All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@cisco.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:57:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9q7iGLmDryWJ0Duk2uQODr5W=5RCt2GAAxKk+N_k9OOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207131918.2252553-6-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:21 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Now that the hardware read-only state can't be changed by the BLKROSET
> ioctl, the code in this method is not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 19 -------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 2ed79b09439a82..2c64ca15ca079f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -692,29 +692,10 @@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>         put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
>  }
>
> -static int rbd_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> -{
> -       struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Both images mapped read-only and snapshots can't be marked
> -        * read-write.
> -        */
> -       if (!ro) {
> -               if (rbd_is_ro(rbd_dev))
> -                       return -EROFS;
> -
> -               rbd_assert(!rbd_is_snap(rbd_dev));
> -       }
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
>         .owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
>         .open                   = rbd_open,
>         .release                = rbd_release,
> -       .set_read_only          = rbd_set_read_only,
>  };
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.29.2
>

If nothing can mess with read-only state after set_disk_ro(disk, true),
looks good.

Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

Thanks,

                Ilya

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@cisco.com>,
	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:57:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9q7iGLmDryWJ0Duk2uQODr5W=5RCt2GAAxKk+N_k9OOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207131918.2252553-6-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:21 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Now that the hardware read-only state can't be changed by the BLKROSET
> ioctl, the code in this method is not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 19 -------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 2ed79b09439a82..2c64ca15ca079f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -692,29 +692,10 @@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>         put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
>  }
>
> -static int rbd_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> -{
> -       struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Both images mapped read-only and snapshots can't be marked
> -        * read-write.
> -        */
> -       if (!ro) {
> -               if (rbd_is_ro(rbd_dev))
> -                       return -EROFS;
> -
> -               rbd_assert(!rbd_is_snap(rbd_dev));
> -       }
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
>         .owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
>         .open                   = rbd_open,
>         .release                = rbd_release,
> -       .set_read_only          = rbd_set_read_only,
>  };
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.29.2
>

If nothing can mess with read-only state after set_disk_ro(disk, true),
looks good.

Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

Thanks,

                Ilya

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@cisco.com>,
	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:57:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9q7iGLmDryWJ0Duk2uQODr5W=5RCt2GAAxKk+N_k9OOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207131918.2252553-6-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:21 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Now that the hardware read-only state can't be changed by the BLKROSET
> ioctl, the code in this method is not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 19 -------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 2ed79b09439a82..2c64ca15ca079f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -692,29 +692,10 @@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>         put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
>  }
>
> -static int rbd_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> -{
> -       struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Both images mapped read-only and snapshots can't be marked
> -        * read-write.
> -        */
> -       if (!ro) {
> -               if (rbd_is_ro(rbd_dev))
> -                       return -EROFS;
> -
> -               rbd_assert(!rbd_is_snap(rbd_dev));
> -       }
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
>         .owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
>         .open                   = rbd_open,
>         .release                = rbd_release,
> -       .set_read_only          = rbd_set_read_only,
>  };
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.29.2
>

If nothing can mess with read-only state after set_disk_ro(disk, true),
looks good.

Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

Thanks,

                Ilya

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-07 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-07 13:19 split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] dm: use bdev_read_only to check if a device is read-only Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08  5:23   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:23     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:23     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  9:59   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08  9:59     ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-08  9:59     ` Ming Lei
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: remove the NULL bdev check in bdev_read_only Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08  5:23   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:23     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:23     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08 10:06   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:06     ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:06     ` Ming Lei
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: add a hard-readonly flag to struct gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08  5:24   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:24     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:24     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:28   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:28     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:28     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08 10:22   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:22     ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:22     ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 10:57       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 10:57       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: propagate BLKROSET on the whole device to all partitions Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08  5:27   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:27     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:27     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  9:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08  9:25       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08  9:25       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 12:41       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-08 12:41         ` [dm-devel] " Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-08 12:41         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-08 10:29   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:29     ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:29     ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 10:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 10:59       ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 10:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09  1:23       ` Ming Lei
2020-12-09  1:23         ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-09  1:23         ` Ming Lei
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 14:57   ` Ilya Dryomov [this message]
2020-12-07 14:57     ` [dm-devel] " Ilya Dryomov
2020-12-07 14:57     ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-12-08  5:30   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:30     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:30     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: allow revalidate to set a namespace read-only Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 18:13   ` Keith Busch
2020-12-07 18:13     ` [dm-devel] " Keith Busch
2020-12-07 18:13     ` Keith Busch
2020-12-08  5:29   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:29     ` [dm-devel] " Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08  5:29     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-10  7:50 ` split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-10  7:50   ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-10  7:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 split hard read-only vs read-only policy v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09  2:52   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-09  2:52     ` Ming Lei
2021-01-09 10:42 split hard read-only vs read-only policy v3 (resend) Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-09 10:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-09 10:42   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOi1vP9q7iGLmDryWJ0Duk2uQODr5W=5RCt2GAAxKk+N_k9OOg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=olkuroch@cisco.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.