All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, arnd@arndb.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, heying24@huawei.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async() with  smp_call_private()
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:06:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmXJ0q24kaxtG1R5@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202204231532.nXbSK9Tk-lkp@intel.com>

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 03:30:18PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Donghai,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next]
> [also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v5.18-rc3 next-20220422]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> config: i386-randconfig-a002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220423/202204231532.nXbSK9Tk-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5bd87350a5ae429baf8f373cb226a57b62f87280)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/3b8a90029bebdb77e2d5c0cd16f371e83d8ed2e8
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
>         git checkout 3b8a90029bebdb77e2d5c0cd16f371e83d8ed2e8
>         # save the config file
>         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> block/blk-mq.c:1065:39: warning: passing 4-byte aligned argument to 16-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'smp_call_private' may result in an unaligned pointer access [-Walign-mismatch]
>                    smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);
>                                                        ^
>    1 warning generated.

This warning was fixed by commit 1139aeb1c521 ("smp: Fix
smp_call_function_single_async prototype"), which is undone by this
proposed change, hence the warning.

Cheers,
Nathan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async() with smp_call_private()
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:06:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmXJ0q24kaxtG1R5@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202204231532.nXbSK9Tk-lkp@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2382 bytes --]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 03:30:18PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Donghai,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next]
> [also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v5.18-rc3 next-20220422]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> config: i386-randconfig-a002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220423/202204231532.nXbSK9Tk-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5bd87350a5ae429baf8f373cb226a57b62f87280)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/3b8a90029bebdb77e2d5c0cd16f371e83d8ed2e8
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
>         git checkout 3b8a90029bebdb77e2d5c0cd16f371e83d8ed2e8
>         # save the config file
>         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> block/blk-mq.c:1065:39: warning: passing 4-byte aligned argument to 16-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'smp_call_private' may result in an unaligned pointer access [-Walign-mismatch]
>                    smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);
>                                                        ^
>    1 warning generated.

This warning was fixed by commit 1139aeb1c521 ("smp: Fix
smp_call_function_single_async prototype"), which is undone by this
proposed change, hence the warning.

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-24 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 20:00 [PATCH v2 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] smp: consolidate the structure definitions to smp.h Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  4:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-25  8:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-25  9:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] smp: define the cross call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] smp: eliminate SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_call() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async() with smp_call_private() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  7:30   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-24 22:06     ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-04-24 22:06       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-25  9:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] smp: use smp_call_private() fron irq_work.c and core.c Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] smp: change smp_call_function_any() to smp_call_any() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_many_cond() with __smp_call_mask_cond() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async with smp_call_private Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_call() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] smp: modify up.c to adopt the same format of cross CPU call Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  5:17   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-23  5:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-26 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmXJ0q24kaxtG1R5@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com \
    --cc=dqiao@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heying24@huawei.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.