All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Defer probe when loading patch firmware
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:32:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hobmk2ql5.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809103430.GA1560@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>

At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:34:30 +0200,
Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:21:15AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:07:13 +0200,
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:42:48AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:36:42 +0200,
> > > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:31:30AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > > At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:08:13 +0200,
> > > > > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:57:13AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > > > > At Thu,  9 Aug 2012 08:45:23 +0200,
> > > > > > > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Recent changes to the firmware loading helpers cause drivers to stall
> > > > > > > > > when firmware is loaded during the module_init() call. The snd-hda-intel
> > > > > > > > > module requests firmware if the patch= parameter is used to load a patch
> > > > > > > > > file. This patch works around the problem by deferring the probe in such
> > > > > > > > > cases, which will cause the module to load successfully and the driver
> > > > > > > > > binding to the device outside the module_init() call.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Is the "recent" change meant 3.6 kernel, or in linux-next?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > In anyway, I don't understand why such a change was allowed.  Most
> > > > > > > > drivers do call request_firmware() at the device probing time.
> > > > > > > > If this really has to be resolved in the driver side, it must be a bug
> > > > > > > > in the firmware loader core code.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > A good explanation of the problem and subsequent discussion can be found
> > > > > > > here:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 	http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/49975
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yeah, but it doesn't justify this ugly module option.
> > > > > > It's a simple bug.  Papering over it with this option doesn't fix
> > > > > > anything.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's not an option, all it does is defer probing if and only if the
> > > > > patch parameter was specified to make sure the firmware load won't
> > > > > stall. I realize that this may not be an optimal solution, but at least
> > > > > it fixes the problem with no fallout.
> > > > 
> > > > Ah sorry, I misread the patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Then it shouldn't be checked at that point.  Since 3.5 kernel, the
> > > > probing code was already split for vga_switcheroo support.
> > > 
> > > Yes, I saw that. But unless you actually use vga_switcheroo, the second
> > > stage, azx_probe_continue(), will still be called from azx_probe() and
> > > therefore ultimately from module_init().
> > 
> > Yeah, but this could be easily delayed.  The split was already done,
> > so the next step would be to return after the first half at probe,
> > then call the second half later.
> > 
> > > Before coming up with this patch I actually did play around a bit with
> > > using the asynchronous firmware load functions but it turned out to be
> > > rather difficult to do so I opted for the easy way. The biggest problem
> > > I faced was that since patch loading needs to be done very early on, a
> > > lot of the initialization would need to be done after .probe() and many
> > > things could still fail, so cleaning up after errors would become
> > > increasingly difficult.
> > 
> > async probe is also on my TODO list, but it's deferred ;)
> > 
> > > > The point you added is the second stage.
> > > 
> > > I don't understand this sentence.
> > 
> > I meant that your patch added the check at the second-half probing
> > function (azx_probe_contine()).  That is, it could be already the
> > point triggered by vga_switcheroo handler, not via module_init any
> > longer.
> > 
> > So, after rethinking what you suggested, I wrote a quick patch below.
> > Could you check whether this works?
> 
> It oopses, though I can't quite tell where. I need to test some more
> later to see where it goes wrong.

Yeah, I tested it here and noticed, too.  As mentioned, the behavior
of -EPROBE_DEFER is somehow flaky.  For example, when it's used for
modules, the deferred probe will be never triggered (unless a new
device is bound).

Considering the problem again, it's currently an issue only for the
built-in sound driver, right?  AFAIK, request_firmware() works fine
for modules.  If so, a simple "fix" to avoid the unexpected behavior
is to make CONFIG_SND_HDA_PATCH_LOADER depending on CONFIG_SND_HDA=m.
It'd be simple enough for merging 3.6 kernel.

I almost finished writing the patch to use request_firmware_nowait()
version, but I'm afraid it's too intrusive for 3.6.  If disabling the
patch loader for the built-in driver is OK, I'd queue the
request_firmware_nowait() patches to 3.7 queue.


Takashi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Defer probe when loading patch firmware
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:32:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hobmk2ql5.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809103430.GA1560@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>

At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:34:30 +0200,
Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:21:15AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:07:13 +0200,
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:42:48AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:36:42 +0200,
> > > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:31:30AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > > At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:08:13 +0200,
> > > > > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:57:13AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > > > > At Thu,  9 Aug 2012 08:45:23 +0200,
> > > > > > > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Recent changes to the firmware loading helpers cause drivers to stall
> > > > > > > > > when firmware is loaded during the module_init() call. The snd-hda-intel
> > > > > > > > > module requests firmware if the patch= parameter is used to load a patch
> > > > > > > > > file. This patch works around the problem by deferring the probe in such
> > > > > > > > > cases, which will cause the module to load successfully and the driver
> > > > > > > > > binding to the device outside the module_init() call.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Is the "recent" change meant 3.6 kernel, or in linux-next?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > In anyway, I don't understand why such a change was allowed.  Most
> > > > > > > > drivers do call request_firmware() at the device probing time.
> > > > > > > > If this really has to be resolved in the driver side, it must be a bug
> > > > > > > > in the firmware loader core code.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > A good explanation of the problem and subsequent discussion can be found
> > > > > > > here:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 	http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/49975
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yeah, but it doesn't justify this ugly module option.
> > > > > > It's a simple bug.  Papering over it with this option doesn't fix
> > > > > > anything.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's not an option, all it does is defer probing if and only if the
> > > > > patch parameter was specified to make sure the firmware load won't
> > > > > stall. I realize that this may not be an optimal solution, but at least
> > > > > it fixes the problem with no fallout.
> > > > 
> > > > Ah sorry, I misread the patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Then it shouldn't be checked at that point.  Since 3.5 kernel, the
> > > > probing code was already split for vga_switcheroo support.
> > > 
> > > Yes, I saw that. But unless you actually use vga_switcheroo, the second
> > > stage, azx_probe_continue(), will still be called from azx_probe() and
> > > therefore ultimately from module_init().
> > 
> > Yeah, but this could be easily delayed.  The split was already done,
> > so the next step would be to return after the first half at probe,
> > then call the second half later.
> > 
> > > Before coming up with this patch I actually did play around a bit with
> > > using the asynchronous firmware load functions but it turned out to be
> > > rather difficult to do so I opted for the easy way. The biggest problem
> > > I faced was that since patch loading needs to be done very early on, a
> > > lot of the initialization would need to be done after .probe() and many
> > > things could still fail, so cleaning up after errors would become
> > > increasingly difficult.
> > 
> > async probe is also on my TODO list, but it's deferred ;)
> > 
> > > > The point you added is the second stage.
> > > 
> > > I don't understand this sentence.
> > 
> > I meant that your patch added the check at the second-half probing
> > function (azx_probe_contine()).  That is, it could be already the
> > point triggered by vga_switcheroo handler, not via module_init any
> > longer.
> > 
> > So, after rethinking what you suggested, I wrote a quick patch below.
> > Could you check whether this works?
> 
> It oopses, though I can't quite tell where. I need to test some more
> later to see where it goes wrong.

Yeah, I tested it here and noticed, too.  As mentioned, the behavior
of -EPROBE_DEFER is somehow flaky.  For example, when it's used for
modules, the deferred probe will be never triggered (unless a new
device is bound).

Considering the problem again, it's currently an issue only for the
built-in sound driver, right?  AFAIK, request_firmware() works fine
for modules.  If so, a simple "fix" to avoid the unexpected behavior
is to make CONFIG_SND_HDA_PATCH_LOADER depending on CONFIG_SND_HDA=m.
It'd be simple enough for merging 3.6 kernel.

I almost finished writing the patch to use request_firmware_nowait()
version, but I'm afraid it's too intrusive for 3.6.  If disabling the
patch loader for the built-in driver is OK, I'd queue the
request_firmware_nowait() patches to 3.7 queue.


Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-09  6:45 [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Defer probe when loading patch firmware Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  6:45 ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  6:57 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  6:57   ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:08   ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  7:08     ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  7:31     ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:31       ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:36       ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  7:36         ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  7:42         ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:42           ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:50           ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:50             ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  7:57             ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  7:57               ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  8:07           ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  8:07             ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09  8:21             ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  8:21               ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  9:19               ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09  9:19                 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 10:34               ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 10:34                 ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 12:32                 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2012-08-09 12:32                   ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 12:49                   ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 12:49                     ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 13:06                     ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:06                       ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:09                   ` [PATCH 0/2] HD-audio firmware loading fixes Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:10                     ` [PATCH 1/2] ALSA: hda - Load firmware in hda_intel.c Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:26                       ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 14:26                         ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 13:11                     ` [PATCH 2/2] ALSA: hda - Deferred probing with request_firmware_nowait() Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:26                       ` David Henningsson
2012-08-09 13:32                         ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:32                           ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:36                           ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:36                             ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 13:54                             ` David Henningsson
2012-08-09 13:54                               ` David Henningsson
2012-08-09 14:04                               ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 14:04                                 ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 14:04                               ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:04                                 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:10                                 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:10                                   ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:19                                   ` David Henningsson
2012-08-09 14:19                                     ` David Henningsson
2012-08-09 14:25                                   ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 14:25                                     ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 14:34                                     ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:34                                       ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-09 14:38                                       ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-09 14:38                                         ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hobmk2ql5.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=david.henningsson@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.