archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Nieder <>
To: Jeff King <>
Cc:, Tim Schumacher <>,,
Subject: Re: ordered string-list considered harmful, was Re: [PATCH v3] Allow aliases that include other aliases
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 23:32:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Jeff King wrote:

> I don't see any point in generating a sorted list and _then_ making an
> auxiliary hashmap. My idea was that if you're using a sorted string-list
> for lookup, then you can replace the whole thing with a hash (inserting
> as you go, rather than sorting at the end).

What if I'm sorting a string list in preparation for emitting a sorted
list, and I *also* want to perform lookups in that same list?  In
other words:

> I think Stefan pointed out a "case 4" in the other part of the thread:
> ones where we really care not just about fast lookup, but actual
> iteration order.

I had assumed that that was the whole point of this data structure.
Anything else that is using it for lookups should indeed use a hash
map instead, and I can take my share of blame for missing this kind of
thing in review.

> I think I like the hashmap way, if the conversion isn't too painful.

If we don't have any callers that actually need the sort-and-lookup
thing, then yay, let's get rid of it.  But I don't actually think of
this as the hashmap way.  It's the get-rid-of-the-unneeded-feature

In other words, *regardless* of what else we should do, we should
update any callers that want a hashmap to use a hashmap.  Please go
ahead, even if it doesn't let us simplify the string list API at all.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06 19:12 Jeff King
2018-09-06 19:20 ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 23:50   ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-07  3:24     ` Jeff King
2018-09-07  6:32       ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2018-09-07  7:20         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-09-07  7:23           ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-09-08 16:49             ` brian m. carlson
2018-09-07 14:48         ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 20:04 ` Stefan Beller
2018-09-06 20:49   ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 20:54     ` Stefan Beller
2018-09-07  3:12       ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: ordered string-list considered harmful, was Re: [PATCH v3] Allow aliases that include other aliases' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).