From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> Cc: "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@sgi.com>, "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, horms@verge.net.au, "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>, ak@suse.de, cfriesen@nortel.com, rpjday@mindspring.com, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, zlynx@acm.org, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, "Chris Snook" <csnook@redhat.com>, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, wensong@linux-vs.org, wjiang@resilience.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:17:43 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a51ab88dc00f8d7fd44f79400671d259@kernel.crashing.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708180002290.3666@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in> >>> No it does not have any volatile semantics. atomic_dec() can be >>> reordered >>> at will by the compiler within the current basic unit if you do not >>> add a >>> barrier. >> >> "volatile" has nothing to do with reordering. > > If you're talking of "volatile" the type-qualifier keyword, then > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/16/231 (and sub-thread below it) shows > otherwise. I'm not sure what in that mail you mean, but anyway... Yes, of course, the fact that "volatile" creates a side effect prevents certain things from being reordered wrt the atomic_dec(); but the atomic_dec() has a side effect *already* so the volatile doesn't change anything. >> atomic_dec() writes >> to memory, so it _does_ have "volatile semantics", implicitly, as >> long as the compiler cannot optimise the atomic variable away >> completely -- any store counts as a side effect. > > I don't think an atomic_dec() implemented as an inline "asm volatile" > or one that uses a "forget" macro would have the same re-ordering > guarantees as an atomic_dec() that uses a volatile access cast. The "asm volatile" implementation does have exactly the same reordering guarantees as the "volatile cast" thing, if that is implemented by GCC in the "obvious" way. Even a "plain" asm() will do the same. Segher
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> Cc: "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@sgi.com>, "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, horms@verge.net.au, "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>, ak@suse.de, cfriesen@nortel.com, rpjday@mindspring.com, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, zlynx@acm.org, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, "Chris Snook" <csnook@redhat.com>, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, wensong@linux-vs.org, wjiang@resilience.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:17:43 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a51ab88dc00f8d7fd44f79400671d259@kernel.crashing.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708180002290.3666@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in> >>> No it does not have any volatile semantics. atomic_dec() can be >>> reordered >>> at will by the compiler within the current basic unit if you do not >>> add a >>> barrier. >> >> "volatile" has nothing to do with reordering. > > If you're talking of "volatile" the type-qualifier keyword, then > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/16/231 (and sub-thread below it) shows > otherwise. I'm not sure what in that mail you mean, but anyway... Yes, of course, the fact that "volatile" creates a side effect prevents certain things from being reordered wrt the atomic_dec(); but the atomic_dec() has a side effect *already* so the volatile doesn't change anything. >> atomic_dec() writes >> to memory, so it _does_ have "volatile semantics", implicitly, as >> long as the compiler cannot optimise the atomic variable away >> completely -- any store counts as a side effect. > > I don't think an atomic_dec() implemented as an inline "asm volatile" > or one that uses a "forget" macro would have the same re-ordering > guarantees as an atomic_dec() that uses a volatile access cast. The "asm volatile" implementation does have exactly the same reordering guarantees as the "volatile cast" thing, if that is implemented by GCC in the "obvious" way. Even a "plain" asm() will do the same. Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-18 0:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 333+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-08-09 13:14 [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Snook 2007-08-09 12:41 ` Arnd Bergmann 2007-08-09 14:29 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-09 15:30 ` Arnd Bergmann 2007-08-14 22:31 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-14 22:45 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-14 22:51 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-14 23:08 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-14 23:04 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-14 23:14 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-15 6:49 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 6:49 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 8:18 ` Heiko Carstens 2007-08-15 13:53 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-15 14:35 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 14:52 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 16:09 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-15 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 17:13 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 18:31 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 18:57 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 19:54 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 20:17 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 20:52 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 22:42 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 20:47 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 0:36 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 0:36 ` (unknown) Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 0:32 ` your mail Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 0:58 ` [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 0:51 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 1:18 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 1:38 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 21:05 ` [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 22:44 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 1:23 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 2:22 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 19:58 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-16 0:39 ` [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() Satyam Sharma 2007-08-24 11:59 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-08-24 12:07 ` Andi Kleen 2007-08-24 12:12 ` Kenn Humborg 2007-08-24 12:12 ` Kenn Humborg 2007-08-24 14:25 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-08-24 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-24 13:30 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-24 17:06 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-24 20:26 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-08-24 20:34 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-24 16:19 ` Luck, Tony 2007-08-24 16:19 ` Luck, Tony 2007-08-15 16:13 ` [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Chris Snook 2007-08-15 23:40 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 23:51 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 1:30 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 2:30 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 19:33 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 1:26 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 2:23 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-16 19:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 2:19 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 3:16 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 3:32 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 3:50 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-17 23:59 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-18 0:09 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-18 1:08 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-18 1:24 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-18 1:41 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-18 4:13 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-18 13:36 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-18 21:54 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-18 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-18 23:19 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-24 12:19 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-08-24 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-18 21:56 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-20 13:31 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-20 22:04 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-20 22:48 ` Russell King 2007-08-20 23:02 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-21 0:05 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-21 7:08 ` Russell King 2007-08-21 7:05 ` Russell King 2007-08-21 9:33 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-21 11:37 ` Andi Kleen 2007-08-21 14:48 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-21 16:16 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-21 22:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks 2007-08-22 0:50 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-22 21:38 ` Adrian Bunk 2007-08-21 14:39 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 3:42 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-17 5:18 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 5:56 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 7:26 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 8:47 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 9:15 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 10:12 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 12:14 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 13:05 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 9:48 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 10:23 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 22:49 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 23:51 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 23:55 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 6:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2007-08-17 8:52 ` Andi Kleen 2007-08-17 10:08 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 22:29 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 17:37 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-14 23:26 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 10:35 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-15 12:04 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 12:31 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 13:08 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-15 13:11 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-15 13:47 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 14:25 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 15:33 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 16:08 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 17:18 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 17:33 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 18:05 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 17:55 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 21:07 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 20:58 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 18:19 ` David Howells 2007-08-15 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 23:41 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-15 23:53 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 0:12 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 0:30 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 0:49 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 0:53 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 1:14 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-15 18:31 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 19:40 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 20:42 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 1:23 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-15 23:22 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 0:26 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 0:34 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 0:40 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 0:39 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 0:42 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 0:53 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 0:59 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 1:14 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 1:41 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 2:15 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 2:08 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 2:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 3:23 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 3:33 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 3:48 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 4:03 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 4:34 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 5:37 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 6:00 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 18:48 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 19:44 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 2:18 ` Chris Friesen 2007-08-16 2:32 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 1:51 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 2:00 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 2:05 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 2:11 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 2:35 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 3:15 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 3:43 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 2:15 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 2:17 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 2:33 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 3:01 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 4:11 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 5:39 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 6:56 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 7:09 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 8:06 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-16 8:10 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 9:54 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-16 10:31 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-16 10:42 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 23:59 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-17 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 7:39 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 14:31 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 18:31 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 18:56 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 3:15 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 4:02 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 4:39 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 7:25 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-17 8:06 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 8:58 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 9:15 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 10:03 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 11:50 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 12:50 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 12:56 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 12:56 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-18 2:15 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 10:48 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-17 10:58 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-18 14:35 ` LDD3 pitfalls (was Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures) Stefan Richter 2007-08-20 13:28 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-17 22:14 ` [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 5:04 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 10:35 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-16 19:48 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-17 0:02 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-17 2:04 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-17 2:13 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-17 2:31 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 5:09 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 5:32 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-17 5:41 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 8:28 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 14:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen 2007-08-16 16:19 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-16 19:55 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-16 20:20 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-17 1:02 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 1:28 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-17 5:07 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 2:16 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-17 3:43 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-17 3:53 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-17 6:26 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 8:38 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 9:14 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 9:31 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 10:55 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 12:39 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 12:39 ` Nick Piggin 2007-08-17 13:36 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-17 18:50 ` Chris Friesen 2007-08-17 18:50 ` Chris Friesen 2007-08-17 18:54 ` Arjan van de Ven 2007-08-17 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 19:49 ` Arjan van de Ven 2007-08-17 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-17 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-20 13:15 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-20 13:15 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-20 13:32 ` Herbert Xu 2007-08-20 13:38 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-20 22:07 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-21 5:46 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-08-21 7:04 ` David Miller 2007-08-21 13:50 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-21 14:59 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-21 16:31 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-21 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-09-09 18:02 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-09 18:18 ` Arjan van de Ven 2007-09-10 10:56 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 11:15 ` Herbert Xu 2007-09-10 12:22 ` Kyle Moffett 2007-09-10 12:22 ` Kyle Moffett 2007-09-10 13:38 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 13:38 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 14:16 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 14:16 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 15:09 ` Linus Torvalds 2007-09-10 16:46 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 19:59 ` Kyle Moffett 2007-09-10 19:59 ` Kyle Moffett 2007-09-10 18:59 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-09-10 23:19 ` [PATCH] Document non-semantics of atomic_read() and atomic_set() Chris Snook 2007-09-10 23:19 ` Chris Snook 2007-09-10 23:44 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-09-10 23:44 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-09-11 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-09-11 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-09-10 14:51 ` [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Arjan van de Ven 2007-09-10 14:38 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-09-10 17:02 ` Arjan van de Ven 2007-08-17 11:08 ` Stefan Richter 2007-08-17 22:09 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 22:09 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 17:41 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 18:38 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 23:17 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message] 2007-08-17 23:17 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 23:55 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-18 0:04 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 0:04 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 1:56 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-18 2:15 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 2:15 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 3:33 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-18 5:18 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 5:18 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 13:20 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-09-10 18:59 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-09-10 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-09-10 21:36 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-09-10 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-09-11 2:27 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-09-11 2:27 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 21:08 ` Luck, Tony 2007-08-16 21:08 ` Luck, Tony 2007-08-16 19:55 ` Chris Snook 2007-08-16 18:54 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-16 20:07 ` Paul E. McKenney 2007-08-16 3:05 ` Paul Mackerras 2007-08-16 19:39 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 2:07 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-24 12:50 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-08-24 17:15 ` Christoph Lameter 2007-08-24 20:21 ` Denys Vlasenko 2007-08-16 3:37 ` Bill Fink 2007-08-16 5:20 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 5:57 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 9:25 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 21:00 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-17 4:32 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 22:38 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-18 14:42 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-16 20:50 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-16 22:40 ` David Schwartz 2007-08-17 4:36 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 4:24 ` Satyam Sharma 2007-08-17 22:34 ` Segher Boessenkool 2007-08-15 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=a51ab88dc00f8d7fd44f79400671d259@kernel.crashing.org \ --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=ak@suse.de \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \ --cc=clameter@sgi.com \ --cc=csnook@redhat.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \ --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \ --cc=horms@verge.net.au \ --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \ --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \ --cc=satyam@infradead.org \ --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \ --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \ --cc=wjiang@resilience.com \ --cc=zlynx@acm.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.