* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
@ 2021-07-14 22:34 Manasi Navare
2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2021-07-14 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
return;
+ if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
+ /* No PLLs set for slave */
+ pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
+
intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
--
2.19.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
@ 2021-07-16 15:44 ` Patchwork
2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
e5339cc39b24 drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
-:10: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#10:
Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
-:18: WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: 'Tested-by:' is the preferred signature form
#18:
Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
@ 2021-07-16 16:13 ` Patchwork
2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3031 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10345 -> Patchwork_20623
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20623 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] ([i915#1372])
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
- {fi-tgl-1115g4}: [FAIL][4] ([i915#1888]) -> [PASS][5]
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#165]) -> [PASS][7]
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[i915#1372]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1372
[i915#165]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/165
[i915#1888]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1888
Participating hosts (41 -> 36)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-1 fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_10345 -> Patchwork_20623
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_10345: 8c6a974b932fbaa798102b4713ceedf3b04227d9 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_6142: 16e753fc5e1e51395e1df40865c569984a74c5ed @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_20623: e5339cc39b2489408746b00e12117e7992296ab1 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
e5339cc39b24 drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3734 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2021-07-16 20:26 ` Patchwork
2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-07-16 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30292 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91830/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10345_full -> Patchwork_20623_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20623_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_20623_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20623_full:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_addfb_basic@invalid-smem-bo-on-discrete.html
#### Suppressed ####
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* igt@runner@aborted:
- {shard-rkl}: ([FAIL][2], [FAIL][3], [FAIL][4], [FAIL][5], [FAIL][6]) ([i915#3002]) -> ([FAIL][7], [FAIL][8], [FAIL][9], [FAIL][10]) ([i915#2029] / [i915#3002])
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@runner@aborted.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20623_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@feature_discovery@display-4x:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#1839])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@display-4x.html
* igt@feature_discovery@psr2:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#658])
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][14] -> [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#180]) +5 similar issues
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0.html
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0:
- shard-skl: [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([i915#146] / [i915#198])
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
- shard-apl: [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3@vecs0.html
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-cleanup:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +1 similar issue
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-cleanup.html
* igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
- shard-skl: [PASS][21] -> [TIMEOUT][22] ([i915#2369] / [i915#3063])
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl9/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl7/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][23] ([i915#2369] / [i915#2481] / [i915#3070])
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
- shard-glk: [PASS][24] -> [FAIL][25] ([i915#2846])
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][26] -> [FAIL][27] ([i915#2842]) +2 similar issues
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0:
- shard-glk: [PASS][28] -> [FAIL][29] ([i915#2842])
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][30] ([i915#2842])
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html
* igt@gem_exec_params@no-blt:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109283])
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_params@no-blt.html
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][32] ([i915#2428])
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy.html
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][33] -> [FAIL][34] ([i915#2428])
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy.html
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-xy.html
* igt@gem_pread@exhaustion:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [WARN][35] ([i915#2658])
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@gem_pread@exhaustion.html
* igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([i915#768]) +1 similar issue
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][37] ([i915#3002]) +1 similar issue
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][38] ([i915#3297])
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap.html
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([i915#3297])
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@unsync-overlap.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][40] ([i915#3318])
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][41] ([i915#3318])
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#112306]) +1 similar issue
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#112306]) +1 similar issue
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][44] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716])
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@batch-invalid-length:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][45] ([fdo#109271]) +226 similar issues
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@batch-invalid-length.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][46] ([i915#3296])
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large.html
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][47] ([i915#3296])
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-large.html
* igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1937])
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp.html
* igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@media-rc6-accuracy:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][49] ([fdo#109289])
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@media-rc6-accuracy.html
* igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-all-modeset-transition:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][50] ([i915#1769])
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_atomic_transition@plane-all-modeset-transition.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][51] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777]) +1 similar issue
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][52] ([i915#3763])
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl5/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][53] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777])
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109271]) +214 similar issues
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#110723])
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][56] ([fdo#111615])
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html
* igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_ccs:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][57] ([i915#3689])
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_ccs.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-multiple:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][58] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-multiple.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-after-suspend:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827])
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl4/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-after-suspend.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-enable-disable-mode:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +11 similar issues
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-enable-disable-mode.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][61] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +13 similar issues
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-snb5/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +17 similar issues
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl3/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][63] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-lic-type-1:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][64] ([i915#3116])
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_content_protection@dp-mst-lic-type-1.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@legacy:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109300] / [fdo#111066])
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_content_protection@legacy.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@lic:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][66] ([i915#1319]) +1 similar issue
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][67] ([i915#3359])
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-sliding:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][68] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#109279])
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x170-sliding.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-256x256-onscreen:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][69] ([fdo#109271]) +39 similar issues
[69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-256x256-onscreen.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-onscreen:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][70] ([fdo#109279] / [i915#3359]) +2 similar issues
[70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-onscreen.html
* igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge:
- shard-skl: [PASS][71] -> [DMESG-WARN][72] ([i915#1982])
[71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl1/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html
[72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl3/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html
* igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-128x128-top-edge:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109278]) +25 similar issues
[73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-d-128x128-top-edge.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-varying-size:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][74] ([fdo#109274] / [fdo#109278]) +1 similar issue
[74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipb-varying-size.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size:
- shard-skl: [PASS][75] -> [FAIL][76] ([i915#2346] / [i915#533])
[75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
[76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size:
- shard-skl: [PASS][77] -> [FAIL][78] ([i915#2346])
[77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size.html
[78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-varying-size.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-bo:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][79] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
[79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-single-bo.html
* igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled:
- shard-glk: [PASS][80] -> [FAIL][81] ([i915#3451])
[80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk3/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled.html
[81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk2/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-untiled.html
* igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109274]) +3 similar issues
[82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1:
- shard-skl: [PASS][83] -> [FAIL][84] ([i915#2122])
[83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl10/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html
[84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1:
- shard-skl: [PASS][85] -> [FAIL][86] ([i915#79])
[85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-skl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1.html
[86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-edp1.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilegen12rcccs:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][87] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672])
[87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl7/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilegen12rcccs.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][88] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672])
[88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][89] ([fdo#109271]) +21 similar issues
[89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-skl5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][90] ([fdo#109280]) +18 similar issues
[90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][91] ([fdo#111825]) +3 similar issues
[91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][92] ([i915#180])
[92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][93] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues
[93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-max.html
* igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-yf:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][94] ([i915#3536]) +1 similar issue
[94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-yf.html
* igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][95] ([fdo#112054])
[95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-b-tiling-yf.html
* igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-x:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][96] ([i915#3536])
[96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-x.html
* igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][97] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2733])
[97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@kms_plane_scaling@scaler-with-clipping-clamping@pipe-c-scaler-with-clipping-clamping.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][98] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +1 similar issue
[98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][99] ([i915#2920])
[99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][100] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue
[100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][101] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +4 similar issues
[101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html
* igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][102] -> [SKIP][103] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068] / [i915#658])
[102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
[103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][104] ([fdo#109441])
[104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_cpu.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][105] -> [SKIP][106] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue
[105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html
[106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html
* igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-suspend:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][107] ([i915#180])
[107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-suspend.html
* igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-c-source-outp-complete:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][108] ([i915#2530])
[108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb5/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-c-source-outp-complete.html
* igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_1:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][109] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue
[109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb3/igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_1.html
* igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_pread_pwrite:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][110] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue
[110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb7/igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_pread_pwrite.html
* igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][111] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +4 similar issues
[111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl8/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1.html
* igt@sysfs_clients@split-10:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][112] ([i915#2994])
[112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb7/igt@sysfs_clients@split-10.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@fbdev@nullptr:
- {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][113] ([i915#2582]) -> [PASS][114]
[113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@fbdev@nullptr.html
[114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@fbdev@nullptr.html
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts:
- {shard-rkl}: [FAIL][115] ([i915#2410]) -> [PASS][116] +1 similar issue
[115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
[116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
* igt@gem_eio@hibernate:
- {shard-rkl}: [INCOMPLETE][117] -> [PASS][118]
[117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-6/igt@gem_eio@hibernate.html
[118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_eio@hibernate.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0:
- shard-tglb: [FAIL][119] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][120] +2 similar issues
[119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html
[120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
- shard-iclb: [FAIL][121] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][122]
[121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
[122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
- shard-kbl: [FAIL][123] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][124]
[123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
[124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
- {shard-rkl}: [FAIL][125] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][126]
[125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
[126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all:
- shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][127] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][128]
[127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all.html
[128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-normal-all.html
* igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade:
- {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][129] ([i915#3012]) -> [PASS][130]
[129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade.html
[130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade.html
* igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr:
- shard-iclb: [DMESG-WARN][131] ([i915#3698]) -> [PASS][132]
[131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
[132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
- {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][133] ([fdo#109308]) -> [PASS][134]
[133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html
[134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress:
- {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][135] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][136] +1 similar issue
[135]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html
[136]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html
* igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader:
- shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][137] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][138]
[137]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10345/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html
[138]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/shard-apl6/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-hflip-async-flip:
- {shard-rkl}: [SKIP][139] ([i915#3721]) -> [PASS][140] +5 similar issues
[139]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.or
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20623/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 34285 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2021-07-19 6:17 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-19 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare, intel-gfx
Patch looks good to me.
Please find below some suggestions
On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
>
> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> return;
>
> + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> + /* No PLLs set for slave */
> + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> +
there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along
with these lines.
In any case:
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>
> if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
@ 2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-19 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nautiyal, Ankit K; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> Please find below some suggestions
>
> On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> >for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> >some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> >the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
> >
> >Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> >Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
> >Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> > return;
> >+ if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> >+ /* No PLLs set for slave */
> >+ pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> >+
>
> there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
>
> if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
>
> Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with
> these lines.
Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call
after this point so need to reset it after separately.
Manasi
>
> In any case:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>
> > intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
> > if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi
@ 2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-07-21 17:42 ` Navare, Manasi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nautiyal, Ankit K @ 2021-07-20 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Navare, Manasi; +Cc: intel-gfx
On 7/20/2021 12:28 AM, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>> Patch looks good to me.
>>
>> Please find below some suggestions
>>
>> On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
>>> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
>>> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
>>> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
>>> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>> checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
>>> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>>> return;
>>> + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
>>> + /* No PLLs set for slave */
>>> + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
>>> +
>> there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
>>
>> if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
>> master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
>>
>> Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with
>> these lines.
> Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call
> after this point so need to reset it after separately.
>
> Manasi
You are right. I missed that, pipe_config gets overwritten just before
this point, so the change is at the right place.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> In any case:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>
>>> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>>> if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
@ 2021-07-21 17:42 ` Navare, Manasi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Navare, Manasi @ 2021-07-21 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nautiyal, Ankit K; +Cc: intel-gfx
Pushed to drm-intel-next, tahnks for the reviews.
Manasi
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:53:23PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 7/20/2021 12:28 AM, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:47:51AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> >>Patch looks good to me.
> >>
> >>Please find below some suggestions
> >>
> >>On 7/15/2021 4:04 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >>>Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> >>>for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> >>>some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> >>>the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
> >>>
> >>>Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> >>>Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >>>Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >>>Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> >>checkpatch warning about tested-by tag.
> >>>Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> >>>---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >>>index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >>>@@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >>> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> >>> return;
> >>>+ if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> >>>+ /* No PLLs set for slave */
> >>>+ pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> >>>+
> >>there is a check for bigjoiner_slave, couple of lines above this:
> >>
> >>if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> >> master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> >>
> >>Perhaps it will make sense to club the set shared_dpll to NULL, along with
> >>these lines.
> >Yup, thats where I was resetting in earlier patch but then it actually gets overridden in a function call
> >after this point so need to reset it after separately.
> >
> >Manasi
>
> You are right. I missed that, pipe_config gets overwritten just before this
> point, so the change is at the right place.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ankit
>
>
> >
> >>In any case:
> >>
> >>Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >>
> >>> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
> >>> if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
@ 2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2021-08-10 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare, intel-gfx
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
> for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
> some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
> the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
>
> Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Tested-By: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 65ddb6ca16e6..c274bfb8e549 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -9006,6 +9006,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> return;
>
> + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> + /* No PLLs set for slave */
> + pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
> +
I know it's been merged already, but feels wrong to have this in
verify_crtc_state(). Kind of out of place.
BR,
Jani.
> intel_pipe_config_sanity_check(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>
> if (!intel_pipe_config_compare(new_crtc_state,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave
@ 2021-06-23 19:04 Manasi Navare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2021-06-23 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Currently when we do the HW state readout, we dont set the shared dpll to NULL
for the bigjoiner slave which should not have a DPLL assigned. So it has
some garbage while the HW state readout is NULL. So explicitly reset
the shared dpll for bigjoiner slave pipe.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3465
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 6be1b31af07b..606b9107d1cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -8971,8 +8971,10 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
"(expected %i, found %i)\n",
new_crtc_state->hw.active, crtc->active);
- if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
+ if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
+ pipe_config->shared_dpll = NULL;
master = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
+ }
for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &master->base, encoder) {
enum pipe pipe;
--
2.19.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-10 13:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-14 22:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Manasi Navare
2021-07-16 15:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-16 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-16 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-19 6:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix shared dpll mismatch for bigjoiner slave Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-07-19 18:58 ` Navare, Manasi
2021-07-20 7:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-07-21 17:42 ` Navare, Manasi
2021-08-10 13:19 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-23 19:04 Manasi Navare
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).