kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhenyzha@redhat.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, ajones@ventanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:34:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb3926da-a683-2811-71a4-31fe36a9cb50@maciej.szmigiero.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014071914.227134-4-gshan@redhat.com>

On 14.10.2022 09:19, Gavin Shan wrote:
> prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory
> slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not
> free and unnecessary.
> 
> Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args()
> for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm().
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
> index dcb492b3f27b..d5aa9148f96f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
> @@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
>   		       void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages,
>   		       struct timespec *slot_runtime)
>   {
> -	uint32_t max_mem_slots;
>   	uint64_t rempages;
>   	uint64_t guest_addr;
>   	uint32_t slot;
>   	struct timespec tstart;
>   	struct sync_area *sync;
>   
> -	max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
> -	TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1,
> -		    "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1");
> -	TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1,
> -		    "Slot count cap should be greater than 1");
> -	if (nslots != -1)
> -		max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots);
> -	pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots);
> -
>   	TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1,
>   		    "Can't test without any memory");
>   
>   	data->npages = mempages;
> -	data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1;
> +	data->nslots = nslots;
>   	data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots;
>   	if (!data->pages_per_slot) {
>   		*maxslots = mempages + 1;
> @@ -885,8 +875,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
>   			break;
>   		case 's':
>   			targs->nslots = atoi(optarg);
> -			if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) {
> -				pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n");
> +			if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) {
> +				pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n");
>   				return false;
>   			}
>   			break;
> @@ -932,6 +922,19 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
>   		return false;
>   	}
>   
> +	/* Memory slot 0 is reserved */
> +	if (targs->nslots == -1) {
> +		targs->nslots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) - 1;
> +		if (targs->nslots < 1) {
> +			pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n");
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		targs->nslots--;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_info_v("Number of memory slots: %d\n", targs->nslots);
> +

Can't see any capping of the command line provided slot count to
KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS value, like the old code did.

>   	return true;
>   }
>   

Thanks,
Maciej

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:34:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb3926da-a683-2811-71a4-31fe36a9cb50@maciej.szmigiero.name> (raw)
Message-ID: <20221017173442.NGifIB79xKuQHGfk3WJKm2pH8G332-mvp8PNTE1awPA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014071914.227134-4-gshan@redhat.com>

On 14.10.2022 09:19, Gavin Shan wrote:
> prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory
> slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not
> free and unnecessary.
> 
> Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args()
> for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm().
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
> index dcb492b3f27b..d5aa9148f96f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
> @@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
>   		       void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages,
>   		       struct timespec *slot_runtime)
>   {
> -	uint32_t max_mem_slots;
>   	uint64_t rempages;
>   	uint64_t guest_addr;
>   	uint32_t slot;
>   	struct timespec tstart;
>   	struct sync_area *sync;
>   
> -	max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
> -	TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1,
> -		    "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1");
> -	TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1,
> -		    "Slot count cap should be greater than 1");
> -	if (nslots != -1)
> -		max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots);
> -	pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots);
> -
>   	TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1,
>   		    "Can't test without any memory");
>   
>   	data->npages = mempages;
> -	data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1;
> +	data->nslots = nslots;
>   	data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots;
>   	if (!data->pages_per_slot) {
>   		*maxslots = mempages + 1;
> @@ -885,8 +875,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
>   			break;
>   		case 's':
>   			targs->nslots = atoi(optarg);
> -			if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) {
> -				pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n");
> +			if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) {
> +				pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n");
>   				return false;
>   			}
>   			break;
> @@ -932,6 +922,19 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
>   		return false;
>   	}
>   
> +	/* Memory slot 0 is reserved */
> +	if (targs->nslots == -1) {
> +		targs->nslots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) - 1;
> +		if (targs->nslots < 1) {
> +			pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n");
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		targs->nslots--;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_info_v("Number of memory slots: %d\n", targs->nslots);
> +

Can't see any capping of the command line provided slot count to
KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS value, like the old code did.

>   	return true;
>   }
>   

Thanks,
Maciej


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14  7:19 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: aarch64 cleanup/fixes Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm() Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19   ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions " Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19   ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19   ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 17:34   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero [this message]
2022-10-17 17:34     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-17 22:18     ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 22:18       ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19   ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 21:31   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-17 21:31     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-18  0:46     ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  0:46       ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  0:51       ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  0:51         ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18 15:56         ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-18 15:56           ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-19  0:26           ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-19  0:26             ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-19 20:18             ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-19 20:18               ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-20  7:19               ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-20  7:19                 ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory sizes Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19   ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 21:36   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-17 21:36     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-17 22:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 22:08       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 22:51       ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 22:51         ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 22:56         ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-17 22:56           ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-17 23:10           ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 23:10             ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 23:32             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 23:32               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 23:39               ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-17 23:39                 ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  7:47       ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-18  7:47         ` Oliver Upton
2022-10-18  8:48         ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  8:48           ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  1:13     ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-18  1:13       ` Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots Gavin Shan
2022-10-14  7:19   ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb3926da-a683-2811-71a4-31fe36a9cb50@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --to=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).