linux-coco.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
	khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv7 10/14] x86/mm: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:02:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220614120231.48165-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614120231.48165-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries.
The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to
totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad()
relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these
unwanted loads.

But, this approach does not work for unaccepted memory. For TDX, a load
from unaccepted memory will not lead to a recoverable exception within
the guest. The guest will exit to the VMM where the only recourse is to
terminate the guest.

There are three parts to fix this issue and comprehensively avoid access
to unaccepted memory. Together these ensure that an extra “guard” page
is accepted in addition to the memory that needs to be used.

1. Implicitly extend the range_contains_unaccepted_memory(start, end)
   checks up to end+2M if ‘end’ is aligned on a 2M boundary.
2. Implicitly extend accept_memory(start, end) to end+2M if ‘end’ is
   aligned on a 2M boundary.
3. Set PageUnaccepted() on both memory that itself needs to be accepted
   *and* memory where the next page needs to be accepted. Essentially,
   make PageUnaccepted(page) a marker for whether work needs to be done
   to make ‘page’ usable. That work might include accepting pages in
   addition to ‘page’ itself.

Side note: This leads to something strange. Pages which were accepted
	   at boot, marked by the firmware as accepted and will never
	   _need_ to be accepted might have PageUnaccepted() set on
	   them. PageUnaccepted(page) is a cue to ensure that the next
	   page is accepted before ‘page’ can be used.

This is an actual, real-world problem which was discovered during TDX
testing.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c         | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c |  7 +++++
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c
index 1df918b21469..bcd56fe82b9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c
@@ -23,6 +23,38 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
 	bitmap = __va(boot_params.unaccepted_memory);
 	range_start = start / PMD_SIZE;
 
+	/*
+	 * load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page
+	 * boundaries. The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they
+	 * might be made to totally unrelated or even unmapped memory.
+	 * load_unaligned_zeropad() relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now
+	 * #VE) to recover from these unwanted loads.
+	 *
+	 * But, this approach does not work for unaccepted memory. For TDX, a
+	 * load from unaccepted memory will not lead to a recoverable exception
+	 * within the guest. The guest will exit to the VMM where the only
+	 * recourse is to terminate the guest.
+	 *
+	 * There are three parts to fix this issue and comprehensively avoid
+	 * access to unaccepted memory. Together these ensure that an extra
+	 * “guard” page is accepted in addition to the memory that needs to be
+	 * used:
+	 *
+	 * 1. Implicitly extend the range_contains_unaccepted_memory(start, end)
+	 *    checks up to end+2M if ‘end’ is aligned on a 2M boundary.
+	 *
+	 * 2. Implicitly extend accept_memory(start, end) to end+2M if ‘end’ is
+	 *    aligned on a 2M boundary.
+	 *
+	 * 3. Set PageUnaccepted() on both memory that itself needs to be
+	 *    accepted *and* memory where the next page needs to be accepted.
+	 *    Essentially, make PageUnaccepted(page) a marker for whether work
+	 *    needs to be done to make ‘page’ usable. That work might include
+	 *    accepting pages in addition to ‘page’ itself.
+	 */
+	if (!(end % PMD_SIZE))
+		end += PMD_SIZE;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags);
 	for_each_set_bitrange_from(range_start, range_end, bitmap,
 				   DIV_ROUND_UP(end, PMD_SIZE)) {
@@ -46,6 +78,10 @@ bool range_contains_unaccepted_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
 
 	bitmap = __va(boot_params.unaccepted_memory);
 
+	/* See comment on load_unaligned_zeropad() in accept_memory() */
+	if (!(end % PMD_SIZE))
+		end += PMD_SIZE;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags);
 	while (start < end) {
 		if (test_bit(start / PMD_SIZE, bitmap)) {
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
index b91c89100b2d..bc1110509de4 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
@@ -709,6 +709,13 @@ static efi_status_t allocate_unaccepted_memory(struct boot_params *params,
 		return EFI_SUCCESS;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * range_contains_unaccepted_memory() may need to check one 2M chunk
+	 * beyond the end of RAM to deal with load_unaligned_zeropad(). Make
+	 * sure that the bitmap is large enough handle it.
+	 */
+	max_addr += PMD_SIZE;
+
 	/*
 	 * If unaccepted memory is present allocate a bitmap to track what
 	 * memory has to be accepted before access.
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-14 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 139+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 12:02 [PATCHv7 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 01/14] x86/boot: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:37   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:57   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-17 19:28   ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-17 20:53     ` Tom Lendacky
2022-07-21 15:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-21 15:49     ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-22 19:18       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-22 19:30         ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-25 12:23           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-25 12:38             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-25 12:53               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-26 14:30                 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-25 13:00             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-25 13:05               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-05 11:49   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-05 12:09     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-05 13:38       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-05 14:22         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-05 14:53           ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-05 14:41         ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-05 18:17           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-08 15:55             ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-10 14:19     ` Mel Gorman
2022-08-15 21:08       ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-15 22:02         ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-29 16:02           ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-29 16:19             ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-06 17:50               ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-09-08 12:11                 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-08 16:23                   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-09-08 19:28                     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-22 14:31                       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-09-24  1:03                         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-24  9:36                           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-26 12:10                           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-26 13:38                             ` Tom Lendacky
2022-09-26 15:42                               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-26 15:42                               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 03/14] mm: Report unaccepted memory in meminfo Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26 14:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 04/14] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-25 13:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 05/14] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 10:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-15 15:05     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-17 17:16       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-25 21:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 06/14] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-22 19:58   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26  8:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 07/14] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 08/14] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26  9:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-30  1:28     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-01  9:37       ` Mike Rapoport
2022-12-01 13:47         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 09/14] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-06-23 17:19   ` [PATCHv7 10/14] x86/mm: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into " Dave Hansen
2022-07-26 10:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-02 23:46     ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-03 14:02       ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-11 11:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-13 16:11           ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-13 21:13             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-13 16:04         ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-13 20:58           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26 17:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-26 17:46     ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26 20:17   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-09 11:38     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-13 16:03       ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-13 21:02         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 11/14] x86: Disable kexec if system has " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:23   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-23 21:48     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-24  2:00       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-28 23:51         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-29  0:10           ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-29  0:59             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-04  7:18               ` Dave Young
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 12/14] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:25   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 13/14] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:31   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26 10:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 14/14] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-24 16:22   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-27 10:42     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26 14:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 11:45     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-10 10:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-24 16:37 ` [PATCHv7 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 16:57   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 17:06     ` Marc Orr
2022-06-24 17:09       ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 17:15         ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 17:19         ` Marc Orr
2022-06-24 17:21           ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 17:47           ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 18:10             ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 18:13               ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 17:40   ` Michael Roth
2022-06-24 17:58     ` Michael Roth
2022-06-24 18:05     ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-27 11:30   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-27 11:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-27 12:22       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-27 16:17         ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-27 16:33           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-27 22:38             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-28 17:17               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-18 17:21                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-18 23:32                   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19  0:31                     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19 18:29                       ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19 19:13                         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-19 20:45                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-19 21:23                             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-19 21:35                               ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-19 21:50                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-19 22:01                                   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-19 22:02                                   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-19 22:08                                     ` Tom Lendacky
2022-07-20  0:26                                     ` Marc Orr
2022-07-20  5:44                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-20 17:03                                         ` Marc Orr
2022-07-22 15:07                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-21 17:12                                       ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-23 11:14                                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-28 22:01                                           ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-09 11:14                                           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-09 11:36                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-08-09 11:54                                               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-09 21:09                                                 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19  2:48                     ` Yao, Jiewen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220614120231.48165-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=philip.cox@canonical.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).