linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Russell King" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] PCI: mvebu: Implement support for legacy INTx interrupts
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:50:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220107115053.k5d2uv7yrftrpcez@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874k6gvkhz.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Thursday 06 January 2022 17:31:36 Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2022 17:20:44 +0000,
> Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 06 Jan 2022 16:27:44 +0000
> > Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > You are completely missing my point. I'm talking about data
> > > structures, you're talking about interrupts. You have this:
> > > 
> > > struct mvebu_pcie_port {
> > >        // Tons of stuff
> > >        struct irq_chip intx_chip;
> > > };
> > > 
> > > What I want you to do is:
> > > 
> > > struct mvebu_pcie_port {
> > >        // Tons of stuff
> > > };
> > > 
> > > static struct irq_chip intx_chip = {
> > > 	.name		= "INTx",
> > > 	.irq_mask	= mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_mask,
> > > 	.irq_unmask	= mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_unmask;
> > > };
> > > 
> > > That's it. No more, no less.
> > > 
> > > 	M.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm, but struct irq_chip contains a dynamic member,
> >   struct device *parent_device;
> > Isn't that used? Or are you planning to kill it?
> 
> Indeed, and I am definitely planning to kill it. This is the wrong
> place for this stuff, and I want it gone. There are thankfully very
> few users of this misfeature.

Ok, so what about this change?

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
index 1e90ab888075..5c816338a569 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -54,9 +54,10 @@
 	 PCIE_CONF_ADDR_EN)
 #define PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF	0x18fc
 #define PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF	0x1900
+#define PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF	0x1910
+#define  PCIE_INT_INTX(i)		BIT(24+i)
 #define  PCIE_INT_PM_PME		BIT(28)
-#define PCIE_MASK_OFF		0x1910
-#define  PCIE_MASK_ENABLE_INTS          0x0f000000
+#define  PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK		GENMASK(31, 0)
 #define PCIE_CTRL_OFF		0x1a00
 #define  PCIE_CTRL_X1_MODE		0x0001
 #define  PCIE_CTRL_RC_MODE		BIT(1)
@@ -110,6 +111,9 @@ struct mvebu_pcie_port {
 	struct mvebu_pcie_window iowin;
 	u32 saved_pcie_stat;
 	struct resource regs;
+	struct irq_domain *intx_irq_domain;
+	raw_spinlock_t irq_lock;
+	int intx_irq;
 };
 
 static inline void mvebu_writel(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port, u32 val, u32 reg)
@@ -235,7 +239,7 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_wins(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 
 static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 {
-	u32 ctrl, lnkcap, cmd, dev_rev, mask;
+	u32 ctrl, lnkcap, cmd, dev_rev, unmask;
 
 	/* Setup PCIe controller to Root Complex mode. */
 	ctrl = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_CTRL_OFF);
@@ -288,10 +292,30 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 	/* Point PCIe unit MBUS decode windows to DRAM space. */
 	mvebu_pcie_setup_wins(port);
 
-	/* Enable interrupt lines A-D. */
-	mask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
-	mask |= PCIE_MASK_ENABLE_INTS;
-	mvebu_writel(port, mask, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
+	/* Mask all interrupt sources. */
+	mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+
+	/* Clear all interrupt causes. */
+	mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF);
+
+	if (port->intx_irq <= 0) {
+		/*
+		 * When neither "summary" interrupt, nor "intx" interrupt was
+		 * specified in DT then unmask all legacy INTx interrupts as in
+		 * this case driver does not provide a way for masking and
+		 * unmasking of individual legacy INTx interrupts. In this case
+		 * all interrupts, including legacy INTx are reported via one
+		 * shared GIC source and therefore kernel cannot distinguish
+		 * which individual legacy INTx was triggered. These interrupts
+		 * are shared, so it should not cause any issue. Just
+		 * performance penalty as every PCIe interrupt handler needs to
+		 * be called when some interrupt is triggered.
+		 */
+		unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+		unmask |= PCIE_INT_INTX(0) | PCIE_INT_INTX(1) |
+			  PCIE_INT_INTX(2) | PCIE_INT_INTX(3);
+		mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+	}
 }
 
 static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_pcie_find_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
@@ -924,6 +948,108 @@ static struct pci_ops mvebu_pcie_ops = {
 	.write = mvebu_pcie_wr_conf,
 };
 
+static void mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = d->domain->host_data;
+	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 unmask;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&port->irq_lock, flags);
+	unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+	unmask &= ~PCIE_INT_INTX(hwirq);
+	mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = d->domain->host_data;
+	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 unmask;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&port->irq_lock, flags);
+	unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+	unmask |= PCIE_INT_INTX(hwirq);
+	mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip intx_irq_chip = {
+	.name = "mvebu-INTx",
+	.irq_mask = mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask = mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static int mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h,
+				   unsigned int virq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = h->host_data;
+
+	irq_set_status_flags(virq, IRQ_LEVEL);
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &intx_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, port);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_domain_ops = {
+	.map = mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_map,
+	.xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
+};
+
+static int mvebu_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &port->pcie->pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&port->irq_lock);
+
+	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(port->dn, NULL);
+	if (!pcie_intc_node) {
+		dev_err(dev, "No PCIe Intc node found for %s\n", port->name);
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	port->intx_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
+						      &mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_domain_ops,
+						      port);
+	of_node_put(pcie_intc_node);
+	if (!port->intx_irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get INTx IRQ domain for %s\n", port->name);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void mvebu_pcie_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+	struct device *dev = &port->pcie->pdev->dev;
+	u32 cause, unmask, status;
+	int i;
+
+	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
+
+	cause = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF);
+	unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+	status = cause & unmask;
+
+	/* Process legacy INTx interrupts */
+	for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_INTX; i++) {
+		if (!(status & PCIE_INT_INTX(i)))
+			continue;
+
+		if (generic_handle_domain_irq(port->intx_irq_domain, i) == -EINVAL)
+			dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "unexpected INT%c IRQ\n", (char)i+'A');
+	}
+
+	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
+}
+
 static int mvebu_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
 {
 	/* Interrupt support on mvebu emulated bridges is not implemented yet */
@@ -1121,6 +1247,21 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
 		port->io_attr = -1;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Old DT bindings do not contain "intx" interrupt
+	 * so do not fail probing driver when interrupt does not exist.
+	 */
+	port->intx_irq = of_irq_get_byname(child, "intx");
+	if (port->intx_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+		ret = port->intx_irq;
+		goto err;
+	}
+	if (port->intx_irq <= 0) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "%s: legacy INTx interrupts cannot be masked individually, "
+			      "%pOF does not contain intx interrupt\n",
+			 port->name, child);
+	}
+
 	reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio_flags(child, "reset-gpios", 0, &flags);
 	if (reset_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
 		ret = reset_gpio;
@@ -1317,6 +1458,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < pcie->nports; i++) {
 		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
+		int irq = port->intx_irq;
 
 		child = port->dn;
 		if (!child)
@@ -1344,6 +1486,22 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		if (irq > 0) {
+			ret = mvebu_pcie_init_irq_domain(port);
+			if (ret) {
+				dev_err(dev, "%s: cannot init irq domain\n",
+					port->name);
+				pci_bridge_emul_cleanup(&port->bridge);
+				devm_iounmap(dev, port->base);
+				port->base = NULL;
+				mvebu_pcie_powerdown(port);
+				continue;
+			}
+			irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq,
+							 mvebu_pcie_irq_handler,
+							 port);
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * PCIe topology exported by mvebu hw is quite complicated. In
 		 * reality has something like N fully independent host bridges
@@ -1448,6 +1606,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < pcie->nports; i++) {
 		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
+		int irq = port->intx_irq;
 
 		if (!port->base)
 			continue;
@@ -1458,7 +1617,17 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		mvebu_writel(port, cmd, PCIE_CMD_OFF);
 
 		/* Mask all interrupt sources. */
-		mvebu_writel(port, 0, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
+		mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
+
+		/* Clear all interrupt causes. */
+		mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF);
+
+		/* Remove IRQ domains. */
+		if (port->intx_irq_domain)
+			irq_domain_remove(port->intx_irq_domain);
+
+		if (irq > 0)
+			irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, NULL, NULL);
 
 		/* Free config space for emulated root bridge. */
 		pci_bridge_emul_cleanup(&port->bridge);
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-07 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-05 15:02 [PATCH 00/11] PCI: mvebu: subsystem ids, AER and INTx Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] PCI: pci-bridge-emul: Re-arrange register tests Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] PCI: pci-bridge-emul: Add support for PCIe extended capabilities Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: pci-bridge-emul: Add support for PCI Bridge Subsystem Vendor ID capability Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 04/11] dt-bindings: PCI: mvebu: Add num-lanes property Pali Rohár
2022-01-12  1:29   ` Rob Herring
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 05/11] PCI: mvebu: Correctly configure x1/x4 mode Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 06/11] PCI: mvebu: Add support for PCI Bridge Subsystem Vendor ID on emulated bridge Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] PCI: mvebu: Add support for Advanced Error Reporting registers " Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] PCI: mvebu: Use child_ops API Pali Rohár
2022-01-05 15:41   ` Rob Herring
2022-01-05 15:49     ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-12  1:43     ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 14:53       ` Rob Herring
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] dt-bindings: PCI: mvebu: Update information about intx interrupts Pali Rohár
2022-01-12  1:30   ` Rob Herring
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] PCI: mvebu: Implement support for legacy INTx interrupts Pali Rohár
2022-01-06 15:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-06 15:44     ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-06 15:55       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-06 16:20         ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-06 16:27           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-06 17:20             ` Marek Behún
2022-01-06 17:31               ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-07 11:50                 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2022-01-07 18:53                   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-05 15:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: dts: armada-385.dtsi: Add definitions for PCIe " Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] PCI: mvebu: subsystem ids, AER and INTx Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 01/11] PCI: pci-bridge-emul: Re-arrange register tests Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 02/11] PCI: pci-bridge-emul: Add support for PCIe extended capabilities Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 03/11] PCI: pci-bridge-emul: Add support for PCI Bridge Subsystem Vendor ID capability Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: PCI: mvebu: Add num-lanes property Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 05/11] PCI: mvebu: Correctly configure x1/x4 mode Pali Rohár
2022-01-20 17:09     ` Rob Herring
2022-01-20 17:19       ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 06/11] PCI: mvebu: Add support for PCI Bridge Subsystem Vendor ID on emulated bridge Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 07/11] PCI: mvebu: Add support for Advanced Error Reporting registers " Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 08/11] PCI: mvebu: Use child_ops API Pali Rohár
2022-01-20 16:49     ` Rob Herring
2022-01-20 16:55       ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-20 18:40         ` Rob Herring
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 09/11] dt-bindings: PCI: mvebu: Update information about intx interrupts Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:36     ` Marek Behún
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 10/11] PCI: mvebu: Implement support for legacy INTx interrupts Pali Rohár
2022-02-11 17:19     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-11 17:52       ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-11 18:21         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-12 10:59           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-02-16 23:40         ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-22 10:21           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-22 10:51             ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-22 15:24               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-22 15:42                 ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-22 15:45                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-22 15:55                     ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 15:18   ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ARM: dts: armada-385.dtsi: Add definitions for PCIe " Pali Rohár
2022-02-14 15:07     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2022-02-14 15:09       ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-14 15:26         ` Gregory CLEMENT
     [not found]           ` <CAEzXK1qYKVk7QiSY_DwqkZ7WV6WU06WBtiqZx0JJCc+mOP-7Kg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-02-15 10:48             ` Luís Mendes
2022-02-15 10:52               ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-18 21:53                 ` Luís Mendes
2022-02-19 13:36                   ` Pali Rohár
2022-02-11 17:50 ` [PATCH 00/11] PCI: mvebu: subsystem ids, AER and INTx Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-11 18:01   ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220107115053.k5d2uv7yrftrpcez@pali \
    --to=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).