* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave @ 2021-07-14 22:34 Manasi Navare 2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork ` (4 more replies) 0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Manasi Navare @ 2021-07-14 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active) return; + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) + /* No PLLs set for slave */ + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; + intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config); if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state, -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) 2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare @ 2021-07-16 15:44 ` Patchwork 2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip e5339cc39b24 drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave -:10: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #10: Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL -:18: WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: 'Tested-by:' is the preferred signature form #18: Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) 2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare 2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 16:13 ` Patchwork 2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3031 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10345 -> Patchwork_20623 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20623 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915: - fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271]) [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915.html * igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast: - fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] ([i915#1372]) [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3: - {fi-tgl-1115g4}: [FAIL][4] ([i915#1888]) -> [PASS][5] [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html * igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend: - fi-kbl-7500u: [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#165]) -> [PASS][7] [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [i915#1372]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1372 [i915#165]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/165 [i915#1888]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1888 Participating hosts (41 -> 36) ------------------------------ Missing (5): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-1 fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_10345 -> Patchwork_20623 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_10345: 8c6a974b932fbaa798102b4713ceedf3b04227d9 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_6142: 16e753fc5e1e51395e1df40865c569984a74c5ed @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git Patchwork_20623: e5339cc39b2489408746b00e12117e7992296ab1 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == e5339cc39b24 drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3734 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) 2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare 2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork 2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 20:26 ` Patchwork 2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K 2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula 4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30292 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10345_full -> Patchwork_20623_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20623_full absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_20623_full, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20623_full: ### IGT changes ### #### Possible regressions #### * igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete.html #### Suppressed #### The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses. They do not affect the overall result. * igt@runner@aborted: - {shard-rkl}: ([FAIL][2], [FAIL][3], [FAIL][4], [FAIL][5], [FAIL][6]) ([i915#3002]) -> ([FAIL][7], [FAIL][8], [FAIL][9], [FAIL][10]) ([i915#2029] / [i915#3002]) [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@runner@aborted.html [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@runner@aborted.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@runner@aborted.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20623_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@feature_discovery@display-4x: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#1839]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@display-4x.html * igt@feature_discovery@psr2: - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#658]) [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0: - shard-kbl: [PASS][14] -> [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#180]) +5 similar issues [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0.html * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0: - shard-skl: [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([i915#146] / [i915#198]) [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html - shard-apl: [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-cleanup: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +1 similar issue [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-cleanup.html * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress: - shard-skl: [PASS][21] -> [TIMEOUT][22] ([i915#2369] / [i915#3063]) [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl9/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl7/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][23] ([i915#2369] / [i915#2481] / [i915#3070]) [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline: - shard-glk: [PASS][24] -> [FAIL][25] ([i915#2846]) [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0: - shard-kbl: [PASS][26] -> [FAIL][27] ([i915#2842]) +2 similar issues [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0: - shard-glk: [PASS][28] -> [FAIL][29] ([i915#2842]) [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][30] ([i915#2842]) [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html * igt@gem_exec_params@no-blt: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109283]) [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_params@no-blt.html * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][32] ([i915#2428]) [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy.html * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy: - shard-iclb: [PASS][33] -> [FAIL][34] ([i915#2428]) [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy.html [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy.html * igt@gem_pread@exhaustion: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [WARN][35] ([i915#2658]) [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@gem_pread@exhaustion.html * igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([i915#768]) +1 similar issue [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][37] ([i915#3002]) +1 similar issue [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][38] ([i915#3297]) [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap.html - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([i915#3297]) [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][40] ([i915#3318]) [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][41] ([i915#3318]) [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#112306]) +1 similar issue [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#112306]) +1 similar issue [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][44] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@batch-invalid-length: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][45] ([fdo#109271]) +226 similar issues [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@batch-invalid-length.html * igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][46] ([i915#3296]) [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large.html - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][47] ([i915#3296]) [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large.html * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1937]) [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp.html * igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@media-rc6-accuracy: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][49] ([fdo#109289]) [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@media-rc6-accuracy.html * igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-all-modeset-transition: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][50] ([i915#1769]) [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-all-modeset-transition.html * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][51] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777]) +1 similar issue [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][52] ([i915#3763]) [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl5/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][53] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777]) [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip.html * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109271]) +214 similar issues [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0.html * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#110723]) [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][56] ([fdo#111615]) [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_ccs: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][57] ([i915#3689]) [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_ccs.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-multiple: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][58] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-multiple.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-after-suspend: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl4/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-after-suspend.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-enable-disable-mode: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +11 similar issues [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-enable-disable-mode.html * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast: - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][61] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +13 similar issues [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +17 similar issues [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25.html * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][63] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red.html * igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-lic-type-1: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][64] ([i915#3116]) [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-lic-type-1.html * igt@kms_content_protection@legacy: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109300] / [fdo#111066]) [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_content_protection@legacy.html * igt@kms_content_protection@lic: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][66] ([i915#1319]) +1 similar issue [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][67] ([i915#3359]) [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-sliding: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][68] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#109279]) [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-sliding.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-256x256-onscreen: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][69] ([fdo#109271]) +39 similar issues [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-onscreen: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][70] ([fdo#109279] / [i915#3359]) +2 similar issues [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-onscreen.html * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge: - shard-skl: [PASS][71] -> [DMESG-WARN][72] ([i915#1982]) [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl1/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl3/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-128x128-top-edge: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109278]) +25 similar issues [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-128x128-top-edge.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-varying-size: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][74] ([fdo#109274] / [fdo#109278]) +1 similar issue [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-varying-size.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size: - shard-skl: [PASS][75] -> [FAIL][76] ([i915#2346] / [i915#533]) [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size: - shard-skl: [PASS][77] -> [FAIL][78] ([i915#2346]) [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size.html [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-bo: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][79] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-bo.html * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled: - shard-glk: [PASS][80] -> [FAIL][81] ([i915#3451]) [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk3/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled.html [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk2/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled.html * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109274]) +3 similar issues [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1: - shard-skl: [PASS][83] -> [FAIL][84] ([i915#2122]) [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl10/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1: - shard-skl: [PASS][85] -> [FAIL][86] ([i915#79]) [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1.html [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1.html * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilegen12rcccs: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][87] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672]) [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilegen12rcccs.html * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][88] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672]) [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt: - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][89] ([fdo#109271]) +21 similar issues [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][90] ([fdo#109280]) +18 similar issues [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][91] ([fdo#111825]) +3 similar issues [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][92] ([i915#180]) [92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][93] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues [93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max.html * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-yf: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][94] ([i915#3536]) +1 similar issue [94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-yf.html * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][95] ([fdo#112054]) [95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf.html * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-x: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][96] ([i915#3536]) [96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-x.html * igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][97] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2733]) [97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][98] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +1 similar issue [98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][99] ([i915#2920]) [99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][100] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue [100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][101] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +4 similar issues [101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html * igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip: - shard-iclb: [PASS][102] -> [SKIP][103] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068] / [i915#658]) [102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html [103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][104] ([fdo#109441]) [104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt: - shard-iclb: [PASS][105] -> [SKIP][106] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue [105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html [106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-suspend: - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][107] ([i915#180]) [107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-suspend.html * igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-c-source-outp-complete: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][108] ([i915#2530]) [108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-c-source-outp-complete.html * igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_1: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][109] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue [109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_1.html * igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_pread_pwrite: - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][110] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue [110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_pread_pwrite.html * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1: - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][111] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +4 similar issues [111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1.html * igt@sysfs_clients@split-10: - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][112] ([i915#2994]) [112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@sysfs_clients@split-10.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@fbdev@nullptr: - {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][113] ([i915#2582]) -> [PASS][114] [113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@fbdev@nullptr.html [114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@fbdev@nullptr.html * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts: - {shard-rkl}: [FAIL][115] ([i915#2410]) -> [PASS][116] +1 similar issue [115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html [116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html * igt@gem_eio@hibernate: - {shard-rkl}: [INCOMPLETE][117] -> [PASS][118] [117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@gem_eio@hibernate.html [118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_eio@hibernate.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0: - shard-tglb: [FAIL][119] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][120] +2 similar issues [119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html [120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0: - shard-iclb: [FAIL][121] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][122] [121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html [122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0: - shard-kbl: [FAIL][123] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][124] [123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html [124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html - {shard-rkl}: [FAIL][125] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][126] [125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html [126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all: - shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][127] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][128] [127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all.html [128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all.html * igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade: - {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][129] ([i915#3012]) -> [PASS][130] [129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade.html [130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade.html * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr: - shard-iclb: [DMESG-WARN][131] ([i915#3698]) -> [PASS][132] [131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html [132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte: - {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][133] ([fdo#109308]) -> [PASS][134] [133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html [134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress: - {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][135] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][136] +1 similar issue [135]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html [136]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader: - shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][137] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][138] [137]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html [138]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl6/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip-async-flip: - {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][139] ([i915#3721]) -> [PASS][140] +5 similar issues [139]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.or == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 34285 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave 2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork @ 2021-07-19 6:17 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K 2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi 2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula 4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-19 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Manasi Navare, intel-gfx Patch looks good to me. Please find below some suggestions On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote: > Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL > for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has > some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset > the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. > > Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> checkpatch warning about tested-by tag. > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active) > return; > > + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) > + /* No PLLs set for slave */ > + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; > + there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this: if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc; Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with these lines. In any case: Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config); > > if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state, _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave 2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi 2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-19 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nautiyal, Ankit K; +Cc: intel-gfx On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote: > Patch looks good to me. > > Please find below some suggestions > > On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote: > >Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL > >for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has > >some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset > >the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. > > > >Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 > >Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > >Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > >Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> > checkpatch warning about tested-by tag. > >Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> > >--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644 > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > > if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active) > > return; > >+ if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) > >+ /* No PLLs set for slave */ > >+ pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; > >+ > > there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this: > > if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) > master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc; > > Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with > these lines. Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call after this point so need to reset it after separately. Manasi > > In any case: > > Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > > > intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config); > > if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state, _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave 2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K 2021-07-21 17:42 ` Navare, Manasi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-20 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Navare, Manasi; +Cc: intel-gfx On 7/20/2021 12:28 AM, Navare, Manasi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote: >> Patch looks good to me. >> >> Please find below some suggestions >> >> On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote: >>> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL >>> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has >>> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset >>> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. >>> >>> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 >>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> >>> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> >> checkpatch warning about tested-by tag. >>> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c >>> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c >>> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, >>> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active) >>> return; >>> + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) >>> + /* No PLLs set for slave */ >>> + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; >>> + >> there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this: >> >> if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) >> master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc; >> >> Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with >> these lines. > Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call > after this point so need to reset it after separately. > > Manasi You are right. I missed that, pipe_config gets overwritten just before this point, so the change is at the right place. Regards, Ankit > >> In any case: >> >> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> >> >>> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config); >>> if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state, _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave 2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-21 17:42 ` Navare, Manasi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-21 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nautiyal, Ankit K; +Cc: intel-gfx Pushed to drm-intel-next, tahnks for the reviews. Manasi On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:53:23PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote: > > On 7/20/2021 12:28 AM, Navare, Manasi wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote: > >>Patch looks good to me. > >> > >>Please find below some suggestions > >> > >>On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote: > >>>Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL > >>>for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has > >>>some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset > >>>the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. > >>> > >>>Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 > >>>Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > >>>Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > >>>Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> > >>checkpatch warning about tested-by tag. > >>>Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> > >>>--- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > >>> > >>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >>>index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644 > >>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >>>@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > >>> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active) > >>> return; > >>>+ if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) > >>>+ /* No PLLs set for slave */ > >>>+ pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; > >>>+ > >>there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this: > >> > >>if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) > >> master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc; > >> > >>Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with > >>these lines. > >Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call > >after this point so need to reset it after separately. > > > >Manasi > > You are right. I missed that, pipe_config gets overwritten just before this > point, so the change is at the right place. > > Regards, > > Ankit > > > > > >>In any case: > >> > >>Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > >> > >>> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config); > >>> if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state, _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave 2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula 4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2021-08-10 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Manasi Navare, intel-gfx On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote: > Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL > for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has > some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset > the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. > > Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active) > return; > > + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) > + /* No PLLs set for slave */ > + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; > + I know it's been merged already, but feels wrong to have this in verify_crtc_state(). Kind of out of place. BR, Jani. > intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config); > > if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state, -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave @ 2021-06-23 19:04 Manasi Navare 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Manasi Navare @ 2021-06-23 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe. Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c index 6be1b31af07b..606b9107d1cf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c @@ -8971,8 +8971,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc, "(expected %i, found %i)\n", new_crtc_state->hw.active, crtc->active); - if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) { + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL; master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc; + } for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &master->base, encoder) { enum pipe pipe; -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-10 13:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare 2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork 2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K 2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi 2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K 2021-07-21 17:42 ` Navare, Manasi 2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-06-23 19:04 Manasi Navare
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).