archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <>
To: Stefan Beller <>
Cc: git <>,, Junio C Hamano <>,
	Duy Nguyen <>
Subject: Re: ordered string-list considered harmful, was Re: [PATCH v3] Allow aliases that include other aliases
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:12:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:54:15PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:

> > > It turns out we make never use of a custom compare function in
> > > the stringlist, which helps gaining confidence this use case is nowhere
> > > to be found in the code.
> >
> > Plenty of code uses the default strcmp. You can find users which assume
> > sorting by their use of string_list_insert() versus _append(). Or ones
> > that call string_list_sort(), of course.
> Here comes my reading-between-the-lines assumption:
> When using the default comparison function, you probably only care
> about the efficient lookup as described above, but if you had a non-default
> order, then we'd have strong evidence of the contrary as the author of such
> code would have found reasons why that order is superior than default order
> (and don't tell me a different order helps making lookups even more efficient,
> this must be another reason).

That's a reasonable hypothesis. It looks like there are a few cases
where we assign to a string_list.cmp, so I picked one arbitrarily to
look at: split_maildir() uses a custom filename comparison. Despite
having no recollection of this code, it appears to come from my commit
18505c3423. :)

And yes, we really do care about order there, as we're trying to read
the files in "maildir order". And I don't think a hash would do.

That said, I don't think we care about using string-list's sorted
operations here (like its binary-search lookup). It would be enough for
us to generate the list (whether as string-list or no; we'd actually be
happy with any array), sort it, and then iterate over the result.

So I think some of these are definitely going to require some thoughtful
conversion to the correct data type. Mostly what I was asking in the
beginning was: does this seem like an overtly terrible line of thinking
to anyone. And so far I think the answer is no. So the next step is to
proceed to actually trying some conversions, and seeing what kinds of
snags I hit. The devil, as usual, is in the details. :)


      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06 19:12 Jeff King
2018-09-06 19:20 ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 23:50   ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-07  3:24     ` Jeff King
2018-09-07  6:32       ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-07  7:20         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-09-07  7:23           ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-08 16:49             ` brian m. carlson
2018-09-07 14:48         ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 20:04 ` Stefan Beller
2018-09-06 20:49   ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 20:54     ` Stefan Beller
2018-09-07  3:12       ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: ordered string-list considered harmful, was Re: [PATCH v3] Allow aliases that include other aliases' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).