All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	boon.leong.ong@intel.com, hawk@kernel.org,
	xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	larysa.zaremba@intel.com, leon@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tariqt@nvidia.com,
	yoong.siang.song@intel.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	saeedm@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 2/7] selftests/bpf: Add counters to xdp_hw_metadata
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:56:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDbiofWhQhFEfIsr@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168130336725.150247.12193228778654006957.stgit@firesoul>

On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets.
> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091.
> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are
> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c  |   15 +++++++++++++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c      |    4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct {
>  	__type(value, __u32);
>  } xsk SEC(".maps");
>  
> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0;
> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0;
> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0;
> +
>  extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
>  					 __u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
>  extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  			udp = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!udp)
> +	if (!udp) {
> +		pkts_skip++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */
> -	if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091))
> +	if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) {
> +		pkts_skip++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta));
>  	if (ret != 0) {

[..]

>  		bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret);

Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk,
add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing
ones are not enough.. WDYT?

> +		pkts_fail++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -78,6 +87,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  
>  	if (meta + 1 > data) {
>  		bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta doesn't appear to work");
> +		pkts_fail++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  	else
>  		meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
>  
> +	pkts_redir++;
>  	return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 1c8acb68b977..3b942ef7297b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd)
>  	while (true) {
>  		errno = 0;
>  		ret = poll(fds, rxq + 1, 1000);
> -		printf("poll: %d (%d)\n", ret, errno);
> +		printf("poll: %d (%d) skip=%llu fail=%llu redir=%llu\n",
> +		       ret, errno, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_skip,
> +		       bpf_obj->bss->pkts_fail, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_redir);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  		if (ret == 0)
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	alexandr.lobakin@intel.com, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
	xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	yoong.siang.song@intel.com, boon.leong.ong@intel.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, hawk@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	tariqt@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf V8 2/7] selftests/bpf: Add counters to xdp_hw_metadata
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:56:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDbiofWhQhFEfIsr@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168130336725.150247.12193228778654006957.stgit@firesoul>

On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets.
> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091.
> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are
> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c  |   15 +++++++++++++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c      |    4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct {
>  	__type(value, __u32);
>  } xsk SEC(".maps");
>  
> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0;
> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0;
> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0;
> +
>  extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
>  					 __u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
>  extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  			udp = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!udp)
> +	if (!udp) {
> +		pkts_skip++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */
> -	if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091))
> +	if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) {
> +		pkts_skip++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta));
>  	if (ret != 0) {

[..]

>  		bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret);

Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk,
add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing
ones are not enough.. WDYT?

> +		pkts_fail++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -78,6 +87,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  
>  	if (meta + 1 > data) {
>  		bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta doesn't appear to work");
> +		pkts_fail++;
>  		return XDP_PASS;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>  	else
>  		meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
>  
> +	pkts_redir++;
>  	return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 1c8acb68b977..3b942ef7297b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd)
>  	while (true) {
>  		errno = 0;
>  		ret = poll(fds, rxq + 1, 1000);
> -		printf("poll: %d (%d)\n", ret, errno);
> +		printf("poll: %d (%d) skip=%llu fail=%llu redir=%llu\n",
> +		       ret, errno, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_skip,
> +		       bpf_obj->bss->pkts_fail, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_redir);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  		if (ret == 0)
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 12:42 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 0/7] XDP-hints: API change for RX-hash kfunc bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 1/7] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata default disable bpf_printk Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 2/7] selftests/bpf: Add counters to xdp_hw_metadata Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 16:56   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2023-04-12 16:56     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-12 17:52     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 17:52       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 17:56       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-12 17:56         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-12 12:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 3/7] xdp: rss hash types representation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 4/7] mlx5: bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash add xdp rss hash type Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 5/7] veth: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:43   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 6/7] mlx4: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:43   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf V8 7/7] selftests/bpf: Adjust bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash for new arg Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-12 12:43   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZDbiofWhQhFEfIsr@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.