From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eric.auger@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support auxiliary domains
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 17:06:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190919150634.GE1013538@lophozonia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626175959.ubxvb2qn4taclact@willie-the-truck>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:59:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > @@ -666,8 +668,14 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
> >
> > struct iommu_domain domain;
> >
> > + /* Unused in aux domains */
> > struct list_head devices;
> > spinlock_t devices_lock;
> > +
> > + /* Auxiliary domain stuff */
> > + struct arm_smmu_domain *parent;
> > + ioasid_t ssid;
> > + unsigned long aux_nr_devs;
>
> Maybe use a union to avoid comments about what is used/unused?
OK
> > +static void arm_smmu_aux_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct iommu_domain *parent_domain;
> > + struct arm_smmu_domain *parent_smmu_domain;
> > + struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_to_master(dev);
> > + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> > +
> > + if (!arm_smmu_dev_feature_enabled(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + parent_domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> > + if (!parent_domain)
> > + return;
> > + parent_smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(parent_domain);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
> > + if (!smmu_domain->aux_nr_devs)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > + if (!--smmu_domain->aux_nr_devs) {
> > + arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(parent_smmu_domain, smmu_domain->ssid,
> > + NULL);
> > + /*
> > + * TLB doesn't need invalidation since accesses from the device
> > + * can't use this domain's ASID once the CD is clear.
> > + *
> > + * Sadly that doesn't apply to ATCs, which are PASID tagged.
> > + * Invalidate all other devices as well, because even though
> > + * they weren't 'officially' attached to the auxiliary domain,
> > + * they could have formed ATC entries.
> > + */
> > + arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(smmu_domain, 0, 0);
>
> I've been struggling to understand the locking here, since both
> arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc and arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain take and release the
> devices_lock for the domain. Is there not a problem with devices coming and
> going in-between the two calls?
Yes, I need to think about this more. I bet there are plenty more issues
like this. For example I don't think I currently prevent the parent
domain from disappearing while auxiliary domains are attached.
> > static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> > .capable = arm_smmu_capable,
> > .domain_alloc = arm_smmu_domain_alloc,
> > @@ -2539,6 +2772,13 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> > .of_xlate = arm_smmu_of_xlate,
> > .get_resv_regions = arm_smmu_get_resv_regions,
> > .put_resv_regions = arm_smmu_put_resv_regions,
> > + .dev_has_feat = arm_smmu_dev_has_feature,
> > + .dev_feat_enabled = arm_smmu_dev_feature_enabled,
> > + .dev_enable_feat = arm_smmu_dev_enable_feature,
> > + .dev_disable_feat = arm_smmu_dev_disable_feature,
>
> Why can't we use the existing ->capable and ->dev_{get,set}_attr callbacks
> for this?
->capable isn't very useful because it applies to all SMMUs in the
system. The existing ->{get,set}_attr callbacks apply to an
iommu_domain. I think the main reason for doing it on endpoints was that
it would be tedious to keep track of capabilities when attaching and
detaching devices to a domain, especially for drivers that allow
multiple IOMMUs per domain [1]. There were more discussions, and in the
end we agreed on this API for device attributes [2].
Thanks,
Jean
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aa1ff748-c2ec-acc0-f1d9-cdff2b131e58@linux.intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20181207102926.GM16835@8bytes.org/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 18:47 [PATCH 0/8] iommu: Add auxiliary domain and PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 9:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 18:13 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 14:22 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 17:05 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-19 14:26 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 12:26 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 14:37 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 17:10 ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-12 11:30 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: document PASID property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 7:58 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support platform SSID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 9:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 18:08 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-19 11:53 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 7:58 ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 14:51 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-26 18:00 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-04 9:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:57 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 15:31 ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-07-08 15:13 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support auxiliary domains Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-26 17:59 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-05 16:29 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:06 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 7:58 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 7:58 ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190919150634.GE1013538@lophozonia \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).