Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:36:25 +0100
Message-ID: <20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610184714.6786-2-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:47:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> wrote:

> Some devices might support multiple DMA address spaces, in particular
> those that have the PCI PASID feature. PASID (Process Address Space ID)
> allows to share process address spaces with devices (SVA), partition a
> device into VM-assignable entities (VFIO mdev) or simply provide
> multiple DMA address space to kernel drivers. Add a global PASID
> allocator usable by different drivers at the same time. Name it I/O ASID
> to avoid confusion with ASIDs allocated by arch code, which are usually
> a separate ID space.
> 
> The IOASID space is global. Each device can have its own PASID space,
> but by convention the IOMMU ended up having a global PASID space, so
> that with SVA, each mm_struct is associated to a single PASID.
> 
> The allocator is primarily used by IOMMU subsystem but in rare occasions
> drivers would like to allocate PASIDs for devices that aren't managed by
> an IOMMU, using the same ID space as IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Hi,

A few trivial comments inline.  May be more because I'm not that familiar
with xa_array than anything else.

Jonathan

> ---
> The most recent discussion on this patch was at:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1556922737-76313-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> I fixed it up a bit following comments in that series, and removed the
> definitions for the custom allocator for now.
> 
> There also is a new version that includes the custom allocator into this
> patch, but is currently missing the RCU fixes, at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1560087862-57608-13-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> ---

...

> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_alloc - Allocate an IOASID
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @min: the minimum ID (inclusive)
> + * @max: the maximum ID (inclusive)
> + * @private: data private to the caller
> + *
> + * Allocate an ID between @min and @max. The @private pointer is stored
> + * internally and can be retrieved with ioasid_find().
> + *
> + * Return: the allocated ID on success, or %INVALID_IOASID on failure.
> + */
> +ioasid_t ioasid_alloc(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> +		      void *private)
> +{
> +	u32 id = INVALID_IOASID;
> +	struct ioasid_data *data;
> +
> +	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +
> +	data->set = set;
> +	data->private = private;
> +
> +	if (xa_alloc(&ioasid_xa, &id, data, XA_LIMIT(min, max), GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to alloc ioasid from %d to %d\n", min, max);
> +		goto exit_free;
> +	}
> +	data->id = id;
> +
> +exit_free:

This error flow is perhaps a little more confusing than it needs to be?

My assumption (perhaps wrong) is that we only have an id == INVALID_IOASID
if the xa_alloc fails, and that we will always have such an id value if
it does (I'm not totally sure this second element is true in __xa_alloc).

If I'm missing something perhaps a comment on how else we'd get here.

> +	if (id == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +		kfree(data);
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +	}
> +	return id;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_free - Free an IOASID
> + * @ioasid: the ID to remove
> + */
> +void ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> +{
> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	ioasid_data = xa_erase(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +
> +	kfree_rcu(ioasid_data, rcu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_free);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_find - Find IOASID data
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @ioasid: the IOASID to find
> + * @getter: function to call on the found object
> + *
> + * The optional getter function allows to take a reference to the found object
> + * under the rcu lock. The function can also check if the object is still valid:
> + * if @getter returns false, then the object is invalid and NULL is returned.
> + *
> + * If the IOASID has been allocated for this set, return the private pointer
> + * passed to ioasid_alloc. Private data can be NULL if not set. Return an error
> + * if the IOASID is not found or does not belong to the set.

Perhaps should make it clear that @set can be null.

> + */
> +void *ioasid_find(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t ioasid,
> +		  bool (*getter)(void *))
> +{
> +	void *priv = NULL;

Set in all paths, so does need to be set here.

> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ioasid_data = xa_load(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +	if (!ioasid_data) {
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (set && ioasid_data->set != set) {
> +		/* data found but does not belong to the set */
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	/* Now IOASID and its set is verified, we can return the private data */
> +	priv = rcu_dereference(ioasid_data->private);
> +	if (getter && !getter(priv))
> +		priv = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return priv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_find);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
...


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply index

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-10 18:47 [PATCH 0/8] iommu: Add auxiliary domain and PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11  9:36   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 18:13       ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 14:22         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 17:05           ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-19 14:26             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 12:26   ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 14:37     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 17:10       ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-12 11:30         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: document PASID property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support platform SSID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11  9:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 18:08   ` Will Deacon
2019-06-19 11:53     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 14:51     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-26 18:00   ` Will Deacon
2019-07-04  9:33     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:57     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 15:31   ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:01     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-07-08 15:13   ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support auxiliary domains Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-26 17:59   ` Will Deacon
2019-07-05 16:29     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:06     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:10     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/0 linux-arm-kernel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1 linux-arm-kernel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-kernel linux-arm-kernel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel \
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org infradead-linux-arm-kernel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-kernel


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox