All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@oracle.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@Sun.COM, tytso@mit.edu,
	mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com,
	Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
	npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken <dave.mccracken@oracle.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:09:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com>

> From: Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
>=20
> On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS
> >  such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache)
>=20
> When you say "block device based", does this exclude network
> filesystems?  It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best
> suited to high-latency network filesystems.

I don't think it should exclude network FSs and agree cleancache
might be well-suited for them.  So if "block device based"
leaves out the possibility of network FSs, I am just
displaying my general ignorance of FSs and I/O, and
welcome clarification from FS developers.  What I really
meant is: Don't use cleancache for RAM-based filesystems.
=20
> > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique
> >  (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers)
>=20
> Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use
> an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)?  Disallowing
> cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-
> bit system reduces its usefulness.

True... Earlier versions of the patch did not use ino_t but
instead used an opaque always-64-bit-unsigned "object id".
The patch changed to use ino_t in response to Al Viro's comment
to "use sane types".

The <pool_id,object_id,pg_offset> triple must uniquely
and permanently (unless explicitly flushed) describe
exactly one page of FS data.  So if usefulness is increased
by changing object_id back to an explicit 64-bit value,
I'm happy to do that.  The only disadvantage I can
see is that 32-bit systems pass an extra 32 bits on
every call that may always be zero on most FSs.

Thanks,
Dan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@oracle.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@Sun.COM, tytso@mit.edu,
	mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com,
	Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
	npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken <dave.mccracken@oracle.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:09:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com>

> From: Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
> 
> On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS
> >  such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache)
> 
> When you say "block device based", does this exclude network
> filesystems?  It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best
> suited to high-latency network filesystems.

I don't think it should exclude network FSs and agree cleancache
might be well-suited for them.  So if "block device based"
leaves out the possibility of network FSs, I am just
displaying my general ignorance of FSs and I/O, and
welcome clarification from FS developers.  What I really
meant is: Don't use cleancache for RAM-based filesystems.
 
> > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique
> >  (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers)
> 
> Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use
> an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)?  Disallowing
> cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-
> bit system reduces its usefulness.

True... Earlier versions of the patch did not use ino_t but
instead used an opaque always-64-bit-unsigned "object id".
The patch changed to use ino_t in response to Al Viro's comment
to "use sane types".

The <pool_id,object_id,pg_offset> triple must uniquely
and permanently (unless explicitly flushed) describe
exactly one page of FS data.  So if usefulness is increased
by changing object_id back to an explicit 64-bit value,
I'm happy to do that.  The only disadvantage I can
see is that 32-bit systems pass an extra 32 bits on
every call that may always be zero on most FSs.

Thanks,
Dan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@oracle.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@Sun.COM, tytso@mit.edu,
	mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com,
	Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
	npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken <dave.mccracken@oracle.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:09:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com>

> From: Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
> 
> On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS
> >  such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache)
> 
> When you say "block device based", does this exclude network
> filesystems?  It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best
> suited to high-latency network filesystems.

I don't think it should exclude network FSs and agree cleancache
might be well-suited for them.  So if "block device based"
leaves out the possibility of network FSs, I am just
displaying my general ignorance of FSs and I/O, and
welcome clarification from FS developers.  What I really
meant is: Don't use cleancache for RAM-based filesystems.
 
> > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique
> >  (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers)
> 
> Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use
> an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)?  Disallowing
> cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-
> bit system reduces its usefulness.

True... Earlier versions of the patch did not use ino_t but
instead used an opaque always-64-bit-unsigned "object id".
The patch changed to use ino_t in response to Al Viro's comment
to "use sane types".

The <pool_id,object_id,pg_offset> triple must uniquely
and permanently (unless explicitly flushed) describe
exactly one page of FS data.  So if usefulness is increased
by changing object_id back to an explicit 64-bit value,
I'm happy to do that.  The only disadvantage I can
see is that 32-bit systems pass an extra 32 bits on
every call that may always be zero on most FSs.

Thanks,
Dan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@oracle.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ngupta@vflare.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@Sun.COM, tytso@mit.edu,
	mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com,
	Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
	npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken <dave.mccracken@oracle.com>,
	riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:09:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22A6238E-0BA4-4AB9-A4FA-28B206A47513@oracle.com>

> From: Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview
> 
> On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS
> >  such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache)
> 
> When you say "block device based", does this exclude network
> filesystems?  It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best
> suited to high-latency network filesystems.

I don't think it should exclude network FSs and agree cleancache
might be well-suited for them.  So if "block device based"
leaves out the possibility of network FSs, I am just
displaying my general ignorance of FSs and I/O, and
welcome clarification from FS developers.  What I really
meant is: Don't use cleancache for RAM-based filesystems.
 
> > - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique
> >  (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers)
> 
> Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use
> an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)?  Disallowing
> cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-
> bit system reduces its usefulness.

True... Earlier versions of the patch did not use ino_t but
instead used an opaque always-64-bit-unsigned "object id".
The patch changed to use ino_t in response to Al Viro's comment
to "use sane types".

The <pool_id,object_id,pg_offset> triple must uniquely
and permanently (unless explicitly flushed) describe
exactly one page of FS data.  So if usefulness is increased
by changing object_id back to an explicit 64-bit value,
I'm happy to do that.  The only disadvantage I can
see is that 32-bit systems pass an extra 32 bits on
every call that may always be zero on most FSs.

Thanks,
Dan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-21 23:18 [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-21 23:18 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-21 23:18 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-22  6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-22  6:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-22  6:40   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-06 20:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-07-06 20:58   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-07-06 20:58   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-07-23  7:36 ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23  7:36   ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23  7:36   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23  8:16   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23  8:16     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Minchan Kim
2010-07-23  8:16     ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23  8:16     ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23 14:56     ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 14:56       ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 14:56       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23  8:17   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23  8:17     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Minchan Kim
2010-07-23  8:17     ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23  8:17     ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-23 13:58   ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 13:58     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 13:58     ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 14:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 14:04       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 14:04       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 14:44       ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 14:44         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 14:44         ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 14:44         ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 15:05         ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 15:05           ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 15:05           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 17:43           ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:43             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:43             ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:43             ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:37         ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:37           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:37           ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 17:37           ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 18:36           ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 18:36             ` Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 18:36             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Nitin Gupta
2010-07-23 21:17         ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 21:17           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 21:17           ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-07-23 21:17           ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 16:22           ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-03 16:22             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-03 16:22             ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-03 17:35             ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 17:35               ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 17:35               ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 17:35               ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 18:34               ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-03 18:34                 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2010-08-03 18:34                 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-03 18:34                 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-08-03 19:09                 ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2010-08-03 19:09                   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 19:09                   ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-08-03 19:09                   ` Dan Magenheimer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-21 23:18 Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-21 23:18 Dan Magenheimer
2010-06-21 23:18 Dan Magenheimer
     [not found] <20100621231809.GA11111@ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af8b0006-0eb7-468a-bbf8-36ecec9bec35@default \
    --to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=adilger@Sun.COM \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@oracle.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.mccracken@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.