From: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>, general-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:45:29 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <adatyz1d17q.fsf@cisco.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <adazl8td35u.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> (Roland Dreier's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:03:25 -0700") > > > Hmm, or are you saying you can only get 1 event per registered range and > > > allocate the thing on registration? That'd need some registration limit > > > to avoid DoS scenarios. > > > > Yes, that's what I do. You're right, I should add a limit... although > > their are lots of ways for userspace to consume arbitrary amounts of > > kernel resources already. > > I'd be good to work at reducing that number, not adding to it ;-) Yes, definitely. I'll add a quick ummunotify module parameter that limits the number of registrations per process. > But yeah, I currently don't see a very nice match to perf counters. OK. It would be nice to tie into something more general, but I think I agree -- perf counters are missing the filtering and the "no lost events" that ummunotify does have. And I'm not sure it's worth messing up the perf counters design just to jam one more not totally related thing in. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, general@lists.openfabrics.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:45:29 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <adatyz1d17q.fsf@cisco.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <adazl8td35u.fsf@cisco.com> (Roland Dreier's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:03:25 -0700") > > > Hmm, or are you saying you can only get 1 event per registered range and > > > allocate the thing on registration? That'd need some registration limit > > > to avoid DoS scenarios. > > > > Yes, that's what I do. You're right, I should add a limit... although > > their are lots of ways for userspace to consume arbitrary amounts of > > kernel resources already. > > I'd be good to work at reducing that number, not adding to it ;-) Yes, definitely. I'll add a quick ummunotify module parameter that limits the number of registrations per process. > But yeah, I currently don't see a very nice match to perf counters. OK. It would be nice to tie into something more general, but I think I agree -- perf counters are missing the filtering and the "no lost events" that ummunotify does have. And I'm not sure it's worth messing up the perf counters design just to jam one more not totally related thing in. - R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 15:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-09-11 4:38 [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify Roland Dreier 2009-09-11 4:38 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-15 11:34 ` Pavel Machek [not found] ` <20090915113434.GF1328-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-15 14:57 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier 2009-09-15 14:57 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <ada7hw0gsqz.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 20:49 ` Pavel Machek 2009-09-28 20:49 ` Pavel Machek [not found] ` <20090928204923.GA1960-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-28 21:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-09-28 21:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe [not found] ` <aday6omhz9d.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-11 5:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-11 5:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-11 6:03 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier 2009-09-11 6:03 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <adatyzahvbm.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-11 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-11 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [not found] ` <20090911150552.DB68.A69D9226-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-11 16:42 ` Gleb Natapov 2009-09-11 16:42 ` Gleb Natapov 2009-09-11 6:15 ` Brice Goglin [not found] ` <4AA9EAF7.5010401-MZpvjPyXg2s@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-11 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-11 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-11 6:22 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-11 6:22 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-11 6:40 ` [ofa-general] " Jason Gunthorpe 2009-09-11 6:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe [not found] ` <20090911064019.GZ4973-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-11 16:58 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-11 16:58 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <adaljklifkt.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-15 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-15 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro 2009-09-15 8:27 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-15 8:27 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-15 12:38 ` Jeff Squyres 2009-09-15 12:38 ` Jeff Squyres 2009-09-16 16:30 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-16 16:30 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-16 16:40 ` [ofa-general] " Linus Torvalds 2009-09-16 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-09-17 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 14:24 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier [not found] ` <adafxalejiq.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-17 14:32 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-17 14:32 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <adaab0tej5c.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-17 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 15:03 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-17 15:03 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <adazl8td35u.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-17 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 15:45 ` Roland Dreier [this message] 2009-09-17 15:45 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <adatyz1d17q.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-18 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-09-18 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-09-29 17:13 ` Pavel Machek 2009-09-29 17:13 ` Pavel Machek [not found] ` <20090929171332.GD14405-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-30 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-09-30 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20090930094456.GD24621-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-09-30 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-09-30 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe [not found] ` <20090930160232.GZ22310-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-12 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-12 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091012181944.GF17138-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-12 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-10-12 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-10-12 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091012202046.GA7648-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-13 4:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-10-13 4:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-10-13 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20091013064006.GC9470-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-13 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-10-13 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2009-10-13 5:43 ` Brice Goglin [not found] ` <4AD41373.8010108-MZpvjPyXg2s@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-13 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-10-13 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar 2009-09-30 17:06 ` Roland Dreier 2009-09-30 17:06 ` Roland Dreier 2009-10-02 16:32 ` Roland Dreier 2009-10-02 16:32 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <ada3a61rc3j.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-02 20:45 ` Pavel Machek 2009-10-02 20:45 ` Pavel Machek 2009-10-07 22:34 ` Roland Dreier 2009-10-07 22:34 ` Roland Dreier [not found] ` <ada3a5uq1dk.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2009-10-12 17:33 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-10-12 17:33 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra 2009-09-17 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=adatyz1d17q.fsf@cisco.com \ --to=rdreier-fyb4gu1cfyuavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \ --cc=anton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \ --cc=general-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \ --cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \ --cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.