm already working on a fix for this particular use-after-free. Another interesting thing about this is that sctp_do_sm() is called for nearly every movement that happens on a sctp socket. Said that, that always-running IDR search hidden on that debug statement do have some nasty performance impact, specially because it's serialized on a spinlock. This wouldn't be happening if it was fully ellided and would be ok if that pr_debug() was really being printed, but not as it is. Kudos to this report that I could notice this. I'm trying to fix this on SCTP-side as well. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 12:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Joe Perches, Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) > > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > >> > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > >> > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, > >> > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): > >> > > > [] > >> > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It > >> > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would > >> > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic > >> > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. > >> > > > > >> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 > >> > > > >> > > I don't see this in the tree. > >> > > >> > It never got applied. > >> > > >> > > Also maybe we should just convert > >> > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. > >> > > >> > Some of them at least. > >> > > >> > > So we can convert all users with this change? > >> > > >> > I don't think so, I think there are some > >> > function evaluation/side effects that are > >> > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. > >> > > >> > It'd be good to at least isolate them. > >> > > >> > I'm not sure how to find them via some > >> > automated tool/mechanism though. > >> > > >> > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this > >> > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 > >> > > >> > >> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely > >> upon hidden in a printk(). > > > > Yup. > > > >> Just convert them and see what breaks :) > > > > I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. > > Try it and see what happens. > > > Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this > particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives > invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And > maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. Agreed. I'm already working on a fix for this particular use-after-free. Another interesting thing about this is that sctp_do_sm() is called for nearly every movement that happens on a sctp socket. Said that, that always-running IDR search hidden on that debug statement do have some nasty performance impact, specially because it's serialized on a spinlock. This wouldn't be happening if it was fully ellided and would be ok if that pr_debug() was really being printed, but not as it is. Kudos to this report that I could notice this. I'm trying to fix this on SCTP-side as well. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 12:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 15:37 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Joe Perches, Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 07:55 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >>> (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) >>> >>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>>>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>>>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>>>>>> [] >>>>>>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>>>>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>>>>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>>>>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see this in the tree. >>>>> >>>>> It never got applied. >>>>> >>>>>> Also maybe we should just convert >>>>>> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >>>>> >>>>> Some of them at least. >>>>> >>>>>> So we can convert all users with this change? >>>>> >>>>> I don't think so, I think there are some >>>>> function evaluation/side effects that are >>>>> required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >>>>> >>>>> It'd be good to at least isolate them. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure how to find them via some >>>>> automated tool/mechanism though. >>>>> >>>>> I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >>>>> thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >>>> upon hidden in a printk(). >>> >>> Yup. >>> >>>> Just convert them and see what breaks :) >>> >>> I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. >>> Try it and see what happens. >> >> >> Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this >> particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives >> invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And >> maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. > > Agreed. I'm already working on a fix for this particular use-after-free. > > Another interesting thing about this is that sctp_do_sm() is called for > nearly every movement that happens on a sctp socket. Said that, that > always-running IDR search hidden on that debug statement do have some > nasty performance impact, specially because it's serialized on a > spinlock. YUCK! I didn't really pay much attention to those debug macros before, but debug_post_sfx() is truly awful. This wasn't such a bad thing where these macros depended on CONFIG_SCTP_DEBUG, but now that they are always built, we need fix them. -vlad > This wouldn't be happening if it was fully ellided and would > be ok if that pr_debug() was really being printed, but not as it is. > Kudos to this report that I could notice this. I'm trying to fix this on > SCTP-side as well. > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 15:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Joe Perches, Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 07:55 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >>> (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) >>> >>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>>>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>>>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>>>>>> [] >>>>>>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>>>>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>>>>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>>>>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see this in the tree. >>>>> >>>>> It never got applied. >>>>> >>>>>> Also maybe we should just convert >>>>>> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >>>>> >>>>> Some of them at least. >>>>> >>>>>> So we can convert all users with this change? >>>>> >>>>> I don't think so, I think there are some >>>>> function evaluation/side effects that are >>>>> required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >>>>> >>>>> It'd be good to at least isolate them. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure how to find them via some >>>>> automated tool/mechanism though. >>>>> >>>>> I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >>>>> thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >>>> upon hidden in a printk(). >>> >>> Yup. >>> >>>> Just convert them and see what breaks :) >>> >>> I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. >>> Try it and see what happens. >> >> >> Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this >> particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives >> invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And >> maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. > > Agreed. I'm already working on a fix for this particular use-after-free. > > Another interesting thing about this is that sctp_do_sm() is called for > nearly every movement that happens on a sctp socket. Said that, that > always-running IDR search hidden on that debug statement do have some > nasty performance impact, specially because it's serialized on a > spinlock. YUCK! I didn't really pay much attention to those debug macros before, but debug_post_sfx() is truly awful. This wasn't such a bad thing where these macros depended on CONFIG_SCTP_DEBUG, but now that they are always built, we need fix them. -vlad > This wouldn't be happening if it was fully ellided and would > be ok if that pr_debug() was really being printed, but not as it is. > Kudos to this report that I could notice this. I'm trying to fix this on > SCTP-side as well. > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 15:37 ` Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-04 15:51 ` Aaron Conole -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Aaron Conole @ 2015-12-04 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov, Joe Perches, Jason Baron, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> writes: > On 12/04/2015 07:55 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >>>> (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>>>>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>>>>>>> [] >>>>>>>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>>>>>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>>>>>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>>>>>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see this in the tree. >>>>>> >>>>>> It never got applied. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Also maybe we should just convert >>>>>>> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some of them at least. >>>>>> >>>>>>> So we can convert all users with this change? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think so, I think there are some >>>>>> function evaluation/side effects that are >>>>>> required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >>>>>> >>>>>> It'd be good to at least isolate them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure how to find them via some >>>>>> automated tool/mechanism though. >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >>>>>> thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >>>>> upon hidden in a printk(). >>>> >>>> Yup. >>>> >>>>> Just convert them and see what breaks :) >>>> >>>> I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. >>>> Try it and see what happens. >>> >>> >>> Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this >>> particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives >>> invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And >>> maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. >> >> Agreed. I'm already working on a fix for this particular use-after-free. >> >> Another interesting thing about this is that sctp_do_sm() is called for >> nearly every movement that happens on a sctp socket. Said that, that >> always-running IDR search hidden on that debug statement do have some >> nasty performance impact, specially because it's serialized on a >> spinlock. > > YUCK! I didn't really pay much attention to those debug macros before, but > debug_post_sfx() is truly awful. > > This wasn't such a bad thing where these macros depended on CONFIG_SCTP_DEBUG, > but now that they are always built, we need fix them. I've proposed a patch to linux-kernel to fix them, but I don't think it's really as bad as folks imagine. Ubuntu, RHEL, and Fedora all use DYNAMIC_DEBUG configuration option, which means that the code is getting emitted anyway (correctly, I'll add) and is shunted out by a dynamic debug flag. So for the average user, it's not even really a blip. That does mean there's a cool side-effect of the entire print-macro setup which implies we execute less code when running with DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y in the "normal" case. "Turn on the dynamic debugging config and watch everything get better" isn't the worst mantra, is it? :) > -vlad > > > >> This wouldn't be happening if it was fully ellided and would >> be ok if that pr_debug() was really being printed, but not as it is. >> Kudos to this report that I could notice this. I'm trying to fix this on >> SCTP-side as well. >> >> Marcelo >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 15:51 ` Aaron Conole 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Aaron Conole @ 2015-12-04 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov, Joe Perches, Jason Baron, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> writes: > On 12/04/2015 07:55 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >>>> (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>>>>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>>>>>>> [] >>>>>>>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>>>>>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>>>>>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>>>>>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see this in the tree. >>>>>> >>>>>> It never got applied. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Also maybe we should just convert >>>>>>> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some of them at least. >>>>>> >>>>>>> So we can convert all users with this change? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think so, I think there are some >>>>>> function evaluation/side effects that are >>>>>> required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >>>>>> >>>>>> It'd be good to at least isolate them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure how to find them via some >>>>>> automated tool/mechanism though. >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >>>>>> thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >>>>> upon hidden in a printk(). >>>> >>>> Yup. >>>> >>>>> Just convert them and see what breaks :) >>>> >>>> I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. >>>> Try it and see what happens. >>> >>> >>> Whatever is the resolution for pr_debug, we still need to fix this >>> particular use-after-free. It affects stability of debug builds, gives >>> invalid debug output, prevents us from finding more bugs in SCTP. And >>> maybe somebody uses CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG in production. >> >> Agreed. I'm already working on a fix for this particular use-after-free. >> >> Another interesting thing about this is that sctp_do_sm() is called for >> nearly every movement that happens on a sctp socket. Said that, that >> always-running IDR search hidden on that debug statement do have some >> nasty performance impact, specially because it's serialized on a >> spinlock. > > YUCK! I didn't really pay much attention to those debug macros before, but > debug_post_sfx() is truly awful. > > This wasn't such a bad thing where these macros depended on CONFIG_SCTP_DEBUG, > but now that they are always built, we need fix them. I've proposed a patch to linux-kernel to fix them, but I don't think it's really as bad as folks imagine. Ubuntu, RHEL, and Fedora all use DYNAMIC_DEBUG configuration option, which means that the code is getting emitted anyway (correctly, I'll add) and is shunted out by a dynamic debug flag. So for the average user, it's not even really a blip. That does mean there's a cool side-effect of the entire print-macro setup which implies we execute less code when running with DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y in the "normal" case. "Turn on the dynamic debugging config and watch everything get better" isn't the worst mantra, is it? :) > -vlad > > > >> This wouldn't be happening if it was fully ellided and would >> be ok if that pr_debug() was really being printed, but not as it is. >> Kudos to this report that I could notice this. I'm trying to fix this on >> SCTP-side as well. >> >> Marcelo >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 20:51 ` Joe Perches @ 2015-12-04 16:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >> > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >> > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >> > > > [] >> > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >> > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >> > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >> > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. >> > > > >> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >> > > >> > > I don't see this in the tree. >> > >> > It never got applied. >> > >> > > Also maybe we should just convert >> > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >> > >> > Some of them at least. >> > >> > > So we can convert all users with this change? >> > >> > I don't think so, I think there are some >> > function evaluation/side effects that are >> > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >> > >> > It'd be good to at least isolate them. >> > >> > I'm not sure how to find them via some >> > automated tool/mechanism though. >> > >> > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >> > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >> > >> >> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >> upon hidden in a printk(). > > Yup. > >> Just convert them and see what breaks :) > > I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. > Try it and see what happens. But Aaron says that DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled in most major distributions, and all these side-effects don't happen with DYNAMIC_DEBUG. This suggests that we can make these side-effects not happen without DYNAMIC_DEBUG as well. Or I am missing something here? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 16:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Jason Baron, Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> > > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> > > > > On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >> > > > > > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >> > > > > > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >> > > > [] >> > > > > Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >> > > > > looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >> > > > > benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >> > > > > 'really_no_printk()' macro. >> > > > >> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >> > > >> > > I don't see this in the tree. >> > >> > It never got applied. >> > >> > > Also maybe we should just convert >> > > no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >> > >> > Some of them at least. >> > >> > > So we can convert all users with this change? >> > >> > I don't think so, I think there are some >> > function evaluation/side effects that are >> > required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >> > >> > It'd be good to at least isolate them. >> > >> > I'm not sure how to find them via some >> > automated tool/mechanism though. >> > >> > I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >> > thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >> > >> >> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >> upon hidden in a printk(). > > Yup. > >> Just convert them and see what breaks :) > > I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. > Try it and see what happens. But Aaron says that DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled in most major distributions, and all these side-effects don't happen with DYNAMIC_DEBUG. This suggests that we can make these side-effects not happen without DYNAMIC_DEBUG as well. Or I am missing something here? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 16:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 16:47 ` Jason Baron -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov, Joe Perches Cc: Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 11:12 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >> (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) >> >> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>>>>> [] >>>>>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>>>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>>>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>>>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >>>>> >>>>> I don't see this in the tree. >>>> >>>> It never got applied. >>>> >>>>> Also maybe we should just convert >>>>> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >>>> >>>> Some of them at least. >>>> >>>>> So we can convert all users with this change? >>>> >>>> I don't think so, I think there are some >>>> function evaluation/side effects that are >>>> required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >>>> >>>> It'd be good to at least isolate them. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how to find them via some >>>> automated tool/mechanism though. >>>> >>>> I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >>>> thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >>>> >>> >>> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >>> upon hidden in a printk(). >> >> Yup. >> >>> Just convert them and see what breaks :) >> >> I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. >> Try it and see what happens. > > > But Aaron says that DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled in most major > distributions, and all these side-effects don't happen with > DYNAMIC_DEBUG. When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled we have this wrapper from include/linux/dynamic_debug.h: if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) <do debug stuff> So the compiler is not emitting the side-effects in this case. >This suggests that we can make these side-effects not > happen without DYNAMIC_DEBUG as well. > Or I am missing something here? > When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is disabled we are instead replacing pr_debug() with the 'no_printk()' function as you've pointed out. We are changing this to emit no code at all: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144918276518878&w=2 Thanks, -Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 16:47 ` Jason Baron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov, Joe Perches Cc: Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 11:12 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >> (adding lkml as this is likely better discussed there) >> >> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:42 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>> On 12/03/2015 03:24 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:10 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>> On 12/03/2015 03:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >>>>>>>> I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted, >>>>>>>> but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test): >>>>>> [] >>>>>>> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It >>>>>>> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would >>>>>>> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic >>>>>>> 'really_no_printk()' macro. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231 >>>>> >>>>> I don't see this in the tree. >>>> >>>> It never got applied. >>>> >>>>> Also maybe we should just convert >>>>> no_printk() to do what your 'eliminated_printk()'. >>>> >>>> Some of them at least. >>>> >>>>> So we can convert all users with this change? >>>> >>>> I don't think so, I think there are some >>>> function evaluation/side effects that are >>>> required. I believe some do hardware I/O. >>>> >>>> It'd be good to at least isolate them. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how to find them via some >>>> automated tool/mechanism though. >>>> >>>> I asked Julia Lawall about it once in this >>>> thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/3/696 >>>> >>> >>> Seems rather fragile to have side effects that we rely >>> upon hidden in a printk(). >> >> Yup. >> >>> Just convert them and see what breaks :) >> >> I appreciate your optimism. It's very 1995. >> Try it and see what happens. > > > But Aaron says that DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled in most major > distributions, and all these side-effects don't happen with > DYNAMIC_DEBUG. When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled we have this wrapper from include/linux/dynamic_debug.h: if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) <do debug stuff> So the compiler is not emitting the side-effects in this case. >This suggests that we can make these side-effects not > happen without DYNAMIC_DEBUG as well. > Or I am missing something here? > When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is disabled we are instead replacing pr_debug() with the 'no_printk()' function as you've pointed out. We are changing this to emit no code at all: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m\x144918276518878&w=2 Thanks, -Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 16:47 ` Jason Baron @ 2015-12-04 17:03 ` Joe Perches -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-04 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 11:47 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled we have this wrapper from > include/linux/dynamic_debug.h: > > if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) > <do debug stuff> > > So the compiler is not emitting the side-effects in this > case. Huh? Do I misunderstand what you are writing? You are testing a variable that is not generally set so the call is not being performed in the general case, but the compiler can not elide the code. If the variable was enabled via the control file, the __dynamic_pr_debug would be performed with the use-after-free. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 17:03 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2015-12-04 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Baron, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 11:47 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled we have this wrapper from > include/linux/dynamic_debug.h: > > if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) > <do debug stuff> > > So the compiler is not emitting the side-effects in this > case. Huh? Do I misunderstand what you are writing? You are testing a variable that is not generally set so the call is not being performed in the general case, but the compiler can not elide the code. If the variable was enabled via the control file, the __dynamic_pr_debug would be performed with the use-after-free. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 17:03 ` Joe Perches @ 2015-12-04 17:11 ` Jason Baron -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-04 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 12:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 11:47 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled we have this wrapper from >> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h: >> >> if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) >> <do debug stuff> >> >> So the compiler is not emitting the side-effects in this >> case. > > Huh? Do I misunderstand what you are writing? Yes, I wasn't terribly clear - I was trying to say that the 'side-effects', in this case the debug code and use-after-free, are hidden behind the branch. They aren't invoked unless we enable the debug statement. Thanks, -Jason > > You are testing a variable that is not generally set > so the call is not being performed in the general case, > but the compiler can not elide the code. > > If the variable was enabled via the control file, the > __dynamic_pr_debug would be performed with the > use-after-free. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 17:11 ` Jason Baron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Jason Baron @ 2015-12-04 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Aaron Conole, Andrew Morton, LKML, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 12:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 11:47 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: >> When DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled we have this wrapper from >> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h: >> >> if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) >> <do debug stuff> >> >> So the compiler is not emitting the side-effects in this >> case. > > Huh? Do I misunderstand what you are writing? Yes, I wasn't terribly clear - I was trying to say that the 'side-effects', in this case the debug code and use-after-free, are hidden behind the branch. They aren't invoked unless we enable the debug statement. Thanks, -Jason > > You are testing a variable that is not generally set > so the call is not being performed in the general case, > but the compiler can not elide the code. > > If the variable was enabled via the control file, the > __dynamic_pr_debug would be performed with the > use-after-free. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2015-12-04 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, LKML On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>> >>> Hmm. >>> >>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>> >>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>> >>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >> >> >> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >> explicitly makes it not a nop... >> >> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >> >> return error; >> } >> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq > > This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches > converting traditional > > #ifdef DEBUG > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ > #else > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() > #endif > > On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. > > It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people > actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, > like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as time flies. FWIW I enabled CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG on my fuzzer. Not that it gives any particular guarantees, but still can catch some of these. > It is definitely a nop for many cases. > > +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) > +{ > + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) > + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", > + __func__, sk); > +} > > -> > > 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: > 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> > 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 > 4745: 55 push %rbp > 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // > atomic_read() but nothing follows > 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 474f: 5d pop %rbp > 4750: c3 retq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet Cc: syzkaller, Vladislav Yasevich, linux-sctp, netdev, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin, LKML On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, I don't. But pr_debug always computes its arguments. See no_printk >>>> in printk.h. So this use-after-free happens for all users. >>> >>> Hmm. >>> >>> pr_debug() should be a nop unless either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set >>> >>> On our production kernels, pr_debug() is a nop. >>> >>> Can you double check ? Thanks ! >> >> >> Why should it be nop? no_printk thing in printk.h pretty much >> explicitly makes it not a nop... >> >> Double-checked: debug_post_sfx leads to some generated code: >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> ffffffff8229f256: 48 8b 85 58 fe ff ff mov -0x1a8(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f25d: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax >> ffffffff8229f260: 74 24 je >> ffffffff8229f286 <sctp_do_sm+0x176> >> ffffffff8229f262: 8b b0 a8 00 00 00 mov 0xa8(%rax),%esi >> ffffffff8229f268: 48 8b 85 60 fe ff ff mov -0x1a0(%rbp),%rax >> ffffffff8229f26f: 44 89 85 74 fe ff ff mov %r8d,-0x18c(%rbp) >> ffffffff8229f276: 48 8b 78 20 mov 0x20(%rax),%rdi >> ffffffff8229f27a: e8 71 28 01 00 callq >> ffffffff822b1af0 <sctp_id2assoc> >> ffffffff8229f27f: 44 8b 85 74 fe ff ff mov -0x18c(%rbp),%r8d >> >> return error; >> } >> ffffffff8229f286: 48 81 c4 a0 01 00 00 add $0x1a0,%rsp >> ffffffff8229f28d: 44 89 c0 mov %r8d,%eax >> ffffffff8229f290: 5b pop %rbx >> ffffffff8229f291: 41 5c pop %r12 >> ffffffff8229f293: 41 5d pop %r13 >> ffffffff8229f295: 41 5e pop %r14 >> ffffffff8229f297: 41 5f pop %r15 >> ffffffff8229f299: 5d pop %rbp >> ffffffff8229f29a: c3 retq > > This is a serious concern, because we let in the past lot of patches > converting traditional > > #ifdef DEBUG > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() printk( ...._ > #else > # define some_hand_coded_ugly_debug() > #endif > > On the premise pr_debug() would be a nop. > > It seems it is not always the case. This is a very serious problem. > > We probably have hundred of potential bugs, because few people > actually make sure all debugging stuff is correct, > like comments can be wrong because they are not updated properly as time flies. FWIW I enabled CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG on my fuzzer. Not that it gives any particular guarantees, but still can catch some of these. > It is definitely a nop for many cases. > > +void eric_test_pr_debug(struct sock *sk) > +{ > + if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc)) > + pr_debug("%s: optmem leakage for sock %p\n", > + __func__, sk); > +} > > -> > > 0000000000004740 <eric_test_pr_debug>: > 4740: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 4745 <eric_test_pr_debug+0x5> > 4741: R_X86_64_PC32 __fentry__-0x4 > 4745: 55 push %rbp > 4746: 8b 87 24 01 00 00 mov 0x124(%rdi),%eax // > atomic_read() but nothing follows > 474c: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 474f: 5d pop %rbp > 4750: c3 retq ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-03 13:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 17:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Hi Dmitry, Can you please test this patch? I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. Thanks. ---8<--- Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c42fa91287d3cde36ac05d860f76d4fe32..05594dcd93e0d649cace5215d225bef2713f9310 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 17:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Hi Dmitry, Can you please test this patch? I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. Thanks. ---8<--- Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c42fa91287d3cde36ac05d860f76d4fe32..05594dcd93e0d649cace5215d225bef2713f9310 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 17:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 20:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > Can you please test this patch? > I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. Still happening with the same stacks. > ---8<--- > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > --- > net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 6098d4c42fa91287d3cde36ac05d860f76d4fe32..05594dcd93e0d649cace5215d225bef2713f9310 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > -- > 2.5.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 20:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > Can you please test this patch? > I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. Still happening with the same stacks. > ---8<--- > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > --- > net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 6098d4c42fa91287d3cde36ac05d860f76d4fe32..05594dcd93e0d649cace5215d225bef2713f9310 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > -- > 2.5.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 20:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 21:34 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > Can you please test this patch? > > I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. > > Still happening with the same stacks. Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line enabled and added a new one: + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); debug_post_sfx(); (should have used %x, but ok) Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: without the patch: [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison with the patch: [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: (null)[STATE_CLOSED] This one, at least, is gone with this patch. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 21:34 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > Can you please test this patch? > > I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. > > Still happening with the same stacks. Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line enabled and added a new one: + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); debug_post_sfx(); (should have used %x, but ok) Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: without the patch: [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison with the patch: [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: (null)[STATE_CLOSED] This one, at least, is gone with this patch. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 21:34 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-04 21:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Dmitry, >> > >> > Can you please test this patch? >> > I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >> >> Still happening with the same stacks. > > Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. > > I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line > enabled and added a new one: > + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); > debug_post_sfx(); > (should have used %x, but ok) > > Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: > > without the patch: > [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 > [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > > 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison > > with the patch: > [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 > [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: > (null)[STATE_CLOSED] > > This one, at least, is gone with this patch. I will try to extract reproducer next week. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-04 21:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-04 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: netdev, Vlad Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Dmitry, >> > >> > Can you please test this patch? >> > I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >> >> Still happening with the same stacks. > > Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. > > I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line > enabled and added a new one: > + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); > debug_post_sfx(); > (should have used %x, but ok) > > Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: > > without the patch: > [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 > [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > > 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison > > with the patch: > [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 > [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: > (null)[STATE_CLOSED] > > This one, at least, is gone with this patch. I will try to extract reproducer next week. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-04 21:34 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-05 16:39 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-05 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Dmitry, >>> >>> Can you please test this patch? >>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >> >> Still happening with the same stacks. > > Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. > > I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line > enabled and added a new one: > + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); > debug_post_sfx(); > (should have used %x, but ok) > > Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: > > without the patch: > [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 > [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > > 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison > > with the patch: > [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 > [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: > (null)[STATE_CLOSED] > > This one, at least, is gone with this patch. > > Marcelo > Hi Marcelo I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when the ABORT chunk may be dropped. I think this might be why we still see the issue. -vlad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-05 16:39 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-05 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Dmitry, >>> >>> Can you please test this patch? >>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >> >> Still happening with the same stacks. > > Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. > > I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line > enabled and added a new one: > + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); > debug_post_sfx(); > (should have used %x, but ok) > > Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: > > without the patch: > [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 > [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > > 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison > > with the patch: > [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 > [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: > (null)[STATE_CLOSED] > > This one, at least, is gone with this patch. > > Marcelo > Hi Marcelo I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when the ABORT chunk may be dropped. I think this might be why we still see the issue. -vlad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-05 16:39 ` Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 11:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-07 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Dmitry, >>>> >>>> Can you please test this patch? >>>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >>> >>> Still happening with the same stacks. >> >> Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. >> >> I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line >> enabled and added a new one: >> + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); >> debug_post_sfx(); >> (should have used %x, but ok) >> >> Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: >> >> without the patch: >> [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 >> [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison >> >> with the patch: >> [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 >> [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: >> (null)[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> This one, at least, is gone with this patch. >> >> Marcelo >> > > Hi Marcelo > > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > > I think this might be why we still see the issue. Marcelo, Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 11:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-07 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Dmitry, >>>> >>>> Can you please test this patch? >>>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >>> >>> Still happening with the same stacks. >> >> Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. >> >> I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line >> enabled and added a new one: >> + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); >> debug_post_sfx(); >> (should have used %x, but ok) >> >> Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: >> >> without the patch: >> [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 >> [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison >> >> with the patch: >> [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 >> [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: >> (null)[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> This one, at least, is gone with this patch. >> >> Marcelo >> > > Hi Marcelo > > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > > I think this might be why we still see the issue. Marcelo, Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 11:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-07 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Hi Dmitry, > >>>> > >>>> Can you please test this patch? > >>>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. > >>> > >>> Still happening with the same stacks. > >> > >> Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. > >> > >> I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line > >> enabled and added a new one: > >> + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); > >> debug_post_sfx(); > >> (should have used %x, but ok) > >> > >> Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: > >> > >> without the patch: > >> [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > >> [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > >> [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 > >> [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > >> > >> 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison > >> > >> with the patch: > >> [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > >> [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > >> [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 > >> [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: > >> (null)[STATE_CLOSED] > >> > >> This one, at least, is gone with this patch. > >> > >> Marcelo > >> > > > > Hi Marcelo > > > > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > > > > I think this might be why we still see the issue. > > > Marcelo, > > Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Hi Dmitry, > >>>> > >>>> Can you please test this patch? > >>>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. > >>> > >>> Still happening with the same stacks. > >> > >> Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. > >> > >> I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line > >> enabled and added a new one: > >> + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); > >> debug_post_sfx(); > >> (should have used %x, but ok) > >> > >> Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: > >> > >> without the patch: > >> [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > >> [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 > >> [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 > >> [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] > >> > >> 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison > >> > >> with the patch: > >> [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > >> [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 > >> [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, > >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] > >> [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 > >> [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: > >> (null)[STATE_CLOSED] > >> > >> This one, at least, is gone with this patch. > >> > >> Marcelo > >> > > > > Hi Marcelo > > > > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > > > > I think this might be why we still see the issue. > > > Marcelo, > > Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 13:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-07 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Hi Dmitry, >> >>>> >> >>>> Can you please test this patch? >> >>>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >> >>> >> >>> Still happening with the same stacks. >> >> >> >> Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. >> >> >> >> I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line >> >> enabled and added a new one: >> >> + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> >> (should have used %x, but ok) >> >> >> >> Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: >> >> >> >> without the patch: >> >> [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> >> [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> >> [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 >> >> [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> >> >> 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison >> >> >> >> with the patch: >> >> [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> >> [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> >> [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 >> >> [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: >> >> (null)[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> >> >> This one, at least, is gone with this patch. >> >> >> >> Marcelo >> >> >> > >> > Hi Marcelo >> > >> > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update >> > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report >> > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when >> > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. >> > >> > I think this might be why we still see the issue. >> >> >> Marcelo, >> >> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? > > Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue > without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. > > I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the > listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. Local connect in another thread I guess. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 13:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-07 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 12/04/2015 04:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Hi Dmitry, >> >>>> >> >>>> Can you please test this patch? >> >>>> I'll re-post with proper subject if it works. >> >>> >> >>> Still happening with the same stacks. >> >> >> >> Then there may be another one, I'm afraid. >> >> >> >> I'm using the testapp you shared in the first email, with that debug line >> >> enabled and added a new one: >> >> + pr_debug("%p %d\n", asoc, asoc ? asoc->state : 0); >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> >> (should have used %x, but ok) >> >> >> >> Also enabled slub_debug=PUZ, and I get: >> >> >> >> without the patch: >> >> [ 87.873640] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> >> [ 87.873647] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 87.873739] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1 >> >> [ 87.873742] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 87.875149] sctp: ffff8800b71533d8 1802201963 >> >> [ 87.875238] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff8800b71533d8[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> >> >> 1802201963 = 0x6b6b6b6b, poison >> >> >> >> with the patch: >> >> [ 81.071265] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> >> [ 81.071273] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 81.071372] sctp: ffff880137571148 1 >> >> [ 81.071375] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, >> >> asoc:ffff880137571148[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> [ 81.072423] sctp: (null) 0 >> >> [ 81.072427] sctp: sctp_do_sm[post-sfx]: error:0, asoc: >> >> (null)[STATE_CLOSED] >> >> >> >> This one, at least, is gone with this patch. >> >> >> >> Marcelo >> >> >> > >> > Hi Marcelo >> > >> > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update >> > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report >> > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when >> > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. >> > >> > I think this might be why we still see the issue. >> >> >> Marcelo, >> >> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? > > Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue > without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. > > I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the > listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. Local connect in another thread I guess. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 13:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-07 18:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: ... > >> > Hi Marcelo > >> > > >> > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > >> > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > >> > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > >> > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > >> > > >> > I think this might be why we still see the issue. > >> > >> > >> Marcelo, > >> > >> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? > > > > Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue > > without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. > > > > I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the > > listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. > > Local connect in another thread I guess. Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. There is one place, though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. Dmitry, still no luck here, cannot reproduce another hit. I'm using sctp_test and a custom test of mine, both on localhost so I would catch it in server or client side, nothing.. I need more info. Please enable the pr_debug() on debug_post_sfn() macro and see which status is being reported when you trigger the issue. And/or share a traffic capture so we can see what's going on with the association. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 18:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: ... > >> > Hi Marcelo > >> > > >> > I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > >> > the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > >> > that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > >> > the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > >> > > >> > I think this might be why we still see the issue. > >> > >> > >> Marcelo, > >> > >> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? > > > > Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue > > without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. > > > > I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the > > listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. > > Local connect in another thread I guess. Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. There is one place, though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. Dmitry, still no luck here, cannot reproduce another hit. I'm using sctp_test and a custom test of mine, both on localhost so I would catch it in server or client side, nothing.. I need more info. Please enable the pr_debug() on debug_post_sfn() macro and see which status is being reported when you trigger the issue. And/or share a traffic capture so we can see what's going on with the association. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 18:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 19:33 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > ... >>>>> Hi Marcelo >>>>> >>>>> I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update >>>>> the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report >>>>> that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when >>>>> the ABORT chunk may be dropped. >>>>> >>>>> I think this might be why we still see the issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> Marcelo, >>>> >>>> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? >>> >>> Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue >>> without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. >>> >>> I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the >>> listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. >> >> Local connect in another thread I guess. > > Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, > and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue > SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus > delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. > There is one place, > though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but > then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. -vlad > > Dmitry, still no luck here, cannot reproduce another hit. > I'm using sctp_test and a custom test of mine, both on localhost so I > would catch it in server or client side, nothing.. > > I need more info. Please enable the pr_debug() on debug_post_sfn() macro > and see which status is being reported when you trigger the issue. > And/or share a traffic capture so we can see what's going on with the > association. > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 19:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > ... >>>>> Hi Marcelo >>>>> >>>>> I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update >>>>> the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report >>>>> that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when >>>>> the ABORT chunk may be dropped. >>>>> >>>>> I think this might be why we still see the issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> Marcelo, >>>> >>>> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? >>> >>> Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue >>> without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. >>> >>> I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the >>> listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. >> >> Local connect in another thread I guess. > > Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, > and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue > SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus > delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. > There is one place, > though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but > then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. -vlad > > Dmitry, still no luck here, cannot reproduce another hit. > I'm using sctp_test and a custom test of mine, both on localhost so I > would catch it in server or client side, nothing.. > > I need more info. Please enable the pr_debug() on debug_post_sfn() macro > and see which status is being reported when you trigger the issue. > And/or share a traffic capture so we can see what's going on with the > association. > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 19:33 ` Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > >>>>> Hi Marcelo > >>>>> > >>>>> I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > >>>>> the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > >>>>> that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > >>>>> the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think this might be why we still see the issue. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Marcelo, > >>>> > >>>> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? > >>> > >>> Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue > >>> without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. > >>> > >>> I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the > >>> listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. > >> > >> Local connect in another thread I guess. > > > > Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, > > and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue > > SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus > > delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. > > They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command > to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all > commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' > code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. > So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in the same loop. (more below) > > There is one place, > > though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but > > then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. > > I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association > if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, the asoc was already NULL. Dmitry, please give this one a run, as I still cannot reproduce your use case.. ---8<--- commit b63ad8dc45257dd6c536ac0227fcc623efd9328b Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > >>>>> Hi Marcelo > >>>>> > >>>>> I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update > >>>>> the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report > >>>>> that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when > >>>>> the ABORT chunk may be dropped. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think this might be why we still see the issue. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Marcelo, > >>>> > >>>> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? > >>> > >>> Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue > >>> without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. > >>> > >>> I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the > >>> listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. > >> > >> Local connect in another thread I guess. > > > > Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, > > and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue > > SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus > > delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. > > They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command > to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all > commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' > code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. > So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in the same loop. (more below) > > There is one place, > > though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but > > then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. > > I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association > if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, the asoc was already NULL. Dmitry, please give this one a run, as I still cannot reproduce your use case.. ---8<--- commit b63ad8dc45257dd6c536ac0227fcc623efd9328b Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 20:37 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>>>>> Hi Marcelo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update >>>>>>> the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report >>>>>>> that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when >>>>>>> the ABORT chunk may be dropped. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think this might be why we still see the issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Marcelo, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? >>>>> >>>>> Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue >>>>> without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. >>>>> >>>>> I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the >>>>> listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. >>>> >>>> Local connect in another thread I guess. >>> >>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >> >> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command >> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all >> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' >> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. >> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. > > Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there > shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in > the same loop. (more below) > >>> There is one place, >>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but >>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >> >> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association >> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. > > Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it > would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing > so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, > the asoc was already NULL. I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while still having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to be authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and terminating the current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT disposition code. This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT disposition and clear the asoc pointer. -vlad > > Dmitry, please give this one a run, as I still cannot reproduce your use > case.. > > ---8<--- > > commit b63ad8dc45257dd6c536ac0227fcc623efd9328b > Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 > > sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* > * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 20:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:20:47PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>>>>> Hi Marcelo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think you also need to catch the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT and update >>>>>>> the pointer. There are some issues there though as some functions report >>>>>>> that code without actually destroying the association. This happens when >>>>>>> the ABORT chunk may be dropped. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think this might be why we still see the issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Marcelo, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this info enough for you to cook another fix? >>>>> >>>>> Hi, I think so. I was really wondering how you could trigger that issue >>>>> without the timestamp fix and Vlad's comment does shed some light on it. >>>>> >>>>> I'll do more tests later today, but what did you have connecting to the >>>>> listening socket? Somehow you made that accept() call to return.. >>>> >>>> Local connect in another thread I guess. >>> >>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >> >> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command >> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all >> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' >> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. >> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. > > Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there > shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in > the same loop. (more below) > >>> There is one place, >>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but >>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >> >> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association >> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. > > Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it > would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing > so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, > the asoc was already NULL. I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while still having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to be authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and terminating the current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT disposition code. This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT disposition and clear the asoc pointer. -vlad > > Dmitry, please give this one a run, as I still cannot reproduce your use > case.. > > ---8<--- > > commit b63ad8dc45257dd6c536ac0227fcc623efd9328b > Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 > > sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* > * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 20:37 ` Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-07 20:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: > On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >>> >>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command >>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all >>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' >>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. >>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >> >> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >> the same loop. (more below) >> >>>> There is one place, >>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but >>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >>> >>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association >>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. >> >> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >> the asoc was already NULL. > > I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while still > having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to be > authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and terminating the > current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT disposition code. > > This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT disposition and > clear the asoc pointer. Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that if() then. Thanks Vlad. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-07 20:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-07 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vlad Yasevich Cc: Dmitry Vyukov, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: > On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >>> >>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the command >>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked after all >>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the 'status' >>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was processed. >>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >> >> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >> the same loop. (more below) >> >>>> There is one place, >>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), but >>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >>> >>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a non-NULL association >>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is established. >> >> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >> the asoc was already NULL. > > I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while still > having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to be > authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and terminating the > current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT disposition code. > > This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT disposition and > clear the asoc pointer. Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that if() then. Thanks Vlad. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-07 20:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-08 17:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-08 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: >> >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >>>> >>>> >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the >>>> command >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked >>>> after all >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the >>>> 'status' >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was >>>> processed. >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >>> >>> >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >>> the same loop. (more below) >>> >>>>> There is one place, >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), >>>>> but >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a >>>> non-NULL association >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is >>>> established. >>> >>> >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >>> the asoc was already NULL. >> >> >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while >> still >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to >> be >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and >> terminating the >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT >> disposition code. >> >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT >> disposition and >> clear the asoc pointer. > > > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that > if() then. Thanks Vlad. So I am waiting for a new patch, right? Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-08 17:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-08 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: >> >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >>>> >>>> >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the >>>> command >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked >>>> after all >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the >>>> 'status' >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was >>>> processed. >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >>> >>> >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >>> the same loop. (more below) >>> >>>>> There is one place, >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), >>>>> but >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a >>>> non-NULL association >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is >>>> established. >>> >>> >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >>> the asoc was already NULL. >> >> >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while >> still >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to >> be >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and >> terminating the >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT >> disposition code. >> >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT >> disposition and >> clear the asoc pointer. > > > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that > if() then. Thanks Vlad. So I am waiting for a new patch, right? Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-08 17:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-08 17:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-08 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: > >> > >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, > >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue > >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus > >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the > >>>> command > >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked > >>>> after all > >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the > >>>> 'status' > >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was > >>>> processed. > >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. > >>> > >>> > >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there > >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in > >>> the same loop. (more below) > >>> > >>>>> There is one place, > >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), > >>>>> but > >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a > >>>> non-NULL association > >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is > >>>> established. > >>> > >>> > >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it > >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing > >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, > >>> the asoc was already NULL. > >> > >> > >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while > >> still > >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to > >> be > >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and > >> terminating the > >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT > >> disposition code. > >> > >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT > >> disposition and > >> clear the asoc pointer. > > > > > > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that > > if() then. Thanks Vlad. > > > So I am waiting for a new patch, right? > Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I > understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which contains this line: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-08 17:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-08 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: > >> > >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, > >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue > >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus > >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the > >>>> command > >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked > >>>> after all > >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the > >>>> 'status' > >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was > >>>> processed. > >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. > >>> > >>> > >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there > >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in > >>> the same loop. (more below) > >>> > >>>>> There is one place, > >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), > >>>>> but > >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a > >>>> non-NULL association > >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is > >>>> established. > >>> > >>> > >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it > >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing > >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, > >>> the asoc was already NULL. > >> > >> > >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while > >> still > >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to > >> be > >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and > >> terminating the > >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT > >> disposition code. > >> > >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT > >> disposition and > >> clear the asoc pointer. > > > > > > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that > > if() then. Thanks Vlad. > > > So I am waiting for a new patch, right? > Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I > understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which contains this line: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-08 17:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-08 19:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-08 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: >> >> >> >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >> >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >> >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >> >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the >> >>>> command >> >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked >> >>>> after all >> >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the >> >>>> 'status' >> >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was >> >>>> processed. >> >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >> >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >> >>> the same loop. (more below) >> >>> >> >>>>> There is one place, >> >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), >> >>>>> but >> >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a >> >>>> non-NULL association >> >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is >> >>>> established. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >> >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >> >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >> >>> the asoc was already NULL. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while >> >> still >> >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to >> >> be >> >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and >> >> terminating the >> >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT >> >> disposition code. >> >> >> >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT >> >> disposition and >> >> clear the asoc pointer. >> > >> > >> > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that >> > if() then. Thanks Vlad. >> >> >> So I am waiting for a new patch, right? >> Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I >> understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? > > The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > > You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > contains this line: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-08 19:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-08 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: >> >> >> >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >> >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >> >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >> >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the >> >>>> command >> >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked >> >>>> after all >> >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the >> >>>> 'status' >> >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was >> >>>> processed. >> >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >> >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >> >>> the same loop. (more below) >> >>> >> >>>>> There is one place, >> >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), >> >>>>> but >> >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a >> >>>> non-NULL association >> >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is >> >>>> established. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >> >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >> >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >> >>> the asoc was already NULL. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while >> >> still >> >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to >> >> be >> >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and >> >> terminating the >> >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT >> >> disposition code. >> >> >> >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT >> >> disposition and >> >> clear the asoc pointer. >> > >> > >> > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that >> > if() then. Thanks Vlad. >> >> >> So I am waiting for a new patch, right? >> Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I >> understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? > > The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > > You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > contains this line: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-08 19:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-09 14:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-09 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: >>> >> >>> >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>> >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>> >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>> >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the >>> >>>> command >>> >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked >>> >>>> after all >>> >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the >>> >>>> 'status' >>> >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was >>> >>>> processed. >>> >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >>> >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >>> >>> the same loop. (more below) >>> >>> >>> >>>>> There is one place, >>> >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), >>> >>>>> but >>> >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a >>> >>>> non-NULL association >>> >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is >>> >>>> established. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >>> >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >>> >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >>> >>> the asoc was already NULL. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while >>> >> still >>> >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to >>> >> be >>> >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and >>> >> terminating the >>> >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT >>> >> disposition code. >>> >> >>> >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT >>> >> disposition and >>> >> clear the asoc pointer. >>> > >>> > >>> > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that >>> > if() then. Thanks Vlad. >>> >>> >>> So I am waiting for a new patch, right? >>> Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I >>> understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? >> >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >> >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >> contains this line: >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. Use-after-free still happens. I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus the following sctp-related changes: diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c..be23d5c 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 03c8256..4c9282b 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -7199,6 +7199,9 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, newinet->mc_ttl = 1; newinet->mc_index = 0; newinet->mc_list = NULL; + + if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) + net_enable_timestamp(); } The new program is: // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) #include <syscall.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <pthread.h> long r0; void *thr(void *arg) { memcpy((void*)0x20001000, "\x02\x00\x33\xd9\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", 128); long r5 = syscall(SYS_connect, r0, 0x20001000ul, 0x80ul, 0, 0, 0); return 0; } int main() { r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x1ul, 0x84ul, 0, 0, 0); long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); memcpy((void*)0x20000000, "\x0a\x00\x33\xe0\x49\xd0\x2e\x70\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x4c\x37\xff\xc4", 28); long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20000000ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); pthread_t th; pthread_create(&th, 0, thr, 0); *(uint32_t*)0x20002ff8 = 0x6; *(uint32_t*)0x20002ffc = 0x0; long r8 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r0, 0x1ul, 0xdul, 0x20002ff8ul, 0x8ul, 0); *(uint64_t*)0x20003ffd = 0x0; long r10 = syscall(SYS_sendfile, r0, r0, 0x20003ffdul, 0xc0ul, 0, 0); memcpy((void*)0x20004f90, "\x88\x24\x1a\xa0\xa9\x55\x4a\x24\x5b\xe8\x4f\x5d\x46\x39\x42\x26\x62\xc3\xd5\xd1\x1c\x00\xf1\x73\x4c\x11\x8d\x48\xbd\x25\x4f\xd3\xc1\xef\xc7\xbf\x1d\x0c\xe1\xf2\xc6\x64\x9d\xb5\x98\x5e\xc0\x1b\x7e\x83\xee\x06\x79\x10\x3b\xeb\x3c\x89\x9e\x30\xb6\xb5\xbd\xf9\xaa\xc1\xe0\x47\xdf\xed\x94\xda\xc5\xcb\x21\x32\x66\xbd\xc9\xa5\x84\xbc\x32\x8f\xce\x8e\xff\x1f\x76\x63\x67\x2f\x40\xc7\x42\xa3\x60\x17\xd6\x05\x45\xc2\x10\xd1\x53\x5f\x0d\x02\xcd\xf1\x44\x30", 112); memcpy((void*)0x20004f80, "\x0a\x00\x33\xdc\x14\x4d\x5b\xd1\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xdd\x01\xf8\xfd\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", 128); long r13 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20004f90ul, 0x70ul, 0x0ul, 0x20004f80ul, 0x80ul); long r14 = syscall(SYS_listen, r0, 0x3ul, 0, 0, 0, 0); long r15 = syscall(SYS_accept4, r0, 0x20003f80ul, 0x20003ab4ul, 0x80800ul, 0, 0); *(uint64_t*)0x20003000 = 0x2; *(uint64_t*)0x20003008 = 0x2; *(uint64_t*)0x20003010 = 0x1; *(uint64_t*)0x20003018 = 0x7; *(uint64_t*)0x20003020 = 0x7; *(uint64_t*)0x20003028 = 0x5f; *(uint64_t*)0x20003030 = 0x9; *(uint64_t*)0x20003038 = 0x88; long r24 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r0, 0xfffffffffffffff7ul, 0x8ul, 0x20003000ul, 0x40ul, 0); long r25 = syscall(SYS_dup3, r15, r0, 0x80000ul, 0, 0, 0); memcpy((void*)0x20006000, "\xd9\x4f\xbe\x3f\x43\x89\x02\x0d\x1e\x84\x8d\x16\xe8\xdf\xdd\x27\x1f\xfe\xc6\x4a\xfa\x93\x00\xb9\xaf\xd7\x5e\xf1\x1f\x88\xc4\x57\x12\x70\xb4\xc5\xa6\xfc\xb9\x99\xd2\x80\x30\x2a\x53\xda\xd2\x57\x6d\xdc", 50); long r27 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r25, 0x117ul, 0x1ul, 0x20006000ul, 0x32ul, 0); long r28 = syscall(SYS_close, r15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); return 0; } The use-after-free reports: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x530e/0x5d90 at addr ffff880069d4c808 Read of size 4 by task a.out/8211 ============================================================================= BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0xbd/0x21d0 age=9 cpu=3 pid=8211 [< none >] ___slab_alloc+0x648/0x8c0 mm/slub.c:2468 [< none >] __slab_alloc+0x4c/0x90 mm/slub.c:2497 [< inline >] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2560 [< inline >] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2602 [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x23c/0x3f0 mm/slub.c:2619 [< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:458 [< inline >] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:602 [< none >] sctp_association_new+0xbd/0x21d0 net/sctp/associola.c:302 [< none >] __sctp_connect+0x5e8/0xd80 net/sctp/socket.c:1161 [< none >] sctp_connect+0xdc/0x130 net/sctp/socket.c:3874 [< none >] inet_dgram_connect+0x136/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:528 [< none >] SYSC_connect+0x263/0x380 net/socket.c:1542 [< none >] SyS_connect+0x24/0x30 net/socket.c:1523 [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185 INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x179/0x2c0 age=11 cpu=3 pid=8211 [< none >] __slab_free+0x21e/0x3e0 mm/slub.c:2678 [< inline >] slab_free mm/slub.c:2833 [< none >] kfree+0x26f/0x3e0 mm/slub.c:3662 [< inline >] sctp_association_destroy net/sctp/associola.c:424 [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x179/0x2c0 net/sctp/associola.c:860 [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x416/0x5d0 net/sctp/associola.c:402 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_delete_tcb net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:867 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_interpreter net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1287 [< inline >] sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1153 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0x1364/0x5d90 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1125 [< none >] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [< none >] sctp_close+0x2ad/0x9b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [< none >] inet_release+0x111/0x270 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [< none >] inet6_release+0x55/0x90 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 [< none >] sock_release+0x96/0x260 net/socket.c:571 [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [< none >] __fput+0x244/0x860 fs/file_table.c:208 [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [< none >] task_work_run+0x130/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [< none >] do_exit+0x885/0x3050 kernel/exit.c:750 [< none >] do_group_exit+0xec/0x390 kernel/exit.c:880 INFO: Slab 0xffffea0001a75200 objects=7 used=2 fp=0xffff880069d4c760 flags=0x5fffc0000004080 INFO: Object 0xffff880069d4c760 @offset=18272 fp=0xffff880069d4b588 CPU: 3 PID: 8211 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc4+ #158 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 0000000000000003 ffff880032a8f3e0 ffffffff82e0f6d8 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff87aa2c7d ffffffff82e0f626 ffff880031901740 ffffffff87ac3e19 ffff88003e806a00 0000000000000008 ffff880069d4c760 ffff880032a8f3e0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff818450f4>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x54/0x70 mm/kasan/report.c:294 [< inline >] sctp_assoc2id include/net/sctp/sctp.h:323 [<ffffffff864927fe>] sctp_do_sm+0x530e/0x5d90 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1128 [<ffffffff864f9899>] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [<ffffffff864e55ad>] sctp_close+0x2ad/0x9b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [<ffffffff85bfe691>] inet_release+0x111/0x270 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [<ffffffff85d60ce5>] inet6_release+0x55/0x90 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 [<ffffffff856b3b96>] sock_release+0x96/0x260 net/socket.c:571 [<ffffffff856b3d76>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [<ffffffff8189d304>] __fput+0x244/0x860 fs/file_table.c:208 [<ffffffff8189d9b5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [<ffffffff813e2dc0>] task_work_run+0x130/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [<ffffffff8137d1e5>] do_exit+0x885/0x3050 kernel/exit.c:750 [<ffffffff8137fb0c>] do_group_exit+0xec/0x390 kernel/exit.c:880 [<ffffffff813aa957>] get_signal+0x677/0x1bf0 kernel/signal.c:2307 [<ffffffff8118645e>] do_signal+0x7e/0x20a0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:712 [<ffffffff81003a1e>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xfe/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 [<ffffffff8100733b>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x16b/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 [<ffffffff86a92662>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 ================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-09 14:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-09 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Em 07-12-2015 18:37, Vlad Yasevich escreveu: >>> >> >>> >> On 12/07/2015 02:50 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 12/07/2015 01:52 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Vlad, I reviewed the places on which it returns SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT, >>> >>>>> and if I didn't miss something in there all of them either issue >>> >>>>> SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_FAILED or SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED before returning it, thus >>> >>>>> delaying DELETE_TCB and with that the asoc free. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> They delay it from the perspective of the command interpreter since the >>> >>>> command >>> >>>> to delete the TCB happens a little later, but status code is checked >>> >>>> after all >>> >>>> commands are processed and command processing doesn't change it. So the >>> >>>> 'status' >>> >>>> code would still be SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT after DELETE_TCB command was >>> >>>> processed. >>> >>>> So, I think we may still have an use-after-free issue here. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gotcha! That's pretty much it then. From that point of view now, there >>> >>> shouldn't be a case that it returns _ABORT without freeing the asoc in >>> >>> the same loop. (more below) >>> >>> >>> >>>>> There is one place, >>> >>>>> though, that may not do it that way, it's sctp_sf_abort_violation(), >>> >>>>> but >>> >>>>> then that code only runs if asoc is already NULL by then. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I don't believe so. The violation state function can run with a >>> >>>> non-NULL association >>> >>>> if we are encountering protocol violations after the association is >>> >>>> established. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Yup, that's correct. I just tried to reference one case on which it >>> >>> would return _ABORT without issuing any of those _FAILEDs before doing >>> >>> so (meaning the association could still be valid) but that in that case, >>> >>> the asoc was already NULL. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I think it is possible to hit the 'discard:' tag in that function while >>> >> still >>> >> having a valid association. That happens when ABORT chunk is required to >>> >> be >>> >> authenticated. This that case, instead of generating an ABORT and >>> >> terminating the >>> >> current association, we just drop the packet, but still report an _ABORT >>> >> disposition code. >>> >> >>> >> This probably need to change if we are going to catch the _ABORT >>> >> disposition and >>> >> clear the asoc pointer. >>> > >>> > >>> > Oups. Nice one. I'll switch it to SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD if it hits that >>> > if() then. Thanks Vlad. >>> >>> >>> So I am waiting for a new patch, right? >>> Can you please combine all changes into a single patch (as far as I >>> understand the previous one must be applied on top of the first one)? >> >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >> >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >> contains this line: >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. Use-after-free still happens. I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus the following sctp-related changes: diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c..be23d5c 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 03c8256..4c9282b 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -7199,6 +7199,9 @@ void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk, newinet->mc_ttl = 1; newinet->mc_index = 0; newinet->mc_list = NULL; + + if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP) + net_enable_timestamp(); } The new program is: // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller) #include <syscall.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <pthread.h> long r0; void *thr(void *arg) { memcpy((void*)0x20001000, "\x02\x00\x33\xd9\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", 128); long r5 = syscall(SYS_connect, r0, 0x20001000ul, 0x80ul, 0, 0, 0); return 0; } int main() { r0 = syscall(SYS_socket, 0xaul, 0x1ul, 0x84ul, 0, 0, 0); long r1 = syscall(SYS_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x10000ul, 0x3ul, 0x32ul, 0xfffffffffffffffful, 0x0ul); memcpy((void*)0x20000000, "\x0a\x00\x33\xe0\x49\xd0\x2e\x70\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x4c\x37\xff\xc4", 28); long r3 = syscall(SYS_bind, r0, 0x20000000ul, 0x1cul, 0, 0, 0); pthread_t th; pthread_create(&th, 0, thr, 0); *(uint32_t*)0x20002ff8 = 0x6; *(uint32_t*)0x20002ffc = 0x0; long r8 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r0, 0x1ul, 0xdul, 0x20002ff8ul, 0x8ul, 0); *(uint64_t*)0x20003ffd = 0x0; long r10 = syscall(SYS_sendfile, r0, r0, 0x20003ffdul, 0xc0ul, 0, 0); memcpy((void*)0x20004f90, "\x88\x24\x1a\xa0\xa9\x55\x4a\x24\x5b\xe8\x4f\x5d\x46\x39\x42\x26\x62\xc3\xd5\xd1\x1c\x00\xf1\x73\x4c\x11\x8d\x48\xbd\x25\x4f\xd3\xc1\xef\xc7\xbf\x1d\x0c\xe1\xf2\xc6\x64\x9d\xb5\x98\x5e\xc0\x1b\x7e\x83\xee\x06\x79\x10\x3b\xeb\x3c\x89\x9e\x30\xb6\xb5\xbd\xf9\xaa\xc1\xe0\x47\xdf\xed\x94\xda\xc5\xcb\x21\x32\x66\xbd\xc9\xa5\x84\xbc\x32\x8f\xce\x8e\xff\x1f\x76\x63\x67\x2f\x40\xc7\x42\xa3\x60\x17\xd6\x05\x45\xc2\x10\xd1\x53\x5f\x0d\x02\xcd\xf1\x44\x30", 112); memcpy((void*)0x20004f80, "\x0a\x00\x33\xdc\x14\x4d\x5b\xd1\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\xdd\x01\xf8\xfd\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00", 128); long r13 = syscall(SYS_sendto, r0, 0x20004f90ul, 0x70ul, 0x0ul, 0x20004f80ul, 0x80ul); long r14 = syscall(SYS_listen, r0, 0x3ul, 0, 0, 0, 0); long r15 = syscall(SYS_accept4, r0, 0x20003f80ul, 0x20003ab4ul, 0x80800ul, 0, 0); *(uint64_t*)0x20003000 = 0x2; *(uint64_t*)0x20003008 = 0x2; *(uint64_t*)0x20003010 = 0x1; *(uint64_t*)0x20003018 = 0x7; *(uint64_t*)0x20003020 = 0x7; *(uint64_t*)0x20003028 = 0x5f; *(uint64_t*)0x20003030 = 0x9; *(uint64_t*)0x20003038 = 0x88; long r24 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r0, 0xfffffffffffffff7ul, 0x8ul, 0x20003000ul, 0x40ul, 0); long r25 = syscall(SYS_dup3, r15, r0, 0x80000ul, 0, 0, 0); memcpy((void*)0x20006000, "\xd9\x4f\xbe\x3f\x43\x89\x02\x0d\x1e\x84\x8d\x16\xe8\xdf\xdd\x27\x1f\xfe\xc6\x4a\xfa\x93\x00\xb9\xaf\xd7\x5e\xf1\x1f\x88\xc4\x57\x12\x70\xb4\xc5\xa6\xfc\xb9\x99\xd2\x80\x30\x2a\x53\xda\xd2\x57\x6d\xdc", 50); long r27 = syscall(SYS_setsockopt, r25, 0x117ul, 0x1ul, 0x20006000ul, 0x32ul, 0); long r28 = syscall(SYS_close, r15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); return 0; } The use-after-free reports: ================================= BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x530e/0x5d90 at addr ffff880069d4c808 Read of size 4 by task a.out/8211 ======================================BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G B ): kasan: bad access detected ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0xbd/0x21d0 age=9 cpu=3 pid‚11 [< none >] ___slab_alloc+0x648/0x8c0 mm/slub.c:2468 [< none >] __slab_alloc+0x4c/0x90 mm/slub.c:2497 [< inline >] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2560 [< inline >] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2602 [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x23c/0x3f0 mm/slub.c:2619 [< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:458 [< inline >] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:602 [< none >] sctp_association_new+0xbd/0x21d0 net/sctp/associola.c:302 [< none >] __sctp_connect+0x5e8/0xd80 net/sctp/socket.c:1161 [< none >] sctp_connect+0xdc/0x130 net/sctp/socket.c:3874 [< none >] inet_dgram_connect+0x136/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:528 [< none >] SYSC_connect+0x263/0x380 net/socket.c:1542 [< none >] SyS_connect+0x24/0x30 net/socket.c:1523 [< none >] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185 INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x179/0x2c0 age\x11 cpu=3 pid‚11 [< none >] __slab_free+0x21e/0x3e0 mm/slub.c:2678 [< inline >] slab_free mm/slub.c:2833 [< none >] kfree+0x26f/0x3e0 mm/slub.c:3662 [< inline >] sctp_association_destroy net/sctp/associola.c:424 [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x179/0x2c0 net/sctp/associola.c:860 [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x416/0x5d0 net/sctp/associola.c:402 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_delete_tcb net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:867 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_interpreter net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1287 [< inline >] sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1153 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0x1364/0x5d90 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1125 [< none >] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [< none >] sctp_close+0x2ad/0x9b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [< none >] inet_release+0x111/0x270 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [< none >] inet6_release+0x55/0x90 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 [< none >] sock_release+0x96/0x260 net/socket.c:571 [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [< none >] __fput+0x244/0x860 fs/file_table.c:208 [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [< none >] task_work_run+0x130/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [< none >] do_exit+0x885/0x3050 kernel/exit.c:750 [< none >] do_group_exit+0xec/0x390 kernel/exit.c:880 INFO: Slab 0xffffea0001a75200 objects=7 used=2 fp=0xffff880069d4c760 flags=0x5fffc0000004080 INFO: Object 0xffff880069d4c760 @offset\x18272 fp=0xffff880069d4b588 CPU: 3 PID: 8211 Comm: a.out Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc4+ #158 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 0000000000000003 ffff880032a8f3e0 ffffffff82e0f6d8 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff87aa2c7d ffffffff82e0f626 ffff880031901740 ffffffff87ac3e19 ffff88003e806a00 0000000000000008 ffff880069d4c760 ffff880032a8f3e0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff818450f4>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x54/0x70 mm/kasan/report.c:294 [< inline >] sctp_assoc2id include/net/sctp/sctp.h:323 [<ffffffff864927fe>] sctp_do_sm+0x530e/0x5d90 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1128 [<ffffffff864f9899>] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [<ffffffff864e55ad>] sctp_close+0x2ad/0x9b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [<ffffffff85bfe691>] inet_release+0x111/0x270 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [<ffffffff85d60ce5>] inet6_release+0x55/0x90 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:406 [<ffffffff856b3b96>] sock_release+0x96/0x260 net/socket.c:571 [<ffffffff856b3d76>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [<ffffffff8189d304>] __fput+0x244/0x860 fs/file_table.c:208 [<ffffffff8189d9b5>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [<ffffffff813e2dc0>] task_work_run+0x130/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [<ffffffff8137d1e5>] do_exit+0x885/0x3050 kernel/exit.c:750 [<ffffffff8137fb0c>] do_group_exit+0xec/0x390 kernel/exit.c:880 [<ffffffff813aa957>] get_signal+0x677/0x1bf0 kernel/signal.c:2307 [<ffffffff8118645e>] do_signal+0x7e/0x20a0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:712 [<ffffffff81003a1e>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xfe/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 [<ffffffff8100733b>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x16b/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 [<ffffffff86a92662>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 ================================= ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-09 14:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-09 15:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-09 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: ... > >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > >> > >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > >> contains this line: > >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > > > > > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. > > > > > Use-after-free still happens. > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus > the following sctp-related changes: Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-09 15:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-09 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: ... > >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > >> > >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > >> contains this line: > >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > > > > > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. > > > > > Use-after-free still happens. > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus > the following sctp-related changes: Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-09 15:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-09 16:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-09 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > > > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > > >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > > >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > > >> > > >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > > >> contains this line: > > >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > > > > > > > > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. > > > > > > > > > > Use-after-free still happens. > > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus > > the following sctp-related changes: > > Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because I could only reproduce it under strace at first. Please give this other patch a try. A state command (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which fooled the patch. ---8<--- commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) { struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; - sctp_disposition_t retval; /* Stop T1-init timer */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); - return retval; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; } /* ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-09 16:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-09 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > > > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > > >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > > >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > > >> > > >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > > >> contains this line: > > >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > > > > > > > > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. > > > > > > > > > > Use-after-free still happens. > > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus > > the following sctp-related changes: > > Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because I could only reproduce it under strace at first. Please give this other patch a try. A state command (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which fooled the patch. ---8<--- commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) { struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; - sctp_disposition_t retval; /* Stop T1-init timer */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); - return retval; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; } /* ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-09 16:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-11 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> > > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >> > >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >> > >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >> > >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >> > >> >> > >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >> > >> contains this line: >> > >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> > > >> > > >> > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Use-after-free still happens. >> > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >> > the following sctp-related changes: >> >> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. > > Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. > It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the > connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because > I could only reproduce it under strace at first. > > Please give this other patch a try. A state command > (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which > leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, > which fooled the patch. > > ---8<--- > commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 > Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 > > sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning > SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by > returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* > * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) > { > struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > - sctp_disposition_t retval; > > /* Stop T1-init timer */ > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, > SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); > - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > > @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, > SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); > > - return retval; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > } > > /* Still happens... I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your latest patch applied. Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x4bca/0x4db0 at addr ffff880067c600a8 Read of size 4 by task syzkaller_execu/10266 ============================================================================= BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G W ): kasan: bad access detected ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1da0 age=53 cpu=2 pid=10265 [< none >] ___slab_alloc+0x489/0x4e0 mm/slub.c:2468 [< none >] __slab_alloc+0x4c/0x90 mm/slub.c:2497 [< inline >] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2560 [< inline >] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2602 [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x264/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:2619 [< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:458 [< inline >] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:602 [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1da0 net/sctp/associola.c:302 [< none >] sctp_unpack_cookie+0x8b0/0x11c0 net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1812 [< none >] sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce+0x3ca/0x1410 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:702 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0x20d/0x4db0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1122 [< none >] sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+0x38d/0x830 net/sctp/endpointola.c:486 [< none >] sctp_inq_push+0x12c/0x190 net/sctp/inqueue.c:95 [< none >] sctp_rcv+0x1d3b/0x2840 net/sctp/input.c:270 [< none >] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2b0/0xa50 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:216 [< inline >] NF_HOOK_THRESH include/linux/netfilter.h:226 [< inline >] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:249 [< none >] ip_local_deliver+0x1c4/0x2f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:257 [< inline >] dst_input include/net/dst.h:465 [< none >] ip_rcv_finish+0x5ea/0x1730 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:365 [< inline >] NF_HOOK_THRESH include/linux/netfilter.h:226 [< inline >] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:249 [< none >] ip_rcv+0x963/0x1080 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:455 [< none >] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x1636/0x2f90 net/core/dev.c:3943 [< none >] __netif_receive_skb+0x2a/0x160 net/core/dev.c:3978 INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=0 cpu=2 pid=10266 [< none >] __slab_free+0x1fc/0x320 mm/slub.c:2678 [< inline >] slab_free mm/slub.c:2833 [< none >] kfree+0x26a/0x290 mm/slub.c:3662 [< inline >] sctp_association_destroy net/sctp/associola.c:424 [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 net/sctp/associola.c:860 [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x3dc/0x520 net/sctp/associola.c:402 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_delete_tcb net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:867 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_interpreter net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1287 [< inline >] sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1153 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0x175c/0x4db0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1125 [< none >] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [< none >] sctp_close+0x274/0x7b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [< none >] __fput+0x233/0x780 fs/file_table.c:208 [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [< none >] task_work_run+0x16b/0x200 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [< none >] do_exit+0x8bb/0x2b20 kernel/exit.c:750 [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 [< none >] get_signal+0x5e4/0x1500 kernel/signal.c:2307 INFO: Slab 0xffffea00019f1800 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880067c60000 flags=0x5fffc0000004080 INFO: Object 0xffff880067c60000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880067c623b0 CPU: 2 PID: 10266 Comm: syzkaller_execu Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc4+ #160 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 00000000ffffffff ffff880038777458 ffffffff82899b0d ffff88003e806a00 ffff880067c60000 ffff880067c60000 ffff880038777488 ffffffff816c5564 ffff88003e806a00 ffffea00019f1800 ffff880067c60000 ffff880067c60000 Call Trace: [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [<ffffffff82899b0d>] dump_stack+0x6f/0xa2 lib/dump_stack.c:50 [<ffffffff816c5564>] print_trailer+0xf4/0x150 mm/slub.c:659 [<ffffffff816cbd1f>] object_err+0x2f/0x40 mm/slub.c:689 [< inline >] print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:138 [<ffffffff816ce6dd>] kasan_report_error+0x25d/0x560 mm/kasan/report.c:251 [< inline >] kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:274 [<ffffffff816cea9e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:294 [< inline >] sctp_assoc2id include/net/sctp/sctp.h:323 [<ffffffff8566f14a>] sctp_do_sm+0x4bca/0x4db0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1128 [<ffffffff856c6289>] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [<ffffffff856b1d94>] sctp_close+0x274/0x7b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [<ffffffff84f29dcd>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [<ffffffff84ae520d>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 [<ffffffff84ae5366>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [<ffffffff81715f73>] __fput+0x233/0x780 fs/file_table.c:208 [<ffffffff81716545>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [<ffffffff8134679b>] task_work_run+0x16b/0x200 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [<ffffffff812f4d3b>] do_exit+0x8bb/0x2b20 kernel/exit.c:750 [<ffffffff812f7118>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 [<ffffffff813196c4>] get_signal+0x5e4/0x1500 kernel/signal.c:2307 [<ffffffff811507a3>] do_signal+0x83/0x1c90 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:712 [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 [<ffffffff8100631f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 [<ffffffff85b676e2>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-11 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-11 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> > > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >> > >> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >> > >> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >> > >> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >> > >> >> > >> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >> > >> contains this line: >> > >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> > > >> > > >> > > You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Use-after-free still happens. >> > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >> > the following sctp-related changes: >> >> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. > > Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. > It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the > connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because > I could only reproduce it under strace at first. > > Please give this other patch a try. A state command > (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which > leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, > which fooled the patch. > > ---8<--- > commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 > Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 > > sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning > SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by > returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* > * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) > { > struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > - sctp_disposition_t retval; > > /* Stop T1-init timer */ > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, > SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); > - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > > @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, > SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); > > - return retval; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > } > > /* Still happens... I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your latest patch applied. Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x4bca/0x4db0 at addr ffff880067c600a8 Read of size 4 by task syzkaller_execu/10266 ======================================BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G W ): kasan: bad access detected ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint INFO: Allocated in sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1da0 ageS cpu=2 pid\x10265 [< none >] ___slab_alloc+0x489/0x4e0 mm/slub.c:2468 [< none >] __slab_alloc+0x4c/0x90 mm/slub.c:2497 [< inline >] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2560 [< inline >] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2602 [< none >] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x264/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:2619 [< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:458 [< inline >] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:602 [< none >] sctp_association_new+0x6f/0x1da0 net/sctp/associola.c:302 [< none >] sctp_unpack_cookie+0x8b0/0x11c0 net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1812 [< none >] sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce+0x3ca/0x1410 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:702 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0x20d/0x4db0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1122 [< none >] sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+0x38d/0x830 net/sctp/endpointola.c:486 [< none >] sctp_inq_push+0x12c/0x190 net/sctp/inqueue.c:95 [< none >] sctp_rcv+0x1d3b/0x2840 net/sctp/input.c:270 [< none >] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2b0/0xa50 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:216 [< inline >] NF_HOOK_THRESH include/linux/netfilter.h:226 [< inline >] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:249 [< none >] ip_local_deliver+0x1c4/0x2f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:257 [< inline >] dst_input include/net/dst.h:465 [< none >] ip_rcv_finish+0x5ea/0x1730 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:365 [< inline >] NF_HOOK_THRESH include/linux/netfilter.h:226 [< inline >] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:249 [< none >] ip_rcv+0x963/0x1080 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:455 [< none >] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x1636/0x2f90 net/core/dev.c:3943 [< none >] __netif_receive_skb+0x2a/0x160 net/core/dev.c:3978 INFO: Freed in sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 age=0 cpu=2 pid\x10266 [< none >] __slab_free+0x1fc/0x320 mm/slub.c:2678 [< inline >] slab_free mm/slub.c:2833 [< none >] kfree+0x26a/0x290 mm/slub.c:3662 [< inline >] sctp_association_destroy net/sctp/associola.c:424 [< none >] sctp_association_put+0x150/0x250 net/sctp/associola.c:860 [< none >] sctp_association_free+0x3dc/0x520 net/sctp/associola.c:402 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_delete_tcb net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:867 [< inline >] sctp_cmd_interpreter net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1287 [< inline >] sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1153 [< none >] sctp_do_sm+0x175c/0x4db0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1125 [< none >] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [< none >] sctp_close+0x274/0x7b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [< none >] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [< none >] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 [< none >] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [< none >] __fput+0x233/0x780 fs/file_table.c:208 [< none >] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [< none >] task_work_run+0x16b/0x200 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [< none >] do_exit+0x8bb/0x2b20 kernel/exit.c:750 [< none >] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 [< none >] get_signal+0x5e4/0x1500 kernel/signal.c:2307 INFO: Slab 0xffffea00019f1800 objects=7 used=1 fp=0xffff880067c60000 flags=0x5fffc0000004080 INFO: Object 0xffff880067c60000 @offset=0 fp=0xffff880067c623b0 CPU: 2 PID: 10266 Comm: syzkaller_execu Tainted: G B W 4.4.0-rc4+ #160 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 00000000ffffffff ffff880038777458 ffffffff82899b0d ffff88003e806a00 ffff880067c60000 ffff880067c60000 ffff880038777488 ffffffff816c5564 ffff88003e806a00 ffffea00019f1800 ffff880067c60000 ffff880067c60000 Call Trace: [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [<ffffffff82899b0d>] dump_stack+0x6f/0xa2 lib/dump_stack.c:50 [<ffffffff816c5564>] print_trailer+0xf4/0x150 mm/slub.c:659 [<ffffffff816cbd1f>] object_err+0x2f/0x40 mm/slub.c:689 [< inline >] print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:138 [<ffffffff816ce6dd>] kasan_report_error+0x25d/0x560 mm/kasan/report.c:251 [< inline >] kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:274 [<ffffffff816cea9e>] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x3e/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:294 [< inline >] sctp_assoc2id include/net/sctp/sctp.h:323 [<ffffffff8566f14a>] sctp_do_sm+0x4bca/0x4db0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1128 [<ffffffff856c6289>] sctp_primitive_ABORT+0xa9/0xd0 net/sctp/primitive.c:119 [<ffffffff856b1d94>] sctp_close+0x274/0x7b0 net/sctp/socket.c:1517 [<ffffffff84f29dcd>] inet_release+0xed/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:413 [<ffffffff84ae520d>] sock_release+0x8d/0x1d0 net/socket.c:571 [<ffffffff84ae5366>] sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1022 [<ffffffff81715f73>] __fput+0x233/0x780 fs/file_table.c:208 [<ffffffff81716545>] ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:244 [<ffffffff8134679b>] task_work_run+0x16b/0x200 kernel/task_work.c:115 [< inline >] exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:21 [<ffffffff812f4d3b>] do_exit+0x8bb/0x2b20 kernel/exit.c:750 [<ffffffff812f7118>] do_group_exit+0x108/0x320 kernel/exit.c:880 [<ffffffff813196c4>] get_signal+0x5e4/0x1500 kernel/signal.c:2307 [<ffffffff811507a3>] do_signal+0x83/0x1c90 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:712 [<ffffffff81003901>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf1/0x1a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:247 [< inline >] prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:282 [<ffffffff8100631f>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x19f/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:344 [<ffffffff85b676e2>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-11 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-11 13:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >>>>>> contains this line: >>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Use-after-free still happens. >>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >>>> the following sctp-related changes: >>> >>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >> >> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >> I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >> >> Please give this other patch a try. A state command >> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >> which fooled the patch. >> >> ---8<--- >> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >> >> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >> >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >> >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >> pointer when the TCB is freed. >> >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >> >> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >> >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >> >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> >> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> sctp_state_t state, >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >> void *event_arg, >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> debug_post_sfn(); >> >> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >> &commands, gfp); >> debug_post_sfx(); >> >> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> sctp_state_t state, >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >> void *event_arg, >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >> */ >> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >> - ep, asoc, >> + ep, *asoc, >> event_arg, status, >> commands, gfp))) >> goto bail; >> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> break; >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> /* This should now be a command. */ >> + *asoc = NULL; >> break; >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> /* >> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >> { >> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >> - sctp_disposition_t retval; >> >> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >> >> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >> >> - return retval; >> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >> } >> >> /* > > > Still happens... > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your > latest patch applied. > Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I > can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return value I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. Keep you posted.. thanks. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-11 13:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >>>>>> contains this line: >>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Use-after-free still happens. >>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >>>> the following sctp-related changes: >>> >>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >> >> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >> I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >> >> Please give this other patch a try. A state command >> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >> which fooled the patch. >> >> ---8<--- >> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >> >> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >> >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >> >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >> pointer when the TCB is freed. >> >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >> >> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >> >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >> >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> >> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> sctp_state_t state, >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >> void *event_arg, >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> debug_post_sfn(); >> >> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >> &commands, gfp); >> debug_post_sfx(); >> >> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> sctp_state_t state, >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >> void *event_arg, >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >> */ >> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >> - ep, asoc, >> + ep, *asoc, >> event_arg, status, >> commands, gfp))) >> goto bail; >> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> break; >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> /* This should now be a command. */ >> + *asoc = NULL; >> break; >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> /* >> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >> { >> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >> - sctp_disposition_t retval; >> >> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >> >> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >> >> - return retval; >> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >> } >> >> /* > > > Still happens... > I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your > latest patch applied. > Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I > can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return value I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. Keep you posted.. thanks. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-11 13:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 14:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: > >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > ><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > >>>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > >>>>><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>... > >>>>>>The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > >>>>>>not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > >>>>>>to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > >>>>>>contains this line: > >>>>>>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Use-after-free still happens. > >>>>I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus > >>>>the following sctp-related changes: > >>> > >>>Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. > >> > >>Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. > >>It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the > >>connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because > >>I could only reproduce it under strace at first. > >> > >>Please give this other patch a try. A state command > >>(sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which > >>leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, > >>which fooled the patch. > >> > >>---8<--- > >>commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 > >>Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > >>Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 > >> > >> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement > >> > >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > >> > >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > >> pointer when the TCB is freed. > >> > >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > >> > >> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning > >> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by > >> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > >> > >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > >> > >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > >> > >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > >>index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 > >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > >>@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> sctp_state_t state, > >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, > >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, > >> void *event_arg, > >> sctp_disposition_t status, > >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > >>@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> debug_post_sfn(); > >> > >> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > >>- ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > >>+ ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > >> &commands, gfp); > >> debug_post_sfx(); > >> > >>@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> sctp_state_t state, > >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, > >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, > >> void *event_arg, > >> sctp_disposition_t status, > >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > >>@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > >> */ > >> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > >>- ep, asoc, > >>+ ep, *asoc, > >> event_arg, status, > >> commands, gfp))) > >> goto bail; > >>@@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> break; > >> > >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > >>+ case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > >> /* This should now be a command. */ > >>+ *asoc = NULL; > >> break; > >> > >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > >>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > >> /* > >> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > >> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > >>index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 > >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > >>@@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) > >> { > >> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > >>- sctp_disposition_t retval; > >> > >> /* Stop T1-init timer */ > >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, > >> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); > >>- retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > >> > >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > >> > >>@@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, > >> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); > >> > >>- return retval; > >>+ return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > >> } > >> > >> /* > > > > > >Still happens... > >I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your > >latest patch applied. > >Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I > >can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. > > I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if > this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have > identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: > - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB > - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT > - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return > value > > I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the > same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those > combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. > > Keep you posted.. thanks. Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. Oh my.. :) Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-11 14:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: > >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > ><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > >>>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > >>>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > >>>>><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>... > >>>>>>The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just > >>>>>>not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want > >>>>>>to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which > >>>>>>contains this line: > >>>>>>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Use-after-free still happens. > >>>>I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus > >>>>the following sctp-related changes: > >>> > >>>Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. > >> > >>Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. > >>It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the > >>connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because > >>I could only reproduce it under strace at first. > >> > >>Please give this other patch a try. A state command > >>(sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which > >>leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, > >>which fooled the patch. > >> > >>---8<--- > >>commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 > >>Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > >>Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 > >> > >> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement > >> > >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > >> > >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > >> pointer when the TCB is freed. > >> > >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > >> > >> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning > >> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by > >> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > >> > >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > >> > >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > >> > >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > >>index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 > >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > >>@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> sctp_state_t state, > >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, > >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, > >> void *event_arg, > >> sctp_disposition_t status, > >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > >>@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> debug_post_sfn(); > >> > >> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > >>- ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > >>+ ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > >> &commands, gfp); > >> debug_post_sfx(); > >> > >>@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> sctp_state_t state, > >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, > >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, > >> void *event_arg, > >> sctp_disposition_t status, > >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > >>@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > >> */ > >> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > >>- ep, asoc, > >>+ ep, *asoc, > >> event_arg, status, > >> commands, gfp))) > >> goto bail; > >>@@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > >> break; > >> > >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > >>+ case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > >> /* This should now be a command. */ > >>+ *asoc = NULL; > >> break; > >> > >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > >>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > >> /* > >> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > >> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > >>index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 > >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > >>@@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) > >> { > >> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > >>- sctp_disposition_t retval; > >> > >> /* Stop T1-init timer */ > >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, > >> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); > >>- retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > >> > >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > >> > >>@@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, > >> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); > >> > >>- return retval; > >>+ return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > >> } > >> > >> /* > > > > > >Still happens... > >I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your > >latest patch applied. > >Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I > >can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. > > I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if > this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have > identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: > - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB > - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT > - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return > value > > I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the > same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those > combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. > > Keep you posted.. thanks. Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. Oh my.. :) Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-11 14:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-11 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: >> >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> ><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> >>>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> >>>>><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>... >> >>>>>>The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >> >>>>>>not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >> >>>>>>to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >> >>>>>>contains this line: >> >>>>>>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>Use-after-free still happens. >> >>>>I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >> >>>>the following sctp-related changes: >> >>> >> >>>Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >> >> >> >>Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >> >>It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >> >>connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >> >>I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >> >> >> >>Please give this other patch a try. A state command >> >>(sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >> >>leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >> >>which fooled the patch. >> >> >> >>---8<--- >> >>commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >> >>Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >> >>Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >> >> >> >> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >> >> >> >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >> >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >> >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >> >> >> >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >> >> pointer when the TCB is freed. >> >> >> >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >> >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >> >> >> >> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >> >> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >> >> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >> >> >> >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >> >> >> >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> >> >> >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> >>index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >> >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> >>@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >> >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> sctp_state_t state, >> >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, >> >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, >> >> void *event_arg, >> >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> >>@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> debug_post_sfn(); >> >> >> >> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >> >>- ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >> >>+ ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >> >> &commands, gfp); >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> >> >> >>@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> sctp_state_t state, >> >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, >> >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, >> >> void *event_arg, >> >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> >>@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >> >> */ >> >> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >> >>- ep, asoc, >> >>+ ep, *asoc, >> >> event_arg, status, >> >> commands, gfp))) >> >> goto bail; >> >>@@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> break; >> >> >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >> >>+ case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> >> /* This should now be a command. */ >> >>+ *asoc = NULL; >> >> break; >> >> >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >> >>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> >> /* >> >> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >> >> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >> >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> >>index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >> >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> >>@@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >> >> { >> >> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >> >>- sctp_disposition_t retval; >> >> >> >> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >> >> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >> >>- retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >> >> >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >> >> >> >>@@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >> >> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >> >> >> >>- return retval; >> >>+ return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >> >> } >> >> >> >> /* >> > >> > >> >Still happens... >> >I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your >> >latest patch applied. >> >Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I >> >can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. >> >> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if >> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have It would be very nice, but it is not always trivial. Fuzzer pretty much tried to trigger everything that is triggerable from user-space. Sometimes what it does can make no sense. But it is still super-important for contexts like Android, where programs can be as malicious as you can imagine and the system heavily relies on kernel for protection. >> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: >> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB >> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT >> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return >> value >> >> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the >> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those >> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. >> >> Keep you posted.. thanks. > > Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last > patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. > > Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case > we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. I see that sctp_cmd_interpreter does: sctp_cmd_delete_tcb(commands, asoc); asoc = NULL; Won't it be simpler to pass sctp_association ** to this function and let it clear it whenever it decides to free the objects, rather than try to duplicate its logic on higher level. Just a blind thought. > Oh my.. :) > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-11 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-11 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: >> >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> ><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >> >>>>>On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >> >>>>><marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>... >> >>>>>>The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >> >>>>>>not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >> >>>>>>to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >> >>>>>>contains this line: >> >>>>>>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>Use-after-free still happens. >> >>>>I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >> >>>>the following sctp-related changes: >> >>> >> >>>Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >> >> >> >>Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >> >>It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >> >>connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >> >>I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >> >> >> >>Please give this other patch a try. A state command >> >>(sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >> >>leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >> >>which fooled the patch. >> >> >> >>---8<--- >> >>commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >> >>Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >> >>Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >> >> >> >> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >> >> >> >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >> >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >> >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >> >> >> >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >> >> pointer when the TCB is freed. >> >> >> >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >> >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >> >> >> >> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >> >> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >> >> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >> >> >> >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >> >> >> >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> >> >> >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> >>index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >> >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >> >>@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >> >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> sctp_state_t state, >> >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, >> >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, >> >> void *event_arg, >> >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> >>@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> debug_post_sfn(); >> >> >> >> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >> >>- ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >> >>+ ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >> >> &commands, gfp); >> >> debug_post_sfx(); >> >> >> >>@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> sctp_state_t state, >> >> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >> >>- struct sctp_association *asoc, >> >>+ struct sctp_association **asoc, >> >> void *event_arg, >> >> sctp_disposition_t status, >> >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >> >>@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >> >> */ >> >> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >> >>- ep, asoc, >> >>+ ep, *asoc, >> >> event_arg, status, >> >> commands, gfp))) >> >> goto bail; >> >>@@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >> >> break; >> >> >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >> >>+ case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> >> /* This should now be a command. */ >> >>+ *asoc = NULL; >> >> break; >> >> >> >> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >> >>- case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >> >> /* >> >> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >> >> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >> >>diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> >>index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >> >>--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> >>+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >> >>@@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> >> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >> >> { >> >> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >> >>- sctp_disposition_t retval; >> >> >> >> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >> >> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >> >>- retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >> >> >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >> >> >> >>@@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >> >> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >> >> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >> >> >> >>- return retval; >> >>+ return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >> >> } >> >> >> >> /* >> > >> > >> >Still happens... >> >I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your >> >latest patch applied. >> >Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I >> >can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. >> >> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if >> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have It would be very nice, but it is not always trivial. Fuzzer pretty much tried to trigger everything that is triggerable from user-space. Sometimes what it does can make no sense. But it is still super-important for contexts like Android, where programs can be as malicious as you can imagine and the system heavily relies on kernel for protection. >> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: >> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB >> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT >> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return >> value >> >> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the >> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those >> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. >> >> Keep you posted.. thanks. > > Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last > patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. > > Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case > we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. I see that sctp_cmd_interpreter does: sctp_cmd_delete_tcb(commands, asoc); asoc = NULL; Won't it be simpler to pass sctp_association ** to this function and let it clear it whenever it decides to free the objects, rather than try to duplicate its logic on higher level. Just a blind thought. > Oh my.. :) > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-11 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov @ 2015-12-11 15:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Em 11-12-2015 12:30, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: >>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>>>>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >>>>>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >>>>>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >>>>>>>>> contains this line: >>>>>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Use-after-free still happens. >>>>>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >>>>>>> the following sctp-related changes: >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >>>>> >>>>> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >>>>> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >>>>> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >>>>> I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >>>>> >>>>> Please give this other patch a try. A state command >>>>> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >>>>> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >>>>> which fooled the patch. >>>>> >>>>> ---8<--- >>>>> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >>>>> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >>>>> >>>>> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >>>>> >>>>> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >>>>> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >>>>> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >>>>> >>>>> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >>>>> pointer when the TCB is freed. >>>>> >>>>> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >>>>> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >>>>> >>>>> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >>>>> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >>>>> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >>>>> >>>>> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>>> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >>>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >>>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>>> void *event_arg, >>>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>>> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> debug_post_sfn(); >>>>> >>>>> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >>>>> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >>>>> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >>>>> &commands, gfp); >>>>> debug_post_sfx(); >>>>> >>>>> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>>> void *event_arg, >>>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>>> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >>>>> */ >>>>> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >>>>> - ep, asoc, >>>>> + ep, *asoc, >>>>> event_arg, status, >>>>> commands, gfp))) >>>>> goto bail; >>>>> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> break; >>>>> >>>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >>>>> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>> /* This should now be a command. */ >>>>> + *asoc = NULL; >>>>> break; >>>>> >>>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>> /* >>>>> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >>>>> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>>> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >>>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>>> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >>>>> { >>>>> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >>>>> - sctp_disposition_t retval; >>>>> >>>>> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >>>>> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >>>>> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >>>>> >>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >>>>> >>>>> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >>>>> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >>>>> >>>>> - return retval; >>>>> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> /* >>>> >>>> >>>> Still happens... >>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your >>>> latest patch applied. >>>> Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I >>>> can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. >>> >>> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if >>> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have > > It would be very nice, but it is not always trivial. > > Fuzzer pretty much tried to trigger everything that is triggerable > from user-space. Sometimes what it does can make no sense. But it is > still super-important for contexts like Android, where programs can be > as malicious as you can imagine and the system heavily relies on > kernel for protection. > >>> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: >>> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB >>> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT >>> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return >>> value >>> >>> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the >>> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those >>> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. >>> >>> Keep you posted.. thanks. >> >> Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last >> patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. >> >> Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case >> we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. > > I see that sctp_cmd_interpreter does: > > sctp_cmd_delete_tcb(commands, asoc); > asoc = NULL; > > Won't it be simpler to pass sctp_association ** to this function and > let it clear it whenever it decides to free the objects, rather than > try to duplicate its logic on higher level. Just a blind thought. That's like a short-circuit between the two logics, it's already somewhat duplicated. I'm afraid that these other still returning DISPOSITION_CONSUME may not be aware that the assoc is going away in short term, maybe we have some other bug there too. If/when we simplify sctp_side_effects() and get ride of that switch case, that's probably how it will work, though. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-11 15:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Vlad Yasevich, netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin Em 11-12-2015 12:30, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: >>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>>>>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >>>>>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >>>>>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >>>>>>>>> contains this line: >>>>>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Use-after-free still happens. >>>>>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >>>>>>> the following sctp-related changes: >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >>>>> >>>>> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >>>>> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >>>>> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >>>>> I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >>>>> >>>>> Please give this other patch a try. A state command >>>>> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >>>>> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >>>>> which fooled the patch. >>>>> >>>>> ---8<--- >>>>> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >>>>> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >>>>> >>>>> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >>>>> >>>>> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >>>>> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >>>>> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >>>>> >>>>> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >>>>> pointer when the TCB is freed. >>>>> >>>>> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >>>>> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >>>>> >>>>> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >>>>> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >>>>> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >>>>> >>>>> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>>> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >>>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >>>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>>> void *event_arg, >>>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>>> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> debug_post_sfn(); >>>>> >>>>> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >>>>> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >>>>> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >>>>> &commands, gfp); >>>>> debug_post_sfx(); >>>>> >>>>> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>>> void *event_arg, >>>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>>> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >>>>> */ >>>>> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >>>>> - ep, asoc, >>>>> + ep, *asoc, >>>>> event_arg, status, >>>>> commands, gfp))) >>>>> goto bail; >>>>> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>>> break; >>>>> >>>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >>>>> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>> /* This should now be a command. */ >>>>> + *asoc = NULL; >>>>> break; >>>>> >>>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>> /* >>>>> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >>>>> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>>> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >>>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>>> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >>>>> { >>>>> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >>>>> - sctp_disposition_t retval; >>>>> >>>>> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >>>>> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >>>>> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >>>>> >>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >>>>> >>>>> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >>>>> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >>>>> >>>>> - return retval; >>>>> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> /* >>>> >>>> >>>> Still happens... >>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your >>>> latest patch applied. >>>> Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I >>>> can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. >>> >>> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if >>> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have > > It would be very nice, but it is not always trivial. > > Fuzzer pretty much tried to trigger everything that is triggerable > from user-space. Sometimes what it does can make no sense. But it is > still super-important for contexts like Android, where programs can be > as malicious as you can imagine and the system heavily relies on > kernel for protection. > >>> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: >>> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB >>> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT >>> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return >>> value >>> >>> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the >>> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those >>> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. >>> >>> Keep you posted.. thanks. >> >> Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last >> patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. >> >> Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case >> we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. > > I see that sctp_cmd_interpreter does: > > sctp_cmd_delete_tcb(commands, asoc); > asoc = NULL; > > Won't it be simpler to pass sctp_association ** to this function and > let it clear it whenever it decides to free the objects, rather than > try to duplicate its logic on higher level. Just a blind thought. That's like a short-circuit between the two logics, it's already somewhat duplicated. I'm afraid that these other still returning DISPOSITION_CONSUME may not be aware that the assoc is going away in short term, maybe we have some other bug there too. If/when we simplify sctp_side_effects() and get ride of that switch case, that's probably how it will work, though. Marcelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement 2015-12-11 15:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-08 13:00 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-08 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: linux-sctp, dvyukov, vyasevich, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin Couldn't get syzkaller working over here, so I still need your help on testing this. I expect this will be the last cycle, though. If it does generate another trace, I'll need the reproducer too because I can't find anything else just with code review. Thanks --8<-- Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 11 ++++++----- net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 17 ++++------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 4f170ad38ff4f7d345d8e3a3fee7d691df64d9cb..2e21384697c2a6a5fd045142bcd9c39992d3867f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1176,11 +1176,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c index 22c2bf367d7e8c7025065f33eabfd7e93a7f4021..f1f08c8f277bd8719299d1ed21eb23e36d55f7e2 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c @@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_6_2(struct net *net, SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_IN_DATA_CHUNK_DISCARDS); goto discard_force; case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: - goto consume; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); @@ -3043,9 +3043,6 @@ discard_noforce: sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_GEN_SACK, force); return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD; -consume: - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; - } /* @@ -3093,7 +3090,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, case SCTP_IERROR_BAD_STREAM: break; case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: - goto consume; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); @@ -3119,7 +3116,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T2_SHUTDOWN)); } -consume: return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; } @@ -4825,9 +4821,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( * if necessary to fill gaps. */ struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; - sctp_disposition_t retval; - - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; if (abort) sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); @@ -4845,7 +4838,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_ABORTEDS); SCTP_DEC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_CURRESTAB); - return retval; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; } /* We tried an illegal operation on an association which is closed. */ @@ -4960,12 +4953,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) { struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; - sctp_disposition_t retval; /* Stop T1-init timer */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; if (abort) sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); @@ -4985,7 +4976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); - return retval; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; } /* -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement @ 2016-01-08 13:00 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-08 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: linux-sctp, dvyukov, vyasevich, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin Couldn't get syzkaller working over here, so I still need your help on testing this. I expect this will be the last cycle, though. If it does generate another trace, I'll need the reproducer too because I can't find anything else just with code review. Thanks --8<-- Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc pointer when the TCB is freed. As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> --- net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 11 ++++++----- net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 17 ++++------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 4f170ad38ff4f7d345d8e3a3fee7d691df64d9cb..2e21384697c2a6a5fd045142bcd9c39992d3867f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, debug_post_sfn(); error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, &commands, gfp); debug_post_sfx(); @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, sctp_state_t state, struct sctp_endpoint *ep, - struct sctp_association *asoc, + struct sctp_association **asoc, void *event_arg, sctp_disposition_t status, sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. */ if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, - ep, asoc, + ep, *asoc, event_arg, status, commands, gfp))) goto bail; @@ -1176,11 +1176,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* This should now be a command. */ + *asoc = NULL; break; case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: /* * We should no longer have much work to do here as the * real work has been done as explicit commands above. diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c index 22c2bf367d7e8c7025065f33eabfd7e93a7f4021..f1f08c8f277bd8719299d1ed21eb23e36d55f7e2 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c @@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_6_2(struct net *net, SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_IN_DATA_CHUNK_DISCARDS); goto discard_force; case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: - goto consume; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); @@ -3043,9 +3043,6 @@ discard_noforce: sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_GEN_SACK, force); return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD; -consume: - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; - } /* @@ -3093,7 +3090,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, case SCTP_IERROR_BAD_STREAM: break; case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: - goto consume; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); @@ -3119,7 +3116,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T2_SHUTDOWN)); } -consume: return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; } @@ -4825,9 +4821,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( * if necessary to fill gaps. */ struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; - sctp_disposition_t retval; - - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; if (abort) sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); @@ -4845,7 +4838,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_ABORTEDS); SCTP_DEC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_CURRESTAB); - return retval; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; } /* We tried an illegal operation on an association which is closed. */ @@ -4960,12 +4953,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) { struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; - sctp_disposition_t retval; /* Stop T1-init timer */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; if (abort) sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); @@ -4985,7 +4976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); - return retval; + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; } /* -- 2.5.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement 2016-01-08 13:00 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-11 17:00 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2016-01-11 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: linux-sctp, dvyukov, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin On 01/08/2016 08:00 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Couldn't get syzkaller working over here, so I still need your help on > testing this. I expect this will be the last cycle, though. > > If it does generate another trace, I'll need the reproducer too because > I can't find anything else just with code review. > > Thanks Looks to me like you got all of them. > > --8<-- > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED > but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme > above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> Thanks -vlad > --- > net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 11 ++++++----- > net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 17 ++++------------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 4f170ad38ff4f7d345d8e3a3fee7d691df64d9cb..2e21384697c2a6a5fd045142bcd9c39992d3867f 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1176,11 +1176,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* > * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > index 22c2bf367d7e8c7025065f33eabfd7e93a7f4021..f1f08c8f277bd8719299d1ed21eb23e36d55f7e2 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > @@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_6_2(struct net *net, > SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_IN_DATA_CHUNK_DISCARDS); > goto discard_force; > case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: > - goto consume; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: > return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, > (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); > @@ -3043,9 +3043,6 @@ discard_noforce: > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_GEN_SACK, force); > > return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD; > -consume: > - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > - > } > > /* > @@ -3093,7 +3090,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, > case SCTP_IERROR_BAD_STREAM: > break; > case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: > - goto consume; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: > return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, > (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); > @@ -3119,7 +3116,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, > SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T2_SHUTDOWN)); > } > > -consume: > return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > } > > @@ -4825,9 +4821,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( > * if necessary to fill gaps. > */ > struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > - sctp_disposition_t retval; > - > - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > > if (abort) > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > @@ -4845,7 +4838,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( > SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_ABORTEDS); > SCTP_DEC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_CURRESTAB); > > - return retval; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > } > > /* We tried an illegal operation on an association which is closed. */ > @@ -4960,12 +4953,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) > { > struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > - sctp_disposition_t retval; > > /* Stop T1-init timer */ > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, > SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); > - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > > if (abort) > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > @@ -4985,7 +4976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, > SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); > > - return retval; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > } > > /* > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement @ 2016-01-11 17:00 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2016-01-11 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev Cc: linux-sctp, dvyukov, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin On 01/08/2016 08:00 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Couldn't get syzkaller working over here, so I still need your help on > testing this. I expect this will be the last cycle, though. > > If it does generate another trace, I'll need the reproducer too because > I can't find anything else just with code review. > > Thanks Looks to me like you got all of them. > > --8<-- > > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED > but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme > above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> Thanks -vlad > --- > net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 11 ++++++----- > net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 17 ++++------------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > index 4f170ad38ff4f7d345d8e3a3fee7d691df64d9cb..2e21384697c2a6a5fd045142bcd9c39992d3867f 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > debug_post_sfn(); > > error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, > + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, > &commands, gfp); > debug_post_sfx(); > > @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > sctp_state_t state, > struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - struct sctp_association *asoc, > + struct sctp_association **asoc, > void *event_arg, > sctp_disposition_t status, > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, > @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. > */ > if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, > - ep, asoc, > + ep, *asoc, > event_arg, status, > commands, gfp))) > goto bail; > @@ -1176,11 +1176,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: > + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* This should now be a command. */ > + *asoc = NULL; > break; > > case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: > - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: > /* > * We should no longer have much work to do here as the > * real work has been done as explicit commands above. > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > index 22c2bf367d7e8c7025065f33eabfd7e93a7f4021..f1f08c8f277bd8719299d1ed21eb23e36d55f7e2 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > @@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_6_2(struct net *net, > SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_IN_DATA_CHUNK_DISCARDS); > goto discard_force; > case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: > - goto consume; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: > return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, > (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); > @@ -3043,9 +3043,6 @@ discard_noforce: > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_GEN_SACK, force); > > return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD; > -consume: > - return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > - > } > > /* > @@ -3093,7 +3090,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, > case SCTP_IERROR_BAD_STREAM: > break; > case SCTP_IERROR_NO_DATA: > - goto consume; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > case SCTP_IERROR_PROTO_VIOLATION: > return sctp_sf_abort_violation(net, ep, asoc, chunk, commands, > (u8 *)chunk->subh.data_hdr, sizeof(sctp_datahdr_t)); > @@ -3119,7 +3116,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_eat_data_fast_4_4(struct net *net, > SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T2_SHUTDOWN)); > } > > -consume: > return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > } > > @@ -4825,9 +4821,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( > * if necessary to fill gaps. > */ > struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > - sctp_disposition_t retval; > - > - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > > if (abort) > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > @@ -4845,7 +4838,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_9_1_prm_abort( > SCTP_INC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_ABORTEDS); > SCTP_DEC_STATS(net, SCTP_MIB_CURRESTAB); > > - return retval; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > } > > /* We tried an illegal operation on an association which is closed. */ > @@ -4960,12 +4953,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) > { > struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; > - sctp_disposition_t retval; > > /* Stop T1-init timer */ > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, > SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); > - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; > > if (abort) > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); > @@ -4985,7 +4976,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( > sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, > SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); > > - return retval; > + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; > } > > /* > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement 2016-01-08 13:00 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-11 22:13 ` David Miller -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2016-01-11 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: marcelo.leitner Cc: netdev, linux-sctp, dvyukov, vyasevich, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:00:54 -0200 > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED > but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme > above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Applied, thank you. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement @ 2016-01-11 22:13 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2016-01-11 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: marcelo.leitner Cc: netdev, linux-sctp, dvyukov, vyasevich, eric.dumazet, syzkaller, kcc, glider, sasha.levin From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:00:54 -0200 > Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the > macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer > after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. > > This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc > pointer when the TCB is freed. > > As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case > because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. > > Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED > but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme > above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. > > The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. > > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Applied, thank you. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement 2016-01-11 22:13 ` David Miller @ 2016-01-12 8:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2016-01-12 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev, linux-sctp, Vladislav Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:13 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:00:54 -0200 > >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >> >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >> pointer when the TCB is freed. >> >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >> >> Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED >> but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme >> above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >> >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >> >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > > Applied, thank you. Tested with this patch for half a day. I did not see any reports related to pr_debug. Let's consider this as fixed. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement @ 2016-01-12 8:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2016-01-12 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, netdev, linux-sctp, Vladislav Yasevich, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:13 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:00:54 -0200 > >> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >> >> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >> pointer when the TCB is freed. >> >> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >> >> Also, there were places issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED and ASSOC_FAILED >> but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme >> above. Fix it by returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >> >> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >> >> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > > Applied, thank you. Tested with this patch for half a day. I did not see any reports related to pr_debug. Let's consider this as fixed. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-11 14:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2015-12-11 18:37 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-11 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/11/2015 09:03 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>>>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >>>>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >>>>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >>>>>>>> contains this line: >>>>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Use-after-free still happens. >>>>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >>>>>> the following sctp-related changes: >>>>> >>>>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >>>> >>>> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >>>> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >>>> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >>>> I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >>>> >>>> Please give this other patch a try. A state command >>>> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >>>> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >>>> which fooled the patch. >>>> >>>> ---8<--- >>>> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >>>> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >>>> >>>> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >>>> >>>> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >>>> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >>>> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >>>> >>>> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >>>> pointer when the TCB is freed. >>>> >>>> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >>>> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >>>> >>>> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >>>> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >>>> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >>>> >>>> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >>>> >>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>> void *event_arg, >>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> debug_post_sfn(); >>>> >>>> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >>>> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >>>> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >>>> &commands, gfp); >>>> debug_post_sfx(); >>>> >>>> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>> void *event_arg, >>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >>>> */ >>>> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >>>> - ep, asoc, >>>> + ep, *asoc, >>>> event_arg, status, >>>> commands, gfp))) >>>> goto bail; >>>> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> break; >>>> >>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >>>> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>> /* This should now be a command. */ >>>> + *asoc = NULL; >>>> break; >>>> >>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>> /* >>>> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >>>> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >>>> { >>>> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >>>> - sctp_disposition_t retval; >>>> >>>> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >>>> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >>>> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >>>> >>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >>>> >>>> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >>>> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >>>> >>>> - return retval; >>>> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* >>> >>> >>> Still happens... >>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your >>> latest patch applied. >>> Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I >>> can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. >> >> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if >> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have >> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: >> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB >> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT >> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return >> value >> >> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the >> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those >> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. >> >> Keep you posted.. thanks. > > Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last > patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. > > Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case > we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. > > Oh my.. :) Yes. This is what I was worried about... Anything that triggers a DELTE_TCB command has to return a code that we can trap. The other way is to do what Dmitri suggested, but even there, we need to be very careful. -vlad > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-11 18:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-11 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/11/2015 09:03 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:51:21AM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Em 11-12-2015 11:35, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu: >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner >>>>>>> <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> The patches were combined already, but this last pick by Vlad is just >>>>>>>> not yet patched. It's not necessary for your testing and I didn't want >>>>>>>> to interrupt it in case you were already testing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can use my last patch here, from 2 emails ago, the one which >>>>>>>> contains this line: >>>>>>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are right. I missed that they are combined. Testing with it now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Use-after-free still happens. >>>>>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 (Dec 8) plus >>>>>> the following sctp-related changes: >>>>> >>>>> Changes are fine. Ugh. Ok, I'll try your new reproducer here. >>>> >>>> Heh I wasn't going to reproduce this by myself anytime soon, I think. >>>> It's using the same socket to connect to itself, and only happens if the >>>> connect() gets there before the listen() call. Figured this out because >>>> I could only reproduce it under strace at first. >>>> >>>> Please give this other patch a try. A state command >>>> (sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort) was issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, which >>>> leads to SCTP_CMD_DELETE_TCB, but returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, >>>> which fooled the patch. >>>> >>>> ---8<--- >>>> commit 9f84d50e36cee0ce66e4ce9b3b1665e0a1dbcdd3 >>>> Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Fri Dec 4 15:30:23 2015 -0200 >>>> >>>> sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement >>>> >>>> Dmitry Vyukov reported a use-after-free in the code expanded by the >>>> macro debug_post_sfx, which is caused by the use of the asoc pointer >>>> after it was freed within sctp_side_effect() scope. >>>> >>>> This patch fixes it by allowing sctp_side_effect to clear that asoc >>>> pointer when the TCB is freed. >>>> >>>> As Vlad explained, we also have to cover the SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT case >>>> because it will trigger DELETE_TCB too on that same loop. >>>> >>>> Also, there was a place issuing SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED but returning >>>> SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME, which would fool the scheme above. Fix it by >>>> returning SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT instead. >>>> >>>> The macro is already prepared to handle such NULL pointer. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >>>> >>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>> index 6098d4c42fa9..be23d5c2074f 100644 >>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c >>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int sctp_cmd_interpreter(sctp_event_t event_type, >>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>> void *event_arg, >>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> debug_post_sfn(); >>>> >>>> error = sctp_side_effects(event_type, subtype, state, >>>> - ep, asoc, event_arg, status, >>>> + ep, &asoc, event_arg, status, >>>> &commands, gfp); >>>> debug_post_sfx(); >>>> >>>> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ int sctp_do_sm(struct net *net, sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> sctp_state_t state, >>>> struct sctp_endpoint *ep, >>>> - struct sctp_association *asoc, >>>> + struct sctp_association **asoc, >>>> void *event_arg, >>>> sctp_disposition_t status, >>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands, >>>> @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> * disposition SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME. >>>> */ >>>> if (0 != (error = sctp_cmd_interpreter(event_type, subtype, state, >>>> - ep, asoc, >>>> + ep, *asoc, >>>> event_arg, status, >>>> commands, gfp))) >>>> goto bail; >>>> @@ -1174,11 +1174,12 @@ static int sctp_side_effects(sctp_event_t event_type, sctp_subtype_t subtype, >>>> break; >>>> >>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB: >>>> + case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>> /* This should now be a command. */ >>>> + *asoc = NULL; >>>> break; >>>> >>>> case SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME: >>>> - case SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT: >>>> /* >>>> * We should no longer have much work to do here as the >>>> * real work has been done as explicit commands above. >>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>> index 6f46aa16cb76..d801e151498a 100644 >>>> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c >>>> @@ -4959,12 +4959,10 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>> sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands) >>>> { >>>> struct sctp_chunk *abort = arg; >>>> - sctp_disposition_t retval; >>>> >>>> /* Stop T1-init timer */ >>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP, >>>> SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_T1_INIT)); >>>> - retval = SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME; >>>> >>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY, SCTP_CHUNK(abort)); >>>> >>>> @@ -4983,7 +4981,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_cookie_wait_prm_abort( >>>> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_INIT_FAILED, >>>> SCTP_PERR(SCTP_ERROR_USER_ABORT)); >>>> >>>> - return retval; >>>> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_ABORT; >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* >>> >>> >>> Still happens... >>> I am on commit aa53685549a2cfb5f175b0c4a20bc9aa1e5a1b85 with your >>> latest patch applied. >>> Can you figure out what happens now from the report below? If not I >>> can create a repro, it's just somewhat time consuming. >> >> I can imagine. I don't know how this fuzzer works, but it would be nice if >> this reproducer extractor could be executed easier. So far, we have >> identified 3 different issues already leading to this bug: >> - 1st, the handling on DELETE_TCB >> - 2nd, the handling on DISPOSITION_ABORT >> - 3rd, the bad combination on internal state-machine command to a return >> value >> >> I can and will review it again, but it's doing nasty stuff like using the >> same socket to connect to itself. It's hard to imagine all those >> combinations in mind that might lead to that use-after-free. >> >> Keep you posted.. thanks. > > Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last > patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. > > Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case > we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. > > Oh my.. :) Yes. This is what I was worried about... Anything that triggers a DELTE_TCB command has to return a code that we can trap. The other way is to do what Dmitri suggested, but even there, we need to be very careful. -vlad > > Marcelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* RE: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-11 18:37 ` Vlad Yasevich (?) @ 2015-12-14 9:50 ` David Laight 2015-12-14 14:25 ` Vlad Yasevich -1 siblings, 1 reply; 153+ messages in thread From: David Laight @ 2015-12-14 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Vlad Yasevich', Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin From: Vlad Yasevich > Sent: 11 December 2015 18:38 ... > > Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last > > patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. > > > > Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case > > we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. > > > > Oh my.. :) > > Yes. This is what I was worried about... Anything that triggers > a DELTE_TCB command has to return a code that we can trap. > > The other way is to do what Dmitri suggested, but even there, we > need to be very careful. I'm always wary of anything that queues actions up for later processing. It is far too easy (as found here) to end up processing actions in invalid states, or to process actions in 'unusual' orders when specific events happen close together. I wonder how much fallout there'd be from getting the sctp code to immediately action things, instead of queuing the actions for later. It would certainly remove a lot of the unusual combinations of events. David ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm 2015-12-14 9:50 ` David Laight @ 2015-12-14 14:25 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-14 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Laight, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/14/2015 04:50 AM, David Laight wrote: > From: Vlad Yasevich >> Sent: 11 December 2015 18:38 > ... >>> Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last >>> patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. >>> >>> Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case >>> we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. >>> >>> Oh my.. :) >> >> Yes. This is what I was worried about... Anything that triggers >> a DELTE_TCB command has to return a code that we can trap. >> >> The other way is to do what Dmitri suggested, but even there, we >> need to be very careful. > > I'm always wary of anything that queues actions up for later processing. > It is far too easy (as found here) to end up processing actions > in invalid states, or to process actions in 'unusual' orders when > specific events happen close together. > > I wonder how much fallout there'd be from getting the sctp code > to immediately action things, instead of queuing the actions for later. > It would certainly remove a lot of the unusual combinations of events. > We've bandied this idea around for a while, but no one has had the time to tackle this. This would be rather time-consuming task, but in the end might be a good idea. -vlad > David > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
* Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm @ 2015-12-14 14:25 ` Vlad Yasevich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 153+ messages in thread From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2015-12-14 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Laight, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Dmitry Vyukov Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, syzkaller, linux-sctp, Kostya Serebryany, Alexander Potapenko, Sasha Levin On 12/14/2015 04:50 AM, David Laight wrote: > From: Vlad Yasevich >> Sent: 11 December 2015 18:38 > ... >>> Found a similar place in abort primitive handling like in this last >>> patch update, it's probably the issue you're still triggering. >>> >>> Also found another place that may lead to this use after free, in case >>> we receive a packet with a chunk that has no data. >>> >>> Oh my.. :) >> >> Yes. This is what I was worried about... Anything that triggers >> a DELTE_TCB command has to return a code that we can trap. >> >> The other way is to do what Dmitri suggested, but even there, we >> need to be very careful. > > I'm always wary of anything that queues actions up for later processing. > It is far too easy (as found here) to end up processing actions > in invalid states, or to process actions in 'unusual' orders when > specific events happen close together. > > I wonder how much fallout there'd be from getting the sctp code > to immediately action things, instead of queuing the actions for later. > It would certainly remove a lot of the unusual combinations of events. > We've bandied this idea around for a while, but no one has had the time to tackle this. This would be rather time-consuming task, but in the end might be a good idea. -vlad > David > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 153+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-12 8:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 153+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-11-24 9:15 use-after-free in sctp_do_sm Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-24 9:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-24 9:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-24 9:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-24 10:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-24 10:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman 2015-11-24 20:45 ` Neil Horman 2015-11-24 21:08 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-11-24 21:08 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-11-24 21:12 ` David Miller 2015-11-24 21:12 ` David Miller 2015-11-25 15:12 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-11-25 15:12 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-11-28 15:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-11-28 15:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 16:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 16:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 17:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 17:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-12-03 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-12-03 18:06 ` Marcelo 2015-12-03 18:06 ` Marcelo 2015-12-03 18:35 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-03 18:35 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-03 18:43 ` Marcelo 2015-12-03 18:43 ` Marcelo 2015-12-04 17:14 ` [PATCH net 0/3] sctp: packet timestamp fixes Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 17:14 ` [PATCH net 1/3] sctp: use the same clock as if sock source timestamps were on Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 20:31 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 20:31 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 17:14 ` [PATCH net 2/3] sctp: update the netstamp_needed counter when copying sockets Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 17:14 ` [PATCH net 3/3] sctp: also copy sk_tsflags when copying the socket Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 17:14 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 20:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-06 3:24 ` [PATCH net 0/3] sctp: packet timestamp fixes David Miller 2015-12-06 3:24 ` David Miller 2015-12-03 13:05 ` use-after-free in sctp_do_sm Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 13:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 13:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-12-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-12-03 15:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 15:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 16:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 16:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Eric Dumazet 2015-12-03 17:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 17:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-03 18:52 ` Aaron Conole 2015-12-03 18:52 ` Aaron Conole 2015-12-03 19:06 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 19:06 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 19:32 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-03 19:32 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-03 20:03 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 20:03 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 20:10 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-03 20:10 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-03 20:24 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 20:24 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 20:42 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-03 20:42 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-03 20:51 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-03 20:51 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-04 10:40 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 10:40 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 12:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 12:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 15:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 15:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-04 15:51 ` Aaron Conole 2015-12-04 15:51 ` Aaron Conole 2015-12-04 16:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 16:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 16:47 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-04 16:47 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-04 17:03 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-04 17:03 ` Joe Perches 2015-12-04 17:11 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-04 17:11 ` Jason Baron 2015-12-04 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 17:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 17:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 20:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 20:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 21:34 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 21:34 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-04 21:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-04 21:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-05 16:39 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-05 16:39 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-07 11:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-07 11:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-07 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 13:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-07 13:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-07 18:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 18:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 19:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-07 19:33 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-07 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 19:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 20:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-07 20:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-07 20:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-07 20:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-08 17:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-08 17:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-08 17:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-08 17:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-08 19:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-08 19:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-09 14:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-09 14:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-09 15:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-09 15:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-09 16:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-09 16:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-11 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-11 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-11 13:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-11 13:51 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-11 14:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-11 14:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-11 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-11 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-11 15:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2015-12-11 15:55 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2016-01-08 13:00 ` [PATCH] sctp: fix use-after-free in pr_debug statement Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2016-01-08 13:00 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2016-01-11 17:00 ` Vlad Yasevich 2016-01-11 17:00 ` Vlad Yasevich 2016-01-11 22:13 ` David Miller 2016-01-11 22:13 ` David Miller 2016-01-12 8:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2016-01-12 8:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov 2015-12-11 18:37 ` use-after-free in sctp_do_sm Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-11 18:37 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-14 9:50 ` David Laight 2015-12-14 14:25 ` Vlad Yasevich 2015-12-14 14:25 ` Vlad Yasevich
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.