[PATCH v3 00/10] Enable root to update the blacklist keyring

[PATCH v3 00/10] Enable root to update the blacklist keyring

[Mickaël Salaün]

This third patch series includes back three fix patches taken from the first
series (and cherry-picked from David Howells's tree [1]), and one cosmetic fix
from Alex Shi which helps avoid future conflicts.  I also added some Acked-by
and improved comments.  As requested, this series is based on v5.11-rc3.

The goal of these patches is to add a new configuration option to enable the
root user to load signed keys in the blacklist keyring.  This keyring is useful
to "untrust" certificates or files.  Enabling to safely update this keyring
without recompiling the kernel makes it more usable.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=keys-fixes

Previous patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201211190330.2586116-1-mic@digikod.net/

Regards,

Alex Shi (1):
  certs/blacklist: fix kernel doc interface issue

David Howells (1):
  certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion

Mickaël Salaün (8):
  certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check
  PKCS#7: Fix missing include
  certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID
  certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict
  certs: Factor out the blacklist hash creation
  certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid
  certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist
    keyring
  tools/certs: Add print-cert-tbs-hash.sh

 MAINTAINERS                                   |   2 +
 certs/.gitignore                              |   1 +
 certs/Kconfig                                 |  10 +
 certs/Makefile                                |  15 +-
 certs/blacklist.c                             | 217 ++++++++++++++----
 certs/system_keyring.c                        |   5 +-
 crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c      |   3 +-
 include/keys/system_keyring.h                 |  14 +-
 include/linux/key.h                           |   1 +
 include/linux/verification.h                  |   2 +
 scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk            |  37 +++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c              |   4 +-
 .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c          |  26 +--
 security/keys/key.c                           |   2 +
 tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh            |  91 ++++++++
 15 files changed, 345 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk
 create mode 100755 tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh


base-commit: 7c53f6b671f4aba70ff15e1b05148b10d58c2837
-- 
2.30.0

[PATCH v3 01/10] certs/blacklist: fix kernel doc interface issue

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>

certs/blacklist.c:84: warning: Function parameter or member 'hash' not
described in 'mark_hash_blacklisted'

Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Cherry-pick patch from
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
  to avoid future merge conflicts.
* Rearrange Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by order.
---
 certs/blacklist.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 6514f9ebc943..2719fb2fbc1c 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static struct key_type key_type_blacklist = {
 
 /**
  * mark_hash_blacklisted - Add a hash to the system blacklist
- * @hash - The hash as a hex string with a type prefix (eg. "tbs:23aa429783")
+ * @hash: The hash as a hex string with a type prefix (eg. "tbs:23aa429783")
  */
 int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
 {
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] certs/blacklist: fix kernel doc interface issue

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:00PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> certs/blacklist.c:84: warning: Function parameter or member 'hash' not
> described in 'mark_hash_blacklisted'
> 
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

/Jarkko

[PATCH v3 02/10] certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

When looking for a blacklisted hash, bin2hex() is used to transform a
binary hash to an ascii (lowercase) hexadecimal string.  This string is
then search for in the description of the keys from the blacklist
keyring.  When adding a key to the blacklist keyring,
blacklist_vet_description() checks the hash prefix and the hexadecimal
string, but not that this string is lowercase.  It is then valid to set
hashes with uppercase hexadecimal, which will be silently ignored by the
kernel.

Add an additional check to blacklist_vet_description() to check that
hexadecimal strings are in lowercase.

Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Cherry-pick v1 patch from
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
  to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
* Rearrange Cc order.
---
 certs/blacklist.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 2719fb2fbc1c..a888b934a1cd 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int blacklist_vet_description(const char *desc)
 found_colon:
 	desc++;
 	for (; *desc; desc++) {
-		if (!isxdigit(*desc))
+		if (!isxdigit(*desc) || isupper(*desc))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		n++;
 	}
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> When looking for a blacklisted hash, bin2hex() is used to transform a
> binary hash to an ascii (lowercase) hexadecimal string.  This string is
> then search for in the description of the keys from the blacklist
> keyring.  When adding a key to the blacklist keyring,
> blacklist_vet_description() checks the hash prefix and the hexadecimal
> string, but not that this string is lowercase.  It is then valid to set
> hashes with uppercase hexadecimal, which will be silently ignored by the
> kernel.
> 
> Add an additional check to blacklist_vet_description() to check that
> hexadecimal strings are in lowercase.
> 
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v2:
> * Cherry-pick v1 patch from
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
> * Rearrange Cc order.
> ---
>  certs/blacklist.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 2719fb2fbc1c..a888b934a1cd 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int blacklist_vet_description(const char *desc)
>  found_colon:
>  	desc++;
>  	for (; *desc; desc++) {
> -		if (!isxdigit(*desc))
> +		if (!isxdigit(*desc) || isupper(*desc))
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		n++;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

Shouldn't this rather convert the upper case to lower case? I don't like
the ABI break that this causes.

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 20/01/2021 04:43, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> When looking for a blacklisted hash, bin2hex() is used to transform a
>> binary hash to an ascii (lowercase) hexadecimal string.  This string is
>> then search for in the description of the keys from the blacklist
>> keyring.  When adding a key to the blacklist keyring,
>> blacklist_vet_description() checks the hash prefix and the hexadecimal
>> string, but not that this string is lowercase.  It is then valid to set
>> hashes with uppercase hexadecimal, which will be silently ignored by the
>> kernel.
>>
>> Add an additional check to blacklist_vet_description() to check that
>> hexadecimal strings are in lowercase.
>>
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> * Cherry-pick v1 patch from
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
>> * Rearrange Cc order.
>> ---
>>  certs/blacklist.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
>> index 2719fb2fbc1c..a888b934a1cd 100644
>> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
>> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int blacklist_vet_description(const char *desc)
>>  found_colon:
>>  	desc++;
>>  	for (; *desc; desc++) {
>> -		if (!isxdigit(*desc))
>> +		if (!isxdigit(*desc) || isupper(*desc))
>>  			return -EINVAL;
>>  		n++;
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 2.30.0
>>
> 
> Shouldn't this rather convert the upper case to lower case? I don't like
> the ABI break that this causes.

It doesn't break the ABI because keys loaded in the blacklist keyring
can only happen with builtin hashes.  Moreover these builtin hashes will
be checked by patch 10/10 at build time.

This patch is also important to remove a false sense of security and
warns about mis-blacklisted certificates or binaries:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c9664a67-61b7-6b4a-86d7-5aca9ff06fa5@digikod.net/

Hot-patching keys doesn't seem a good idea, especially when these keys
are signed. Moreover, it would bring additional complexity and will
require to change the core of the key management.

> 
> /Jarkko
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:12:50PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 20/01/2021 04:43, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >>
> >> When looking for a blacklisted hash, bin2hex() is used to transform a
> >> binary hash to an ascii (lowercase) hexadecimal string.  This string is
> >> then search for in the description of the keys from the blacklist
> >> keyring.  When adding a key to the blacklist keyring,
> >> blacklist_vet_description() checks the hash prefix and the hexadecimal
> >> string, but not that this string is lowercase.  It is then valid to set
> >> hashes with uppercase hexadecimal, which will be silently ignored by the
> >> kernel.
> >>
> >> Add an additional check to blacklist_vet_description() to check that
> >> hexadecimal strings are in lowercase.
> >>
> >> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes since v2:
> >> * Cherry-pick v1 patch from
> >>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
> >>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
> >> * Rearrange Cc order.
> >> ---
> >>  certs/blacklist.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> >> index 2719fb2fbc1c..a888b934a1cd 100644
> >> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> >> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> >> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int blacklist_vet_description(const char *desc)
> >>  found_colon:
> >>  	desc++;
> >>  	for (; *desc; desc++) {
> >> -		if (!isxdigit(*desc))
> >> +		if (!isxdigit(*desc) || isupper(*desc))
> >>  			return -EINVAL;
> >>  		n++;
> >>  	}
> >> -- 
> >> 2.30.0
> >>
> > 
> > Shouldn't this rather convert the upper case to lower case? I don't like
> > the ABI break that this causes.
> 
> It doesn't break the ABI because keys loaded in the blacklist keyring
> can only happen with builtin hashes.  Moreover these builtin hashes will
> be checked by patch 10/10 at build time.

Right the patches are just out of order then.

/Jarkko

> 
> This patch is also important to remove a false sense of security and
> warns about mis-blacklisted certificates or binaries:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c9664a67-61b7-6b4a-86d7-5aca9ff06fa5@digikod.net/
> 
> Hot-patching keys doesn't seem a good idea, especially when these keys
> are signed. Moreover, it would bring additional complexity and will
> require to change the core of the key management.
> 
> > 
> > /Jarkko
> > 
> 

[PATCH v3 03/10] PKCS#7: Fix missing include

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Add missing linux/types.h for size_t.

[DH: Changed from stddef.h]

Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Cherry-pick v1 patch from
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
  to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
---
 include/linux/verification.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/verification.h b/include/linux/verification.h
index 911ab7c2b1ab..a655923335ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/verification.h
+++ b/include/linux/verification.h
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_VERIFICATION_H
 #define _LINUX_VERIFICATION_H
 
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
 /*
  * Indicate that both builtin trusted keys and secondary trusted keys
  * should be used.
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] PKCS#7: Fix missing include

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:02PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Add missing linux/types.h for size_t.
> 
> [DH: Changed from stddef.h]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

/Jarkko

> 
> Changes since v2:
> * Cherry-pick v1 patch from
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
> ---
>  include/linux/verification.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/verification.h b/include/linux/verification.h
> index 911ab7c2b1ab..a655923335ae 100644
> --- a/include/linux/verification.h
> +++ b/include/linux/verification.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  #ifndef _LINUX_VERIFICATION_H
>  #define _LINUX_VERIFICATION_H
>  
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
>  /*
>   * Indicate that both builtin trusted keys and secondary trusted keys
>   * should be used.
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

[PATCH v3 04/10] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

KEY_FLAG_KEEP is not meant to be passed to keyring_alloc() or key_alloc(),
as these only take KEY_ALLOC_* flags.  KEY_FLAG_KEEP has the same value as
KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, but fortunately only key_create_or_update()
uses it.  LSMs using the key_alloc hook don't check that flag.

KEY_FLAG_KEEP is then ignored but fortunately (again) the root user cannot
write to the blacklist keyring, so it is not possible to remove a key/hash
from it.

Fix this by adding a KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP flag that tells key_alloc() to set
KEY_FLAG_KEEP on the new key.  blacklist_init() can then, correctly, pass
this to keyring_alloc().

We can also use this in ima_mok_init() rather than setting the flag
manually.

Note that this doesn't fix an observable bug with the current
implementation but it is required to allow addition of new hashes to the
blacklist in the future without making it possible for them to be removed.

Fixes: 734114f8782f ("KEYS: Add a system blacklist keyring")
cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Reported-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[mic@linux.microsoft.com: fix ima_mok_init()]
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Cherry-pick rewritten v1 patch from
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
  to rebase on v5.11-rc3 and fix ima_mok_init().
---
 certs/blacklist.c                | 2 +-
 include/linux/key.h              | 1 +
 security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 4 +---
 security/keys/key.c              | 2 ++
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index a888b934a1cd..029471947838 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
 			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
 			      KEY_USR_SEARCH,
 			      KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
-			      KEY_FLAG_KEEP,
+			      KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
 			      NULL, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(blacklist_keyring))
 		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist keyring\n");
diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h
index 0f2e24f13c2b..eed3ce139a32 100644
--- a/include/linux/key.h
+++ b/include/linux/key.h
@@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ extern struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type,
 #define KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN		0x0004	/* Key is built into kernel */
 #define KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION	0x0008	/* Override the check on restricted keyrings */
 #define KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING		0x0010	/* allocating a user or user session keyring */
+#define KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP		0x0020	/* Set the KEEP flag on the key/keyring */
 
 extern void key_revoke(struct key *key);
 extern void key_invalidate(struct key *key);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
index 36cadadbfba4..5594dd38ab04 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
@@ -38,13 +38,11 @@ __init int ima_mok_init(void)
 				(KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
 				KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
 				KEY_USR_WRITE | KEY_USR_SEARCH,
-				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
+				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
 				restriction, NULL);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(ima_blacklist_keyring))
 		panic("Can't allocate IMA blacklist keyring.");
-
-	set_bit(KEY_FLAG_KEEP, &ima_blacklist_keyring->flags);
 	return 0;
 }
 device_initcall(ima_mok_init);
diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c
index ebe752b137aa..c45afdd1dfbb 100644
--- a/security/keys/key.c
+++ b/security/keys/key.c
@@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc,
 		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN;
 	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING)
 		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_UID_KEYRING;
+	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP)
+		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_KEEP;
 
 #ifdef KEY_DEBUGGING
 	key->magic = KEY_DEBUG_MAGIC;
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is not meant to be passed to keyring_alloc() or key_alloc(),
> as these only take KEY_ALLOC_* flags.  KEY_FLAG_KEEP has the same value as
> KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, but fortunately only key_create_or_update()
> uses it.  LSMs using the key_alloc hook don't check that flag.
> 
> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is then ignored but fortunately (again) the root user cannot
> write to the blacklist keyring, so it is not possible to remove a key/hash
> from it.
> 
> Fix this by adding a KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP flag that tells key_alloc() to set
> KEY_FLAG_KEEP on the new key.  blacklist_init() can then, correctly, pass
> this to keyring_alloc().

OK, so thing work by luck now, but given the new patches which allow
to append new keys they would break, right?

> We can also use this in ima_mok_init() rather than setting the flag
> manually.

What does ima_mok_init() do?
> Note that this doesn't fix an observable bug with the current
> implementation but it is required to allow addition of new hashes to the
> blacklist in the future without making it possible for them to be removed.
> 
> Fixes: 734114f8782f ("KEYS: Add a system blacklist keyring")
> cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Nit: Cc

> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Reported-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> [mic@linux.microsoft.com: fix ima_mok_init()]
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v2:
> * Cherry-pick rewritten v1 patch from
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3 and fix ima_mok_init().
> ---
>  certs/blacklist.c                | 2 +-
>  include/linux/key.h              | 1 +
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 4 +---
>  security/keys/key.c              | 2 ++
>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index a888b934a1cd..029471947838 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>  			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
>  			      KEY_USR_SEARCH,
>  			      KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
> -			      KEY_FLAG_KEEP,
> +			      KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
>  			      NULL, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(blacklist_keyring))
>  		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist keyring\n");
> diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h
> index 0f2e24f13c2b..eed3ce139a32 100644
> --- a/include/linux/key.h
> +++ b/include/linux/key.h
> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ extern struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type,
>  #define KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN		0x0004	/* Key is built into kernel */
>  #define KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION	0x0008	/* Override the check on restricted keyrings */
>  #define KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING		0x0010	/* allocating a user or user session keyring */
> +#define KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP		0x0020	/* Set the KEEP flag on the key/keyring */
>  
>  extern void key_revoke(struct key *key);
>  extern void key_invalidate(struct key *key);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> index 36cadadbfba4..5594dd38ab04 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
> @@ -38,13 +38,11 @@ __init int ima_mok_init(void)
>  				(KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
>  				KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
>  				KEY_USR_WRITE | KEY_USR_SEARCH,
> -				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
> +				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
>  				restriction, NULL);
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR(ima_blacklist_keyring))
>  		panic("Can't allocate IMA blacklist keyring.");
> -
> -	set_bit(KEY_FLAG_KEEP, &ima_blacklist_keyring->flags);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  device_initcall(ima_mok_init);
> diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c
> index ebe752b137aa..c45afdd1dfbb 100644
> --- a/security/keys/key.c
> +++ b/security/keys/key.c
> @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc,
>  		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN;
>  	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING)
>  		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_UID_KEYRING;
> +	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP)
> +		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_KEEP;
>  
>  #ifdef KEY_DEBUGGING
>  	key->magic = KEY_DEBUG_MAGIC;
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 20/01/2021 04:55, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>>
>> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is not meant to be passed to keyring_alloc() or key_alloc(),
>> as these only take KEY_ALLOC_* flags.  KEY_FLAG_KEEP has the same value as
>> KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, but fortunately only key_create_or_update()
>> uses it.  LSMs using the key_alloc hook don't check that flag.
>>
>> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is then ignored but fortunately (again) the root user cannot
>> write to the blacklist keyring, so it is not possible to remove a key/hash
>> from it.
>>
>> Fix this by adding a KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP flag that tells key_alloc() to set
>> KEY_FLAG_KEEP on the new key.  blacklist_init() can then, correctly, pass
>> this to keyring_alloc().
> 
> OK, so thing work by luck now, but given the new patches which allow
> to append new keys they would break, right?

Without this fix, patch 9/10 would allow to remove and modify keys from
the blacklist keyring.

> 
>> We can also use this in ima_mok_init() rather than setting the flag
>> manually.
> 
> What does ima_mok_init() do?

This was initially an addition from David Howells, I only fixed the
argument bit-ORing. ima_mok_init() allocates a blacklist keyring (with
different properties) dedicated to IMA.

>> Note that this doesn't fix an observable bug with the current
>> implementation but it is required to allow addition of new hashes to the
>> blacklist in the future without making it possible for them to be removed.
>>
>> Fixes: 734114f8782f ("KEYS: Add a system blacklist keyring")
>> cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Nit: Cc

OK

> 
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Reported-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> [mic@linux.microsoft.com: fix ima_mok_init()]
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> * Cherry-pick rewritten v1 patch from
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
>>   to rebase on v5.11-rc3 and fix ima_mok_init().
>> ---
>>  certs/blacklist.c                | 2 +-
>>  include/linux/key.h              | 1 +
>>  security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c | 4 +---
>>  security/keys/key.c              | 2 ++
>>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
>> index a888b934a1cd..029471947838 100644
>> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
>> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>>  			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
>>  			      KEY_USR_SEARCH,
>>  			      KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
>> -			      KEY_FLAG_KEEP,
>> +			      KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
>>  			      NULL, NULL);
>>  	if (IS_ERR(blacklist_keyring))
>>  		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist keyring\n");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h
>> index 0f2e24f13c2b..eed3ce139a32 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/key.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/key.h
>> @@ -289,6 +289,7 @@ extern struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type,
>>  #define KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN		0x0004	/* Key is built into kernel */
>>  #define KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION	0x0008	/* Override the check on restricted keyrings */
>>  #define KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING		0x0010	/* allocating a user or user session keyring */
>> +#define KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP		0x0020	/* Set the KEEP flag on the key/keyring */
>>  
>>  extern void key_revoke(struct key *key);
>>  extern void key_invalidate(struct key *key);
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
>> index 36cadadbfba4..5594dd38ab04 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c
>> @@ -38,13 +38,11 @@ __init int ima_mok_init(void)
>>  				(KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
>>  				KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
>>  				KEY_USR_WRITE | KEY_USR_SEARCH,
>> -				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
>> +				KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
>>  				restriction, NULL);
>>  
>>  	if (IS_ERR(ima_blacklist_keyring))
>>  		panic("Can't allocate IMA blacklist keyring.");
>> -
>> -	set_bit(KEY_FLAG_KEEP, &ima_blacklist_keyring->flags);
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  device_initcall(ima_mok_init);
>> diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c
>> index ebe752b137aa..c45afdd1dfbb 100644
>> --- a/security/keys/key.c
>> +++ b/security/keys/key.c
>> @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc,
>>  		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN;
>>  	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_UID_KEYRING)
>>  		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_UID_KEYRING;
>> +	if (flags & KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP)
>> +		key->flags |= 1 << KEY_FLAG_KEEP;
>>  
>>  #ifdef KEY_DEBUGGING
>>  	key->magic = KEY_DEBUG_MAGIC;
>> -- 
>> 2.30.0
>>
> 
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> 
> /Jarkko
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 20/01/2021 04:55, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:03PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >> From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is not meant to be passed to keyring_alloc() or key_alloc(),
> >> as these only take KEY_ALLOC_* flags.  KEY_FLAG_KEEP has the same value as
> >> KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, but fortunately only key_create_or_update()
> >> uses it.  LSMs using the key_alloc hook don't check that flag.
> >>
> >> KEY_FLAG_KEEP is then ignored but fortunately (again) the root user cannot
> >> write to the blacklist keyring, so it is not possible to remove a key/hash
> >> from it.
> >>
> >> Fix this by adding a KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP flag that tells key_alloc() to set
> >> KEY_FLAG_KEEP on the new key.  blacklist_init() can then, correctly, pass
> >> this to keyring_alloc().
> > 
> > OK, so thing work by luck now, but given the new patches which allow
> > to append new keys they would break, right?
> 
> Without this fix, patch 9/10 would allow to remove and modify keys from
> the blacklist keyring.
> 
> > 
> >> We can also use this in ima_mok_init() rather than setting the flag
> >> manually.
> > 
> > What does ima_mok_init() do?
> 
> This was initially an addition from David Howells, I only fixed the
> argument bit-ORing. ima_mok_init() allocates a blacklist keyring (with
> different properties) dedicated to IMA.
 
Please add this to the commit message.

/Jarkko

[PATCH v3 05/10] certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Align with the new macros and add appropriate include files.

Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Cherry-pick v1 patch from
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2659836.1607940186@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
  to rebase on v5.11-rc3.
---
 certs/blacklist.c      | 4 ++--
 certs/system_keyring.c | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 029471947838..bffe4c6f4a9e 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/uidgid.h>
 #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
 #include "blacklist.h"
 
@@ -156,8 +157,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
 
 	blacklist_keyring =
 		keyring_alloc(".blacklist",
-			      KUIDT_INIT(0), KGIDT_INIT(0),
-			      current_cred(),
+			      GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID, current_cred(),
 			      (KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
 			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
 			      KEY_USR_SEARCH,
diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c
index 798291177186..4b693da488f1 100644
--- a/certs/system_keyring.c
+++ b/certs/system_keyring.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/cred.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/uidgid.h>
 #include <linux/verification.h>
 #include <keys/asymmetric-type.h>
 #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
@@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ static __init int system_trusted_keyring_init(void)
 
 	builtin_trusted_keys =
 		keyring_alloc(".builtin_trusted_keys",
-			      KUIDT_INIT(0), KGIDT_INIT(0), current_cred(),
+			      GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID, current_cred(),
 			      ((KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
 			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ | KEY_USR_SEARCH),
 			      KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
@@ -109,7 +110,7 @@ static __init int system_trusted_keyring_init(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
 	secondary_trusted_keys =
 		keyring_alloc(".secondary_trusted_keys",
-			      KUIDT_INIT(0), KGIDT_INIT(0), current_cred(),
+			      GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID, current_cred(),
 			      ((KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
 			       KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ | KEY_USR_SEARCH |
 			       KEY_USR_WRITE),
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:04PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Align with the new macros and add appropriate include files.
> 
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

The commit message makes no sense. What you new macros?

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 20/01/2021 06:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:04PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Align with the new macros and add appropriate include files.
>>
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> The commit message makes no sense. What you new macros?

What about "Use the new GLOBAL_ROOT_UID and GLOBAL_ROOT_GID definitions,
and add appropriate include files."?

> 
> /Jarkko
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:17:28PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 20/01/2021 06:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:04PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >>
> >> Align with the new macros and add appropriate include files.
> >>
> >> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > 
> > The commit message makes no sense. What you new macros?
> 
> What about "Use the new GLOBAL_ROOT_UID and GLOBAL_ROOT_GID definitions,
> and add appropriate include files."?

They were added in 2011 so you could just remove "the new". Otherwise,
WFM.

/Jarkko

[PATCH v3 06/10] certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Before exposing this new key type to user space, make sure that only
meaningful blacklisted hashes are accepted.  This is also checked for
builtin blacklisted hashes, but a following commit make sure that the
user will notice (at built time) and will fix the configuration if it
already included errors.

Check that a blacklist key description starts with a valid prefix and
then a valid hexadecimal string.

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---

Changes since v2:
* Fix typo in blacklist_vet_description() comment, spotted by Tyler
  Hicks.
* Add Jarkko's Acked-by.

Changes since v1:
* Return ENOPKG (instead of EINVAL) when a hash is greater than the
  maximum currently known hash (suggested by David Howells).
---
 certs/blacklist.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index bffe4c6f4a9e..334ab7b964bc 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -18,6 +18,16 @@
 #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
 #include "blacklist.h"
 
+/*
+ * According to crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c:x509_note_pkey_algo(),
+ * the size of the currently longest supported hash algorithm is 512 bits,
+ * which translates into 128 hex characters.
+ */
+#define MAX_HASH_LEN	128
+
+static const char tbs_prefix[] = "tbs";
+static const char bin_prefix[] = "bin";
+
 static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
 
 /*
@@ -26,24 +36,40 @@ static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
  */
 static int blacklist_vet_description(const char *desc)
 {
-	int n = 0;
-
-	if (*desc == ':')
-		return -EINVAL;
-	for (; *desc; desc++)
-		if (*desc == ':')
-			goto found_colon;
+	int i, prefix_len, tbs_step = 0, bin_step = 0;
+
+	/* The following algorithm only works if prefix lengths match. */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(tbs_prefix) != sizeof(bin_prefix));
+	prefix_len = sizeof(tbs_prefix) - 1;
+	for (i = 0; *desc; desc++, i++) {
+		if (*desc == ':') {
+			if (tbs_step == prefix_len)
+				goto found_colon;
+			if (bin_step == prefix_len)
+				goto found_colon;
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		if (i >= prefix_len)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if (*desc == tbs_prefix[i])
+			tbs_step++;
+		if (*desc == bin_prefix[i])
+			bin_step++;
+	}
 	return -EINVAL;
 
 found_colon:
 	desc++;
-	for (; *desc; desc++) {
+	for (i = 0; *desc && i < MAX_HASH_LEN; desc++, i++) {
 		if (!isxdigit(*desc) || isupper(*desc))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		n++;
 	}
+	if (*desc)
+		/* The hash is greater than MAX_HASH_LEN. */
+		return -ENOPKG;
 
-	if (n == 0 || n & 1)
+	/* Checks for an even number of hexadecimal characters. */
+	if (i == 0 || i & 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:05PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Before exposing this new key type to user space, make sure that only
> meaningful blacklisted hashes are accepted.  This is also checked for
> builtin blacklisted hashes, but a following commit make sure that the
> user will notice (at built time) and will fix the configuration if it
> already included errors.
> 
> Check that a blacklist key description starts with a valid prefix and
> then a valid hexadecimal string.
> 
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

In this I'm not as worried about ABI, i.e. you don't have any reason
supply any other data, which doesn't follow these ruels, whereas there
could very well be a script that does format hex "incorrectly".

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 20/01/2021 05:16, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:05PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Before exposing this new key type to user space, make sure that only
>> meaningful blacklisted hashes are accepted.  This is also checked for
>> builtin blacklisted hashes, but a following commit make sure that the
>> user will notice (at built time) and will fix the configuration if it
>> already included errors.
>>
>> Check that a blacklist key description starts with a valid prefix and
>> then a valid hexadecimal string.
>>
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> 
> In this I'm not as worried about ABI, i.e. you don't have any reason
> supply any other data, which doesn't follow these ruels, whereas there
> could very well be a script that does format hex "incorrectly".

I think I answered this comment in patch 2/10: there is no ABI breakage,
it only prepares for safe dynamic key addition. Patch 10/10 enables to
avoid using incorrect/useless/mis-leading hashes and force users to fix
these hashes (that were not taken into account)

> 
> /Jarkko
> 

[PATCH v3 07/10] certs: Factor out the blacklist hash creation

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Factor out the blacklist hash creation with the get_raw_hash() helper.
This also centralize the "tbs" and "bin" prefixes and make them private,
which help to manage them consistently.

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---

Changes since v2:
* Add Jarkko's Acked-by.
---
 certs/blacklist.c                             | 73 ++++++++++++++-----
 crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c      |  3 +-
 include/keys/system_keyring.h                 | 14 +++-
 .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c          | 26 +------
 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 334ab7b964bc..1e63971bea94 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -103,11 +103,43 @@ static struct key_type key_type_blacklist = {
 	.describe		= blacklist_describe,
 };
 
+static char *get_raw_hash(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
+		enum blacklist_hash_type hash_type)
+{
+	size_t type_len;
+	const char *type_prefix;
+	char *buffer, *p;
+
+	switch (hash_type) {
+	case BLACKLIST_HASH_X509_TBS:
+		type_len = sizeof(tbs_prefix) - 1;
+		type_prefix = tbs_prefix;
+		break;
+	case BLACKLIST_HASH_BINARY:
+		type_len = sizeof(bin_prefix) - 1;
+		type_prefix = bin_prefix;
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+	buffer = kmalloc(type_len + 1 + hash_len * 2 + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!buffer)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	p = memcpy(buffer, type_prefix, type_len);
+	p += type_len;
+	*p++ = ':';
+	bin2hex(p, hash, hash_len);
+	p += hash_len * 2;
+	*p = '\0';
+	return buffer;
+}
+
 /**
- * mark_hash_blacklisted - Add a hash to the system blacklist
+ * mark_raw_hash_blacklisted - Add a hash to the system blacklist
  * @hash: The hash as a hex string with a type prefix (eg. "tbs:23aa429783")
  */
-int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
+static int mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
 {
 	key_ref_t key;
 
@@ -127,29 +159,33 @@ int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int mark_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
+		enum blacklist_hash_type hash_type)
+{
+	const char *buffer;
+
+	buffer = get_raw_hash(hash, hash_len, hash_type);
+	if (IS_ERR(buffer))
+		return PTR_ERR(buffer);
+	kfree(buffer);
+	return 0;
+}
 /**
  * is_hash_blacklisted - Determine if a hash is blacklisted
  * @hash: The hash to be checked as a binary blob
  * @hash_len: The length of the binary hash
- * @type: Type of hash
+ * @hash_type: Type of hash
  */
-int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len, const char *type)
+int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
+		enum blacklist_hash_type hash_type)
 {
 	key_ref_t kref;
-	size_t type_len = strlen(type);
-	char *buffer, *p;
+	const char *buffer;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	buffer = kmalloc(type_len + 1 + hash_len * 2 + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!buffer)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	p = memcpy(buffer, type, type_len);
-	p += type_len;
-	*p++ = ':';
-	bin2hex(p, hash, hash_len);
-	p += hash_len * 2;
-	*p = 0;
-
+	buffer = get_raw_hash(hash, hash_len, hash_type);
+	if (IS_ERR(buffer))
+		return PTR_ERR(buffer);
 	kref = keyring_search(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true),
 			      &key_type_blacklist, buffer, false);
 	if (!IS_ERR(kref)) {
@@ -164,7 +200,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_hash_blacklisted);
 
 int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len)
 {
-	if (is_hash_blacklisted(hash, hash_len, "bin") == -EKEYREJECTED)
+	if (is_hash_blacklisted(hash, hash_len, BLACKLIST_HASH_BINARY) ==
+			-EKEYREJECTED)
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -194,7 +231,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
 		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist keyring\n");
 
 	for (bl = blacklist_hashes; *bl; bl++)
-		if (mark_hash_blacklisted(*bl) < 0)
+		if (mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(*bl) < 0)
 			pr_err("- blacklisting failed\n");
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
index ae450eb8be14..3b7dba5e4cd9 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ int x509_get_sig_params(struct x509_certificate *cert)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto error_2;
 
-	ret = is_hash_blacklisted(sig->digest, sig->digest_size, "tbs");
+	ret = is_hash_blacklisted(sig->digest, sig->digest_size,
+				  BLACKLIST_HASH_X509_TBS);
 	if (ret == -EKEYREJECTED) {
 		pr_err("Cert %*phN is blacklisted\n",
 		       sig->digest_size, sig->digest);
diff --git a/include/keys/system_keyring.h b/include/keys/system_keyring.h
index fb8b07daa9d1..b184d8743e23 100644
--- a/include/keys/system_keyring.h
+++ b/include/keys/system_keyring.h
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@
 
 #include <linux/key.h>
 
+enum blacklist_hash_type {
+	/* TBSCertificate hash */
+	BLACKLIST_HASH_X509_TBS = 1,
+	/* Raw data hash */
+	BLACKLIST_HASH_BINARY = 2,
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING
 
 extern int restrict_link_by_builtin_trusted(struct key *keyring,
@@ -32,13 +39,14 @@ extern int restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted(
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
-extern int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash);
+extern int mark_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
+			       enum blacklist_hash_type hash_type);
 extern int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
-			       const char *type);
+			       enum blacklist_hash_type hash_type);
 extern int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len);
 #else
 static inline int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len,
-				      const char *type)
+				      enum blacklist_hash_type hash_type)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
index c5ba695c10e3..4a78fa1fde53 100644
--- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
+++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
@@ -15,35 +15,13 @@ static efi_guid_t efi_cert_x509_sha256_guid __initdata =
 	EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID;
 static efi_guid_t efi_cert_sha256_guid __initdata = EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID;
 
-/*
- * Blacklist a hash.
- */
-static __init void uefi_blacklist_hash(const char *source, const void *data,
-				       size_t len, const char *type,
-				       size_t type_len)
-{
-	char *hash, *p;
-
-	hash = kmalloc(type_len + len * 2 + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!hash)
-		return;
-	p = memcpy(hash, type, type_len);
-	p += type_len;
-	bin2hex(p, data, len);
-	p += len * 2;
-	*p = 0;
-
-	mark_hash_blacklisted(hash);
-	kfree(hash);
-}
-
 /*
  * Blacklist an X509 TBS hash.
  */
 static __init void uefi_blacklist_x509_tbs(const char *source,
 					   const void *data, size_t len)
 {
-	uefi_blacklist_hash(source, data, len, "tbs:", 4);
+	mark_hash_blacklisted(data, len, BLACKLIST_HASH_X509_TBS);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -52,7 +30,7 @@ static __init void uefi_blacklist_x509_tbs(const char *source,
 static __init void uefi_blacklist_binary(const char *source,
 					 const void *data, size_t len)
 {
-	uefi_blacklist_hash(source, data, len, "bin:", 4);
+	mark_hash_blacklisted(data, len, BLACKLIST_HASH_BINARY);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.30.0

[PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Add and use a check-blacklist-hashes.awk script to make sure that the
builtin blacklist hashes will be approved by the run time blacklist
description checks.  This is useful to debug invalid hash formats, and
it make sure that previous hashes which could have been loaded in the
kernel (but ignored) are now noticed and deal with by the user.

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---

Changes since v2:
* Add Jarkko's Acked-by.

Changes since v1:
* Prefix script path with $(scrtree)/ (suggested by David Howells).
* Fix hexadecimal number check.
---
 MAINTAINERS                        |  1 +
 certs/.gitignore                   |  1 +
 certs/Makefile                     | 15 +++++++++++-
 scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100755 scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cc1e6a5ee6e6..bda31ccbfad0 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4120,6 +4120,7 @@ L:	keyrings@vger.kernel.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	Documentation/admin-guide/module-signing.rst
 F:	certs/
+F:	scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk
 F:	scripts/extract-cert.c
 F:	scripts/sign-file.c
 
diff --git a/certs/.gitignore b/certs/.gitignore
index 2a2483990686..42cc2ac24b93 100644
--- a/certs/.gitignore
+++ b/certs/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+blacklist_hashes_checked
 x509_certificate_list
diff --git a/certs/Makefile b/certs/Makefile
index f4c25b67aad9..eb45407ff282 100644
--- a/certs/Makefile
+++ b/certs/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,20 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += system_keyring.o system_certificates.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o
 ifneq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST),"")
+
+quiet_cmd_check_blacklist_hashes = CHECK   $(patsubst "%",%,$(2))
+      cmd_check_blacklist_hashes = $(AWK) -f $(srctree)/scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk $(2); touch $@
+
+$(eval $(call config_filename,SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST))
+
+$(obj)/blacklist_hashes.o: $(obj)/blacklist_hashes_checked
+
+targets += blacklist_hashes_checked
+$(obj)/blacklist_hashes_checked: $(SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST_SRCPREFIX)$(SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST_FILENAME) scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk FORCE
+	$(call if_changed,check_blacklist_hashes,$(SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST))
+
 obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_hashes.o
+
 else
 obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_nohashes.o
 endif
@@ -29,7 +42,7 @@ $(obj)/x509_certificate_list: scripts/extract-cert $(SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS_SRCPREF
 	$(call if_changed,extract_certs,$(SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS))
 endif # CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING
 
-clean-files := x509_certificate_list .x509.list
+clean-files := x509_certificate_list .x509.list blacklist_hashes_checked
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG),y)
 ###############################################################################
diff --git a/scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk b/scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..107c1d3204d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+#!/usr/bin/awk -f
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Copyright © 2020, Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+#
+# Author: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
+#
+# Check that a CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST file contains a valid array of
+# hash strings.  Such string must start with a prefix ("tbs" or "bin"), then a
+# colon (":"), and finally an even number of hexadecimal lowercase characters
+# (up to 128).
+
+BEGIN {
+	RS = ","
+}
+{
+	if (!match($0, "^[ \t\n\r]*\"([^\"]*)\"[ \t\n\r]*$", part1)) {
+		print "Not a string (item " NR "):", $0;
+		exit 1;
+	}
+	if (!match(part1[1], "^(tbs|bin):(.*)$", part2)) {
+		print "Unknown prefix (item " NR "):", part1[1];
+		exit 1;
+	}
+	if (!match(part2[2], "^([0-9a-f]+)$", part3)) {
+		print "Not a lowercase hexadecimal string (item " NR "):", part2[2];
+		exit 1;
+	}
+	if (length(part3[1]) > 128) {
+		print "Hash string too long (item " NR "):", part3[1];
+		exit 1;
+	}
+	if (length(part3[1]) % 2 == 1) {
+		print "Not an even number of hexadecimal characters (item " NR "):", part3[1];
+		exit 1;
+	}
+}
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Add and use a check-blacklist-hashes.awk script to make sure that the
> builtin blacklist hashes will be approved by the run time blacklist
> description checks.  This is useful to debug invalid hash formats, and
> it make sure that previous hashes which could have been loaded in the
> kernel (but ignored) are now noticed and deal with by the user.
> 
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

I get this with a self-signed cert:

certs/Makefile:18: *** target pattern contains no '%'.  Stop.

CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="tbs:8eed1340eef37c1dc84d996406ad05c7dbb3eade19132d688408ca2f63904869"

I used the script in 10/10 to test this, which is another
reamark: the patches are in invalid order, as you need to
apply 10/10 before you can test  8/10.

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 20/01/2021 06:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Add and use a check-blacklist-hashes.awk script to make sure that the
>> builtin blacklist hashes will be approved by the run time blacklist
>> description checks.  This is useful to debug invalid hash formats, and
>> it make sure that previous hashes which could have been loaded in the
>> kernel (but ignored) are now noticed and deal with by the user.
>>
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> 
> I get this with a self-signed cert:
> 
> certs/Makefile:18: *** target pattern contains no '%'.  Stop.
> 
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="tbs:8eed1340eef37c1dc84d996406ad05c7dbb3eade19132d688408ca2f63904869"

As said in the Kconfig documentation for
CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST, you need to provide a file with the
list, not to set the string directly in the configuration variable. This
patch series didn't change this behavior. The same kind of macros are
used for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY.

> 
> I used the script in 10/10 to test this, which is another
> reamark: the patches are in invalid order, as you need to
> apply 10/10 before you can test  8/10.

I'll move patch 10/10 earlier but this kind of formatting was already
required (but silently ignored) for this option to be really taken into
account. Only the kernel code was available to understand how to
effectively create such hash.

> 
> /Jarkko
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 20/01/2021 06:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >>
> >> Add and use a check-blacklist-hashes.awk script to make sure that the
> >> builtin blacklist hashes will be approved by the run time blacklist
> >> description checks.  This is useful to debug invalid hash formats, and
> >> it make sure that previous hashes which could have been loaded in the
> >> kernel (but ignored) are now noticed and deal with by the user.
> >>
> >> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I get this with a self-signed cert:
> > 
> > certs/Makefile:18: *** target pattern contains no '%'.  Stop.
> > 
> > CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="tbs:8eed1340eef37c1dc84d996406ad05c7dbb3eade19132d688408ca2f63904869"
> 
> As said in the Kconfig documentation for
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST, you need to provide a file with the
> list, not to set the string directly in the configuration variable. This
> patch series didn't change this behavior. The same kind of macros are
> used for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY.

OK, the documentation just states that:

"Hashes to be preloaded into the system blacklist keyring"

No mention about a file. I'd add a patch to update this documentation.

> 
> > 
> > I used the script in 10/10 to test this, which is another
> > reamark: the patches are in invalid order, as you need to
> > apply 10/10 before you can test  8/10.
> 
> I'll move patch 10/10 earlier but this kind of formatting was already
> required (but silently ignored) for this option to be really taken into
> account. Only the kernel code was available to understand how to
> effectively create such hash.

Great, thanks.


> > 
> > /Jarkko
> > 


/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 21/01/2021 00:53, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>
>> On 20/01/2021 06:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add and use a check-blacklist-hashes.awk script to make sure that the
>>>> builtin blacklist hashes will be approved by the run time blacklist
>>>> description checks.  This is useful to debug invalid hash formats, and
>>>> it make sure that previous hashes which could have been loaded in the
>>>> kernel (but ignored) are now noticed and deal with by the user.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> I get this with a self-signed cert:
>>>
>>> certs/Makefile:18: *** target pattern contains no '%'.  Stop.
>>>
>>> CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="tbs:8eed1340eef37c1dc84d996406ad05c7dbb3eade19132d688408ca2f63904869"
>>
>> As said in the Kconfig documentation for
>> CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST, you need to provide a file with the
>> list, not to set the string directly in the configuration variable. This
>> patch series didn't change this behavior. The same kind of macros are
>> used for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY.
> 
> OK, the documentation just states that:
> 
> "Hashes to be preloaded into the system blacklist keyring"
> 
> No mention about a file. I'd add a patch to update this documentation.

I was referring to the full description:

config SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST
	string "Hashes to be preloaded into the system blacklist keyring"
	depends on SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
	help
	  If set, this option should be the filename of a list of hashes in the
	  form "<hash>", "<hash>", ... .  This will be included into a C
	  wrapper to incorporate the list into the kernel.  Each <hash> should
	  be a string of hex digits.

…but the short description doesn't mention filename.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> I used the script in 10/10 to test this, which is another
>>> reamark: the patches are in invalid order, as you need to
>>> apply 10/10 before you can test  8/10.
>>
>> I'll move patch 10/10 earlier but this kind of formatting was already
>> required (but silently ignored) for this option to be really taken into
>> account. Only the kernel code was available to understand how to
>> effectively create such hash.
> 
> Great, thanks.
> 
> 
>>>
>>> /Jarkko
>>>
> 
> 
> /Jarkko
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:18:20AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 21/01/2021 00:53, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >>
> >> On 20/01/2021 06:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >>>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add and use a check-blacklist-hashes.awk script to make sure that the
> >>>> builtin blacklist hashes will be approved by the run time blacklist
> >>>> description checks.  This is useful to debug invalid hash formats, and
> >>>> it make sure that previous hashes which could have been loaded in the
> >>>> kernel (but ignored) are now noticed and deal with by the user.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> >>>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> >>>> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> >>>
> >>> I get this with a self-signed cert:
> >>>
> >>> certs/Makefile:18: *** target pattern contains no '%'.  Stop.
> >>>
> >>> CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="tbs:8eed1340eef37c1dc84d996406ad05c7dbb3eade19132d688408ca2f63904869"
> >>
> >> As said in the Kconfig documentation for
> >> CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST, you need to provide a file with the
> >> list, not to set the string directly in the configuration variable. This
> >> patch series didn't change this behavior. The same kind of macros are
> >> used for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY.
> > 
> > OK, the documentation just states that:
> > 
> > "Hashes to be preloaded into the system blacklist keyring"
> > 
> > No mention about a file. I'd add a patch to update this documentation.
> 
> I was referring to the full description:
> 
> config SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST
> 	string "Hashes to be preloaded into the system blacklist keyring"
> 	depends on SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
> 	help
> 	  If set, this option should be the filename of a list of hashes in the
> 	  form "<hash>", "<hash>", ... .  This will be included into a C
> 	  wrapper to incorporate the list into the kernel.  Each <hash> should
> 	  be a string of hex digits.
> 
> …but the short description doesn't mention filename.

Aah.

Anyway, I'll test the next version. Now all should be clear how
to approach that. Thanks.

/Jarkko

[PATCH v3 09/10] certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Add a kernel option SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE to enable the root user
to dynamically add new keys to the blacklist keyring.  This enables to
invalidate new certificates, either from being loaded in a keyring, or
from being trusted in a PKCS#7 certificate chain.  This also enables to
add new file hashes to be denied by the integrity infrastructure.

Being able to untrust a certificate which could have normaly been
trusted is a sensitive operation.  This is why adding new hashes to the
blacklist keyring is only allowed when these hashes are signed and
vouched by the builtin trusted keyring.  A blacklist hash is stored as a
key description.  The PKCS#7 signature of this description must be
provided as the key payload.

Marking a certificate as untrusted should be enforced while the system
is running.  It is then forbiden to remove such blacklist keys.

Update blacklist keyring and blacklist key access rights:
* allows the root user to search for a specific blacklisted hash, which
  make sense because the descriptions are already viewable;
* forbids key update;
* restricts kernel rights on the blacklist keyring to align with the
  root user rights.

See the help in tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh provided by a
following commit.

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
---

Changes since v2:
* Add comment for blacklist_key_instantiate().
---
 certs/Kconfig     | 10 ++++++
 certs/blacklist.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/certs/Kconfig b/certs/Kconfig
index c94e93d8bccf..35fe9989e7b9 100644
--- a/certs/Kconfig
+++ b/certs/Kconfig
@@ -83,4 +83,14 @@ config SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST
 	  wrapper to incorporate the list into the kernel.  Each <hash> should
 	  be a string of hex digits.
 
+config SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE
+	bool "Allow root to add signed blacklist keys"
+	depends on SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
+	depends on SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
+	help
+	  If set, provide the ability to load new blacklist keys at run time if
+	  they are signed and vouched by a certificate from the builtin trusted
+	  keyring.  The PKCS#7 signature of the description is set in the key
+	  payload.  Blacklist keys cannot be removed.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
index 1e63971bea94..07c592ae5307 100644
--- a/certs/blacklist.c
+++ b/certs/blacklist.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/uidgid.h>
+#include <linux/verification.h>
 #include <keys/system_keyring.h>
 #include "blacklist.h"
 
@@ -25,6 +26,9 @@
  */
 #define MAX_HASH_LEN	128
 
+#define BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM (KEY_POS_SEARCH | KEY_POS_VIEW | \
+			    KEY_USR_SEARCH | KEY_USR_VIEW)
+
 static const char tbs_prefix[] = "tbs";
 static const char bin_prefix[] = "bin";
 
@@ -74,19 +78,51 @@ static int blacklist_vet_description(const char *desc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * The hash to be blacklisted is expected to be in the description.  There will
- * be no payload.
- */
-static int blacklist_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
+static int blacklist_key_instantiate(struct key *key,
+		struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
 {
-	if (prep->datalen > 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-	return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE
+	int err;
+#endif
+
+	/* Sets safe default permissions for keys loaded by user space. */
+	key->perm = BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM;
+
+	/*
+	 * Skips the authentication step for builtin hashes, they are not
+	 * signed but still trusted.
+	 */
+	if (key->flags & (1 << KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN))
+		goto out;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE
+	/*
+	 * Verifies the description's PKCS#7 signature against the builtin
+	 * trusted keyring.
+	 */
+	err = verify_pkcs7_signature(key->description,
+			strlen(key->description), prep->data, prep->datalen,
+			NULL, VERIFYING_UNSPECIFIED_SIGNATURE, NULL, NULL);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+#else
+	/*
+	 * It should not be possible to come here because the keyring doesn't
+	 * have KEY_USR_WRITE and the only other way to call this function is
+	 * for builtin hashes.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+	return -EPERM;
+#endif
+
+out:
+	return generic_key_instantiate(key, prep);
 }
 
-static void blacklist_free_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
+static int blacklist_key_update(struct key *key,
+		struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
 {
+	return -EPERM;
 }
 
 static void blacklist_describe(const struct key *key, struct seq_file *m)
@@ -97,9 +133,8 @@ static void blacklist_describe(const struct key *key, struct seq_file *m)
 static struct key_type key_type_blacklist = {
 	.name			= "blacklist",
 	.vet_description	= blacklist_vet_description,
-	.preparse		= blacklist_preparse,
-	.free_preparse		= blacklist_free_preparse,
-	.instantiate		= generic_key_instantiate,
+	.instantiate		= blacklist_key_instantiate,
+	.update			= blacklist_key_update,
 	.describe		= blacklist_describe,
 };
 
@@ -148,8 +183,7 @@ static int mark_raw_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash)
 				   hash,
 				   NULL,
 				   0,
-				   ((KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
-				    KEY_USR_VIEW),
+				   BLACKLIST_KEY_PERM,
 				   KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
 				   KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN);
 	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
@@ -208,25 +242,43 @@ int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_binary_blacklisted);
 
+static int restrict_link_for_blacklist(struct key *dest_keyring,
+		const struct key_type *type, const union key_payload *payload,
+		struct key *restrict_key)
+{
+	if (type != &key_type_blacklist)
+		return -EPERM;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Initialise the blacklist
  */
 static int __init blacklist_init(void)
 {
 	const char *const *bl;
+	struct key_restriction *restriction;
 
 	if (register_key_type(&key_type_blacklist) < 0)
 		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist key type\n");
 
+	restriction = kzalloc(sizeof(*restriction), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!restriction)
+		panic("Can't allocate blacklist keyring restriction\n");
+	restriction->check = restrict_link_for_blacklist;
+
 	blacklist_keyring =
 		keyring_alloc(".blacklist",
 			      GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID, current_cred(),
-			      (KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) |
-			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ |
-			      KEY_USR_SEARCH,
-			      KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
+			      KEY_POS_VIEW | KEY_POS_READ | KEY_POS_SEARCH |
+			      KEY_POS_WRITE |
+			      KEY_USR_VIEW | KEY_USR_READ | KEY_USR_SEARCH
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE
+			      | KEY_USR_WRITE
+#endif
+			      , KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA |
 			      KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP,
-			      NULL, NULL);
+			      restriction, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(blacklist_keyring))
 		panic("Can't allocate system blacklist keyring\n");
 
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring

[Mimi Zohar]

Hi Mickaël,

On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 16:19 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Add a kernel option SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE to enable the root user
> to dynamically add new keys to the blacklist keyring.  This enables to
> invalidate new certificates, either from being loaded in a keyring, or
> from being trusted in a PKCS#7 certificate chain.  This also enables to
> add new file hashes to be denied by the integrity infrastructure.
> 
> Being able to untrust a certificate which could have normaly been
> trusted is a sensitive operation.  This is why adding new hashes to the
> blacklist keyring is only allowed when these hashes are signed and
> vouched by the builtin trusted keyring.  A blacklist hash is stored as a
> key description.  The PKCS#7 signature of this description must be
> provided as the key payload.
> 
> Marking a certificate as untrusted should be enforced while the system
> is running.  It is then forbiden to remove such blacklist keys.
> 
> Update blacklist keyring and blacklist key access rights:
> * allows the root user to search for a specific blacklisted hash, which
>   make sense because the descriptions are already viewable;
> * forbids key update;
> * restricts kernel rights on the blacklist keyring to align with the
>   root user rights.
> 
> See the help in tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh provided by a
> following commit.

The design looks good.  I'm hoping to review/test at least this patch
next week.

thanks,

Mimi

Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:08PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Add a kernel option SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE to enable the root user
> to dynamically add new keys to the blacklist keyring.  This enables to
> invalidate new certificates, either from being loaded in a keyring, or
> from being trusted in a PKCS#7 certificate chain.  This also enables to
> add new file hashes to be denied by the integrity infrastructure.
> 
> Being able to untrust a certificate which could have normaly been
> trusted is a sensitive operation.  This is why adding new hashes to the
> blacklist keyring is only allowed when these hashes are signed and
> vouched by the builtin trusted keyring.  A blacklist hash is stored as a
> key description.  The PKCS#7 signature of this description must be
> provided as the key payload.
> 
> Marking a certificate as untrusted should be enforced while the system
> is running.  It is then forbiden to remove such blacklist keys.
> 
> Update blacklist keyring and blacklist key access rights:
> * allows the root user to search for a specific blacklisted hash, which
>   make sense because the descriptions are already viewable;
> * forbids key update;
> * restricts kernel rights on the blacklist keyring to align with the
>   root user rights.
> 
> See the help in tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh provided by a
> following commit.

Please re-order patches in a way that print-cert-tbs-hash.sh is
available before this. That way we get rid of this useless remark.

> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring

[Mickaël Salaün]

On 20/01/2021 06:23, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:19:08PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Add a kernel option SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_AUTH_UPDATE to enable the root user
>> to dynamically add new keys to the blacklist keyring.  This enables to
>> invalidate new certificates, either from being loaded in a keyring, or
>> from being trusted in a PKCS#7 certificate chain.  This also enables to
>> add new file hashes to be denied by the integrity infrastructure.
>>
>> Being able to untrust a certificate which could have normaly been
>> trusted is a sensitive operation.  This is why adding new hashes to the
>> blacklist keyring is only allowed when these hashes are signed and
>> vouched by the builtin trusted keyring.  A blacklist hash is stored as a
>> key description.  The PKCS#7 signature of this description must be
>> provided as the key payload.
>>
>> Marking a certificate as untrusted should be enforced while the system
>> is running.  It is then forbiden to remove such blacklist keys.
>>
>> Update blacklist keyring and blacklist key access rights:
>> * allows the root user to search for a specific blacklisted hash, which
>>   make sense because the descriptions are already viewable;
>> * forbids key update;
>> * restricts kernel rights on the blacklist keyring to align with the
>>   root user rights.
>>
>> See the help in tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh provided by a
>> following commit.
> 
> Please re-order patches in a way that print-cert-tbs-hash.sh is
> available before this. That way we get rid of this useless remark.

OK

> 
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> /Jarkko
> 

[PATCH v3 10/10] tools/certs: Add print-cert-tbs-hash.sh

[Mickaël Salaün]

From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>

Add a new helper print-cert-tbs-hash.sh to generate a TBSCertificate
hash from a given certificate.  This is useful to generate a blacklist
key description used to forbid loading a specific certificate in a
keyring, or to invalidate a certificate provided by a PKCS#7 file.

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
---

Changes since v1:
* Fix typo.
* Use "if" block instead of "||" .
---
 MAINTAINERS                        |  1 +
 tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index bda31ccbfad0..c7bad1354531 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4123,6 +4123,7 @@ F:	certs/
 F:	scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk
 F:	scripts/extract-cert.c
 F:	scripts/sign-file.c
+F:	tools/certs/
 
 CFAG12864B LCD DRIVER
 M:	Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
diff --git a/tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh b/tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..c93df5387ec9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Copyright © 2020, Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+#
+# Author: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
+#
+# Compute and print the To Be Signed (TBS) hash of a certificate.  This is used
+# as description of keys in the blacklist keyring to identify certificates.
+# This output should be redirected, without newline, in a file (hash0.txt) and
+# signed to create a PKCS#7 file (hash0.p7s).  Both of these files can then be
+# loaded in the kernel with.
+#
+# Exemple on a workstation:
+# ./print-cert-tbs-hash.sh certificate-to-invalidate.pem > hash0.txt
+# openssl smime -sign -in hash0.txt -inkey builtin-private-key.pem \
+#               -signer builtin-certificate.pem -certfile certificate-chain.pem \
+#               -noattr -binary -outform DER -out hash0.p7s
+#
+# Exemple on a managed system:
+# keyctl padd blacklist "$(< hash0.txt)" %:.blacklist < hash0.p7s
+
+set -u -e -o pipefail
+
+CERT="${1:-}"
+BASENAME="$(basename -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"
+
+if [ $# -ne 1 ] || [ ! -f "${CERT}" ]; then
+	echo "usage: ${BASENAME} <certificate>" >&2
+	exit 1
+fi
+
+# Checks that it is indeed a certificate (PEM or DER encoded) and exclude the
+# optional PEM text header.
+if ! PEM="$(openssl x509 -inform DER -in "${CERT}" 2>/dev/null || openssl x509 -in "${CERT}")"; then
+	echo "ERROR: Failed to parse certificate" >&2
+	exit 1
+fi
+
+# TBSCertificate starts at the second entry.
+# Cf. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3280#section-4.1
+#
+# Exemple of first lines printed by openssl asn1parse:
+#    0:d=0  hl=4 l= 763 cons: SEQUENCE
+#    4:d=1  hl=4 l= 483 cons: SEQUENCE
+#    8:d=2  hl=2 l=   3 cons: cont [ 0 ]
+#   10:d=3  hl=2 l=   1 prim: INTEGER           :02
+#   13:d=2  hl=2 l=  20 prim: INTEGER           :3CEB2CB8818D968AC00EEFE195F0DF9665328B7B
+#   35:d=2  hl=2 l=  13 cons: SEQUENCE
+#   37:d=3  hl=2 l=   9 prim: OBJECT            :sha256WithRSAEncryption
+RANGE_AND_DIGEST_RE='
+2s/^\s*\([0-9]\+\):d=\s*[0-9]\+\s\+hl=\s*[0-9]\+\s\+l=\s*\([0-9]\+\)\s\+cons:\s*SEQUENCE\s*$/\1 \2/p;
+7s/^\s*[0-9]\+:d=\s*[0-9]\+\s\+hl=\s*[0-9]\+\s\+l=\s*[0-9]\+\s\+prim:\s*OBJECT\s*:\(.*\)$/\1/p;
+'
+
+RANGE_AND_DIGEST=($(echo "${PEM}" | \
+	openssl asn1parse -in - | \
+	sed -n -e "${RANGE_AND_DIGEST_RE}"))
+
+if [ "${#RANGE_AND_DIGEST[@]}" != 3 ]; then
+	echo "ERROR: Failed to parse TBSCertificate." >&2
+	exit 1
+fi
+
+OFFSET="${RANGE_AND_DIGEST[0]}"
+END="$(( OFFSET + RANGE_AND_DIGEST[1] ))"
+DIGEST="${RANGE_AND_DIGEST[2]}"
+
+# The signature hash algorithm is used by Linux to blacklist certificates.
+# Cf. crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c:x509_note_pkey_algo()
+DIGEST_MATCH=""
+while read -r DIGEST_ITEM; do
+	if [ -z "${DIGEST_ITEM}" ]; then
+		break
+	fi
+	if echo "${DIGEST}" | grep -qiF "${DIGEST_ITEM}"; then
+		DIGEST_MATCH="${DIGEST_ITEM}"
+		break
+	fi
+done < <(openssl list -digest-commands | tr ' ' '\n' | sort -ur)
+
+if [ -z "${DIGEST_MATCH}" ]; then
+	echo "ERROR: Unknown digest algorithm: ${DIGEST}" >&2
+	exit 1
+fi
+
+echo "${PEM}" | \
+	openssl x509 -in - -outform DER | \
+	dd "bs=1" "skip=${OFFSET}" "count=${END}" "status=none" | \
+	openssl dgst "-${DIGEST_MATCH}" - | \
+	awk '{printf "tbs:" $2}'
-- 
2.30.0

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Enable root to update the blacklist keyring

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:18:59PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> This third patch series includes back three fix patches taken from the first
> series (and cherry-picked from David Howells's tree [1]), and one cosmetic fix
> from Alex Shi which helps avoid future conflicts.  I also added some Acked-by
> and improved comments.  As requested, this series is based on v5.11-rc3.
> 
> The goal of these patches is to add a new configuration option to enable the
> root user to load signed keys in the blacklist keyring.  This keyring is useful
> to "untrust" certificates or files.  Enabling to safely update this keyring
> without recompiling the kernel makes it more usable.
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=keys-fixes
> 
> Previous patch series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201211190330.2586116-1-mic@digikod.net/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Alex Shi (1):
>   certs/blacklist: fix kernel doc interface issue
> 
> David Howells (1):
>   certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion
> 
> Mickaël Salaün (8):
>   certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check
>   PKCS#7: Fix missing include
>   certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID
>   certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict
>   certs: Factor out the blacklist hash creation
>   certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid
>   certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist
>     keyring
>   tools/certs: Add print-cert-tbs-hash.sh
> 
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   2 +
>  certs/.gitignore                              |   1 +
>  certs/Kconfig                                 |  10 +
>  certs/Makefile                                |  15 +-
>  certs/blacklist.c                             | 217 ++++++++++++++----
>  certs/system_keyring.c                        |   5 +-
>  crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c      |   3 +-
>  include/keys/system_keyring.h                 |  14 +-
>  include/linux/key.h                           |   1 +
>  include/linux/verification.h                  |   2 +
>  scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk            |  37 +++
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_mok.c              |   4 +-
>  .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c          |  26 +--
>  security/keys/key.c                           |   2 +
>  tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh            |  91 ++++++++
>  15 files changed, 345 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 scripts/check-blacklist-hashes.awk
>  create mode 100755 tools/certs/print-cert-tbs-hash.sh
> 
> 
> base-commit: 7c53f6b671f4aba70ff15e1b05148b10d58c2837
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
> 

Thank you. Unfortunately no time to review this anymore this week but I
sanity checked that this applies cleanly now, so should be easy to get on
testing this series next week:

$ git-pw series apply 414691
Applying: certs/blacklist: fix kernel doc interface issue
Applying: certs: Fix blacklisted hexadecimal hash string check
Applying: PKCS#7: Fix missing include
Applying: certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion
Applying: certs: Replace K{U,G}IDT_INIT() with GLOBAL_ROOT_{U,G}ID
Applying: certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict
Applying: certs: Factor out the blacklist hash creation
Applying: certs: Check that builtin blacklist hashes are valid
Applying: certs: Allow root user to append signed hashes to the blacklist keyring
Applying: tools/certs: Add print-cert-tbs-hash.sh

/Jarkko