[PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

Small patch series cleaning up/standardizing bio_for_each_segment_all(),
which means we can use the same guts for bio_for_each_folio_all(),
considerably simplifying that code.

The squashfs maintainer will want to look at and test those changes,
that code was doing some slightly tricky things. The rest was a pretty
mechanical conversion.

Kent Overstreet (2):
  block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()
  block: Rework bio_for_each_folio_all()

 block/bio.c               |  38 ++++++------
 block/blk-map.c           |  38 ++++++------
 block/bounce.c            |  12 ++--
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c |   8 +--
 drivers/md/dm-crypt.c     |  10 ++--
 drivers/md/raid1.c        |   4 +-
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c        |  10 ++--
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c      |  52 ++++++++--------
 fs/btrfs/inode.c          |   8 +--
 fs/btrfs/raid56.c         |  18 +++---
 fs/crypto/bio.c           |   8 +--
 fs/erofs/zdata.c          |   4 +-
 fs/ext4/page-io.c         |   8 +--
 fs/ext4/readpage.c        |   4 +-
 fs/f2fs/data.c            |  20 +++----
 fs/gfs2/lops.c            |  10 ++--
 fs/gfs2/meta_io.c         |   8 +--
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c    |  14 +++--
 fs/mpage.c                |   4 +-
 fs/squashfs/block.c       |  48 ++++++++-------
 fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c |  17 +++---
 fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c |  17 +++---
 fs/verity/verify.c        |   4 +-
 include/linux/bio.h       | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 include/linux/bvec.h      |  70 ++++++++++++++--------
 25 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 255 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Kent Overstreet]

This patch reworks bio_for_each_segment_all() to be more inline with how
the other bio iterators work:

 - bio_iter_all_peek() now returns a synthesized bio_vec; we don't stash
   one in the iterator and pass a pointer to it - bad. This way makes it
   clearer what's a constructed value vs. a reference to something
   pre-existing, and it also will help with cleaning up and
   consolidating code with bio_for_each_folio_all().

 - We now provide bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(), for squashfs:
   this makes their code clearer.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
---
 block/bio.c               | 38 ++++++++++++------------
 block/blk-map.c           | 38 ++++++++++++------------
 block/bounce.c            | 12 ++++----
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c |  8 ++---
 drivers/md/dm-crypt.c     | 10 +++----
 drivers/md/raid1.c        |  4 +--
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c        | 10 +++----
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c      | 52 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 fs/btrfs/inode.c          |  8 ++---
 fs/btrfs/raid56.c         | 18 ++++++------
 fs/crypto/bio.c           |  8 ++---
 fs/erofs/zdata.c          |  4 +--
 fs/ext4/page-io.c         |  8 ++---
 fs/ext4/readpage.c        |  4 +--
 fs/f2fs/data.c            | 20 ++++++-------
 fs/gfs2/lops.c            | 10 +++----
 fs/gfs2/meta_io.c         |  8 ++---
 fs/mpage.c                |  4 +--
 fs/squashfs/block.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c | 17 ++++++-----
 fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c | 17 ++++++-----
 fs/verity/verify.c        |  4 +--
 include/linux/bio.h       | 31 +++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/bvec.h      | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 24 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 203 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index ab59a491a8..8d3abe249e 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1170,13 +1170,13 @@ bool bio_add_folio(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
 
 void __bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio, bool mark_dirty)
 {
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		if (mark_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
-			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec->bv_page);
-		put_page(bvec->bv_page);
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter) {
+		if (mark_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec.bv_page))
+			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec.bv_page);
+		put_page(bvec.bv_page);
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bio_release_pages);
@@ -1441,11 +1441,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_copy_data);
 
 void bio_free_pages(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all)
-		__free_page(bvec->bv_page);
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter)
+		__free_page(bvec.bv_page);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_free_pages);
 
@@ -1480,12 +1480,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_free_pages);
  */
 void bio_set_pages_dirty(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		if (!PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
-			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec->bv_page);
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter) {
+		if (!PageCompound(bvec.bv_page))
+			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec.bv_page);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1528,12 +1528,12 @@ static void bio_dirty_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 
 void bio_check_pages_dirty(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		if (!PageDirty(bvec->bv_page) && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter) {
+		if (!PageDirty(bvec.bv_page) && !PageCompound(bvec.bv_page))
 			goto defer;
 	}
 
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 19940c978c..1daac7370a 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -45,21 +45,21 @@ static struct bio_map_data *bio_alloc_map_data(struct iov_iter *data,
  */
 static int bio_copy_from_iter(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all bv_iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, bv_iter) {
 		ssize_t ret;
 
-		ret = copy_page_from_iter(bvec->bv_page,
-					  bvec->bv_offset,
-					  bvec->bv_len,
+		ret = copy_page_from_iter(bvec.bv_page,
+					  bvec.bv_offset,
+					  bvec.bv_len,
 					  iter);
 
 		if (!iov_iter_count(iter))
 			break;
 
-		if (ret < bvec->bv_len)
+		if (ret < bvec.bv_len)
 			return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
@@ -76,21 +76,21 @@ static int bio_copy_from_iter(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
  */
 static int bio_copy_to_iter(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter iter)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all bv_iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, bv_iter) {
 		ssize_t ret;
 
-		ret = copy_page_to_iter(bvec->bv_page,
-					bvec->bv_offset,
-					bvec->bv_len,
+		ret = copy_page_to_iter(bvec.bv_page,
+					bvec.bv_offset,
+					bvec.bv_len,
 					&iter);
 
 		if (!iov_iter_count(&iter))
 			break;
 
-		if (ret < bvec->bv_len)
+		if (ret < bvec.bv_len)
 			return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
@@ -443,12 +443,12 @@ static void bio_copy_kern_endio(struct bio *bio)
 static void bio_copy_kern_endio_read(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	char *p = bio->bi_private;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		memcpy_from_bvec(p, bvec);
-		p += bvec->bv_len;
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter) {
+		memcpy_from_bvec(p, &bvec);
+		p += bvec.bv_len;
 	}
 
 	bio_copy_kern_endio(bio);
diff --git a/block/bounce.c b/block/bounce.c
index 7cfcb242f9..e701832d76 100644
--- a/block/bounce.c
+++ b/block/bounce.c
@@ -102,18 +102,18 @@ static void copy_to_high_bio_irq(struct bio *to, struct bio *from)
 static void bounce_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct bio *bio_orig = bio->bi_private;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec, orig_vec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec, orig_vec;
 	struct bvec_iter orig_iter = bio_orig->bi_iter;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
 
 	/*
 	 * free up bounce indirect pages used
 	 */
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter) {
 		orig_vec = bio_iter_iovec(bio_orig, orig_iter);
-		if (bvec->bv_page != orig_vec.bv_page) {
-			dec_zone_page_state(bvec->bv_page, NR_BOUNCE);
-			mempool_free(bvec->bv_page, &page_pool);
+		if (bvec.bv_page != orig_vec.bv_page) {
+			dec_zone_page_state(bvec.bv_page, NR_BOUNCE);
+			mempool_free(bvec.bv_page, &page_pool);
 		}
 		bio_advance_iter(bio_orig, &orig_iter, orig_vec.bv_len);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 147c493a98..98ce12b239 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -373,12 +373,12 @@ static void do_btree_node_write(struct btree *b)
 		       bset_sector_offset(&b->keys, i));
 
 	if (!bch_bio_alloc_pages(b->bio, __GFP_NOWARN|GFP_NOWAIT)) {
-		struct bio_vec *bv;
+		struct bio_vec bv;
 		void *addr = (void *) ((unsigned long) i & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1));
-		struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+		struct bvec_iter_all iter;
 
-		bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, b->bio, iter_all) {
-			memcpy(page_address(bv->bv_page), addr, PAGE_SIZE);
+		bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, b->bio, iter) {
+			memcpy(page_address(bv.bv_page), addr, PAGE_SIZE);
 			addr += PAGE_SIZE;
 		}
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
index 2653516bcd..48798c63e6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
@@ -1709,12 +1709,12 @@ static struct bio *crypt_alloc_buffer(struct dm_crypt_io *io, unsigned size)
 
 static void crypt_free_buffer_pages(struct crypt_config *cc, struct bio *clone)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, clone, iter_all) {
-		BUG_ON(!bv->bv_page);
-		mempool_free(bv->bv_page, &cc->page_pool);
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, clone, iter) {
+		BUG_ON(!bv.bv_page);
+		mempool_free(bv.bv_page, &cc->page_pool);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
index 68a9e2d998..4f58cae37e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -2188,7 +2188,7 @@ static void process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
 		blk_status_t status = sbio->bi_status;
 		struct page **ppages = get_resync_pages(pbio)->pages;
 		struct page **spages = get_resync_pages(sbio)->pages;
-		struct bio_vec *bi;
+		struct bio_vec bi;
 		int page_len[RESYNC_PAGES] = { 0 };
 		struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ static void process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
 		sbio->bi_status = 0;
 
 		bio_for_each_segment_all(bi, sbio, iter_all)
-			page_len[j++] = bi->bv_len;
+			page_len[j++] = bi.bv_len;
 
 		if (!status) {
 			for (j = vcnt; j-- ; ) {
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 3aa0422431..72f3d38cfb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -798,15 +798,15 @@ bool btrfs_wq_submit_bio(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct bio *bio, int mirror_
 
 static blk_status_t btree_csum_one_bio(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct btrfs_root *root;
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		root = BTRFS_I(bvec->bv_page->mapping->host)->root;
-		ret = csum_dirty_buffer(root->fs_info, bvec);
+		root = BTRFS_I(bvec.bv_page->mapping->host)->root;
+		ret = csum_dirty_buffer(root->fs_info, &bvec);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -3970,12 +3970,12 @@ ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(open_ctree, ERRNO);
 static void btrfs_end_super_write(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct btrfs_device *device = bio->bi_private;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	struct page *page;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		page = bvec->bv_page;
+		page = bvec.bv_page;
 
 		if (bio->bi_status) {
 			btrfs_warn_rl_in_rcu(device->fs_info,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 3bbf8703db..6a6573a88b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 {
 	struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
 	int error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	u64 start;
 	u64 end;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
@@ -923,23 +923,23 @@ static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 		struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
 		struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 		const u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
 
 		/* Our read/write should always be sector aligned. */
-		if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_offset, sectorsize))
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_offset, sectorsize))
 			btrfs_err(fs_info,
 		"partial page write in btrfs with offset %u and length %u",
-				  bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
-		else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_len, sectorsize))
+				  bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
+		else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_len, sectorsize))
 			btrfs_info(fs_info,
 		"incomplete page write with offset %u and length %u",
-				   bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
+				   bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
 
-		start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
-		end = start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
+		start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+		end = start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
 
 		if (first_bvec) {
 			btrfs_record_physical_zoned(inode, start, bio);
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 
 		end_extent_writepage(page, error, start, end);
 
-		btrfs_page_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, start, bvec->bv_len);
+		btrfs_page_clear_writeback(fs_info, page, start, bvec.bv_len);
 	}
 
 	bio_put(bio);
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static struct extent_buffer *find_extent_buffer_readpage(
 static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 {
 	struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct processed_extent processed = { 0 };
 	/*
 	 * The offset to the beginning of a bio, since one bio can never be
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
 		bool uptodate = !bio->bi_status;
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 		struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
 		struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 		const u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
@@ -1111,19 +1111,19 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 		 * for unaligned offsets, and an error if they don't add up to
 		 * a full sector.
 		 */
-		if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_offset, sectorsize))
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_offset, sectorsize))
 			btrfs_err(fs_info,
 		"partial page read in btrfs with offset %u and length %u",
-				  bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
-		else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_offset + bvec->bv_len,
+				  bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
+		else if (!IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_offset + bvec.bv_len,
 				     sectorsize))
 			btrfs_info(fs_info,
 		"incomplete page read with offset %u and length %u",
-				   bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len);
+				   bvec.bv_offset, bvec.bv_len);
 
-		start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
-		end = start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
-		len = bvec->bv_len;
+		start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+		end = start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
+		len = bvec.bv_len;
 
 		mirror = bbio->mirror_num;
 		if (likely(uptodate)) {
@@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 			 * submit_data_read_repair() will handle all the good
 			 * and bad sectors, we just continue to the next bvec.
 			 */
-			submit_data_read_repair(inode, bbio, bio_offset, bvec,
+			submit_data_read_repair(inode, bbio, bio_offset, &bvec,
 						error_bitmap);
 		} else {
 			/* Update page status and unlock */
@@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 {
 	struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	fs_info = btrfs_sb(bio_first_page_all(bio)->mapping->host->i_sb);
@@ -2458,12 +2458,12 @@ static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
-		u64 bvec_start = page_offset(page) + bvec->bv_offset;
-		u64 bvec_end = bvec_start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
+		u64 bvec_start = page_offset(page) + bvec.bv_offset;
+		u64 bvec_end = bvec_start + bvec.bv_len - 1;
 		u64 cur_bytenr = bvec_start;
 
-		ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(bvec->bv_len, fs_info->nodesize));
+		ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(bvec.bv_len, fs_info->nodesize));
 
 		/* Iterate through all extent buffers in the range */
 		while (cur_bytenr <= bvec_end) {
@@ -2507,14 +2507,14 @@ static void end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 static void end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 {
 	struct bio *bio = &bbio->bio;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct extent_buffer *eb;
 	int done;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 
 		eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private;
 		BUG_ON(!eb);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 98a800b8bd..aa2fa925de 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -10317,7 +10317,7 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_encoded_read_verify_csum(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 	struct btrfs_inode *inode = priv->inode;
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
 	u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	u32 bio_offset = 0;
 
@@ -10327,12 +10327,12 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_encoded_read_verify_csum(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, iter_all) {
 		unsigned int i, nr_sectors, pgoff;
 
-		nr_sectors = BTRFS_BYTES_TO_BLKS(fs_info, bvec->bv_len);
-		pgoff = bvec->bv_offset;
+		nr_sectors = BTRFS_BYTES_TO_BLKS(fs_info, bvec.bv_len);
+		pgoff = bvec.bv_offset;
 		for (i = 0; i < nr_sectors; i++) {
 			ASSERT(pgoff < PAGE_SIZE);
 			if (btrfs_check_data_csum(inode, bbio, bio_offset,
-					    bvec->bv_page, pgoff))
+					    bvec.bv_page, pgoff))
 				return BLK_STS_IOERR;
 			bio_offset += sectorsize;
 			pgoff += sectorsize;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
index ff4b1d5837..de30399348 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static struct sector_ptr *find_stripe_sector(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
 static void set_bio_pages_uptodate(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	const u32 sectorsize = rbio->bioc->fs_info->sectorsize;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
@@ -1391,9 +1391,9 @@ static void set_bio_pages_uptodate(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct bio *bio)
 		struct sector_ptr *sector;
 		int pgoff;
 
-		for (pgoff = bvec->bv_offset; pgoff - bvec->bv_offset < bvec->bv_len;
+		for (pgoff = bvec.bv_offset; pgoff - bvec.bv_offset < bvec.bv_len;
 		     pgoff += sectorsize) {
-			sector = find_stripe_sector(rbio, bvec->bv_page, pgoff);
+			sector = find_stripe_sector(rbio, bvec.bv_page, pgoff);
 			ASSERT(sector);
 			if (sector)
 				sector->uptodate = 1;
@@ -1424,12 +1424,12 @@ static void rbio_update_error_bitmap(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct bio *bi
 {
 	int total_sector_nr = get_bio_sector_nr(rbio, bio);
 	u32 bio_size = 0;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	int i;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all)
-		bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
+		bio_size += bvec.bv_len;
 
 	/*
 	 * Since we can have multiple bios touching the error_bitmap, we cannot
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ static void verify_bio_data_sectors(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rbio->bioc->fs_info;
 	int total_sector_nr = get_bio_sector_nr(rbio, bio);
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	/* No data csum for the whole stripe, no need to verify. */
@@ -1462,8 +1462,8 @@ static void verify_bio_data_sectors(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
 		int bv_offset;
 
-		for (bv_offset = bvec->bv_offset;
-		     bv_offset < bvec->bv_offset + bvec->bv_len;
+		for (bv_offset = bvec.bv_offset;
+		     bv_offset < bvec.bv_offset + bvec.bv_len;
 		     bv_offset += fs_info->sectorsize, total_sector_nr++) {
 			u8 csum_buf[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
 			u8 *expected_csum = rbio->csum_buf +
@@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ static void verify_bio_data_sectors(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
 			if (!test_bit(total_sector_nr, rbio->csum_bitmap))
 				continue;
 
-			ret = btrfs_check_sector_csum(fs_info, bvec->bv_page,
+			ret = btrfs_check_sector_csum(fs_info, bvec.bv_page,
 				bv_offset, csum_buf, expected_csum);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				set_bit(total_sector_nr, rbio->error_bitmap);
diff --git a/fs/crypto/bio.c b/fs/crypto/bio.c
index 1b4403136d..d4990cf44c 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/bio.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/bio.c
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@
  */
 bool fscrypt_decrypt_bio(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
-		int err = fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks(page, bv->bv_len,
-							   bv->bv_offset);
+		struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
+		int err = fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks(page, bv.bv_len,
+							   bv.bv_offset);
 
 		if (err) {
 			bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(err);
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index 5200bb86e2..1f077210a3 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -1364,11 +1364,11 @@ static void z_erofs_decompressqueue_endio(struct bio *bio)
 	tagptr1_t t = tagptr_init(tagptr1_t, bio->bi_private);
 	struct z_erofs_decompressqueue *q = tagptr_unfold_ptr(t);
 	blk_status_t err = bio->bi_status;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 
 		DBG_BUGON(PageUptodate(page));
 		DBG_BUGON(z_erofs_page_is_invalidated(page));
diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
index beaec6d810..e7176a0420 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
@@ -99,15 +99,15 @@ static void buffer_io_error(struct buffer_head *bh)
 
 static void ext4_finish_bio(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 		struct page *bounce_page = NULL;
 		struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
-		unsigned bio_start = bvec->bv_offset;
-		unsigned bio_end = bio_start + bvec->bv_len;
+		unsigned bio_start = bvec.bv_offset;
+		unsigned bio_end = bio_start + bvec.bv_len;
 		unsigned under_io = 0;
 		unsigned long flags;
 
diff --git a/fs/ext4/readpage.c b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
index d5266932ce..616c57ba8b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/readpage.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
@@ -69,11 +69,11 @@ struct bio_post_read_ctx {
 static void __read_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct page *page;
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
-		page = bv->bv_page;
+		page = bv.bv_page;
 
 		if (bio->bi_status)
 			ClearPageUptodate(page);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 97e816590c..eb628f7557 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -139,12 +139,12 @@ struct bio_post_read_ctx {
  */
 static void f2fs_finish_read_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	struct bio_post_read_ctx *ctx = bio->bi_private;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
 
 		if (f2fs_is_compressed_page(page)) {
 			if (ctx && !ctx->decompression_attempted)
@@ -189,11 +189,11 @@ static void f2fs_verify_bio(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * as those were handled separately by f2fs_end_read_compressed_page().
 	 */
 	if (may_have_compressed_pages) {
-		struct bio_vec *bv;
+		struct bio_vec bv;
 		struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 		bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
-			struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
+			struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
 
 			if (!f2fs_is_compressed_page(page) &&
 			    !fsverity_verify_page(page)) {
@@ -241,13 +241,13 @@ static void f2fs_verify_and_finish_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
 static void f2fs_handle_step_decompress(struct bio_post_read_ctx *ctx,
 		bool in_task)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	bool all_compressed = true;
 	block_t blkaddr = ctx->fs_blkaddr;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, ctx->bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
 
 		if (f2fs_is_compressed_page(page))
 			f2fs_end_read_compressed_page(page, false, blkaddr,
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static void f2fs_read_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	iostat_update_and_unbind_ctx(bio, 1);
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 	}
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 		enum count_type type = WB_DATA_TYPE(page);
 
 		if (page_private_dummy(page)) {
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void __submit_merged_bio(struct f2fs_bio_info *io)
 static bool __has_merged_page(struct bio *bio, struct inode *inode,
 						struct page *page, nid_t ino)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	if (!bio)
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static bool __has_merged_page(struct bio *bio, struct inode *inode,
 		return true;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *target = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *target = bvec.bv_page;
 
 		if (fscrypt_is_bounce_page(target)) {
 			target = fscrypt_pagecache_page(target);
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lops.c b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
index 1902413d5d..7f62fe8eb7 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/lops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/lops.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void gfs2_end_log_write_bh(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp,
 static void gfs2_end_log_write(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = bio->bi_private;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct page *page;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static void gfs2_end_log_write(struct bio *bio)
 	}
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		page = bvec->bv_page;
+		page = bvec.bv_page;
 		if (page_has_buffers(page))
-			gfs2_end_log_write_bh(sdp, bvec, bio->bi_status);
+			gfs2_end_log_write_bh(sdp, &bvec, bio->bi_status);
 		else
 			mempool_free(page, gfs2_page_pool);
 	}
@@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ static void gfs2_log_write_page(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct page *page)
 static void gfs2_end_log_read(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct page *page;
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		page = bvec->bv_page;
+		page = bvec.bv_page;
 		if (bio->bi_status) {
 			int err = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
 
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
index 3c41b864ee..ed0acf1015 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/meta_io.c
@@ -193,15 +193,15 @@ struct buffer_head *gfs2_meta_new(struct gfs2_glock *gl, u64 blkno)
 
 static void gfs2_meta_read_endio(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bvec.bv_page;
 		struct buffer_head *bh = page_buffers(page);
-		unsigned int len = bvec->bv_len;
+		unsigned int len = bvec.bv_len;
 
-		while (bh_offset(bh) < bvec->bv_offset)
+		while (bh_offset(bh) < bvec.bv_offset)
 			bh = bh->b_this_page;
 		do {
 			struct buffer_head *next = bh->b_this_page;
diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
index 0f8ae954a5..0f9d9468c3 100644
--- a/fs/mpage.c
+++ b/fs/mpage.c
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@
  */
 static void mpage_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
 		page_endio(page, bio_op(bio),
 			   blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status));
 	}
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/block.c b/fs/squashfs/block.c
index bed3bb8b27..83e8b44518 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/block.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/block.c
@@ -35,30 +35,33 @@ static int copy_bio_to_actor(struct bio *bio,
 			     int offset, int req_length)
 {
 	void *actor_addr;
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all = {};
-	struct bio_vec *bvec = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter_all);
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	int copied_bytes = 0;
 	int actor_offset = 0;
+	int bytes_to_copy;
 
 	squashfs_actor_nobuff(actor);
 	actor_addr = squashfs_first_page(actor);
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all)))
-		return 0;
+	bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);
+	bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, offset);
 
-	while (copied_bytes < req_length) {
-		int bytes_to_copy = min_t(int, bvec->bv_len - offset,
+	while (copied_bytes < req_length &&
+	       iter.idx < bio->bi_vcnt) {
+		bvec = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter);
+
+		bytes_to_copy = min_t(int, bvec.bv_len,
 					  PAGE_SIZE - actor_offset);
 
 		bytes_to_copy = min_t(int, bytes_to_copy,
 				      req_length - copied_bytes);
 		if (!IS_ERR(actor_addr))
-			memcpy(actor_addr + actor_offset, bvec_virt(bvec) +
-					offset, bytes_to_copy);
+			memcpy(actor_addr + actor_offset, bvec_virt(&bvec),
+			       bytes_to_copy);
 
 		actor_offset += bytes_to_copy;
 		copied_bytes += bytes_to_copy;
-		offset += bytes_to_copy;
 
 		if (actor_offset >= PAGE_SIZE) {
 			actor_addr = squashfs_next_page(actor);
@@ -66,11 +69,8 @@ static int copy_bio_to_actor(struct bio *bio,
 				break;
 			actor_offset = 0;
 		}
-		if (offset >= bvec->bv_len) {
-			if (!bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all))
-				break;
-			offset = 0;
-		}
+
+		bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, bytes_to_copy);
 	}
 	squashfs_finish_page(actor);
 	return copied_bytes;
@@ -159,8 +159,10 @@ int squashfs_read_data(struct super_block *sb, u64 index, int length,
 		 * Metadata block.
 		 */
 		const u8 *data;
-		struct bvec_iter_all iter_all = {};
-		struct bio_vec *bvec = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter_all);
+		struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+		struct bio_vec bvec;
+
+		bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);
 
 		if (index + 2 > msblk->bytes_used) {
 			res = -EIO;
@@ -170,21 +172,25 @@ int squashfs_read_data(struct super_block *sb, u64 index, int length,
 		if (res)
 			goto out;
 
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all))) {
+		bvec = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter);
+
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bvec.bv_len)) {
 			res = -EIO;
 			goto out_free_bio;
 		}
 		/* Extract the length of the metadata block */
-		data = bvec_virt(bvec);
+		data = bvec_virt(&bvec);
 		length = data[offset];
-		if (offset < bvec->bv_len - 1) {
+		if (offset < bvec.bv_len - 1) {
 			length |= data[offset + 1] << 8;
 		} else {
-			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all))) {
+			bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, bvec.bv_len);
+
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bvec.bv_len)) {
 				res = -EIO;
 				goto out_free_bio;
 			}
-			data = bvec_virt(bvec);
+			data = bvec_virt(&bvec);
 			length |= data[0] << 8;
 		}
 		bio_free_pages(bio);
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c b/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c
index 49797729f1..bd0dd787d2 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c
@@ -92,20 +92,23 @@ static int lz4_uncompress(struct squashfs_sb_info *msblk, void *strm,
 	struct bio *bio, int offset, int length,
 	struct squashfs_page_actor *output)
 {
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all = {};
-	struct bio_vec *bvec = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter_all);
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct squashfs_lz4 *stream = strm;
 	void *buff = stream->input, *data;
 	int bytes = length, res;
 
-	while (bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all)) {
-		int avail = min(bytes, ((int)bvec->bv_len) - offset);
+	bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);
+	bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, offset);
 
-		data = bvec_virt(bvec);
-		memcpy(buff, data + offset, avail);
+	bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvec, bio, iter) {
+		unsigned avail = min_t(unsigned, bytes, bvec.bv_len);
+
+		memcpy(buff, bvec_virt(&bvec), avail);
 		buff += avail;
 		bytes -= avail;
-		offset = 0;
+		if (!bytes)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	res = LZ4_decompress_safe(stream->input, stream->output,
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c b/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c
index d216aeefa8..bccfcfa12e 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c
@@ -66,21 +66,24 @@ static int lzo_uncompress(struct squashfs_sb_info *msblk, void *strm,
 	struct bio *bio, int offset, int length,
 	struct squashfs_page_actor *output)
 {
-	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all = {};
-	struct bio_vec *bvec = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter_all);
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct squashfs_lzo *stream = strm;
 	void *buff = stream->input, *data;
 	int bytes = length, res;
 	size_t out_len = output->length;
 
-	while (bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all)) {
-		int avail = min(bytes, ((int)bvec->bv_len) - offset);
+	bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);
+	bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, offset);
 
-		data = bvec_virt(bvec);
-		memcpy(buff, data + offset, avail);
+	bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvec, bio, iter) {
+		unsigned avail = min_t(unsigned, bytes, bvec.bv_len);
+
+		memcpy(buff, bvec_virt(&bvec), avail);
 		buff += avail;
 		bytes -= avail;
-		offset = 0;
+		if (!bytes)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	res = lzo1x_decompress_safe(stream->input, (size_t)length,
diff --git a/fs/verity/verify.c b/fs/verity/verify.c
index 961ba24802..c08ff3b406 100644
--- a/fs/verity/verify.c
+++ b/fs/verity/verify.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void fsverity_verify_bio(struct bio *bio)
 	const struct fsverity_info *vi = inode->i_verity_info;
 	const struct merkle_tree_params *params = &vi->tree_params;
 	struct ahash_request *req;
-	struct bio_vec *bv;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
 	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
 	unsigned long max_ra_pages = 0;
 
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ void fsverity_verify_bio(struct bio *bio)
 	}
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
-		struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
+		struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
 		unsigned long level0_index = page->index >> params->log_arity;
 		unsigned long level0_ra_pages =
 			min(max_ra_pages, params->level0_blocks - level0_index);
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index c1da63f6c8..554eebd6a9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -76,22 +76,37 @@ static inline void *bio_data(struct bio *bio)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static inline bool bio_next_segment(const struct bio *bio,
-				    struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
+static inline struct bio_vec bio_iter_all_peek(const struct bio *bio,
+					       struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
 {
-	if (iter->idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)
-		return false;
+	BUG_ON(iter->idx >= bio->bi_vcnt);
+	return bvec_iter_all_peek(bio->bi_io_vec, iter);
+}
 
-	bvec_advance(&bio->bi_io_vec[iter->idx], iter);
-	return true;
+static inline void bio_iter_all_advance(const struct bio *bio,
+					struct bvec_iter_all *iter,
+					unsigned bytes)
+{
+	bvec_iter_all_advance(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
+
+	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt || (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
 }
 
+#define bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvl, bio, iter)		\
+	for (;								\
+	     iter.idx < bio->bi_vcnt &&					\
+		((bvl = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter)), true);		\
+	     bio_iter_all_advance((bio), &iter, bvl.bv_len))
+
 /*
  * drivers should _never_ use the all version - the bio may have been split
  * before it got to the driver and the driver won't own all of it
  */
-#define bio_for_each_segment_all(bvl, bio, iter) \
-	for (bvl = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter); bio_next_segment((bio), &iter); )
+#define bio_for_each_segment_all(bvl, bio, iter)			\
+	for (bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);					\
+	     iter.idx < bio->bi_vcnt &&					\
+		((bvl = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter)), true);		\
+	     bio_iter_all_advance((bio), &iter, bvl.bv_len))
 
 static inline void bio_advance_iter(const struct bio *bio,
 				    struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned int bytes)
diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
index 35c25dff65..12f0e073c0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@ -46,12 +46,6 @@ struct bvec_iter {
 						   current bvec */
 } __packed;
 
-struct bvec_iter_all {
-	struct bio_vec	bv;
-	int		idx;
-	unsigned	done;
-};
-
 /*
  * various member access, note that bio_data should of course not be used
  * on highmem page vectors
@@ -145,7 +139,10 @@ static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv,
 		((bvl = bvec_iter_bvec((bio_vec), (iter))), 1);	\
 	     bvec_iter_advance_single((bio_vec), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len))
 
-/* for iterating one bio from start to end */
+/*
+ * bvec_iter_all: for advancing over a bio as it was originally created, but
+ * with the usual bio_for_each_segment interface - nonstandard, do not use:
+ */
 #define BVEC_ITER_ALL_INIT (struct bvec_iter)				\
 {									\
 	.bi_sector	= 0,						\
@@ -154,33 +151,45 @@ static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv,
 	.bi_bvec_done	= 0,						\
 }
 
-static inline struct bio_vec *bvec_init_iter_all(struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
+/*
+ * bvec_iter_all: for advancing over individual pages in a bio, as it was when
+ * it was first created:
+ */
+struct bvec_iter_all {
+	int		idx;
+	unsigned	done;
+};
+
+static inline void bvec_iter_all_init(struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
 {
 	iter_all->done = 0;
 	iter_all->idx = 0;
+}
 
-	return &iter_all->bv;
+static inline struct bio_vec bvec_iter_all_peek(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
+						struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
+{
+	struct bio_vec bv = bvec[iter->idx];
+
+	bv.bv_offset	+= iter->done;
+	bv.bv_len	-= iter->done;
+
+	bv.bv_page	+= bv.bv_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	bv.bv_offset	&= ~PAGE_MASK;
+	bv.bv_len	= min_t(unsigned, PAGE_SIZE - bv.bv_offset, bv.bv_len);
+
+	return bv;
 }
 
-static inline void bvec_advance(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
-				struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
+static inline void bvec_iter_all_advance(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
+					 struct bvec_iter_all *iter,
+					 unsigned bytes)
 {
-	struct bio_vec *bv = &iter_all->bv;
-
-	if (iter_all->done) {
-		bv->bv_page++;
-		bv->bv_offset = 0;
-	} else {
-		bv->bv_page = bvec->bv_page + (bvec->bv_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-		bv->bv_offset = bvec->bv_offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
-	}
-	bv->bv_len = min_t(unsigned int, PAGE_SIZE - bv->bv_offset,
-			   bvec->bv_len - iter_all->done);
-	iter_all->done += bv->bv_len;
+	iter->done += bytes;
 
-	if (iter_all->done == bvec->bv_len) {
-		iter_all->idx++;
-		iter_all->done = 0;
+	while (iter->done && iter->done >= bvec[iter->idx].bv_len) {
+		iter->done -= bvec[iter->idx].bv_len;
+		iter->idx++;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Phillip Lougher]

On 27/03/2023 18:44, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This patch reworks bio_for_each_segment_all() to be more inline with how
> the other bio iterators work:
> 
>   - bio_iter_all_peek() now returns a synthesized bio_vec; we don't stash
>     one in the iterator and pass a pointer to it - bad. This way makes it
>     clearer what's a constructed value vs. a reference to something
>     pre-existing, and it also will help with cleaning up and
>     consolidating code with bio_for_each_folio_all().
> 
>   - We now provide bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(), for squashfs:
>     this makes their code clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>

> --- a/fs/squashfs/block.c
> +++ b/fs/squashfs/block.c

> @@ -170,21 +172,25 @@ int squashfs_read_data(struct super_block *sb, u64 index, int length,
>   		if (res)
>   			goto out;
>   
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all))) {
> +		bvec = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter);
> +
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bvec.bv_len)) {
>   			res = -EIO;
>   			goto out_free_bio;
>   		}
>   		/* Extract the length of the metadata block */
> -		data = bvec_virt(bvec);
> +		data = bvec_virt(&bvec);
>   		length = data[offset];
> -		if (offset < bvec->bv_len - 1) {
> +		if (offset < bvec.bv_len - 1) {
>   			length |= data[offset + 1] << 8;
>   		} else {
> -			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all))) {
> +			bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, bvec.bv_len);
> +
> +			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bvec.bv_len)) {
>   				res = -EIO;
>   				goto out_free_bio;
>   			}
> -			data = bvec_virt(bvec);
> +			data = bvec_virt(&bvec);
>   			length |= data[0] << 8;
>   		}

There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
results:

Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 32780
Index 77867356495, offset 335, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 3214
Index 78012985028, offset 708, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 3161
Index 77738921515, offset 555, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2647
Index 78012988191, offset 799, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 3157
Index 77738926684, offset 604, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2291
Index 77738933889, offset 641, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2549
Index 77738936440, offset 120, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2375
Index 77738938817, offset 449, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2686
Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 32780
Index 77867356495, offset 335, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 3214
Index 78012985028, offset 708, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 3161
Index 77738941505, offset 65, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2730
Index 78012988191, offset 799, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 3157
Index 77738946766, offset 206, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2651
Index 77738949419, offset 811, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2616
Index 77738952037, offset 357, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
length 2712
Index 77738954751, offset 1023, bvec.bv_len 1024: Overlapping bios, 
metadata length 41205, low-byte 245 high-byte 160
SQUASHFS error: Failed to read block 0x12199a5001: -5
Kernel panic - not syncing: squashfs read failed

The output should be fairly explanatory.

When the two-byte length field is in the same bio, it is correctly read.

When it overlaps two bios, the first (low-byte) is read correctly, but
the high byte read from the second bio is wrong.  It is being read as
160 when it should be 10.

So the code that reads the second bio isn't working as it should do.

Phillip


>   		bio_free_pages(bio);
> diff --git a/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c b/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c
> index 49797729f1..bd0dd787d2 100644
> --- a/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c
> +++ b/fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c
> @@ -92,20 +92,23 @@ static int lz4_uncompress(struct squashfs_sb_info *msblk, void *strm,
>   	struct bio *bio, int offset, int length,
>   	struct squashfs_page_actor *output)
>   {
> -	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all = {};
> -	struct bio_vec *bvec = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter_all);
> +	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
> +	struct bio_vec bvec;
>   	struct squashfs_lz4 *stream = strm;
>   	void *buff = stream->input, *data;
>   	int bytes = length, res;
>   
> -	while (bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all)) {
> -		int avail = min(bytes, ((int)bvec->bv_len) - offset);
> +	bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);
> +	bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, offset);
>   
> -		data = bvec_virt(bvec);
> -		memcpy(buff, data + offset, avail);
> +	bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvec, bio, iter) {
> +		unsigned avail = min_t(unsigned, bytes, bvec.bv_len);
> +
> +		memcpy(buff, bvec_virt(&bvec), avail);
>   		buff += avail;
>   		bytes -= avail;
> -		offset = 0;
> +		if (!bytes)
> +			break;
>   	}
>   
>   	res = LZ4_decompress_safe(stream->input, stream->output,
> diff --git a/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c b/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c
> index d216aeefa8..bccfcfa12e 100644
> --- a/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c
> +++ b/fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c
> @@ -66,21 +66,24 @@ static int lzo_uncompress(struct squashfs_sb_info *msblk, void *strm,
>   	struct bio *bio, int offset, int length,
>   	struct squashfs_page_actor *output)
>   {
> -	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all = {};
> -	struct bio_vec *bvec = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter_all);
> +	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
> +	struct bio_vec bvec;
>   	struct squashfs_lzo *stream = strm;
>   	void *buff = stream->input, *data;
>   	int bytes = length, res;
>   	size_t out_len = output->length;
>   
> -	while (bio_next_segment(bio, &iter_all)) {
> -		int avail = min(bytes, ((int)bvec->bv_len) - offset);
> +	bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);
> +	bio_iter_all_advance(bio, &iter, offset);
>   
> -		data = bvec_virt(bvec);
> -		memcpy(buff, data + offset, avail);
> +	bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvec, bio, iter) {
> +		unsigned avail = min_t(unsigned, bytes, bvec.bv_len);
> +
> +		memcpy(buff, bvec_virt(&bvec), avail);
>   		buff += avail;
>   		bytes -= avail;
> -		offset = 0;
> +		if (!bytes)
> +			break;
>   	}
>   
>   	res = lzo1x_decompress_safe(stream->input, (size_t)length,
> diff --git a/fs/verity/verify.c b/fs/verity/verify.c
> index 961ba24802..c08ff3b406 100644
> --- a/fs/verity/verify.c
> +++ b/fs/verity/verify.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void fsverity_verify_bio(struct bio *bio)
>   	const struct fsverity_info *vi = inode->i_verity_info;
>   	const struct merkle_tree_params *params = &vi->tree_params;
>   	struct ahash_request *req;
> -	struct bio_vec *bv;
> +	struct bio_vec bv;
>   	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
>   	unsigned long max_ra_pages = 0;
>   
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ void fsverity_verify_bio(struct bio *bio)
>   	}
>   
>   	bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, iter_all) {
> -		struct page *page = bv->bv_page;
> +		struct page *page = bv.bv_page;
>   		unsigned long level0_index = page->index >> params->log_arity;
>   		unsigned long level0_ra_pages =
>   			min(max_ra_pages, params->level0_blocks - level0_index);
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index c1da63f6c8..554eebd6a9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -76,22 +76,37 @@ static inline void *bio_data(struct bio *bio)
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool bio_next_segment(const struct bio *bio,
> -				    struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
> +static inline struct bio_vec bio_iter_all_peek(const struct bio *bio,
> +					       struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
>   {
> -	if (iter->idx >= bio->bi_vcnt)
> -		return false;
> +	BUG_ON(iter->idx >= bio->bi_vcnt);
> +	return bvec_iter_all_peek(bio->bi_io_vec, iter);
> +}
>   
> -	bvec_advance(&bio->bi_io_vec[iter->idx], iter);
> -	return true;
> +static inline void bio_iter_all_advance(const struct bio *bio,
> +					struct bvec_iter_all *iter,
> +					unsigned bytes)
> +{
> +	bvec_iter_all_advance(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
> +
> +	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt || (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
>   }
>   
> +#define bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvl, bio, iter)		\
> +	for (;								\
> +	     iter.idx < bio->bi_vcnt &&					\
> +		((bvl = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter)), true);		\
> +	     bio_iter_all_advance((bio), &iter, bvl.bv_len))
> +
>   /*
>    * drivers should _never_ use the all version - the bio may have been split
>    * before it got to the driver and the driver won't own all of it
>    */
> -#define bio_for_each_segment_all(bvl, bio, iter) \
> -	for (bvl = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter); bio_next_segment((bio), &iter); )
> +#define bio_for_each_segment_all(bvl, bio, iter)			\
> +	for (bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);					\
> +	     iter.idx < bio->bi_vcnt &&					\
> +		((bvl = bio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter)), true);		\
> +	     bio_iter_all_advance((bio), &iter, bvl.bv_len))
>   
>   static inline void bio_advance_iter(const struct bio *bio,
>   				    struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned int bytes)
> diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
> index 35c25dff65..12f0e073c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bvec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
> @@ -46,12 +46,6 @@ struct bvec_iter {
>   						   current bvec */
>   } __packed;
>   
> -struct bvec_iter_all {
> -	struct bio_vec	bv;
> -	int		idx;
> -	unsigned	done;
> -};
> -
>   /*
>    * various member access, note that bio_data should of course not be used
>    * on highmem page vectors
> @@ -145,7 +139,10 @@ static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv,
>   		((bvl = bvec_iter_bvec((bio_vec), (iter))), 1);	\
>   	     bvec_iter_advance_single((bio_vec), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len))
>   
> -/* for iterating one bio from start to end */
> +/*
> + * bvec_iter_all: for advancing over a bio as it was originally created, but
> + * with the usual bio_for_each_segment interface - nonstandard, do not use:
> + */
>   #define BVEC_ITER_ALL_INIT (struct bvec_iter)				\
>   {									\
>   	.bi_sector	= 0,						\
> @@ -154,33 +151,45 @@ static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv,
>   	.bi_bvec_done	= 0,						\
>   }
>   
> -static inline struct bio_vec *bvec_init_iter_all(struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
> +/*
> + * bvec_iter_all: for advancing over individual pages in a bio, as it was when
> + * it was first created:
> + */
> +struct bvec_iter_all {
> +	int		idx;
> +	unsigned	done;
> +};
> +
> +static inline void bvec_iter_all_init(struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
>   {
>   	iter_all->done = 0;
>   	iter_all->idx = 0;
> +}
>   
> -	return &iter_all->bv;
> +static inline struct bio_vec bvec_iter_all_peek(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
> +						struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
> +{
> +	struct bio_vec bv = bvec[iter->idx];
> +
> +	bv.bv_offset	+= iter->done;
> +	bv.bv_len	-= iter->done;
> +
> +	bv.bv_page	+= bv.bv_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	bv.bv_offset	&= ~PAGE_MASK;
> +	bv.bv_len	= min_t(unsigned, PAGE_SIZE - bv.bv_offset, bv.bv_len);
> +
> +	return bv;
>   }
>   
> -static inline void bvec_advance(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
> -				struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
> +static inline void bvec_iter_all_advance(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
> +					 struct bvec_iter_all *iter,
> +					 unsigned bytes)
>   {
> -	struct bio_vec *bv = &iter_all->bv;
> -
> -	if (iter_all->done) {
> -		bv->bv_page++;
> -		bv->bv_offset = 0;
> -	} else {
> -		bv->bv_page = bvec->bv_page + (bvec->bv_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -		bv->bv_offset = bvec->bv_offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
> -	}
> -	bv->bv_len = min_t(unsigned int, PAGE_SIZE - bv->bv_offset,
> -			   bvec->bv_len - iter_all->done);
> -	iter_all->done += bv->bv_len;
> +	iter->done += bytes;
>   
> -	if (iter_all->done == bvec->bv_len) {
> -		iter_all->idx++;
> -		iter_all->done = 0;
> +	while (iter->done && iter->done >= bvec[iter->idx].bv_len) {
> +		iter->done -= bvec[iter->idx].bv_len;
> +		iter->idx++;
>   	}
>   }
>   

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Kent Overstreet]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:50:27PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
> results:
> 
> Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata length
> 32780

Could you share how you're doing your testing? I set up a basic test
(created images using every compression type, tested reading them) and
so far I'm not able to reproduce this.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Phillip Lougher]

On 30/03/2023 18:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:50:27PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
>> There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
>> results:
>>
>> Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata length
>> 32780
> 
> Could you share how you're doing your testing? I set up a basic test
> (created images using every compression type, tested reading them) and
> so far I'm not able to reproduce this.

I use a very large Squashfs file that triggers the edge case.

That is too big to post, and so I'll see if I can artifically generate
a small Squashfs filesystem that triggers the edge case.

Phillip

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Phillip Lougher]

On 30/03/2023 19:59, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> On 30/03/2023 18:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:50:27PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
>>> There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
>>> results:
>>>
>>> Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio, metadata 
>>> length
>>> 32780
>>
>> Could you share how you're doing your testing? I set up a basic test
>> (created images using every compression type, tested reading them) and
>> so far I'm not able to reproduce this.
> 
> I use a very large Squashfs file that triggers the edge case.
> 
> That is too big to post, and so I'll see if I can artifically generate
> a small Squashfs filesystem that triggers the edge case.
> 
> Phillip
> 
> 

Hi,

This is a Google drive link to a file that triggers the issue.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3-a1BKq62hZGQ6ynioreMSWFMuCV9B4/view?usp=sharing

To reproduce the issue

% mount -t squashfs <the file> /mnt -o errors=panic

then either one of the following will produce a panic

% ls /mnt
% find /mnt -type f | xargs wc > /dev/null


Phillip

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Kent Overstreet]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:10:15AM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> On 30/03/2023 19:59, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> > On 30/03/2023 18:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:50:27PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> > > > There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
> > > > results:
> > > > 
> > > > Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio,
> > > > metadata length
> > > > 32780
> > > 
> > > Could you share how you're doing your testing? I set up a basic test
> > > (created images using every compression type, tested reading them) and
> > > so far I'm not able to reproduce this.
> > 
> > I use a very large Squashfs file that triggers the edge case.
> > 
> > That is too big to post, and so I'll see if I can artifically generate
> > a small Squashfs filesystem that triggers the edge case.
> > 
> > Phillip
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a Google drive link to a file that triggers the issue.
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3-a1BKq62hZGQ6ynioreMSWFMuCV9B4/view?usp=sharing
> 
> To reproduce the issue
> 
> % mount -t squashfs <the file> /mnt -o errors=panic
> 
> then either one of the following will produce a panic
> 
> % ls /mnt
> % find /mnt -type f | xargs wc > /dev/null

Appears to be fixed now - updated version of the patchset is at
https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git bio_folio_iter

Can you confirm, then I'll mail out the updated series?

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Phillip Lougher]

On 01/04/2023 03:28, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:10:15AM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
>> On 30/03/2023 19:59, Phillip Lougher wrote:
>>> On 30/03/2023 18:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:50:27PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
>>>>> There is a problem with the above code, on testing I get the following
>>>>> results:
>>>>>
>>>>> Index 78018785329, offset 49, bvec.bv_len 1024: In same bio,
>>>>> metadata length
>>>>> 32780
>>>>
>>>> Could you share how you're doing your testing? I set up a basic test
>>>> (created images using every compression type, tested reading them) and
>>>> so far I'm not able to reproduce this.
>>>
>>> I use a very large Squashfs file that triggers the edge case.
>>>
>>> That is too big to post, and so I'll see if I can artifically generate
>>> a small Squashfs filesystem that triggers the edge case.
>>>
>>> Phillip
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a Google drive link to a file that triggers the issue.
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3-a1BKq62hZGQ6ynioreMSWFMuCV9B4/view?usp=sharing
>>
>> To reproduce the issue
>>
>> % mount -t squashfs <the file> /mnt -o errors=panic
>>
>> then either one of the following will produce a panic
>>
>> % ls /mnt
>> % find /mnt -type f | xargs wc > /dev/null
> 
> Appears to be fixed now - updated version of the patchset is at
> https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git bio_folio_iter
> 
> Can you confirm, then I'll mail out the updated series?

Thw updated patch-set fixes the issues seen.

Phillip

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Ming Lei]

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:44:01PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This patch reworks bio_for_each_segment_all() to be more inline with how
> the other bio iterators work:
> 
>  - bio_iter_all_peek() now returns a synthesized bio_vec; we don't stash
>    one in the iterator and pass a pointer to it - bad. This way makes it
>    clearer what's a constructed value vs. a reference to something
>    pre-existing, and it also will help with cleaning up and
>    consolidating code with bio_for_each_folio_all().
> 
>  - We now provide bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(), for squashfs:
>    this makes their code clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
> ---
>  block/bio.c               | 38 ++++++++++++------------
>  block/blk-map.c           | 38 ++++++++++++------------
>  block/bounce.c            | 12 ++++----
>  drivers/md/bcache/btree.c |  8 ++---
>  drivers/md/dm-crypt.c     | 10 +++----
>  drivers/md/raid1.c        |  4 +--
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c        | 10 +++----
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c      | 52 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c          |  8 ++---
>  fs/btrfs/raid56.c         | 18 ++++++------
>  fs/crypto/bio.c           |  8 ++---
>  fs/erofs/zdata.c          |  4 +--
>  fs/ext4/page-io.c         |  8 ++---
>  fs/ext4/readpage.c        |  4 +--
>  fs/f2fs/data.c            | 20 ++++++-------
>  fs/gfs2/lops.c            | 10 +++----
>  fs/gfs2/meta_io.c         |  8 ++---
>  fs/mpage.c                |  4 +--
>  fs/squashfs/block.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++--------------
>  fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c | 17 ++++++-----
>  fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c | 17 ++++++-----
>  fs/verity/verify.c        |  4 +--
>  include/linux/bio.h       | 31 +++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/bvec.h      | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  24 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 203 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index ab59a491a8..8d3abe249e 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -1170,13 +1170,13 @@ bool bio_add_folio(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
>  
>  void __bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio, bool mark_dirty)
>  {
> -	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
> -	struct bio_vec *bvec;
> +	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
> +	struct bio_vec bvec;
>  
> -	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
> -		if (mark_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
> -			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec->bv_page);
> -		put_page(bvec->bv_page);
> +	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter) {
> +		if (mark_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec.bv_page))
> +			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec.bv_page);
> +		put_page(bvec.bv_page);
>  	}

bio_for_each_segment_all is supposed to be used by bio which owns the
bvec table, so it is just fine to return bvec pointer by bio_for_each_segment_all
to save extra bvec copy.

And the change becomes not efficient any more.


Thanks,
Ming

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()

[Kent Overstreet]

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:49:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> bio_for_each_segment_all is supposed to be used by bio which owns the
> bvec table, so it is just fine to return bvec pointer by bio_for_each_segment_all
> to save extra bvec copy.

No. And you wrote this code, so I'd expect you to know this:
bio_for_each_segment_all() can _not_ return a pointer into the original
bvec table, it has to synthesize bvecs - same as regular
bio_for_each_segment() - because it has to break bvecs up into
individiual pages.

There was zero benefit to the way you were doing it, you were just
adding pointer access to something that was on the caller's stack.

> And the change becomes not efficient any more.

Based on _what_?

Code size doesn't change, as I already showed hch. What's your claim?

[PATCH 2/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_folio_all()

[Kent Overstreet]

This reimplements bio_for_each_folio_all() on top of the newly-reworked
bvec_iter_all, and since it's now trivial we also provide
bio_for_each_folio.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 14 ++++---
 include/linux/bio.h    | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 include/linux/bvec.h   | 15 +++++--
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 356193e44c..212c8d350b 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -187,10 +187,11 @@ static void iomap_finish_folio_read(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
 static void iomap_read_end_io(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	int error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
-	struct folio_iter fi;
+	struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+	struct folio_vec fv;
 
-	bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio)
-		iomap_finish_folio_read(fi.folio, fi.offset, fi.length, error);
+	bio_for_each_folio_all(fv, bio, iter)
+		iomap_finish_folio_read(fv.fv_folio, fv.fv_offset, fv.fv_len, error);
 	bio_put(bio);
 }
 
@@ -1299,7 +1300,8 @@ iomap_finish_ioend(struct iomap_ioend *ioend, int error)
 	u32 folio_count = 0;
 
 	for (bio = &ioend->io_inline_bio; bio; bio = next) {
-		struct folio_iter fi;
+		struct bvec_iter_all iter;
+		struct folio_vec fv;
 
 		/*
 		 * For the last bio, bi_private points to the ioend, so we
@@ -1311,8 +1313,8 @@ iomap_finish_ioend(struct iomap_ioend *ioend, int error)
 			next = bio->bi_private;
 
 		/* walk all folios in bio, ending page IO on them */
-		bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio) {
-			iomap_finish_folio_write(inode, fi.folio, fi.length,
+		bio_for_each_folio_all(fv, bio, iter) {
+			iomap_finish_folio_write(inode, fv.fv_folio, fv.fv_len,
 					error);
 			folio_count++;
 		}
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index 554eebd6a9..ae4e6975ab 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static inline void bio_iter_all_advance(const struct bio *bio,
 {
 	bvec_iter_all_advance(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
 
-	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt || (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
+	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt ||
+	       (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
 }
 
 #define bio_for_each_segment_all_continue(bvl, bio, iter)		\
@@ -164,6 +165,42 @@ static inline void bio_advance(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nbytes)
 #define bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter)				\
 	__bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter, (bio)->bi_iter)
 
+struct folio_vec {
+	struct folio	*fv_folio;
+	size_t		fv_offset;
+	size_t		fv_len;
+};
+
+static inline struct folio_vec biovec_to_foliovec(struct bio_vec bv)
+{
+
+	struct folio *folio	= page_folio(bv.bv_page);
+	size_t offset		= (folio_page_idx(folio, bv.bv_page) << PAGE_SHIFT) +
+		bv.bv_offset;
+	size_t len = min_t(size_t, folio_size(folio) - offset, bv.bv_len);
+
+	return (struct folio_vec) {
+		.fv_folio	= folio,
+		.fv_offset	= offset,
+		.fv_len		= len,
+	};
+}
+
+static inline struct folio_vec bio_iter_iovec_folio(struct bio *bio,
+						    struct bvec_iter iter)
+{
+	return biovec_to_foliovec(bio_iter_iovec(bio, iter));
+}
+
+#define __bio_for_each_folio(bvl, bio, iter, start)			\
+	for (iter = (start);						\
+	     (iter).bi_size &&						\
+		((bvl = bio_iter_iovec_folio((bio), (iter))), 1);	\
+	     bio_advance_iter_single((bio), &(iter), (bvl).fv_len))
+
+#define bio_for_each_folio(bvl, bio, iter)				\
+	__bio_for_each_folio(bvl, bio, iter, (bio)->bi_iter)
+
 #define __bio_for_each_bvec(bvl, bio, iter, start)		\
 	for (iter = (start);						\
 	     (iter).bi_size &&						\
@@ -272,59 +309,22 @@ static inline struct bio_vec *bio_last_bvec_all(struct bio *bio)
 	return &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
 }
 
-/**
- * struct folio_iter - State for iterating all folios in a bio.
- * @folio: The current folio we're iterating.  NULL after the last folio.
- * @offset: The byte offset within the current folio.
- * @length: The number of bytes in this iteration (will not cross folio
- *	boundary).
- */
-struct folio_iter {
-	struct folio *folio;
-	size_t offset;
-	size_t length;
-	/* private: for use by the iterator */
-	struct folio *_next;
-	size_t _seg_count;
-	int _i;
-};
-
-static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
-				   int i)
-{
-	struct bio_vec *bvec = bio_first_bvec_all(bio) + i;
-
-	fi->folio = page_folio(bvec->bv_page);
-	fi->offset = bvec->bv_offset +
-			PAGE_SIZE * (bvec->bv_page - &fi->folio->page);
-	fi->_seg_count = bvec->bv_len;
-	fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio) - fi->offset, fi->_seg_count);
-	fi->_next = folio_next(fi->folio);
-	fi->_i = i;
-}
-
-static inline void bio_next_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio)
+static inline struct folio_vec bio_folio_iter_all_peek(const struct bio *bio,
+						       const struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
 {
-	fi->_seg_count -= fi->length;
-	if (fi->_seg_count) {
-		fi->folio = fi->_next;
-		fi->offset = 0;
-		fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio), fi->_seg_count);
-		fi->_next = folio_next(fi->folio);
-	} else if (fi->_i + 1 < bio->bi_vcnt) {
-		bio_first_folio(fi, bio, fi->_i + 1);
-	} else {
-		fi->folio = NULL;
-	}
+	return biovec_to_foliovec(__bvec_iter_all_peek(bio->bi_io_vec, iter));
 }
 
 /**
  * bio_for_each_folio_all - Iterate over each folio in a bio.
- * @fi: struct folio_iter which is updated for each folio.
+ * @fi: struct bio_folio_iter_all which is updated for each folio.
  * @bio: struct bio to iterate over.
  */
-#define bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio)				\
-	for (bio_first_folio(&fi, bio, 0); fi.folio; bio_next_folio(&fi, bio))
+#define bio_for_each_folio_all(fv, bio, iter)				\
+	for (bvec_iter_all_init(&iter);					\
+	     iter.idx < bio->bi_vcnt &&					\
+		((fv = bio_folio_iter_all_peek(bio, &iter)), true);	\
+	     bio_iter_all_advance((bio), &iter, fv.fv_len))
 
 enum bip_flags {
 	BIP_BLOCK_INTEGRITY	= 1 << 0, /* block layer owns integrity data */
diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
index 12f0e073c0..c21a26445e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@ -166,18 +166,27 @@ static inline void bvec_iter_all_init(struct bvec_iter_all *iter_all)
 	iter_all->idx = 0;
 }
 
-static inline struct bio_vec bvec_iter_all_peek(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
-						struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
+static inline struct bio_vec __bvec_iter_all_peek(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
+						  const struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
 {
 	struct bio_vec bv = bvec[iter->idx];
 
+	BUG_ON(iter->done >= bv.bv_len);
+
 	bv.bv_offset	+= iter->done;
 	bv.bv_len	-= iter->done;
 
 	bv.bv_page	+= bv.bv_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	bv.bv_offset	&= ~PAGE_MASK;
-	bv.bv_len	= min_t(unsigned, PAGE_SIZE - bv.bv_offset, bv.bv_len);
+	return bv;
+}
+
+static inline struct bio_vec bvec_iter_all_peek(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
+						const struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
+{
+	struct bio_vec bv = __bvec_iter_all_peek(bvec, iter);
 
+	bv.bv_len = min_t(unsigned, PAGE_SIZE - bv.bv_offset, bv.bv_len);
 	return bv;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_folio_all()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:44:02PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> +	bio_for_each_folio_all(fv, bio, iter)
> +		iomap_finish_folio_read(fv.fv_folio, fv.fv_offset, fv.fv_len, error);

Please avoid the overly long lines.  Also if we pass all arguments
of the folio_vec we might as ell just pass that folio_vec anyway.

> -	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt || (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
> +	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt ||
> +	       (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));

Seems like this should be folded into the previous patch.  Also I
generally prefer to avoid top-level || in asserts and just do multiple
asserts, as that shows which condition triggered.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Rework bio_for_each_folio_all()

[Kent Overstreet]

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 08:13:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:44:02PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > +	bio_for_each_folio_all(fv, bio, iter)
> > +		iomap_finish_folio_read(fv.fv_folio, fv.fv_offset, fv.fv_len, error);
> 
> Please avoid the overly long lines.  Also if we pass all arguments
> of the folio_vec we might as ell just pass that folio_vec anyway.
> 
> > -	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt || (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
> > +	BUG_ON(iter->idx > bio->bi_vcnt ||
> > +	       (iter->idx == bio->bi_vcnt && iter->done));
> 
> Seems like this should be folded into the previous patch.  Also I
> generally prefer to avoid top-level || in asserts and just do multiple
> asserts, as that shows which condition triggered.

It should be folded in, but it's logically the same assert (advance
past the end of the iter) so not worth the increased code size.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:44:00PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Small patch series cleaning up/standardizing bio_for_each_segment_all(),
> which means we can use the same guts for bio_for_each_folio_all(),
> considerably simplifying that code.
> 
> The squashfs maintainer will want to look at and test those changes,
> that code was doing some slightly tricky things. The rest was a pretty
> mechanical conversion.

Can you post a code size comparism for the before and after cases?

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:14:05PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:44:00PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Small patch series cleaning up/standardizing bio_for_each_segment_all(),
> > which means we can use the same guts for bio_for_each_folio_all(),
> > considerably simplifying that code.
> > 
> > The squashfs maintainer will want to look at and test those changes,
> > that code was doing some slightly tricky things. The rest was a pretty
> > mechanical conversion.
> 
> Can you post a code size comparism for the before and after cases?

6.2:
kent@moria:~/linux$ size ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
13234215        5355074  872448 19461737        128f669 ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux

With patches:
kent@moria:~/linux$ size ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
13234215        5355578  872448 19462241        128f861 ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:28:08PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Can you post a code size comparism for the before and after cases?
> 
> 6.2:
> kent@moria:~/linux$ size ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 13234215        5355074  872448 19461737        128f669 ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
> 
> With patches:
> kent@moria:~/linux$ size ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 13234215        5355578  872448 19462241        128f861 ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux

So we have a slightly larger binary size, and a slighly larger source
code size.  What is the overall benefit of this conversion?

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 08:10:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:28:08PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > Can you post a code size comparism for the before and after cases?
> > 
> > 6.2:
> > kent@moria:~/linux$ size ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > 13234215        5355074  872448 19461737        128f669 ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
> > 
> > With patches:
> > kent@moria:~/linux$ size ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > 13234215        5355578  872448 19462241        128f861 ktest-out/kernel_build.x86_64/vmlinux
> 
> So we have a slightly larger binary size, and a slighly larger source
> code size.  What is the overall benefit of this conversion?

Data went up a bit because I added some asserts, yes. And it's also not
uncommon for source code to grow a bit when you start focusing on
readability instead of just playing code golf.

And that was one of the main motivations - Matthew was complaining about
the bio iter code being a pain in the ass when he did the bio folio iter
code; additionally, I realized I could do a much cleaner and smaller
version of bio_for_each_folio() with some refactoring of the existing
code.

But this was all right there in the original commit message. And to be
honest Christoph, these kinds of drive by "let's focus on the easiest
thing to measure" comments are what I expect from you at this point, but
I don't find them to be super helpful. Reads like a typical MBA manager
who just wants to focus on making their silly charts going up, instead
of digging in and understanding what's going on. Was it your time in
FinTech that you got that from...?

If we want object size to go back down, we could
 - convert WARN_ONS() to BUG_ON()s (Linus won't like that)
 - drop the new assertions (_I_ wouldn't like that)
 - switch from inlines to out-of-line functions - this'll make text size
   go down vs. baseline, but if there's a performance impact Jens will
   care about that.

Anyways, I've got a patch converting to out-of-line functions but I
don't have as sensitive a performance testing setup as Jens does. If the
patch is interesting to people - if Jens wants to perf test it or just
take it - I'm happy to post it too.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 12:36:20PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> But this was all right there in the original commit message. And to be
> honest Christoph, these kinds of drive by "let's focus on the easiest
> thing to measure" comments are what I expect from you at this point,

I'm really just curious what the motivation is.  The code does not
seem much cleaner to me as the user of the API, and it doesn't reduce
code size.  Maybe there is a good reason for it, but then it needs to
be very clearly stated and you need to sell people on it.

Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
reviewers that it's really useful in general.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 08:20:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 12:36:20PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > But this was all right there in the original commit message. And to be
> > honest Christoph, these kinds of drive by "let's focus on the easiest
> > thing to measure" comments are what I expect from you at this point,
> 
> I'm really just curious what the motivation is.  The code does not
> seem much cleaner to me as the user of the API, and it doesn't reduce
> code size.  Maybe there is a good reason for it, but then it needs to
> be very clearly stated and you need to sell people on it.

Yeah, you're not trying to advance the discussion here, you're just
restating your original position. I heard you, and I responded.

> Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
> reviewers that it's really useful in general.

I know you and others like to talk a lot about what you want as
maintainers and reviewers - but I find that the people who are the
loudest and the most authoritarian in that respect tend not to be the
people who drive discussions forward in productive ways.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:47:02AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Yeah, you're not trying to advance the discussion here, you're just
> restating your original position. I heard you, and I responded.

Hi Kent,

it might sound unusual to you, but yes, sometimes people ask questions
to advance "the discussion" or to try to find out what someone else is
actuall trying to do because it wasn't obvious.  It then greatly
helps if you treat it as just a question and not a personal attack.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 08:59:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:47:02AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Yeah, you're not trying to advance the discussion here, you're just
> > restating your original position. I heard you, and I responded.
> 
> Hi Kent,
> 
> it might sound unusual to you, but yes, sometimes people ask questions
> to advance "the discussion" or to try to find out what someone else is
> actuall trying to do because it wasn't obvious.  It then greatly
> helps if you treat it as just a question and not a personal attack.

"Asking the question", when the question is basic and already been
discussed/responded to, can also be a form of obtuse trolling.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Jens Axboe]

>> Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
>> reviewers that it's really useful in general.
> 
> I know you and others like to talk a lot about what you want as
> maintainers and reviewers - but I find that the people who are the
> loudest and the most authoritarian in that respect tend not to be the
> people who drive discussions forward in productive ways.

One issue is certainly that nobody wants to engage with people that
instantly try and make this personal, or just uncomfortable in general.
Then it's better to focus on other things that are more rewarding and
pleasant, nobody needs extra drama in their life. I sure as hell don't.
And unfortunately I find that your postings most often degenerate to
that. Which is a shame, because there's good stuff in a lot of these
patches, but it's often not worth the time/energy investment because of
it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:01:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
> >> reviewers that it's really useful in general.
> > 
> > I know you and others like to talk a lot about what you want as
> > maintainers and reviewers - but I find that the people who are the
> > loudest and the most authoritarian in that respect tend not to be the
> > people who drive discussions forward in productive ways.
> 
> One issue is certainly that nobody wants to engage with people that
> instantly try and make this personal, or just uncomfortable in general.

Yeah, you like to respond to technical discussion with a *plonk*.

*eyeroll*

Christoph can handle himself, he doesn't need you defending him.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Jens Axboe]

On 4/4/23 10:06?AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:01:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
>>>> reviewers that it's really useful in general.
>>>
>>> I know you and others like to talk a lot about what you want as
>>> maintainers and reviewers - but I find that the people who are the
>>> loudest and the most authoritarian in that respect tend not to be the
>>> people who drive discussions forward in productive ways.
>>
>> One issue is certainly that nobody wants to engage with people that
>> instantly try and make this personal, or just uncomfortable in general.
> 
> Yeah, you like to respond to technical discussion with a *plonk*.
> 
> *eyeroll*
> 
> Christoph can handle himself, he doesn't need you defending him.

I'm not defending Christoph, I'm trying to help YOU understand why
your patchsets always turn sour. And I'm trying to get this toxicity off
the list, because it's frankly not productive at all and it's hurting
the developer environment for everybody else.

If everybody else seems like an asshole, maybe it's actually you? A
little introspection would be prudent. If you can't change your tone,
please just go somewhere else. I'm not interested.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:14:36AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/4/23 10:06?AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 10:01:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>> Starting to get personal instead tends to not help to convince your
> >>>> reviewers that it's really useful in general.
> >>>
> >>> I know you and others like to talk a lot about what you want as
> >>> maintainers and reviewers - but I find that the people who are the
> >>> loudest and the most authoritarian in that respect tend not to be the
> >>> people who drive discussions forward in productive ways.
> >>
> >> One issue is certainly that nobody wants to engage with people that
> >> instantly try and make this personal, or just uncomfortable in general.
> > 
> > Yeah, you like to respond to technical discussion with a *plonk*.
> > 
> > *eyeroll*
> > 
> > Christoph can handle himself, he doesn't need you defending him.
> 
> I'm not defending Christoph, I'm trying to help YOU understand why
> your patchsets always turn sour. And I'm trying to get this toxicity off
> the list, because it's frankly not productive at all and it's hurting
> the developer environment for everybody else.
> 
> If everybody else seems like an asshole, maybe it's actually you? A
> little introspection would be prudent. If you can't change your tone,
> please just go somewhere else. I'm not interested.

Let's just leave this aside for now and talk about it at LSF.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Phillip Lougher]

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Small patch series cleaning up/standardizing bio_for_each_segment_all(),
> which means we can use the same guts for bio_for_each_folio_all(),
> considerably simplifying that code.
>
> The squashfs maintainer will want to look at and test those changes,
> that code was doing some slightly tricky things. The rest was a pretty
> mechanical conversion.

An eyeball of the changes doesn't bring up anything obviously wrong.

I'll apply and do some tests.

Phillip

BTW please CC me on the cover letter as well as patch [1/2].


>
> Kent Overstreet (2):
>   block: Rework bio_for_each_segment_all()
>   block: Rework bio_for_each_folio_all()
>
>  block/bio.c               |  38 ++++++------
>  block/blk-map.c           |  38 ++++++------
>  block/bounce.c            |  12 ++--
>  drivers/md/bcache/btree.c |   8 +--
>  drivers/md/dm-crypt.c     |  10 ++--
>  drivers/md/raid1.c        |   4 +-
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c        |  10 ++--
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c      |  52 ++++++++--------
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c          |   8 +--
>  fs/btrfs/raid56.c         |  18 +++---
>  fs/crypto/bio.c           |   8 +--
>  fs/erofs/zdata.c          |   4 +-
>  fs/ext4/page-io.c         |   8 +--
>  fs/ext4/readpage.c        |   4 +-
>  fs/f2fs/data.c            |  20 +++----
>  fs/gfs2/lops.c            |  10 ++--
>  fs/gfs2/meta_io.c         |   8 +--
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c    |  14 +++--
>  fs/mpage.c                |   4 +-
>  fs/squashfs/block.c       |  48 ++++++++-------
>  fs/squashfs/lz4_wrapper.c |  17 +++---
>  fs/squashfs/lzo_wrapper.c |  17 +++---
>  fs/verity/verify.c        |   4 +-
>  include/linux/bio.h       | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  include/linux/bvec.h      |  70 ++++++++++++++--------
>  25 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 255 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Kent Overstreet]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 02:42:28PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Kent Overstreet
> <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Small patch series cleaning up/standardizing bio_for_each_segment_all(),
> > which means we can use the same guts for bio_for_each_folio_all(),
> > considerably simplifying that code.
> >
> > The squashfs maintainer will want to look at and test those changes,
> > that code was doing some slightly tricky things. The rest was a pretty
> > mechanical conversion.
> 
> An eyeball of the changes doesn't bring up anything obviously wrong.
> 
> I'll apply and do some tests.
> 
> Phillip
> 
> BTW please CC me on the cover letter as well as patch [1/2].

Will do.

There were some squashfs files that got missed, there's a fixup patch
you'll want in this branch:

https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git/log/?h=bio_folio_iter

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio iter improvements

[Phillip Lougher]

On 28/03/2023 17:57, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 02:42:28PM +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Kent Overstreet
>> <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
>>>
>>> Small patch series cleaning up/standardizing bio_for_each_segment_all(),
>>> which means we can use the same guts for bio_for_each_folio_all(),
>>> considerably simplifying that code.
>>>
>>> The squashfs maintainer will want to look at and test those changes,
>>> that code was doing some slightly tricky things. The rest was a pretty
>>> mechanical conversion.
>>
>> An eyeball of the changes doesn't bring up anything obviously wrong.
>>
>> I'll apply and do some tests.
>>
>> Phillip
>>
>> BTW please CC me on the cover letter as well as patch [1/2].
> 
> Will do.
> 
> There were some squashfs files that got missed, there's a fixup patch
> you'll want in this branch:
> 
> https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git/log/?h=bio_folio_iter

Patches applied, and I do see some issues in testing.

I'll reply on patch [1/2] because that's where the code is.

Phillip