[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/4] arm: socfpga: imply SPL config instead of select

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 1/8/19 7:24 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:58 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/7/19 10:14 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> In order to build a smaller SPL, let's imply SPL_DM_RESET and
>>> SPL_WATCHDOG_SUPPORT instead of selecting them, so they can be disabled
>>> via defconfig.
>>>
>>> This also seems to be required to use OF_PLATDATA, as the reset drivers
>>> don't seem to work with it.
>>
>> How do you un-reset IP blocks if you disable the reset controller ?
> 
> Here again, socfpga seems to be another bad example. Taking
> peripherals out of reset
> is cluttered throughout the mach-socfpga code at least in SPL. By now
> I know socfpga is
> lacking support for clock and reset management via devicetree. And
> this is bad, I know,
> but can we keep this a seperate issue from OF_PLATDATA?
> 
> That being said, drivers/reset/reset-uclass.c fails to compile with
> OF_PLATDATA, so I
> guess this has not been used with OF_PLATDATA before. And given that I
> don't seem
> to need it for socfpga either, I don't think this would be the right
> series to fix that.

Don't you need it to unreset at least the DWMMC or CQSPI ?
Anyway, I'd much prefer to start cleaning up the horrorshow that
arch/arm/mach-socfpga is in terms of clock and reset, at least like A10.
Would that be possible ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut