intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:18:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210727071845.841554-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)

Explicit support for CNL is being removed from the driver as it's not
expected to work. Remove the workaround for PORT_F from
display/intel_bios.c so we can also remove the generic DISPLAY_VER == 10
calls to intel_ddi_init(): the only platform with that display version
is already handled separately (GLK).

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c    | 6 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 -------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index aa667fa71158..4172c8ee6aa6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -1871,12 +1871,12 @@ intel_bios_encoder_supports_edp(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
 static bool is_port_valid(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
 {
 	/*
-	 * On some ICL/CNL SKUs port F is not present, but broken VBTs mark
+	 * On some ICL SKUs port F is not present, but broken VBTs mark
 	 * the port as present. Only try to initialize port F for the
 	 * SKUs that may actually have it.
 	 */
-	if (port == PORT_F && (IS_ICELAKE(i915) || IS_CANNONLAKE(i915)))
-		return IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(i915) || IS_CNL_WITH_PORT_F(i915);
+	if (port == PORT_F && IS_ICELAKE(i915))
+		return IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(i915);
 
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index bb0aebcc3ecd..dab04a4d60f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -11413,13 +11413,6 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
 		vlv_dsi_init(dev_priv);
-	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10) {
-		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
-		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
-		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
-		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
-		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
-		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
 	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-27  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27  7:18 Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 02/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 03/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 05/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 06/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 07/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 08/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 09/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 10/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 11/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 12/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 13/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 14/28] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 15/28] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 16/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 17/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 18/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 19/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 20/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 21/28] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 22/28] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 23/28] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 24/28] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 25/28] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 26/28] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 27/28] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 28/28] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27 16:45   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2.1] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-27  7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Patchwork
2021-07-27  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-27  8:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-27 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-27 17:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-27 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-27 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-28  3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210727071845.841554-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).