profiling tools on a T4240RDB board

profiling tools on a T4240RDB board

[Tanasa Bogdan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]

Hi,

We are using the (freescale) linux yocto 1.6 on a T4240RDB board where we want to have "tools-profile" set in our local.conf file. When building the fsl-image-minimal we see that there are some packages that are graphics-related (like gtk+, pixbuf, etc..). The card does not have any graphics capabilities. Why does these packets install at all? Is it possible to have the profiling tools without any gtk dependencies? How the local.conf should look like?

PS: These dependencies are there even when we choose tools-sdk in order to have gcc in the final image.

Thanks,
Bogdan.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2488 bytes --]

Re: profiling tools on a T4240RDB board

[Leonardo Sandoval]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 989 bytes --]



El 08/24/2016 a las 04:01 AM, Tanasa Bogdan escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are using the (freescale) linux yocto 1.6 on a T4240RDB board where 
> we want to have "tools-profile" set in our local.conf file. When 
> building the fsl-image-minimal we see that there are some packages 
> that are graphics-related (like gtk+, pixbuf, etc..). The card does 
> not have any graphics capabilities. Why does these packets install at 
> all? Is it possible to have the profiling tools without any gtk 
> dependencies? How the local.conf should look like?
>
I believe the image you are using include those graphic-related pkgs so 
that is why you are seeing them. You may redefine your image, at the end 
fsl-image-minimal is just an example that you can modify. Also you may 
have more answers  on a FSL (NXP?) channel/mailing-list

> PS: These dependencies are there even when we choose tools-sdk in 
> order to have gcc in the final image.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bogdan.
>
>
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3372 bytes --]

Re: profiling tools on a T4240RDB board

[Zhenhua Luo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1570 bytes --]

The fsl-image-minimal rootfs doesn't include those graphic packages by default, I think those packages are included by the dependency of new added packages.

You can run "bitbake -g fsl-image-minimal" to generate the dependence file and analysis how the unneeded packages are brought in.


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Leonardo Sandoval
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:19 PM
To: Tanasa Bogdan <bogdan.tanasa@saabgroup.com>; 'yocto@yoctoproject.org' <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] profiling tools on a T4240RDB board




El 08/24/2016 a las 04:01 AM, Tanasa Bogdan escribió:
Hi,

We are using the (freescale) linux yocto 1.6 on a T4240RDB board where we want to have "tools-profile" set in our local.conf file. When building the fsl-image-minimal we see that there are some packages that are graphics-related (like gtk+, pixbuf, etc..). The card does not have any graphics capabilities. Why does these packets install at all? Is it possible to have the profiling tools without any gtk dependencies? How the local.conf should look like?
I believe the image you are using include those graphic-related pkgs so that is why you are seeing them. You may redefine your image, at the end fsl-image-minimal is just an example that you can modify. Also you may have more answers  on a FSL (NXP?) channel/mailing-list



PS: These dependencies are there even when we choose tools-sdk in order to have gcc in the final image.

Thanks,
Bogdan.




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6218 bytes --]