Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard for block devices
@ 2018-10-30 23:06 Evan Green
  2018-10-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: Report EOPNOTSUPP properly Evan Green
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Evan Green @ 2018-10-30 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe
  Cc: Gwendal Grignou, Alexis Savery, Evan Green, linux-block, linux-kernel

This series addresses some errors seen when using the loop
device directly backed by a block device. The first change plumbs
out the correct error message, and the second change prevents the
error from occurring in many cases.


Evan Green (2):
  loop: Report EOPNOTSUPP properly
  loop: Better discard support for block devices

 drivers/block/loop.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

-- 
2.16.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices
@ 2020-03-17 15:11 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
  2020-03-17 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz @ 2020-03-17 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-block; +Cc: Jens Axboe, kernel, andrzej.p

This is a respin of the series from Evan, after rebasing it
on a current tree (v5.6-rc6). In the current upstream tree
there already is code which differentiates between REQ_OP_DISCARD
and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROS. Since applying the second patch required
dropping some code inside it, I have also dropped the A-b/R-b tags.

Below is the cover letter of the previous iteration of the series:

This series addresses some errors seen when using the loop
device directly backed by a block device. The first change plumbs
out the correct error message, and the second change prevents the
error from occurring in many cases.

The errors look like this:
[   90.880875] print_req_error: I/O error, dev loop5, sector 0

The errors occur when trying to do a discard or write zeroes operation
on a loop device backed by a block device that does not support write zeroes.
Firstly, the error itself is incorrectly reported as I/O error, but is
actually EOPNOTSUPP. The first patch plumbs out EOPNOTSUPP to properly
report the error.

The second patch prevents these errors from occurring by mirroring the
zeroing capabilities of the underlying block device into the loop device.
Before this change, discard was always reported as being supported, and
the loop device simply turns around and does an fallocate operation on the
backing device. After this change, backing block devices that do support
zeroing will continue to work as before, and continue to get all the
benefits of doing that. Backing devices that do not support zeroing will
fail earlier, avoiding hitting the loop device at all and ultimately
avoiding this error in the logs.

I can also confirm that this fixes test block/003 in the blktests, when
running blktests on a loop device backed by a block device.


Changes in v5:
- Don't mirror discard if lo_encrypt_key_size is non-zero (Gwendal)

Changes in v4:
- Mirror blkdev's write_zeroes into loopdev's discard_sectors.

Changes in v3:
- Updated tags
- Updated commit description

Changes in v2:
- Unnested error if statement (Bart)

Evan Green (2):
  loop: Report EOPNOTSUPP properly
  loop: Better discard support for block devices

 drivers/block/loop.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-30 23:06 [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard for block devices Evan Green
2018-10-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: Report EOPNOTSUPP properly Evan Green
2018-11-28  1:06   ` Ming Lei
2018-10-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices Evan Green
2018-11-26 18:53   ` Evan Green
2018-11-27  2:55     ` Ming Lei
2018-11-27 23:34       ` Evan Green
2018-11-28  1:28         ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28  1:26   ` Ming Lei
2018-12-04 22:19     ` Evan Green
2018-12-05  1:10       ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 19:35         ` Evan Green
2018-12-06  0:22           ` Ming Lei
2018-12-06  3:15           ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-12-10 17:31             ` Evan Green
2018-12-18 23:48               ` Evan Green
2018-10-30 23:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard " Bart Van Assche
2018-11-01 18:15   ` Evan Green
2018-11-01 22:41     ` Gwendal Grignou
2018-11-01 22:44     ` Gwendal Grignou
2018-11-02 16:02       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 20:35         ` Evan Green
2020-03-17 15:11 [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard support " Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2020-03-17 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Andrzej Pietrasiewicz

Linux-Block Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/0 linux-block/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-block linux-block/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block \
		linux-block@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-block

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-block


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git