From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>
To: "Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:49:52 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <162740819244.18666.8562764825649612982@emeril.freedesktop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727071845.841554-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93056/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
a5e4bffd6d6f drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL
00ffd16fcca9 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c
f0962a46c4db drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c
9cef952bf781 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c
b0b88d826064 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c
e2ad5114dd83 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c
58f0263bf79d drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c
9edcd79df25c drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c
0933019dde76 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c
1552f5470753 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c
02aea789a348 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c
302231afebdf drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c
b52e50d278b9 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c
8ae2070a04a2 drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables
a81e83af78c5 drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c
-:63: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'id' - possible side-effects?
#63: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7752:
+#define GLK_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A) + (set) * 8, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B) + (set) * 8)
-:63: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'set' - possible side-effects?
#63: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7752:
+#define GLK_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A) + (set) * 8, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B) + (set) * 8)
-:68: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'id' - possible side-effects?
#68: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7756:
+#define GLK_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A) + (set) * 8, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B) + (set) * 8)
-:68: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'set' - possible side-effects?
#68: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7756:
+#define GLK_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A) + (set) * 8, \
_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B) + (set) * 8)
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 48 lines checked
a1a4e070f933 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c
1a5d634b421c drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c
e17f59582390 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c
f586bf32e6ff drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c
393456abc7be drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c
80d677c2345f drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c
6de7ed1a59e6 drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c
7aa7558721aa drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h
4e912a6452e0 drm/i915: finish removal of CNL
4ba93d420a70 drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10
-:348: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev_priv' - possible side-effects?
#348: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1650:
+#define HAS_GMBUS_BURST_READ(dev_priv) (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || \
IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || \
IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 336 lines checked
cd928dae0d3e drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers
0b043f4ac3d8 drm/i915: replace random CNL comments
780f9f17ba29 drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER
-:12: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#12:
v3 (Lucas): Change check to DISPLAY_VER >= 9, to cover the GLK's num_scalers,
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 7:18 [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 02/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 03/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 05/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 06/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 07/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 08/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 09/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 10/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 11/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 12/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 13/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 14/28] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 15/28] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 16/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 17/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 18/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 19/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 20/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 21/28] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 22/28] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 23/28] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 24/28] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 25/28] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 26/28] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 27/28] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 28/28] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2.1] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Patchwork
2021-07-27 7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-27 8:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-27 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-27 17:49 ` Patchwork [this message]
2021-07-27 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-27 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-28 3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=162740819244.18666.8562764825649612982@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--to=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2)' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).