From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, dkangude@cadence.com
Cc: yash.shah@sifive.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
bp@alien8.de, mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sachin.ghadi@sifive.com,
rrichter@marvell.com, james.morse@arm.com,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: sifive: Add SiFive specific Cadence DDR controller driver
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:12:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-d2a95187-c772-4c5d-b30b-b053a3195177@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907061126.GA14999@infradead.org>
On Sun, 06 Sep 2020 23:11:26 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:17:58AM +0530, Yash Shah wrote:
>> Add a driver to manage the Cadence DDR controller present on SiFive SoCs
>> At present the driver manages the EDAC feature of the DDR controller.
>> Additional features may be added to the driver in future to control
>> other aspects of the DDR controller.
>
> So if this is a generic(ish) Cadence IP block shouldn't it be named
> Cadence and made generic? Or is the frontend somehow SiFive specific?
For some reason I thought we had a SiFive-specific interface to this, but I may
have gotten that confused with something else as it's been a while. Someone
from SiFive would probably have a better idea, but it looks like the person I'd
ask isn't thereany more so I'm all out of options ;)
It looks like there was a very similar driver posted by Dhananjay Kangude from
Cadence in April: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/6/358 . Some of the register
definitions seem to be different, but the code I looked at is very similar so
there's at least some bits that could be shared. I found a v4 of that patch
set, but that was back in May: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/11/912 . It
alludes to a v5, but I can't find one. I've added Dhananjay, maybe he knows
what's up?
I don't know enough about the block to know if the subtle difference in
register names/offsets means. They look properly jumbled up (ie, not just an
offset), so maybe there's just different versions or that's the SiFive-specific
part I had bouncing around my head? Either way, it seems like one driver with
some simple configuration could handle both of these -- either sticking the
offsets in the DT (if they're going to be different everywhere) or by coming up
with some version sort of thing (if there's a handful of these).
I'm now also a bit worried about the provenace of this code. The two drivers
are errily similar -- for example, the variable definitions in handle_ce()
u64 err_c_addr = 0x0;
u64 err_c_data = 0x0;
u32 err_c_synd, err_c_id;
u32 sig_val_l, sig_val_h;
are exactly the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-09 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-07 5:47 [PATCH v2 0/3] SiFive DDR controller and EDAC support Yash Shah
2020-09-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT documentation for DDR Controller in SiFive SoCs Yash Shah
2020-09-15 15:24 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: sifive: Add SiFive specific Cadence DDR controller driver Yash Shah
2020-09-07 5:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-07 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-09 3:12 ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2020-09-09 3:56 ` Yash Shah
2020-09-09 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-09 20:31 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-09-17 9:56 ` Dhananjay Vilasrao Kangude
2020-09-07 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] EDAC/sifive: Add EDAC support for Memory Controller in SiFive SoCs Yash Shah
2020-09-23 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-15 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] SiFive DDR controller and EDAC support Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mhng-d2a95187-c772-4c5d-b30b-b053a3195177@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1 \
--to=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dkangude@cadence.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
--cc=sachin.ghadi@sifive.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yash.shah@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).