[PATCH 08/15] chainlint.sed: tolerate harmless ";" at end of last line in block

[Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>]

chainlint.sed flags ";" when used as a command terminator since it
breaks the &&-chain, thus can allow failures to go undetected. However,
when a command terminated by ";" is the last command in the body of a
compound statement, such as `command-2` in:

    if test $# -gt 1
    then
        command-1 &&
        command-2;
    fi

then the ";" is harmless and the exit code from `command-2` is passed
through untouched and becomes the exit code of the compound statement,
as if the ";" was not present. Therefore, tolerate a trailing ";" in
this position rather than complaining about broken &&-chain.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
---
 t/chainlint.sed              | 11 ++++++-----
 t/chainlint/semicolon.expect |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/chainlint.sed b/t/chainlint.sed
index 60c2099c18..91077b6e26 100644
--- a/t/chainlint.sed
+++ b/t/chainlint.sed
@@ -47,8 +47,9 @@
 # "?!AMP?!" violation is removed from the "bar" line (retrieved from the "hold"
 # area) since the final statement of a subshell must not end with "&&". The
 # final line of a subshell may still break the &&-chain by using ";" internally
-# to chain commands together rather than "&&", so "?!SEMI?!" is never removed
-# from a line (even though "?!AMP?!" might be).
+# to chain commands together rather than "&&", so "?!SEMI?!" is not removed
+# from such a line; however, if the line ends with "?!SEMI?!", then the ";" is
+# harmless and the annotation is removed.
 #
 # Care is taken to recognize the last _statement_ of a multi-line subshell, not
 # necessarily the last textual _line_ within the subshell, since &&-chaining
@@ -303,7 +304,7 @@ bcase
 # that line legitimately lacks "&&"
 :else
 x
-s/ ?!AMP?!$//
+s/\( ?!SEMI?!\)* ?!AMP?!$//
 x
 bcont
 
@@ -311,7 +312,7 @@ bcont
 # "suspect" from final contained line since that line legitimately lacks "&&"
 :done
 x
-s/ ?!AMP?!$//
+s/\( ?!SEMI?!\)* ?!AMP?!$//
 x
 # is 'done' or 'fi' cuddled with ")" to close subshell?
 /done.*)/bclose
@@ -354,7 +355,7 @@ bblock
 # since that line legitimately lacks "&&" and exit subshell loop
 :clssolo
 x
-s/ ?!AMP?!$//
+s/\( ?!SEMI?!\)* ?!AMP?!$//
 p
 x
 s/^/>/
diff --git a/t/chainlint/semicolon.expect b/t/chainlint/semicolon.expect
index d2d804f5b0..0e6389f532 100644
--- a/t/chainlint/semicolon.expect
+++ b/t/chainlint/semicolon.expect
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
 	cat foo; ?!SEMI?! echo bar
 >) &&
 (
-	foo; ?!SEMI?!
+	foo;
 >) &&
 (
 cd foo &&
 	for i in a b c; do
-		echo; ?!SEMI?!
+		echo;
 >	done)
-- 
2.34.1.397.gfae76fe5da