From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/15] t/chainlint/one-liner: avoid overly intimate chainlint.sed knowledge
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 01:30:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213063059.19424-5-sunshine@sunshineco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213063059.19424-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com>
The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within
subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level
&&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh
should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them
magically exit with code 117.
Unfortunately, one of the chainlint.sed self-tests has overly intimate
knowledge of this particular division of responsibilities and only cares
about what chainlint.sed itself will produce, while ignoring the fact
that a more all-encompassing linter would complain about a broken
&&-chain outside the subshell. This makes it difficult to re-use the
test with a more capable chainlint implementation should one ever be
developed. Therefore, adjust the test and its "expected" output to
avoid being specific to the tunnel-vision of this one implementation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
---
t/chainlint/one-liner.expect | 2 +-
t/chainlint/one-liner.test | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect b/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect
index 237f227349..c64058f7af 100644
--- a/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect
+++ b/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) &&
?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) |
-?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) >baz
+?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) >baz &&
(foo "bar; baz")
diff --git a/t/chainlint/one-liner.test b/t/chainlint/one-liner.test
index 69796d7505..be9858fa29 100644
--- a/t/chainlint/one-liner.test
+++ b/t/chainlint/one-liner.test
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
# LINT: top-level one-liner subshell missing internal "&&" and broken &&-chain
(foo; bar) &&
(foo; bar) |
-(foo; bar) >baz
+(foo; bar) >baz &&
# LINT: ";" in string not misinterpreted as broken &&-chain
(foo "bar; baz")
--
2.34.1.397.gfae76fe5da
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 6:30 [PATCH 00/15] generalize chainlint self-tests Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 01/15] t/chainlint/*.test: don't use invalid shell syntax Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 02/15] t/chainlint/*.test: fix invalid test cases due to mixing quote types Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 03/15] t/chainlint/*.test: generalize self-test commentary Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 10:09 ` [RFC PATCH] t/Makefile: use dependency graph for "check-chainlint" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-14 7:44 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-14 12:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 10:22 ` [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-13 14:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 15:43 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-13 16:02 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 16:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 17:05 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 17:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 19:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 21:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 16:14 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-16 13:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-16 15:47 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-16 19:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/15] chainlint.sed: improve ?!AMP?! placement accuracy Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 07/15] chainlint.sed: improve ?!SEMI?! " Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 08/15] chainlint.sed: tolerate harmless ";" at end of last line in block Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 09/15] chainlint.sed: drop unnecessary distinction between ?!AMP?! and ?!SEMI?! Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 10/15] chainlint.sed: drop subshell-closing ">" annotation Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 11/15] chainlint.sed: make here-doc "<<-" operator recognition more POSIX-like Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 12/15] chainlint.sed: don't mistake `<< word` in string as here-doc operator Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 13/15] chainlint.sed: stop throwing away here-doc tags Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] chainlint.sed: swallow comments consistently Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 15/15] chainlint.sed: stop splitting "(..." into separate lines "(" and "..." Eric Sunshine
2021-12-15 0:00 ` [PATCH 00/15] generalize chainlint self-tests Elijah Newren
2021-12-15 3:15 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211213063059.19424-5-sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=fs@gigacodes.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).