From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:37:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRrX396RRGGhjMDB6ybNa0WxcAOY-BfW4FTE84R+ucLkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <211213.86zgp470wa.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:36 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13 2021, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > Another less sledge-hammer approach would be to make t/Makefile
> > respect GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT so that it doesn't run `check-chainlint`
> > for `test` and `prove` when that variable is `0`. That would allow
> > your `git rebase -i --exec` case to avoid the wasted extra overhead of
> > `check-chainlint` (and chainlint in general).
>
> Yes, but I just don't see why it's needed.
>
> We need to build e.g. t/helpers/ to run the tests, and doing that is
> probably always going to take eons of compilation times compared to
> these assertions.
>
> But it's a one-off eon because we declare the dependency DAG and don't
> recompile them unless the sources or their dependencies change. Likewise
> for these chainlint tests we can (and maybe should) make them optional,
> but as long as we're not needlessly running them when no changes have
> happened...
That's a good point, and the same observation applies to
t/check-non-portable-shell.pl which is run unconditionally, as well,
whenever `test` and `prove` are run.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 6:30 [PATCH 00/15] generalize chainlint self-tests Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 01/15] t/chainlint/*.test: don't use invalid shell syntax Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 02/15] t/chainlint/*.test: fix invalid test cases due to mixing quote types Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 03/15] t/chainlint/*.test: generalize self-test commentary Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 04/15] t/chainlint/one-liner: avoid overly intimate chainlint.sed knowledge Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 10:09 ` [RFC PATCH] t/Makefile: use dependency graph for "check-chainlint" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-14 7:44 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-14 12:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 10:22 ` [PATCH 05/15] t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-13 14:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 15:43 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-13 16:02 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 16:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 17:05 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 17:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 19:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 21:37 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2021-12-13 16:14 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-16 13:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-16 15:47 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-12-16 19:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 06/15] chainlint.sed: improve ?!AMP?! placement accuracy Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 07/15] chainlint.sed: improve ?!SEMI?! " Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 08/15] chainlint.sed: tolerate harmless ";" at end of last line in block Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 09/15] chainlint.sed: drop unnecessary distinction between ?!AMP?! and ?!SEMI?! Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 10/15] chainlint.sed: drop subshell-closing ">" annotation Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 11/15] chainlint.sed: make here-doc "<<-" operator recognition more POSIX-like Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 12/15] chainlint.sed: don't mistake `<< word` in string as here-doc operator Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 13/15] chainlint.sed: stop throwing away here-doc tags Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] chainlint.sed: swallow comments consistently Eric Sunshine
2021-12-13 6:30 ` [PATCH 15/15] chainlint.sed: stop splitting "(..." into separate lines "(" and "..." Eric Sunshine
2021-12-15 0:00 ` [PATCH 00/15] generalize chainlint self-tests Elijah Newren
2021-12-15 3:15 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cRrX396RRGGhjMDB6ybNa0WxcAOY-BfW4FTE84R+ucLkQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=fs@gigacodes.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).