Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] x86/mm: fix comment

From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] x86/mm: fix comment
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 01:00:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0f40cd6-29fd-412d-061d-d52b489e282f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlVMMmTbaTqipwM9@zn.tnic>

On 4/12/2022 2:53 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:47:42PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
>> There is no _set_memory_prot internal helper, while coming across
>> the code, might as well fix the comment.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> index abf5ed76e4b7..38af155aaba9 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> @@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static inline int cpa_clear_pages_array(struct page **pages, int numpages,
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> - * _set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed
>> + * __set_memory_prot is an internal helper for callers that have been passed
>>    * a pgprot_t value from upper layers and a reservation has already been taken.
>>    * If you want to set the pgprot to a specific page protocol, use the
>>    * set_memory_xx() functions.
>> -- 
> 
> This is such a trivial change so that having it as a separate patch is
> probably not needed - might as well merge it with patch 3...

This change used to be folded in the mce patch, but for that I received 
a review comment pointing out that the change is unrelated to the said 
patch and doesn't belong, hence I pulled it out to stand by itself.  :)

thanks!
-jane

> 
> Thx.
> 