All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Larry Woodman" <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:32:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f36306aa-cc28-ae2e-1a7e-a6b69c474daf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115121035.GD24857@8bytes.org>

On 11/15/2016 6:10 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:35:13PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) can reduce the size of the physical
>> + * address space if it is enabled, even if memory encryption is not active.
>> + * Adjust x86_phys_bits if SME is enabled.
>> + */
>> +static void phys_bits_adjust(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> +{
> 
> Better call this function amd_sme_phys_bits_adjust(). This name makes it
> clear at the call-site why it is there and what it does.

Will do.

> 
>> +	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>> +	u64 msr;
>> +
>> +	if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (c->extended_cpuid_level < 0x8000001f)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Check for SME feature */
>> +	cpuid(0x8000001f, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> +	if (!(eax & 0x01))
>> +		return;
> 
> Maybe add a comment here why you can't use cpu_has (yet).
> 

Ok, will do.

Thanks,
Tom

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Matt Fleming"
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	"Alexander Potapenko"
	<glider-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Larry Woodman"
	<lwoodman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	kasan-dev-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin"
	<aryabinin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini"
	<pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:32:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f36306aa-cc28-ae2e-1a7e-a6b69c474daf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115121035.GD24857-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On 11/15/2016 6:10 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:35:13PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) can reduce the size of the physical
>> + * address space if it is enabled, even if memory encryption is not active.
>> + * Adjust x86_phys_bits if SME is enabled.
>> + */
>> +static void phys_bits_adjust(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> +{
> 
> Better call this function amd_sme_phys_bits_adjust(). This name makes it
> clear at the call-site why it is there and what it does.

Will do.

> 
>> +	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>> +	u64 msr;
>> +
>> +	if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (c->extended_cpuid_level < 0x8000001f)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Check for SME feature */
>> +	cpuid(0x8000001f, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> +	if (!(eax & 0x01))
>> +		return;
> 
> Maybe add a comment here why you can't use cpu_has (yet).
> 

Ok, will do.

Thanks,
Tom

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Larry Woodman" <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:32:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f36306aa-cc28-ae2e-1a7e-a6b69c474daf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115121035.GD24857@8bytes.org>

On 11/15/2016 6:10 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:35:13PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) can reduce the size of the physical
>> + * address space if it is enabled, even if memory encryption is not active.
>> + * Adjust x86_phys_bits if SME is enabled.
>> + */
>> +static void phys_bits_adjust(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> +{
> 
> Better call this function amd_sme_phys_bits_adjust(). This name makes it
> clear at the call-site why it is there and what it does.

Will do.

> 
>> +	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>> +	u64 msr;
>> +
>> +	if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (c->extended_cpuid_level < 0x8000001f)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Check for SME feature */
>> +	cpuid(0x8000001f, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> +	if (!(eax & 0x01))
>> +		return;
> 
> Maybe add a comment here why you can't use cpu_has (yet).
> 

Ok, will do.

Thanks,
Tom

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 244+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-10  0:34 [RFC PATCH v3 00/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10 10:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10 10:51     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-14 17:15     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 17:15       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 17:15       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/20] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for full PAT support Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10 13:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10 13:14     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-11  1:26     ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2016-11-11  1:26       ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2016-11-11  1:26       ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2016-11-14 16:51       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:51         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:51         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:51         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/20] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:34   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-11 11:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-11 11:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10  0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 12:10   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-15 12:10     ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-15 12:10     ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-15 12:14     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 12:14       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 14:40       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 14:40         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 15:33         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 15:33           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 15:33           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 16:06           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 16:06             ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 16:06             ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 16:33             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 16:33               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 17:08               ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 17:08                 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 17:08                 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 21:22       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 21:22         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 21:22         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 21:33         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 21:33           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 21:33           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-15 22:01           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 22:01             ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 14:32     ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2016-11-15 14:32       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 14:32       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/20] x86: Add Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/20] x86: Add support to enable SME during early boot processing Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 17:29   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-14 17:29     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-14 18:18     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 18:18       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 18:18       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 20:01       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-14 20:01         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10  0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-16 10:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-16 10:46     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-16 19:22     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-16 19:22       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-16 19:22       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/20] x86: Insure that boot memory areas are mapped properly Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-17 12:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 12:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-19 18:12     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-19 18:12       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/20] Add support to access boot related data in the clear Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-11 16:17   ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2016-11-11 16:17     ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2016-11-14 16:24     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:24       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:24       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-17 15:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 15:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-19 18:33     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-19 18:33       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-19 18:33       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-20 23:04       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-20 23:04         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-07 13:19   ` Matt Fleming
2016-12-07 13:19     ` Matt Fleming
2016-12-07 13:19     ` Matt Fleming
2016-12-09 14:26     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-12-09 14:26       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-12-09 14:26       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-17 17:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 17:39     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-19 18:48     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-19 18:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-21  8:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-21  8:27         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10  0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/20] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-17 18:09   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-17 18:09     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-19 18:50     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-19 18:50       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 14:39   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 14:39     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 14:39     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 17:02     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 17:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 17:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 17:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 18:17       ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 18:17         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 18:17         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 18:17         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-15 20:33         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 20:33           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 20:33           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 20:33           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 15:16   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-15 15:16     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-15 15:16     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-15 18:29     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 18:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 18:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-15 19:16       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-15 19:16         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-15 19:16         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-22 11:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 11:38         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 11:38         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 15:22         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-22 15:22           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-22 15:22           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-22 15:41           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 15:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 20:41             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-22 20:41               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-22 20:41               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-10  0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/20] iommu/amd: Disable AMD IOMMU if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:32   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-14 16:32     ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-14 16:32     ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-14 16:48     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-14 16:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/20] x86: Check for memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-22 19:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 19:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-29 18:00     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-29 18:00       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-29 18:00       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/20] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for video mappings Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/20] x86: Access the setup data through debugfs un-encrypted Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/20] x86: Add support to make use of Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-24 12:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-24 12:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-24 12:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-29 18:40     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-29 18:40       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/20] " Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-22 18:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 18:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-22 18:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-26 20:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-26 20:47     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-29 18:48     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-29 18:48       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-11-29 19:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-29 19:56         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f36306aa-cc28-ae2e-1a7e-a6b69c474daf@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.