* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC @ 2021-06-30 23:06 Anusha Srivatsa 2021-06-30 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork ` (4 more replies) 0 siblings, 5 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Anusha Srivatsa @ 2021-06-30 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Lucas De Marchi On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display stepping-substepping combinations. Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c @@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { }; static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; +struct stepping_info *display_step; + +static struct stepping_info * +intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) +{ + + switch (step.display_step) { + case STEP_A0: + display_step->stepping = 'A'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_A2: + display_step->stepping = 'A'; + display_step->substepping = '2'; + break; + case STEP_B0: + display_step->stepping = 'B'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_B1: + display_step->stepping = 'B'; + display_step->substepping = '1'; + break; + case STEP_C0: + display_step->stepping = 'C'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + case STEP_D0: + display_step->stepping = 'D'; + display_step->substepping = '0'; + break; + default: + display_step->stepping = '*'; + display_step->substepping = '*'; + break; + } + return display_step; +} static const struct stepping_info * intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { const struct stepping_info *si; + struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; unsigned int size; - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { + si = intel_get_display_stepping(step); + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); si = icl_stepping_info; } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { @@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) si = NULL; } - if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) - return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) + return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; - return &no_stepping_info; + return si; } static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) -- 2.32.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-06-30 23:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC Anusha Srivatsa @ 2021-06-30 23:13 ` Patchwork 2021-06-30 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-06-30 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/92088/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip dc34e57ce634 drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC -:29: CHECK:BRACES: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{' #29: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c:274: +{ + -:84: WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 101 exceeds 100 columns #84: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c:332: + return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks, 69 lines checked _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-06-30 23:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC Anusha Srivatsa 2021-06-30 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork @ 2021-06-30 23:14 ` Patchwork 2021-06-30 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-06-30 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/92088/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately. - +drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c:269:22: warning: symbol 'display_step' was not declared. Should it be static? _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-06-30 23:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC Anusha Srivatsa 2021-06-30 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork 2021-06-30 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork @ 2021-06-30 23:44 ` Patchwork 2021-07-01 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-01 5:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-06-30 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1730 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/92088/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10295 -> Patchwork_20500 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/index.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20500 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat: - fi-bdw-5557u: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2] ([i915#541]) [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html [i915#541]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/541 Participating hosts (39 -> 33) ------------------------------ Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-tgl-dsi fi-tgl-1115g4 fi-bsw-cyan fi-dg1-1 fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_10295 -> Patchwork_20500 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_10295: 683b7f160eb6993ccfc19e67e3c7111f12946bea @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_6124: 357d5477c93f2bdd3354afe91b89ccfd4ee4fd56 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git Patchwork_20500: dc34e57ce63492d648bec07e172458837b8d71d8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == dc34e57ce634 drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2329 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-06-30 23:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC Anusha Srivatsa ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-06-30 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork @ 2021-07-01 0:01 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-01 0:15 ` Souza, Jose 2021-07-02 7:49 ` Jani Nikula 2021-07-01 5:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork 4 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-01 0:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: >On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display >stepping-substepping combinations. > >Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues >the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step >Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). > >Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> >Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >@@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { > }; > > static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; >+struct stepping_info *display_step; >+ >+static struct stepping_info * >+intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) >+{ >+ >+ switch (step.display_step) { >+ case STEP_A0: >+ display_step->stepping = 'A'; >+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >+ break; >+ case STEP_A2: >+ display_step->stepping = 'A'; >+ display_step->substepping = '2'; >+ break; >+ case STEP_B0: >+ display_step->stepping = 'B'; >+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >+ break; >+ case STEP_B1: >+ display_step->stepping = 'B'; >+ display_step->substepping = '1'; >+ break; >+ case STEP_C0: >+ display_step->stepping = 'C'; >+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >+ break; >+ case STEP_D0: >+ display_step->stepping = 'D'; >+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >+ break; >+ default: >+ display_step->stepping = '*'; >+ display_step->substepping = '*'; >+ break; >+ } "crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion: changing the step enum to be: #define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num)) STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'), STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'), and adapt the rest of the code to play with u16 instead of u8, and handle the STEP_FUTURE/STEP_NONE/STEP_FOREVER. Maybe it is crazy, dunno. +Jani / +Jose. Thoughts? For this version the next comment is probably more important. >+ return display_step; >+} > > static const struct stepping_info * > intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > const struct stepping_info *si; >+ struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; > unsigned int size; > >- if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { >+ si = intel_get_display_stepping(step); >+ } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { > size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); > si = icl_stepping_info; can we move the other ones too? Just use display_step for all platforms. Notice that before the separation we will have display_step == graphics_step, so it should just work. Lucas De Marchi > } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { >@@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > si = NULL; > } > >- if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) >- return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); >+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) >+ return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; > >- return &no_stepping_info; >+ return si; > } > > static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >-- >2.32.0 > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-07-01 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-01 0:15 ` Souza, Jose 2021-07-01 0:17 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-02 7:49 ` Jani Nikula 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Souza, Jose @ 2021-07-01 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Srivatsa, Anusha, De Marchi, Lucas; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 17:01 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display > > stepping-substepping combinations. > > > > Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues > > the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step > > Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). > > > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c > > @@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { > > }; > > > > static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; > > +struct stepping_info *display_step; > > + > > +static struct stepping_info * > > +intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) > > +{ > > + > > + switch (step.display_step) { > > + case STEP_A0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_A2: > > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; > > + display_step->substepping = '2'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_B0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_B1: > > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; > > + display_step->substepping = '1'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_C0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'C'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + case STEP_D0: > > + display_step->stepping = 'D'; > > + display_step->substepping = '0'; > > + break; > > + default: > > + display_step->stepping = '*'; > > + display_step->substepping = '*'; > > + break; > > + } > > > "crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion: > changing the step enum to be: > > > #define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num)) > > STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'), > STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'), Looks a good idea to me, we could also keep it u8 using 4bits for each if there is memory concerns. > > and adapt the rest of the code to play with u16 instead of u8, and > handle the STEP_FUTURE/STEP_NONE/STEP_FOREVER. > Maybe it is crazy, dunno. > > +Jani / +Jose. Thoughts? > > > For this version the next comment is probably more important. > > > + return display_step; > > +} > > > > static const struct stepping_info * > > intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > { > > const struct stepping_info *si; > > + struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; > > unsigned int size; > > > > - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { > > + si = intel_get_display_stepping(step); > > + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { > > size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); > > si = icl_stepping_info; > > can we move the other ones too? Just use display_step for all platforms. > Notice that before the separation we will have display_step == > graphics_step, so it should just work. > > > Lucas De Marchi > > > } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { > > @@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > si = NULL; > > } > > > > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) > > - return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) > > + return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; > > > > - return &no_stepping_info; > > + return si; > > } > > > > static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > -- > > 2.32.0 > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-07-01 0:15 ` Souza, Jose @ 2021-07-01 0:17 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-01 17:46 ` Lucas De Marchi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-01 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:15:00PM -0700, Jose Souza wrote: >On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 17:01 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp >> >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: >> > On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display >> > stepping-substepping combinations. >> > >> > Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues >> > the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step >> > Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). >> > >> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >> > index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >> > @@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { >> > }; >> > >> > static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; >> > +struct stepping_info *display_step; >> > + >> > +static struct stepping_info * >> > +intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) >> > +{ >> > + >> > + switch (step.display_step) { >> > + case STEP_A0: >> > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '0'; >> > + break; >> > + case STEP_A2: >> > + display_step->stepping = 'A'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '2'; >> > + break; >> > + case STEP_B0: >> > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '0'; >> > + break; >> > + case STEP_B1: >> > + display_step->stepping = 'B'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '1'; >> > + break; >> > + case STEP_C0: >> > + display_step->stepping = 'C'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '0'; >> > + break; >> > + case STEP_D0: >> > + display_step->stepping = 'D'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '0'; >> > + break; >> > + default: >> > + display_step->stepping = '*'; >> > + display_step->substepping = '*'; >> > + break; >> > + } >> >> >> "crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion: >> changing the step enum to be: >> >> >> #define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num)) >> >> STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'), >> STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'), > >Looks a good idea to me, we could also keep it u8 using 4bits for each if there is memory concerns. humn... indeed. Not much a concern actually, but not having to change additional code is already a good thing. I hope no stepping goes beyond Z9 :) Lucas De Marchi > >> >> and adapt the rest of the code to play with u16 instead of u8, and >> handle the STEP_FUTURE/STEP_NONE/STEP_FOREVER. >> Maybe it is crazy, dunno. >> >> +Jani / +Jose. Thoughts? >> >> >> For this version the next comment is probably more important. >> >> > + return display_step; >> > +} >> > >> > static const struct stepping_info * >> > intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> > { >> > const struct stepping_info *si; >> > + struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; >> > unsigned int size; >> > >> > - if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { >> > + si = intel_get_display_stepping(step); >> > + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >> > size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); >> > si = icl_stepping_info; >> >> can we move the other ones too? Just use display_step for all platforms. >> Notice that before the separation we will have display_step == >> graphics_step, so it should just work. >> >> >> Lucas De Marchi >> >> > } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { >> > @@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> > si = NULL; >> > } >> > >> > - if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) >> > - return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); >> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) >> > + return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; >> > >> > - return &no_stepping_info; >> > + return si; >> > } >> > >> > static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> > -- >> > 2.32.0 >> > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-07-01 0:17 ` Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-01 17:46 ` Lucas De Marchi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-01 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Souza, Jose; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:17:52PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:15:00PM -0700, Jose Souza wrote: >>On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 17:01 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>>Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp >>> >>>On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: >>>> On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display >>>> stepping-substepping combinations. >>>> >>>> Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues >>>> the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step >>>> Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). >>>> >>>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>>> index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>>> @@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { >>>> }; >>>> >>>> static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; >>>> +struct stepping_info *display_step; >>>> + >>>> +static struct stepping_info * >>>> +intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) >>>> +{ >>>> + >>>> + switch (step.display_step) { >>>> + case STEP_A0: >>>> + display_step->stepping = 'A'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>> + break; >>>> + case STEP_A2: >>>> + display_step->stepping = 'A'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '2'; >>>> + break; >>>> + case STEP_B0: >>>> + display_step->stepping = 'B'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>> + break; >>>> + case STEP_B1: >>>> + display_step->stepping = 'B'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '1'; >>>> + break; >>>> + case STEP_C0: >>>> + display_step->stepping = 'C'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>> + break; >>>> + case STEP_D0: >>>> + display_step->stepping = 'D'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>> + break; >>>> + default: >>>> + display_step->stepping = '*'; >>>> + display_step->substepping = '*'; >>>> + break; >>>> + } >>> >>> >>>"crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion: >>>changing the step enum to be: >>> >>> >>>#define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num)) >>> >>>STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'), >>>STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'), >> >>Looks a good idea to me, we could also keep it u8 using 4bits for each if there is memory concerns. > >humn... indeed. Not much a concern actually, but not having to change >additional code is already a good thing. > > >I hope no stepping goes beyond Z9 :) I take that out. Even if we would do (number - 'A'), there is not enough room in 4bits to handle until Z. In fact we could go only until P8 - so if we are going that route we will need to have some extra build checks that we don't go beyond that. Lucas De Marchi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-07-01 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-01 0:15 ` Souza, Jose @ 2021-07-02 7:49 ` Jani Nikula 2021-07-04 5:34 ` Lucas De Marchi 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2021-07-02 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas De Marchi, Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote: > Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: >>On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display >>stepping-substepping combinations. >> >>Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues >>the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step >>Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). >> >>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> >>Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> >>--- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>@@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { >> }; >> >> static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; >>+struct stepping_info *display_step; >>+ >>+static struct stepping_info * >>+intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) >>+{ >>+ >>+ switch (step.display_step) { >>+ case STEP_A0: >>+ display_step->stepping = 'A'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>+ break; >>+ case STEP_A2: >>+ display_step->stepping = 'A'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '2'; >>+ break; >>+ case STEP_B0: >>+ display_step->stepping = 'B'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>+ break; >>+ case STEP_B1: >>+ display_step->stepping = 'B'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '1'; >>+ break; >>+ case STEP_C0: >>+ display_step->stepping = 'C'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>+ break; >>+ case STEP_D0: >>+ display_step->stepping = 'D'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>+ break; >>+ default: >>+ display_step->stepping = '*'; >>+ display_step->substepping = '*'; >>+ break; >>+ } > > > "crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion: > changing the step enum to be: > > > #define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num)) > > STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'), > STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'), > > and adapt the rest of the code to play with u16 instead of u8, and > handle the STEP_FUTURE/STEP_NONE/STEP_FOREVER. > Maybe it is crazy, dunno. > > +Jani / +Jose. Thoughts? Frankly, I think all of this should be incorporated to intel_step.[ch] instead of having a semi-overlapping handling here. Just look at the amount of duplication already. BR, Jani. > > > For this version the next comment is probably more important. > >>+ return display_step; >>+} >> >> static const struct stepping_info * >> intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> { >> const struct stepping_info *si; >>+ struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; >> unsigned int size; >> >>- if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >>+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { >>+ si = intel_get_display_stepping(step); >>+ } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >> size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); >> si = icl_stepping_info; > > can we move the other ones too? Just use display_step for all platforms. > Notice that before the separation we will have display_step == > graphics_step, so it should just work. > > > Lucas De Marchi > >> } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { >>@@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >> si = NULL; >> } >> >>- if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) >>- return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); >>+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) >>+ return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; >> >>- return &no_stepping_info; >>+ return si; >> } >> >> static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >>-- >>2.32.0 >> -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-07-02 7:49 ` Jani Nikula @ 2021-07-04 5:34 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-05 7:45 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-04 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:49:05AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote: >> Typo: RUNTIME_INFO->stp >> >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:06:24PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: >>>On the dmc side,we maintain a lookup table with different display >>>stepping-substepping combinations. >>> >>>Instead of adding new table for every new platform, lets ues >>>the stepping info from RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step >>>Adding the helper intel_get_display_step(). >>> >>>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> >>>Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> >>>--- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>>index f8789d4543bf..c7ff7ff3f412 100644 >>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c >>>@@ -266,14 +266,55 @@ static const struct stepping_info icl_stepping_info[] = { >>> }; >>> >>> static const struct stepping_info no_stepping_info = { '*', '*' }; >>>+struct stepping_info *display_step; >>>+ >>>+static struct stepping_info * >>>+intel_get_display_stepping(struct intel_step_info step) >>>+{ >>>+ >>>+ switch (step.display_step) { >>>+ case STEP_A0: >>>+ display_step->stepping = 'A'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>+ break; >>>+ case STEP_A2: >>>+ display_step->stepping = 'A'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '2'; >>>+ break; >>>+ case STEP_B0: >>>+ display_step->stepping = 'B'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>+ break; >>>+ case STEP_B1: >>>+ display_step->stepping = 'B'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '1'; >>>+ break; >>>+ case STEP_C0: >>>+ display_step->stepping = 'C'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>+ break; >>>+ case STEP_D0: >>>+ display_step->stepping = 'D'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '0'; >>>+ break; >>>+ default: >>>+ display_step->stepping = '*'; >>>+ display_step->substepping = '*'; >>>+ break; >>>+ } >> >> >> "crazy" idea that would avoid this type of conversion: >> changing the step enum to be: >> >> >> #define make_step(letter, num) (int)(((letter) << 8 ) | (num)) >> >> STEP_A0 = make_step('A', '0'), >> STEP_A1 = make_step('A', '1'), >> >> and adapt the rest of the code to play with u16 instead of u8, and >> handle the STEP_FUTURE/STEP_NONE/STEP_FOREVER. >> Maybe it is crazy, dunno. >> >> +Jani / +Jose. Thoughts? > >Frankly, I think all of this should be incorporated to intel_step.[ch] >instead of having a semi-overlapping handling here. Just look at the >amount of duplication already. I guess you missed I gave the same suggestion below and that there is already a new version of this patch? Question here was about going a step further to avoid the conversion STEP_* to 2 chars. thanks Lucas De Marchi > > >BR, >Jani. > >> >> >> For this version the next comment is probably more important. >> >>>+ return display_step; >>>+} >>> >>> static const struct stepping_info * >>> intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >>> { >>> const struct stepping_info *si; >>>+ struct intel_step_info step = RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->step; >>> unsigned int size; >>> >>>- if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >>>+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) { >>>+ si = intel_get_display_stepping(step); >>>+ } else if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) { >>> size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_stepping_info); >>> si = icl_stepping_info; >> >> can we move the other ones too? Just use display_step for all platforms. >> Notice that before the separation we will have display_step == >> graphics_step, so it should just work. >> >> >> Lucas De Marchi >> >>> } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) { >>>@@ -287,10 +328,10 @@ intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >>> si = NULL; >>> } >>> >>>- if (INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size) >>>- return si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv); >>>+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) >>>+ return INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < size ? si + INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) : &no_stepping_info; >>> >>>- return &no_stepping_info; >>>+ return si; >>> } >>> >>> static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) >>>-- >>>2.32.0 >>> > >-- >Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-07-04 5:34 ` Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-05 7:45 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2021-07-05 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx On Sat, 03 Jul 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:49:05AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >>Frankly, I think all of this should be incorporated to intel_step.[ch] >>instead of having a semi-overlapping handling here. Just look at the >>amount of duplication already. > > I guess you missed I gave the same suggestion below and that there is > already a new version of this patch? Question here was about going a > step further to avoid the conversion STEP_* to 2 chars. Sorry for the noise. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC 2021-06-30 23:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC Anusha Srivatsa ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2021-07-01 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi @ 2021-07-01 5:48 ` Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-01 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anusha Srivatsa; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 27153 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/92088/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10295_full -> Patchwork_20500_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20500_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_20500_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20500_full: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl9/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20500_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_create@create-massive: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([i915#3002]) [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl1/igt@gem_create@create-massive.html * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile-preempt: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +3 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-snb6/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile-preempt.html * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress: - shard-skl: [PASS][4] -> [TIMEOUT][5] ([i915#2369] / [i915#3063]) [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl5/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl5/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html - shard-iclb: [PASS][6] -> [TIMEOUT][7] ([i915#2369] / [i915#2481] / [i915#3070]) [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: - shard-apl: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271]) [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2842]) [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-forked: - shard-skl: [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-WARN][12] ([i915#1982]) +1 similar issue [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl7/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-forked.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl6/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-forked.html * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190]) [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl1/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-odd: - shard-iclb: [PASS][14] -> [FAIL][15] ([i915#307]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-odd.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-odd.html * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-xy: - shard-glk: [PASS][16] -> [FAIL][17] ([i915#307]) [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-glk6/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-xy.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-glk3/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@big-copy-xy.html * igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [WARN][18] ([i915#2658]) [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-snb5/igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion.html - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [WARN][19] ([i915#2658]) [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl8/igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3323]) [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl3/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][21] ([i915#3318]) [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single: - shard-skl: [PASS][22] -> [DMESG-WARN][23] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl9/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][24] ([i915#2782]) [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-snb6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][25] ([fdo#109271]) +336 similar issues [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl8/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-mode-timings: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +18 similar issues [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-mode-timings.html * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][27] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +12 similar issues [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-snb6/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red.html * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][28] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +31 similar issues [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl1/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25.html * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-degamma: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][29] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl3/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-degamma.html * igt@kms_content_protection@atomic: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][30] ([i915#1319]) +2 similar issues [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend: - shard-kbl: [PASS][31] -> [INCOMPLETE][32] ([i915#155] / [i915#2828]) [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][33] ([fdo#109271]) +215 similar issues [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-bo: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][34] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +2 similar issues [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-bo.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1: - shard-kbl: [PASS][35] -> [DMESG-WARN][36] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html - shard-apl: [PASS][37] -> [DMESG-WARN][38] ([i915#180]) [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([fdo#109271]) +272 similar issues [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-snb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-d-frame-sequence: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][40] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +2 similar issues [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl3/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-d-frame-sequence.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c: - shard-skl: [PASS][41] -> [INCOMPLETE][42] ([i915#198] / [i915#2828]) [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c.html [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl7/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-d: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl3/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-d.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-7efc: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][44] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +3 similar issues [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-7efc.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-7efc: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][45] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-7efc.html * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-d-tiling-yf: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][46] ([fdo#109271]) +49 similar issues [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl3/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-d-tiling-yf.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +7 similar issues [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl8/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-3: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +3 similar issues [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-3.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move: - shard-iclb: [PASS][49] -> [SKIP][50] ([fdo#109441]) +3 similar issues [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move.html [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move.html * igt@kms_writeback@writeback-check-output: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][51] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437]) +2 similar issues [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl1/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-check-output.html * igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][52] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437]) [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl3/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters.html * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-0: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][53] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +3 similar issues [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl3/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-0.html * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-3: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl3/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-3.html * igt@sysfs_clients@sema-10: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +3 similar issues [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl2/igt@sysfs_clients@sema-10.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0: - shard-kbl: [FAIL][56] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][57] [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0: - shard-glk: [FAIL][58] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][59] [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1: - shard-kbl: [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109271]) -> [PASS][61] [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-32bpp-rotate-0: - shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][62] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][63] +1 similar issue [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-glk3/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-32bpp-rotate-0.html [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-glk5/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-32bpp-rotate-0.html * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb8888-blt-xtiled: - shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][64] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][65] [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl5/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb8888-blt-xtiled.html [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl5/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb8888-blt-xtiled.html * igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend: - shard-apl: [INCOMPLETE][66] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][67] [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl3/igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend.html [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl1/igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@c-hdmi-a1: - shard-glk: [FAIL][68] ([i915#2122]) -> [PASS][69] +1 similar issue [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-glk8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@c-hdmi-a1.html [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-glk4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@c-hdmi-a1.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-dp1: - shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][70] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][71] +1 similar issue [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-dp1.html [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-dp1.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@c-dp1: - shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][72] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][73] +10 similar issues [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@c-dp1.html [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@c-dp1.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-farfromfence-mmap-gtt: - shard-glk: [FAIL][74] ([i915#2546]) -> [PASS][75] [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-glk5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-farfromfence-mmap-gtt.html [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-glk9/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-farfromfence-mmap-gtt.html * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend: - shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][76] ([i915#146] / [i915#198] / [i915#2828]) -> [PASS][77] [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl2/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl9/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][78] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][79] +3 similar issues [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html * igt@perf_pmu@module-unload: - shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][80] ([i915#1982] / [i915#262]) -> [PASS][81] [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl5/igt@perf_pmu@module-unload.html [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl5/igt@perf_pmu@module-unload.html #### Warnings #### * igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109349]) -> [DMESG-WARN][83] ([i915#1226]) [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][84] ([i915#2920]) -> [SKIP][85] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][86] ([i915#658]) -> [SKIP][87] ([i915#2920]) +1 similar issue [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html * igt@runner@aborted: - shard-kbl: ([FAIL][88], [FAIL][89], [FAIL][90], [FAIL][91], [FAIL][92], [FAIL][93], [FAIL][94], [FAIL][95], [FAIL][96], [FAIL][97], [FAIL][98], [FAIL][99], [FAIL][100]) ([i915#1436] / [i915#180] / [i915#1814] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363] / [i915#602] / [i915#92]) -> ([FAIL][101], [FAIL][102], [FAIL][103], [FAIL][104], [FAIL][105]) ([i915#180] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363] / [i915#92]) [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl3/igt@runner@aborted.html [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html [92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html [93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html [94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html [95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html [96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html [97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html [98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl3/igt@runner@aborted.html [99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html [100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html [101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html [102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html [103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html [104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html [105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html - shard-apl: ([FAIL][106], [FAIL][107], [FAIL][108], [FAIL][109]) ([fdo#109271] / [i915#180] / [i915#1814] / [i915#3363]) -> ([FAIL][110], [FAIL][111]) ([i915#180] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363]) [106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl6/igt@runner@aborted.html [107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl6/igt@runner@aborted.html [108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl8/igt@runner@aborted.html [109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-apl3/igt@runner@aborted.html [110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl3/igt@runner@aborted.html [111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-apl1/igt@runner@aborted.html - shard-tglb: ([FAIL][112], [FAIL][113], [FAIL][114]) ([i915#1814] / [i915#2426] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3690]) -> [FAIL][115] ([i915#2426] / [i915#3690]) [112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-tglb1/igt@runner@aborted.html [113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-tglb6/igt@runner@aborted.html [114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-tglb7/igt@runner@aborted.html [115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-tglb6/igt@runner@aborted.html - shard-skl: ([FAIL][116], [FAIL][117]) ([i915#3002] / [i915#3363]) -> ([FAIL][118], [FAIL][119], [FAIL][120], [FAIL][121]) ([i915#1436] / [i915#1814] / [i915#2029] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363]) [116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl5/igt@runner@aborted.html [117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10295/shard-skl10/igt@runner@aborted.html [118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl4/igt@runner@aborted.html [119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl5/igt@runner@aborted.html [120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl5/igt@runner@aborted.html [121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/shard-skl7/igt@runner@aborted.html [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145 [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#109349]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109349 [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441 [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827 [i915#1099]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1099 [i915#118]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/118 [i915#1226]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1226 [i915#1319]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1319 [i915#1436]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1436 [i915#146]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/146 [i915#155]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/155 [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180 [i915#1814]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1814 [i915#198]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/198 [i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982 [i915#2029]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2029 [i915#2122]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2122 [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190 [i915#2369]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2369 [i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426 [i915#2437]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2437 [i915#2481]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2481 [i915#2546]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2546 [i915#262]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/262 [i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265 [i915#2658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2658 [i915#2782]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2782 [i915#2828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2828 [i915#2842]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842 [i915#2920]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2920 [i915#2994]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2994 [i915#3002]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3002 [i915#3063]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3063 [i915#307]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/307 [i915#3070]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3070 [i915#3318]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3318 [i915#3323]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3323 [i915#3363]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3363 [i915#3690]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3690 [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533 [i915#602]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/602 [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658 [i915#716]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/716 [i915#92]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/92 [i915#95]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/95 Participating hosts (11 -> 10) ------------------------------ Missing (1): shard-rkl Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_10295 -> Patchwork_20500 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_10295: 683b7f160eb6993ccfc19e67e3c7111f12946bea @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_6124: 357d5477c93f2bdd3354afe91b89ccfd4ee4fd56 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git Patchwork_20500: dc34e57ce63492d648bec07e172458837b8d71d8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20500/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 34557 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-05 7:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-06-30 23:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Use RUNTIME_INFO->stp for DMC Anusha Srivatsa 2021-06-30 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork 2021-06-30 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-06-30 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-07-01 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-01 0:15 ` Souza, Jose 2021-07-01 0:17 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-01 17:46 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-02 7:49 ` Jani Nikula 2021-07-04 5:34 ` Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-05 7:45 ` Jani Nikula 2021-07-01 5:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).