linux-i3c.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kieran Bingham" <kieran@ksquared.org.uk>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jacopo Mondi" <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
	"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Luca Ceresoli" <luca@lucaceresoli.net>,
	"Linux I2C" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org,
	"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] i2c: of: mark a whole array of regs as reserved
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:09:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUvADDozCX6Bd0dDVejpTY-k42naEnB7Q5Z6w7Yg94_Vw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220172403.26062-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Hi Wolfram,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:26 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> Back then, 'reg' properties in I2C DT bindings only contained one
> address and this address was assigned a device and, thus, blocked.
> Meanwhile, chips using multiple addresses are common and the 'reg'
> property can be an array described by 'reg-names'. This code enhances
> I2C DT parsing, so it will reserve all addresses described in an array.
> They will be bound to the 'dummy' driver as 'reserved' iff the first
> address can be assigned successfully. If that is not the case, the array
> is not further considered. If one later address of the array can not be
> assigned, it will be reported but we don't bail out. The driver has to
> decide if that address is critical or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

One comment below.

> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
> @@ -21,20 +21,12 @@
>
>  #include "i2c-core.h"
>
> -int of_i2c_get_board_info(struct device_node *node, struct i2c_board_info *info)
> +static void of_i2c_decode_board_info(struct device_node *node, u32 addr,
> +                                    bool first_addr, struct i2c_board_info *info)
>  {
> -       u32 addr;
> -       int ret;
> -
>         memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
>
> -       ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr);
> -       if (ret) {
> -               pr_err("invalid reg on %pOF\n", node);
> -               return ret;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (of_modalias_node(node, info->type, sizeof(info->type)) < 0)
> +       if (!first_addr || of_modalias_node(node, info->type, sizeof(info->type)) < 0)
>                 strlcpy(info->type, I2C_RESERVED_DRV_NAME, sizeof(I2C_RESERVED_DRV_NAME));
>
>         if (addr & I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) {
> @@ -51,11 +43,27 @@ int of_i2c_get_board_info(struct device_node *node, struct i2c_board_info *info)
>         info->of_node = node;
>         info->fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(node);
>
> -       if (of_property_read_bool(node, "host-notify"))
> -               info->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_HOST_NOTIFY;
> +       if (first_addr) {
> +               if (of_property_read_bool(node, "host-notify"))
> +                       info->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_HOST_NOTIFY;
> +
> +               if (of_get_property(node, "wakeup-source", NULL))
> +                       info->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_WAKE;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +int of_i2c_get_board_info(struct device_node *node, struct i2c_board_info *info)
> +{
> +       u32 addr;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr);

Perhaps the time is ripe to start considering #address-cells, instead
of assuming 1, here ...

> +       if (ret) {
> +               pr_err("invalid reg on %pOF\n", node);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
>
> -       if (of_get_property(node, "wakeup-source", NULL))
> -               info->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_WAKE;
> +       of_i2c_decode_board_info(node, addr, true, info);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -64,21 +72,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_i2c_get_board_info);
>  static struct i2c_client *of_i2c_register_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>                                                  struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -       struct i2c_client *client;
> +       struct i2c_client *client, *first_client = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>         struct i2c_board_info info;
> -       int ret;
> +       bool first_reg = true;
> +       struct property *prop;
> +       const __be32 *cur;
> +       u32 reg;
>
>         pr_debug("register %pOF\n", node);
>
> -       ret = of_i2c_get_board_info(node, &info);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +       of_property_for_each_u32(node, "reg", prop, cur, reg) {

... and especially here, if this code can ever be reused for i3c, which uses 3.

> +               of_i2c_decode_board_info(node, reg, first_reg, &info);
> +
> +               client = i2c_new_client_device(adap, &info);
> +               if (IS_ERR(client)) {
> +                       pr_err("failure registering addr 0x%02x for %pOF\n",
> +                               reg, node);
> +                       if (first_reg)
> +                               return client;
> +               }
>
> -       client = i2c_new_client_device(adap, &info);
> -       if (IS_ERR(client))
> -               pr_err("failure registering %pOF\n", node);
> +               if (first_reg) {
> +                       first_client = client;
> +                       first_reg = false;
> +               }
> +       }
>
> -       return client;
> +       return first_client;
>  }
>
>  void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-21 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 17:23 [RFC PATCH 0/7] i2c: of: reserve unknown and ancillary addresses Wolfram Sang
2020-02-20 17:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] i2c: add sanity check for parameter of i2c_verify_client() Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21  9:36   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-20 17:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] i2c: use DEFINE for the dummy driver name Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21  9:38   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-20 17:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] i2c: allow DT nodes without 'compatible' Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21  9:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-21  9:48     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-23 23:11     ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-03-12 11:19       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-12 11:44         ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-04-10 13:47         ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-02-26 16:30   ` Rob Herring
2020-02-20 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] i2c: of: remove superfluous parameter from exported function Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21  9:50   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-24  8:12   ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-02-20 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] i2c: of: error message unification Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21  9:54   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-20 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] i2c: of: mark a whole array of regs as reserved Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21 10:09   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2020-03-12 11:21     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-18 14:33     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-02-28 12:11   ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-02-20 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] i2c: core: hand over reserved devices when requesting ancillary addresses Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21 10:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-28 12:11     ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-03-12 11:30       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-12 11:21     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-13 12:42     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-02-21 10:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] i2c: of: reserve unknown and " Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdUvADDozCX6Bd0dDVejpTY-k42naEnB7Q5Z6w7Yg94_Vw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
    --cc=kieran@ksquared.org.uk \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).