intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
@ 2021-07-14 22:34 Manasi Navare
  2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2021-07-14 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
 		return;
 
+	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
+		/* No PLLs set for slave */
+		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
+
 	intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
 
 	if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
  2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
@ 2021-07-16 15:44 ` Patchwork
  2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
e5339cc39b24 drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
-:10: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#10: 
Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL

-:18: WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: 'Tested-by:' is the preferred signature form
#18: 
Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
  2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
  2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
@ 2021-07-16 16:13 ` Patchwork
  2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3031 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10345 -> Patchwork_20623
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20623 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] ([i915#1372])
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
    - {fi-tgl-1115g4}:    [FAIL][4] ([i915#1888]) -> [PASS][5]
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#165]) -> [PASS][7]
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#1372]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1372
  [i915#165]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/165
  [i915#1888]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1888


Participating hosts (41 -> 36)
------------------------------

  Missing    (5): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-1 fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_10345 -> Patchwork_20623

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_10345: 8c6a974b932fbaa798102b4713ceedf3b04227d9 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6142: 16e753fc5e1e51395e1df40865c569984a74c5ed @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_20623: e5339cc39b2489408746b00e12117e7992296ab1 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

e5339cc39b24 drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3734 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
  2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
  2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
  2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2021-07-16 20:26 ` Patchwork
  2021-07-19  6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
  2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30292 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10345_full -> Patchwork_20623_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20623_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_20623_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20623_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete.html

  
#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - {shard-rkl}:        ([FAIL][2], [FAIL][3], [FAIL][4], [FAIL][5], [FAIL][6]) ([i915#3002]) -> ([FAIL][7], [FAIL][8], [FAIL][9], [FAIL][10]) ([i915#2029] / [i915#3002])
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20623_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@feature_discovery@display-4x:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#1839])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@display-4x.html

  * igt@feature_discovery@psr2:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#658])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][14] -> [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#180]) +5 similar issues
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([i915#146] / [i915#198])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-cleanup:
    - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +1 similar issue
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-cleanup.html

  * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][21] -> [TIMEOUT][22] ([i915#2369] / [i915#3063])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl9/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl7/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][23] ([i915#2369] / [i915#2481] / [i915#3070])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][24] -> [FAIL][25] ([i915#2846])
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][26] -> [FAIL][27] ([i915#2842]) +2 similar issues
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][28] -> [FAIL][29] ([i915#2842])
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][30] ([i915#2842])
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_params@no-blt:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109283])
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_params@no-blt.html

  * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][32] ([i915#2428])
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy.html

  * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][33] -> [FAIL][34] ([i915#2428])
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy.html

  * igt@gem_pread@exhaustion:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [WARN][35] ([i915#2658])
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@gem_pread@exhaustion.html

  * igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([i915#768]) +1 similar issue
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][37] ([i915#3002]) +1 similar issue
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][38] ([i915#3297])
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap.html
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([i915#3297])
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][40] ([i915#3318])
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][41] ([i915#3318])
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#112306]) +1 similar issue
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#112306]) +1 similar issue
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][44] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716])
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@batch-invalid-length:
    - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][45] ([fdo#109271]) +226 similar issues
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@batch-invalid-length.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][46] ([i915#3296])
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large.html
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][47] ([i915#3296])
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large.html

  * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1937])
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@media-rc6-accuracy:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][49] ([fdo#109289])
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@media-rc6-accuracy.html

  * igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-all-modeset-transition:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][50] ([i915#1769])
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-all-modeset-transition.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][51] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777]) +1 similar issue
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][52] ([i915#3763])
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl5/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][53] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777])
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109271]) +214 similar issues
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#110723])
   [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][56] ([fdo#111615])
   [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_ccs:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][57] ([i915#3689])
   [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-multiple:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][58] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues
   [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-multiple.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-after-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827])
   [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl4/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-after-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-enable-disable-mode:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +11 similar issues
   [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-enable-disable-mode.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][61] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +13 similar issues
   [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +17 similar issues
   [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][63] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues
   [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-lic-type-1:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][64] ([i915#3116])
   [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-lic-type-1.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@legacy:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109300] / [fdo#111066])
   [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_content_protection@legacy.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@lic:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][66] ([i915#1319]) +1 similar issue
   [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][67] ([i915#3359])
   [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-sliding:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][68] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#109279])
   [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-sliding.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-256x256-onscreen:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][69] ([fdo#109271]) +39 similar issues
   [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-onscreen:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][70] ([fdo#109279] / [i915#3359]) +2 similar issues
   [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-onscreen.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][71] -> [DMESG-WARN][72] ([i915#1982])
   [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl1/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html
   [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl3/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-128x128-top-edge:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109278]) +25 similar issues
   [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-128x128-top-edge.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-varying-size:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][74] ([fdo#109274] / [fdo#109278]) +1 similar issue
   [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][75] -> [FAIL][76] ([i915#2346] / [i915#533])
   [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
   [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][77] -> [FAIL][78] ([i915#2346])
   [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size.html
   [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-bo:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][79] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
   [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-bo.html

  * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][80] -> [FAIL][81] ([i915#3451])
   [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk3/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled.html
   [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk2/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109274]) +3 similar issues
   [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][83] -> [FAIL][84] ([i915#2122])
   [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl10/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html
   [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][85] -> [FAIL][86] ([i915#79])
   [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1.html
   [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilegen12rcccs:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][87] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672])
   [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilegen12rcccs.html

  * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][88] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672])
   [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][89] ([fdo#109271]) +21 similar issues
   [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][90] ([fdo#109280]) +18 similar issues
   [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][91] ([fdo#111825]) +3 similar issues
   [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][92] ([i915#180])
   [92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][93] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues
   [93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-yf:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][94] ([i915#3536]) +1 similar issue
   [94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-yf.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][95] ([fdo#112054])
   [95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-x:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][96] ([i915#3536])
   [96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-x.html

  * igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][97] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2733])
   [97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][98] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +1 similar issue
   [98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][99] ([i915#2920])
   [99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][100] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue
   [100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][101] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +4 similar issues
   [101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][102] -> [SKIP][103] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068] / [i915#658])
   [102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
   [103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][104] ([fdo#109441])
   [104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][105] -> [SKIP][106] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue
   [105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html
   [106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][107] ([i915#180])
   [107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-suspend.html

  * igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-c-source-outp-complete:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][108] ([i915#2530])
   [108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-c-source-outp-complete.html

  * igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_1:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][109] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue
   [109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_1.html

  * igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_pread_pwrite:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][110] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue
   [110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_pread_pwrite.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][111] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +4 similar issues
   [111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@split-10:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][112] ([i915#2994])
   [112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@sysfs_clients@split-10.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@fbdev@nullptr:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][113] ([i915#2582]) -> [PASS][114]
   [113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@fbdev@nullptr.html
   [114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@fbdev@nullptr.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][115] ([i915#2410]) -> [PASS][116] +1 similar issue
   [115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
   [116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html

  * igt@gem_eio@hibernate:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [INCOMPLETE][117] -> [PASS][118]
   [117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@gem_eio@hibernate.html
   [118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_eio@hibernate.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         [FAIL][119] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][120] +2 similar issues
   [119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html
   [120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][121] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][122]
   [121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
   [122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [FAIL][123] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][124]
   [123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
   [124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][125] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][126]
   [125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
   [126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all:
    - shard-glk:          [DMESG-WARN][127] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][128]
   [127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all.html
   [128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all.html

  * igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][129] ([i915#3012]) -> [PASS][130]
   [129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade.html
   [130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr:
    - shard-iclb:         [DMESG-WARN][131] ([i915#3698]) -> [PASS][132]
   [131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
   [132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][133] ([fdo#109308]) -> [PASS][134]
   [133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html
   [134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][135] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][136] +1 similar issue
   [135]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html
   [136]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][137] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][138]
   [137]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html
   [138]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl6/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip-async-flip:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][139] ([i915#3721]) -> [PASS][140] +5 similar issues
   [139]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.or

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 34285 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
  2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2021-07-19  6:17 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
  2021-07-19 18:58   ` Navare, Manasi
  2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-19  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manasi Navare, intel-gfx

Patch looks good to me.

Please find below some suggestions

On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
>
> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>   	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>   		return;
>   
> +	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> +		/* No PLLs set for slave */
> +		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> +

there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:

if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
                 master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;

Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along 
with these lines.

In any case:

Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

>   	intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>   
>   	if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
  2021-07-19  6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
@ 2021-07-19 18:58   ` Navare, Manasi
  2021-07-20  7:23     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-19 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nautiyal, Ankit K; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> Patch looks good to me.
> 
> Please find below some suggestions
> 
> On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> >for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> >some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> >the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
> >
> >Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> >Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
> >Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >  	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> >  		return;
> >+	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> >+		/* No PLLs set for slave */
> >+		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> >+
> 
> there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
> 
> if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
>                 master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> 
> Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with
> these lines.

Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call
after this point so need to reset it after separately.

Manasi

> 
> In any case:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> 
> >  	intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
> >  	if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
  2021-07-19 18:58   ` Navare, Manasi
@ 2021-07-20  7:23     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
  2021-07-21 17:42       ` Navare, Manasi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-20  7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Navare, Manasi; +Cc: intel-gfx


On 7/20/2021 12:28 AM, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>> Patch looks good to me.
>>
>> Please find below some suggestions
>>
>> On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
>>> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
>>> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
>>> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
>>> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>> checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
>>> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>>   	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>>>   		return;
>>> +	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
>>> +		/* No PLLs set for slave */
>>> +		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
>>> +
>> there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
>>
>> if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
>>                  master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
>>
>> Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with
>> these lines.
> Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call
> after this point so need to reset it after separately.
>
> Manasi

You are right. I missed that, pipe_config gets overwritten just before 
this point, so the change is at the right place.

Regards,

Ankit


>
>> In any case:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>
>>>   	intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>>>   	if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
  2021-07-20  7:23     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
@ 2021-07-21 17:42       ` Navare, Manasi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-21 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nautiyal, Ankit K; +Cc: intel-gfx

Pushed to drm-intel-next, tahnks for the reviews.

Manasi

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:53:23PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> 
> On 7/20/2021 12:28 AM, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> >>Patch looks good to me.
> >>
> >>Please find below some suggestions
> >>
> >>On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >>>Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> >>>for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> >>>some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> >>>the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
> >>>
> >>>Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> >>>Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >>>Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >>>Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> >>checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
> >>>Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> >>>---
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >>>index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >>>@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >>>  	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> >>>  		return;
> >>>+	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> >>>+		/* No PLLs set for slave */
> >>>+		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> >>>+
> >>there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
> >>
> >>if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> >>                 master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> >>
> >>Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with
> >>these lines.
> >Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call
> >after this point so need to reset it after separately.
> >
> >Manasi
> 
> You are right. I missed that, pipe_config gets overwritten just before this
> point, so the change is at the right place.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ankit
> 
> 
> >
> >>In any case:
> >>
> >>Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >>
> >>>  	intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
> >>>  	if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
  2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-07-19  6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
@ 2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2021-08-10 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manasi Navare, intel-gfx

On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
>
> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> +		/* No PLLs set for slave */
> +		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> +

I know it's been merged already, but feels wrong to have this in
verify_crtc_state(). Kind of out of place.

BR,
Jani.

>  	intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>  
>  	if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
@ 2021-06-23 19:04 Manasi Navare
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2021-06-23 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 6be1b31af07b..606b9107d1cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -8971,8 +8971,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 			"(expected %i, found %i)\n",
 			new_crtc_state->hw.active, crtc->active);
 
-	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
+	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
+		pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
 		master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
+	}
 
 	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &master->base, encoder) {
 		enum pipe pipe;
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-10 13:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-19  6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-07-19 18:58   ` Navare, Manasi
2021-07-20  7:23     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-07-21 17:42       ` Navare, Manasi
2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-23 19:04 Manasi Navare

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).