All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: Add support for panels with VESA backlights with PWM enable/disable
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:09:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW8J8Nc7UJnISaVg@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006024018.320394-2-lyude@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:40:14PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This simply adds proper support for panel backlights that can be controlled
> via VESA's backlight control protocol, but which also require that we
> enable and disable the backlight via PWM instead of via the DPCD interface.
> We also enable this by default, in order to fix some people's backlights
> that were broken by not having this enabled.
> 
> For reference, backlights that require this and use VESA's backlight
> interface tend to be laptops with hybrid GPUs, but this very well may
> change in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3680
> Fixes: fe7d52bccab6 ("drm/i915/dp: Don't use DPCD backlights that need PWM enable/disable")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 569d17b4d00f..594fdc7453ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> +		panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->enable(crtc_state, conn_state,
> +						   panel->backlight.pwm_level_max);

What't the story here with the non-inverted max vs. pontetially inverted
0 in the counterpart?

> +
>  	drm_edp_backlight_enable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info, level);
>  }
>  
> @@ -304,6 +308,10 @@ static void intel_dp_aux_vesa_disable_backlight(const struct drm_connector_state
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  
>  	drm_edp_backlight_disable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info);
> +
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> +		panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->disable(old_conn_state,
> +						    intel_backlight_invert_pwm_level(connector, 0));
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe)
> @@ -321,6 +329,15 @@ static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable) {
> +		ret = panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->setup(connector, pipe);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			drm_err(&i915->drm,
> +				"Failed to setup PWM backlight controls for eDP backlight: %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
>  	panel->backlight.max = panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.max;
>  	panel->backlight.min = 0;
>  	if (current_mode == DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD) {
> @@ -340,12 +357,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  
> -	/* TODO: We currently only support AUX only backlight configurations, not backlights which
> -	 * require a mix of PWM and AUX controls to work. In the mean time, these machines typically
> -	 * work just fine using normal PWM controls anyway.
> -	 */
> -	if ((intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> -	    drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
> +	if (drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "AUX Backlight Control Supported!\n");
>  		return true;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.31.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: Add support for panels with VESA backlights with PWM enable/disable
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:09:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW8J8Nc7UJnISaVg@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006024018.320394-2-lyude@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:40:14PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This simply adds proper support for panel backlights that can be controlled
> via VESA's backlight control protocol, but which also require that we
> enable and disable the backlight via PWM instead of via the DPCD interface.
> We also enable this by default, in order to fix some people's backlights
> that were broken by not having this enabled.
> 
> For reference, backlights that require this and use VESA's backlight
> interface tend to be laptops with hybrid GPUs, but this very well may
> change in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3680
> Fixes: fe7d52bccab6 ("drm/i915/dp: Don't use DPCD backlights that need PWM enable/disable")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 569d17b4d00f..594fdc7453ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> +		panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->enable(crtc_state, conn_state,
> +						   panel->backlight.pwm_level_max);

What't the story here with the non-inverted max vs. pontetially inverted
0 in the counterpart?

> +
>  	drm_edp_backlight_enable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info, level);
>  }
>  
> @@ -304,6 +308,10 @@ static void intel_dp_aux_vesa_disable_backlight(const struct drm_connector_state
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  
>  	drm_edp_backlight_disable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info);
> +
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> +		panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->disable(old_conn_state,
> +						    intel_backlight_invert_pwm_level(connector, 0));
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe)
> @@ -321,6 +329,15 @@ static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable) {
> +		ret = panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->setup(connector, pipe);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			drm_err(&i915->drm,
> +				"Failed to setup PWM backlight controls for eDP backlight: %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
>  	panel->backlight.max = panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.max;
>  	panel->backlight.min = 0;
>  	if (current_mode == DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD) {
> @@ -340,12 +357,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  
> -	/* TODO: We currently only support AUX only backlight configurations, not backlights which
> -	 * require a mix of PWM and AUX controls to work. In the mean time, these machines typically
> -	 * work just fine using normal PWM controls anyway.
> -	 */
> -	if ((intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> -	    drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
> +	if (drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "AUX Backlight Control Supported!\n");
>  		return true;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.31.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: Add support for panels with VESA backlights with PWM enable/disable
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:09:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW8J8Nc7UJnISaVg@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211006024018.320394-2-lyude@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:40:14PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This simply adds proper support for panel backlights that can be controlled
> via VESA's backlight control protocol, but which also require that we
> enable and disable the backlight via PWM instead of via the DPCD interface.
> We also enable this by default, in order to fix some people's backlights
> that were broken by not having this enabled.
> 
> For reference, backlights that require this and use VESA's backlight
> interface tend to be laptops with hybrid GPUs, but this very well may
> change in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3680
> Fixes: fe7d52bccab6 ("drm/i915/dp: Don't use DPCD backlights that need PWM enable/disable")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 569d17b4d00f..594fdc7453ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> +		panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->enable(crtc_state, conn_state,
> +						   panel->backlight.pwm_level_max);

What't the story here with the non-inverted max vs. pontetially inverted
0 in the counterpart?

> +
>  	drm_edp_backlight_enable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info, level);
>  }
>  
> @@ -304,6 +308,10 @@ static void intel_dp_aux_vesa_disable_backlight(const struct drm_connector_state
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  
>  	drm_edp_backlight_disable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info);
> +
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> +		panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->disable(old_conn_state,
> +						    intel_backlight_invert_pwm_level(connector, 0));
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe)
> @@ -321,6 +329,15 @@ static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable) {
> +		ret = panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->setup(connector, pipe);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			drm_err(&i915->drm,
> +				"Failed to setup PWM backlight controls for eDP backlight: %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
>  	panel->backlight.max = panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.max;
>  	panel->backlight.min = 0;
>  	if (current_mode == DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD) {
> @@ -340,12 +357,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  
> -	/* TODO: We currently only support AUX only backlight configurations, not backlights which
> -	 * require a mix of PWM and AUX controls to work. In the mean time, these machines typically
> -	 * work just fine using normal PWM controls anyway.
> -	 */
> -	if ((intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> -	    drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
> +	if (drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "AUX Backlight Control Supported!\n");
>  		return true;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.31.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-19 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-06  2:40 [Nouveau] [PATCH v3 0/5] drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: Add support for panels with VESA backlights with PWM enable/disable Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-19 18:09   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-10-19 18:09     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-19 18:09     ` [Nouveau] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-20 21:30     ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-20 21:30       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-20 21:30       ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Explicitly check DPCD backlights for aux enable/brightness Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06 16:30   ` Karol Herbst
2021-10-06 16:30     ` [Intel-gfx] " Karol Herbst
2021-10-06 20:14     ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-06 20:14       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/dp: Disable unsupported features in DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_MODE_SET_REGISTER Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/dp, drm/i915: Add support for VESA backlights using PWM for brightness control Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-12 20:45   ` Doug Anderson
2021-10-12 20:45     ` [Nouveau] " Doug Anderson
2021-10-12 20:45     ` [Intel-gfx] " Doug Anderson
2021-10-06  2:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915: Clarify probing order in intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs() Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-06  2:40   ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-10-19 18:15   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-19 18:15     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-19 18:15     ` [Nouveau] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-06  3:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers (rev4) Patchwork
2021-10-06  3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-06  9:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-06 16:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers (rev5) Patchwork
2021-10-06 16:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-06 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-06 21:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers (rev6) Patchwork
2021-10-06 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-06 23:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-07 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers (rev7) Patchwork
2021-10-07 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-07 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-08 21:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers (rev8) Patchwork
2021-10-08 22:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-09  1:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-11 18:50   ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-11 21:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/dp, drm/i915: Finish basic PWM support for VESA backlight helpers (rev9) Patchwork
2021-10-11 22:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-12  2:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YW8J8Nc7UJnISaVg@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.