Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, mperttunen@nvidia.com,
	mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, kishon@ti.com,
	kthota@nvidia.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sagar.tv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 04/15] PCI: dwc: Move config space capability search API
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 16:17:57 -0500
Message-ID: <20190521211757.GF57618@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517123846.3708-5-vidyas@nvidia.com>

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 06:08:35PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Move PCIe config space capability search API to common DesignWare file
> as this can be used by both host and ep mode codes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
> ---
> Changes since [v6]:
> * Exported dw_pcie_find_capability() API
> 
> Changes since [v5]:
> * None
> 
> Changes since [v4]:
> * Removed redundant APIs in pcie-designware-ep.c file after moving them
>   to pcie-designware.c file based on Bjorn's comments.
> 
> Changes since [v3]:
> * Rebased to linux-next top of the tree
> 
> Changes since [v2]:
> * None
> 
> Changes since [v1]:
> * Removed dw_pcie_find_next_ext_capability() API from here and made a
>   separate patch for that
> 
>  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c   | 37 +----------------
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c  | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h  |  2 +
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 2bf5a35c0570..65f479250087 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -40,39 +40,6 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar)
>  	__dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar, 0);
>  }
>  
> -static u8 __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap_ptr,
> -			      u8 cap)
> -{
> -	u8 cap_id, next_cap_ptr;
> -	u16 reg;
> -
> -	if (!cap_ptr)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, cap_ptr);
> -	cap_id = (reg & 0x00ff);
> -
> -	if (cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (cap_id == cap)
> -		return cap_ptr;
> -
> -	next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0xff00) >> 8;
> -	return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(pci, next_cap_ptr, cap);
> -}
> -
> -static u8 dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap)
> -{
> -	u8 next_cap_ptr;
> -	u16 reg;
> -
> -	reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST);
> -	next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0x00ff);
> -
> -	return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(pci, next_cap_ptr, cap);
> -}
> -
>  static int dw_pcie_ep_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>  				   struct pci_epf_header *hdr)
>  {
> @@ -612,9 +579,9 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to reserve memory for MSI/MSI-X\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> -	ep->msi_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
> +	ep->msi_cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
>  
> -	ep->msix_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
> +	ep->msix_cap = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
>  
>  	offset = dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
>  	if (offset) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 83cdd2ce2486..8f53ce63d17e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,46 @@
>  
>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
>  
> +/*
> + * These APIs are different from standard pci_find_*capability() APIs in the
> + * sense that former can only be used post device enumeration as they require
> + * 'struct pci_dev *' pointer whereas these APIs require 'struct dw_pcie *'
> + * pointer and can be used before link up also.

I think this comment is slightly misleading because it suggests the
reason we need these DW interfaces is because we're doing something
before a pci_dev pointer is available.

But these DW interfaces are used on devices that will *never* have a
pci_dev pointer because they are not PCI devices.  They're used on
host controller devices, which have a PCIe link on the downstream
side, but the host controller driver operates them using their
upstream, non-PCI interfaces.  Logically, I think they would be
considered parts of Root Complexes, not Root Ports.

There's actually no reason why that upstream interface should look
anything like PCI; it doesn't need to organize registers into
capability lists at all.  It might be convenient for the hardware to
do that and share things with a Root Port device, which *is* a PCI
device, but it's not required.

It also really has nothing to do with whether the link is up.  This
code operates on hardware that is upstream from the link, so we can
reach it regardless of the link.

> + */
> +static u8 __dw_pcie_find_next_cap(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap_ptr,
> +				  u8 cap)
> +{
> +	u8 cap_id, next_cap_ptr;
> +	u16 reg;
> +
> +	if (!cap_ptr)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, cap_ptr);
> +	cap_id = (reg & 0x00ff);
> +
> +	if (cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (cap_id == cap)
> +		return cap_ptr;
> +
> +	next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0xff00) >> 8;
> +	return __dw_pcie_find_next_cap(pci, next_cap_ptr, cap);
> +}
> +
> +u8 dw_pcie_find_capability(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap)
> +{
> +	u8 next_cap_ptr;
> +	u16 reg;
> +
> +	reg = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST);
> +	next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0x00ff);
> +
> +	return __dw_pcie_find_next_cap(pci, next_cap_ptr, cap);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_pcie_find_capability);
> +
>  int dw_pcie_read(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 *val)
>  {
>  	if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)addr, size)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 14762e262758..6cb978132469 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -251,6 +251,8 @@ struct dw_pcie {
>  #define to_dw_pcie_from_ep(endpoint)   \
>  		container_of((endpoint), struct dw_pcie, ep)
>  
> +u8 dw_pcie_find_capability(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 cap);
> +
>  int dw_pcie_read(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 *val);
>  int dw_pcie_write(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 val);
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-17 12:38 [PATCH V7 00/15] Add Tegra194 PCIe support Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 01/15] PCI: Add #defines for some of PCIe spec r4.0 features Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 02/15] PCI: Disable MSI for Tegra194 root port Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:27   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-21 16:47     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 19:34       ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 19:36       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-05-22  8:07         ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 03/15] PCI: dwc: Perform dbi regs write lock towards the end Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:29   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 04/15] PCI: dwc: Move config space capability search API Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:29   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-21 21:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-05-22  8:56     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-22 14:02       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-05-24 14:46         ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 05/15] PCI: dwc: Add ext " Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:36   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-21 17:14     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 06/15] dt-bindings: PCI: designware: Add binding for CDM register check Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:37   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-24 20:23   ` Rob Herring
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 07/15] PCI: dwc: Add support to enable " Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:38   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 08/15] dt-bindings: Add PCIe supports-clkreq property Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:39   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 09/15] dt-bindings: PCI: tegra: Add device tree support for Tegra194 Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:51   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-21 18:00     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-24 20:26   ` Rob Herring
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 10/15] dt-bindings: PHY: P2U: Add Tegra194 P2U block Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:52   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 11/15] arm64: tegra: Add P2U and PCIe controller nodes to Tegra194 DT Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 13:03   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-17 17:38     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 12/15] arm64: tegra: Enable PCIe slots in P2972-0000 board Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 10:54   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-21 18:17     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-22 13:48       ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 13/15] phy: tegra: Add PCIe PIPE2UPHY support Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 11:00   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-21 19:37     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 11:00   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-22  8:59     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 14/15] PCI: tegra: Add Tegra194 PCIe support Vidya Sagar
2019-05-21 11:41   ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-22 12:05     ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-22 14:14       ` Thierry Reding
2019-05-24 18:07         ` Vidya Sagar
2019-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH V7 15/15] arm64: Add Tegra194 PCIe driver to defconfig Vidya Sagar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190521211757.GF57618@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/0 linux-arm-kernel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1 linux-arm-kernel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-kernel linux-arm-kernel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel \
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org infradead-linux-arm-kernel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-kernel


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox