kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>,
	Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:14:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202007301113.45D24C9D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7tpa3hg.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

[heavily trimmed CC list because I think lkml is ignoring this
thread...]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:03:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Kees,
> 
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> > This is the infrastructure changes to prepare the tasklet API for
> > conversion to passing the tasklet struct as the callback argument instead
> > of an arbitrary unsigned long. The first patch details why this is useful
> > (it's the same rationale as the timer_struct changes from a bit ago:
> > less abuse during memory corruption attacks, more in line with existing
> > ways of doing things in the kernel, save a little space in struct,
> > etc). Notably, the existing tasklet API use is much less messy, so there
> > is less to clean up.
> >
> > It's not clear to me which tree this should go through... Greg since it
> > starts with a USB clean-up, -tip for timer or interrupt, or if I should
> > just carry it. I'm open to suggestions, but if I don't hear otherwise,
> > I'll just carry it.
> >
> > My goal is to have this merged for v5.9-rc1 so that during the v5.10
> > development cycle the new API will be available. The entire tree of
> > changes is here[1] currently, but to split it up by maintainer the
> > infrastructure changes need to be landed first.
> >
> > Review and Acks appreciated! :)
> 
> I'd rather see tasklets vanish from the planet completely, but that's
> going to be a daring feat. So, grudgingly:

Understood! I will update the comments near the tasklet API.

> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-30 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16  3:08 [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: udc: Avoid tasklet passing a global Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:28   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16 19:41     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-31  9:20   ` Felipe Balbi
2020-07-16  3:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD() Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:30   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16 11:29   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 19:15     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  3:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] tasklet: Introduce new initialization API Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:30   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-16 15:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-16 19:22     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16  7:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-16  8:15   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-07-16 19:24     ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 19:14   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-16 20:48     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-07-16 21:24       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30  7:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-30 18:14   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-08-03  8:46     ` Allen
2020-08-11 12:16       ` Allen
2020-08-11 21:33       ` Kees Cook
2020-08-12  6:21         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-12 11:32           ` Allen
2020-08-12 12:31         ` Allen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202007301113.45D24C9D@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oscar.carter@gmx.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).