* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis @ 2015-12-19 18:05 Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 12:13 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-19 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hi, here you will find my current snapshot for the next Kodi release: https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/tree/kodi16 Current release status is beta4: http://kodi.tv/kodi-16-0-beta-4-jarvis-is-getting-ready-4/ My tree uses HEAD of the Jarvis branch: https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/tree/Jarvis The first two patches in my series do not depend on the Kodi version bump, I am using them with 15.2 already, therefore they precede the Kodi version bump: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/538512/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/538513/ Kodi moved to C++11 so we need gcc >= 4.7: https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/6412 I know that hash files are missing, I will add them to the patch series of the final bump after the release of Kodi 16.0-Jarvis. Feedback welcome ;) Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-19 18:05 [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 12:13 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:05:23 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > Hi, > > here you will find my current snapshot for the next Kodi release: > https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/tree/kodi16 Hi, after a first review by Thomas I just updated the branch. Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 12:13 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-12-20 13:00 ` Yann E. MORIN 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-20 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Bernd, On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 13:13:19 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > after a first review by Thomas I just updated the branch. Thanks. I don't know if others will agree, but I believe it might make things easier to review if all the very simple "bump version" patches for all kodi add-ons were merged into a single patch. I know we normally don't do that, but it would make the series a lot shorter, and would emphasize the few updates for which it's not just a mechanical bump. So, this "big" commit would only contain the version bumps for the packages that don't require anything but a change to the version. If you need to do more than that, then it should be in a separate commit per package. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-20 13:00 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-12-20 13:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-12-20 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Thomas, Bernd, All, On 2015-12-20 13:54 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 13:13:19 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > > after a first review by Thomas I just updated the branch. > > Thanks. I don't know if others will agree, but I believe it might make > things easier to review if all the very simple "bump version" patches > for all kodi add-ons were merged into a single patch. I know we > normally don't do that, but it would make the series a lot shorter, and > would emphasize the few updates for which it's not just a mechanical > bump. So, this "big" commit would only contain the version bumps for > the packages that don't require anything but a change to the version. > If you need to do more than that, then it should be in a separate > commit per package. Well, I'm not too fond of that. But indeed, it's a pain to review either way. Maybe a middle-ground solution would be to bump all the screensavers in one patch, all the audiocoders in a second one and so on? Also, I'm not too fond of doing reviews on a github repository. I'd largely prefer we have a complete RFC series on the list, otherwise the reviews are lost. For example, I now can't see what Thomas as said, since the branch has been rebased and previous comments are lost. So, if the bumps are grouped by catregories, the series will machanically be shorter, and will be easier to handle on the list. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 13:00 ` Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-12-20 13:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-12-20 13:48 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 14:47 ` Yann E. MORIN 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-20 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:00:54 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Well, I'm not too fond of that. But indeed, it's a pain to review either > way. > > Maybe a middle-ground solution would be to bump all the screensavers in > one patch, all the audiocoders in a second one and so on? I'm fine with this, but I'd like to keep my request to have the "simple bumps" grouped together in certain commits, but as soon as the bump is not just a mechanical one, it should be a separate patch. I.e for example: kodi-screensaver-*: mechanical bumps kodi-screensaver-baz: bump version > Also, I'm not too fond of doing reviews on a github repository. I'd > largely prefer we have a complete RFC series on the list, otherwise the > reviews are lost. For example, I now can't see what Thomas as said, > since the branch has been rebased and previous comments are lost. I think Bernd's intention was just to announce that he was going to post all the patches as soon as Kodi 16 was out, but he wants to wait for that release to happen before posting 100 patches on the list. But by grouping package bumps a little bit, the size of the series would be a lot shorter, and it would therefore be a bit more acceptable to post such an RFC series on the list. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 13:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-20 13:48 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 14:51 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-12-20 14:47 ` Yann E. MORIN 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:16:13 +0100 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: >> Also, I'm not too fond of doing reviews on a github repository. I'd >> largely prefer we have a complete RFC series on the list, otherwise the >> reviews are lost. For example, I now can't see what Thomas as said, >> since the branch has been rebased and previous comments are lost. > > I think Bernd's intention was just to announce that he was going to post > all the patches as soon as Kodi 16 was out, but he wants to wait for > that release to happen before posting 100 patches on the list. Hi Thomas, yes, you got my intention right, and, btw, I just followed your advice ;) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.buildroot/120960 @Yann: Thomas' comments were about license files and one missing SELECT in Config.in and the format of a patch file, no big stuff. Just to get things right, these patches should be squashed into one patch bumping all audio en-/decoder addons? * 13b3dfb - package/kodi-audioencoder-wav: bump version * cef928f - package/kodi-audioencoder-vorbis: bump version * f5a66b6 - package/kodi-audioencoder-lame: bump version * 603a6b6 - package/kodi-audioencoder-flac: bump version * fd66f18 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-vgmstream: bump version * 16a8773 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-timidity: bump version * 91d7adf - package/kodi-audiodecoder-stsound: bump version * 666a842 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-snesapu: bump version * 7abfa7e - package/kodi-audiodecoder-sidplay: bump version * 9476aa9 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-nosefart: bump version * 6a13973 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-modplug: bump version These should be squashed into one patch to bump all pvr addons: * 909e692 - package/kodi-pvr-wmc: bump version * 19e326d - package/kodi-pvr-vuplus: bump version * f8db75b - package/kodi-pvr-vdr-vnsi: bump version * 7e50b7d - package/kodi-pvr-vbox: bump version * ebeea23 - package/kodi-pvr-stalker: bump version * a988af9 - package/kodi-pvr-pctv: bump version * 35557cb - package/kodi-pvr-njoy: bump version * 24b0af6 - package/kodi-pvr-nextpvr: bump version * 59045cb - package/kodi-pvr-mythtv: bump version * dd75d83 - package/kodi-pvr-mediaportal-tvserver: bump version * bc96596 - package/kodi-pvr-iptvsimple: bump version * 8383797 - package/kodi-pvr-hts: bump version * b0a5951 - package/kodi-pvr-filmon: bump version * 5d8466f - package/kodi-pvr-dvbviewer: bump version * c1d70ad - package/kodi-pvr-dvblink: bump version * 21337f8 - package/kodi-pvr-argustv: bump version and one patch for visualisation bumps: * 304d2be - package/kodi-visualisation-waveform: bump version * d608df6 - package/kodi-visualisation-spectrum: bump version * 10aaad1 - package/kodi-visualisation-shadertoy: bump version yet another patch for screensaver bumps: * 3f26e24 - package/kodi-screensaver-stars: bump version * aa76a13 - package/kodi-screensaver-pyro: bump version * ccae71c - package/kodi-screensaver-pingpong: bump version * 8f8c82a - package/kodi-screensaver-greynetic: bump version * 0d4e7f6 - package/kodi-screensaver-biogenesis: bump version * 658b5eb - package/kodi-screensaver-asteroids: bump version What about the hash files to be added with the final patch series? Should they be included in the combined patches or shall I make seperate patches for each hash file added? If this is the case then I can keep the patch series as is because I will then include each hash file with the corresponding version bump patch. I kept the hash files out at this stage because the Kodi development is still in progress with on-going updates in the PVR area. Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 13:48 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 14:51 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-12-20 20:37 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 20:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-12-20 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Bernd, All, On 2015-12-20 14:48 +0100, Bernd Kuhls spake thusly: > Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:16:13 +0100 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: [--SNIP--] > > I think Bernd's intention was just to announce that he was going to post > > all the patches as soon as Kodi 16 was out, but he wants to wait for > > that release to happen before posting 100 patches on the list. > > Hi Thomas, > > yes, you got my intention right, and, btw, I just followed your advice ;) > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.buildroot/120960 Ah, OK! :-) > @Yann: Thomas' comments were about license files and one missing SELECT > in Config.in and the format of a patch file, no big stuff. Good! > Just to get things right, these patches should be squashed into one patch > bumping all audio en-/decoder addons? > > * 13b3dfb - package/kodi-audioencoder-wav: bump version > * cef928f - package/kodi-audioencoder-vorbis: bump version > * f5a66b6 - package/kodi-audioencoder-lame: bump version > * 603a6b6 - package/kodi-audioencoder-flac: bump version > * fd66f18 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-vgmstream: bump version > * 16a8773 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-timidity: bump version > * 91d7adf - package/kodi-audiodecoder-stsound: bump version > * 666a842 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-snesapu: bump version > * 7abfa7e - package/kodi-audiodecoder-sidplay: bump version > * 9476aa9 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-nosefart: bump version > * 6a13973 - package/kodi-audiodecoder-modplug: bump version As long as it is only a mechanical bump, without change to the .mk files, and with n/removed patches (i.e. only the _VERSION variables are changed), then yes, a single commit. > These should be squashed into one patch to bump all pvr addons: > * 909e692 - package/kodi-pvr-wmc: bump version > * 19e326d - package/kodi-pvr-vuplus: bump version > * f8db75b - package/kodi-pvr-vdr-vnsi: bump version > * 7e50b7d - package/kodi-pvr-vbox: bump version > * ebeea23 - package/kodi-pvr-stalker: bump version > * a988af9 - package/kodi-pvr-pctv: bump version > * 35557cb - package/kodi-pvr-njoy: bump version > * 24b0af6 - package/kodi-pvr-nextpvr: bump version > * 59045cb - package/kodi-pvr-mythtv: bump version > * dd75d83 - package/kodi-pvr-mediaportal-tvserver: bump version > * bc96596 - package/kodi-pvr-iptvsimple: bump version > * 8383797 - package/kodi-pvr-hts: bump version > * b0a5951 - package/kodi-pvr-filmon: bump version > * 5d8466f - package/kodi-pvr-dvbviewer: bump version > * c1d70ad - package/kodi-pvr-dvblink: bump version > * 21337f8 - package/kodi-pvr-argustv: bump version Yup. And possibly kodi-addon-xvdr too, no? > and one patch for visualisation bumps: > * 304d2be - package/kodi-visualisation-waveform: bump version > * d608df6 - package/kodi-visualisation-spectrum: bump version > * 10aaad1 - package/kodi-visualisation-shadertoy: bump version Yup. > yet another patch for screensaver bumps: > * 3f26e24 - package/kodi-screensaver-stars: bump version > * aa76a13 - package/kodi-screensaver-pyro: bump version > * ccae71c - package/kodi-screensaver-pingpong: bump version > * 8f8c82a - package/kodi-screensaver-greynetic: bump version > * 0d4e7f6 - package/kodi-screensaver-biogenesis: bump version > * 658b5eb - package/kodi-screensaver-asteroids: bump version Yup. > What about the hash files to be added with the final patch series? Should > they be included in the combined patches or shall I make seperate patches > for each hash file added? If this is the case then I can keep the patch > series as is because I will then include each hash file with the > corresponding version bump patch. I kept the hash files out at this stage > because the Kodi development is still in progress with on-going updates > in the PVR area. The hashes you include in the same patch as the bumps. Thanks! :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 14:51 ` Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-12-20 20:37 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-24 13:44 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 20:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:53 +0100 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: > As long as it is only a mechanical bump, without change to the .mk > files, and with n/removed patches (i.e. only the _VERSION variables are > changed), then yes, a single commit. Hi Yann, done: https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/commits/kodi16 Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 20:37 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-01-24 13:44 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-24 14:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2016-01-31 16:38 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-01-24 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:37:09 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:53 +0100 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: > >> As long as it is only a mechanical bump, without change to the .mk >> files, and with n/removed patches (i.e. only the _VERSION variables are >> changed), then yes, a single commit. > > Hi Yann, > > done: https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/commits/kodi16 > > Regards, Bernd Hi @all: Kodi 16.0-rc1 was released this week, I updated my github repo. Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-01-24 13:44 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-01-24 14:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2016-01-24 15:18 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-31 16:38 ` Bernd Kuhls 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-01-24 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Bernd, On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:44:31 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > Hi @all: > > Kodi 16.0-rc1 was released this week, I updated my github repo. Do you know when the final 16 release will be published ? If it's before end of January, then we can include it in 2016.02 and you should post the patches for -rc1 as soon as possible. However, if it's scheduled to be released after end of January, then it will only make it for Buildroot 2016.05, in which case you can wait just after the release of 2016.02 to post your patch series. How does that sound? (BTW, if you want a specific reaction from me from a mail posted on the mailing list, try to Cc me.) Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-01-24 14:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-01-24 15:18 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-01-24 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:56:06 +0100 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: > Bernd, > > On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:44:31 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > >> Hi @all: >> >> Kodi 16.0-rc1 was released this week, I updated my github repo. > > Do you know when the final 16 release will be published ? Hi Thomas, unfortunately I have no idea, let's wait and see ;) Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-01-24 13:44 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-24 14:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-01-31 16:38 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-02-04 20:39 ` Bernd Kuhls 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-01-31 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:44:31 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:37:09 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > >> Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:53 +0100 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: >> >>> As long as it is only a mechanical bump, without change to the .mk >>> files, and with n/removed patches (i.e. only the _VERSION variables >>> are changed), then yes, a single commit. >> >> Hi Yann, >> >> done: https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/commits/kodi16 >> >> Regards, Bernd > > Hi @all: > > Kodi 16.0-rc1 was released this week, I updated my github repo. > > Regards, Bernd Hi @all: Kodi 16.0-rc2 was released this week, I updated my github repo. http://kodi.tv/kodi-16-0-jarvis-release-candidate-2/ Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-01-31 16:38 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-02-04 20:39 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-02-07 13:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-02-04 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:38:17 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > Am Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:44:31 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > >> Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:37:09 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: >> >>> Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:53 +0100 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: >>> >>>> As long as it is only a mechanical bump, without change to the .mk >>>> files, and with n/removed patches (i.e. only the _VERSION variables >>>> are changed), then yes, a single commit. >>> >>> Hi Yann, >>> >>> done: https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/commits/kodi16 >>> >>> Regards, Bernd >> >> Hi @all: >> >> Kodi 16.0-rc1 was released this week, I updated my github repo. >> >> Regards, Bernd > > Hi @all: > > Kodi 16.0-rc2 was released this week, I updated my github repo. > http://kodi.tv/kodi-16-0-jarvis-release-candidate-2/ > > Regards, Bernd Hi, I just rebased the patch series. Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-02-04 20:39 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-02-07 13:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-02-07 13:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-02-07 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:39:28 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: > Am Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:38:17 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: >> Am Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:44:31 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: >>> Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:37:09 +0100 schrieb Bernd Kuhls: >>>> Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:53 +0100 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: >>>>> As long as it is only a mechanical bump, without change to the .mk >>>>> files, and with n/removed patches (i.e. only the _VERSION variables >>>>> are changed), then yes, a single commit. >>>> >>>> Hi Yann, >>>> >>>> done: https://github.com/bkuhls/buildroot/commits/kodi16 >>> >>> Hi @all: >>> >>> Kodi 16.0-rc1 was released this week, I updated my github repo. >> >> Hi @all: >> >> Kodi 16.0-rc2 was released this week, I updated my github repo. >> http://kodi.tv/kodi-16-0-jarvis-release-candidate-2/ > > I just rebased the patch series. > Hi, right now I am preparing the updated patch series for Kodi 16.0 rc3 which was released this week. Because I do not expect any changes to my patch series when 16.0 is finally released I would like to ask if you accept the Kodi rc3 patch series before buildroot enters rc1 state with the final version bump (and addition of hash files, of course ;)) in the next weeks? Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-02-07 13:41 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-02-07 13:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2016-02-13 15:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-02-07 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Dear Bernd Kuhls, (Please try to Cc: me explicitly on such questions, otherwise I miss them.) On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:41:02 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > right now I am preparing the updated patch series for Kodi 16.0 rc3 which > was released this week. Because I do not expect any changes to my patch > series when 16.0 is finally released I would like to ask if you accept > the Kodi rc3 patch series before buildroot enters rc1 state with the > final version bump (and addition of hash files, of course ;)) in the next > weeks? Are we sure that Kodi 16.0 will be released by the end of February ? If that's the case, then I think I'm OK with taking the -rc3 patches right now, and then bump to 16.0 when it gets released, before we release 2016.02. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2016-02-07 13:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2016-02-13 15:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2016-02-13 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:58:59 +0100 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: > Are we sure that Kodi 16.0 will be released by the end of February ? If > that's the case, then I think I'm OK with taking the -rc3 patches right > now, and then bump to 16.0 when it gets released, before we release > 2016.02. Hi Thomas, I marked the whole Kodi series as "deferred" in patchworks to reduce the number of patches there. When Kodi 16.0 is finally released I will send an updated version with hashes ;) Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 14:51 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-12-20 20:37 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 20:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Am Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:51:53 +0100 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: > Yup. And possibly kodi-addon-xvdr too, no? Hi Yann, there were no changes to its upstream repo, the current buildroot package reflects the latest version of the repo: https://github.com/pipelka/xbmc-addon-xvdr/commits/master But tbh I am not a vdr expert, personally I am happy with tvheadend. Regards, Bernd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis 2015-12-20 13:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-12-20 13:48 ` Bernd Kuhls @ 2015-12-20 14:47 ` Yann E. MORIN 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-12-20 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Thomas, All, On 2015-12-20 14:16 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:00:54 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Well, I'm not too fond of that. But indeed, it's a pain to review either > > way. > > > > Maybe a middle-ground solution would be to bump all the screensavers in > > one patch, all the audiocoders in a second one and so on? > > I'm fine with this, but I'd like to keep my request to have the "simple > bumps" grouped together in certain commits, but as soon as the bump is > not just a mechanical one, it should be a separate patch. I.e for > example: > > kodi-screensaver-*: mechanical bumps > kodi-screensaver-baz: bump version Yes, agreed. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-13 15:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-12-19 18:05 [Buildroot] RFC: Patch series for Kodi 16-Jarvis Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 12:13 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-12-20 13:00 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-12-20 13:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2015-12-20 13:48 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 14:51 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-12-20 20:37 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-24 13:44 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-24 14:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2016-01-24 15:18 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-01-31 16:38 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-02-04 20:39 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-02-07 13:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 2016-02-07 13:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2016-02-13 15:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 20:41 ` Bernd Kuhls 2015-12-20 14:47 ` Yann E. MORIN
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.