From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, <eric.auger.pro@gmail.com>,
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <will@kernel.org>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <maz@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, vivek.gautam@arm.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:26:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5cc1635-b69b-50a6-404a-5bf667296669@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201118112151.25412-4-eric.auger@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
On 2020/11/18 19:21, Eric Auger wrote:
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
>
> When handling faults from the event or PRI queue, we need to find the
> struct device associated to a SID. Add a rb_tree to keep track of SIDs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
[...]
> }
>
> +static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct arm_smmu_stream *new_stream, *cur_stream;
> + struct rb_node **new_node, *parent_node = NULL;
> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
> +
> + master->streams = kcalloc(fwspec->num_ids,
> + sizeof(struct arm_smmu_stream), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!master->streams)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + master->num_streams = fwspec->num_ids;
This is not roll-backed when fail.
> +
> + mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> + for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids && !ret; i++) {
Check ret at here, makes it hard to decide the start index of rollback.
If we fail at here, then start index is (i-2).
If we fail in the loop, then start index is (i-1).
> + u32 sid = fwspec->ids[i];
> +
> + new_stream = &master->streams[i];
> + new_stream->id = sid;
> + new_stream->master = master;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check the SIDs are in range of the SMMU and our stream table
> + */
> + if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> + ret = -ERANGE;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> + if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> + ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Insert into SID tree */
> + new_node = &(smmu->streams.rb_node);
> + while (*new_node) {
> + cur_stream = rb_entry(*new_node, struct arm_smmu_stream,
> + node);
> + parent_node = *new_node;
> + if (cur_stream->id > new_stream->id) {
> + new_node = &((*new_node)->rb_left);
> + } else if (cur_stream->id < new_stream->id) {
> + new_node = &((*new_node)->rb_right);
> + } else {
> + dev_warn(master->dev,
> + "stream %u already in tree\n",
> + cur_stream->id);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + rb_link_node(&new_stream->node, parent_node, new_node);
> + rb_insert_color(&new_stream->node, &smmu->streams);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + for (; i > 0; i--)
should be (i >= 0)?
And the start index seems not correct.
> + rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
> + kfree(master->streams);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_remove_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
> +
> + if (!smmu || !master->streams)
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> + for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++)
> + rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
> + mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +
> + kfree(master->streams);
> +}
> +
> static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops;
>
> static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> {
> - int i, ret;
> + int ret;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> struct arm_smmu_master *master;
> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> @@ -2331,27 +2447,12 @@ static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>
> master->dev = dev;
> master->smmu = smmu;
> - master->sids = fwspec->ids;
> - master->num_sids = fwspec->num_ids;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&master->bonds);
> dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, master);
>
> - /* Check the SIDs are in range of the SMMU and our stream table */
> - for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> - u32 sid = master->sids[i];
> -
> - if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> - ret = -ERANGE;
> - goto err_free_master;
> - }
> -
> - /* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> - if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> - ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_free_master;
> - }
> - }
> + ret = arm_smmu_insert_master(smmu, master);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_master;
>
> master->ssid_bits = min(smmu->ssid_bits, fwspec->num_pasid_bits);
>
> @@ -2389,6 +2490,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
> WARN_ON(arm_smmu_master_sva_enabled(master));
> arm_smmu_detach_dev(master);
> arm_smmu_disable_pasid(master);
> + arm_smmu_remove_master(master);
> kfree(master);
Thanks,
Keqian
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 11:21 [PATCH v13 00/15] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part) Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 01/15] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Eric Auger
2020-11-18 16:19 ` Jacob Pan
2020-11-19 17:02 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-01 11:27 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-01 17:18 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 02/15] iommu: Introduce bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2021-02-01 11:52 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-12 8:55 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-18 8:43 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-18 10:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 03/15] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Eric Auger
2021-02-01 12:26 ` Keqian Zhu [this message]
2021-02-01 15:15 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-02 6:39 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-01 17:19 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-02 7:20 ` Keqian Zhu
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 04/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow s1 and s2 configs to coexist Eric Auger
2021-02-01 12:35 ` Keqian Zhu
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 05/15] iommu/smmuv3: Get prepared for nested stage support Eric Auger
2020-11-19 3:59 ` kernel test robot
2020-12-03 12:32 ` Kunkun Jiang
2020-12-03 13:01 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:23 ` Kunkun Jiang
2020-12-09 14:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-02-02 7:14 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-11 17:36 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 06/15] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table Eric Auger
2021-02-02 8:03 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-11 17:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs Eric Auger
2020-12-01 13:33 ` Xingang Wang
2020-12-01 13:58 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-02 12:59 ` Wang Xingang
2020-12-03 18:42 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-04 9:53 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-12-04 10:20 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2020-12-04 10:23 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 16:58 ` Auger Eric
2021-01-14 17:09 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-14 17:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-01-14 18:00 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-15 13:17 ` Auger Eric
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 08/15] iommu/smmuv3: Implement cache_invalidate Eric Auger
2021-01-16 2:24 ` chenxiang (M)
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 09/15] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 10/15] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 11/15] iommu/smmuv3: Enforce incompatibility between nested mode and HW MSI regions Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 12/15] iommu/smmuv3: Implement bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 13/15] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 14/15] iommu/smmuv3: Accept configs with more than one context descriptor Eric Auger
2020-11-18 11:21 ` [PATCH v13 15/15] iommu/smmuv3: Add PASID cache invalidation per PASID Eric Auger
2021-01-08 17:05 ` [PATCH v13 00/15] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part) Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-01-13 15:37 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-21 18:21 ` Auger Eric
2021-02-22 8:56 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-03-15 18:04 ` Krishna Reddy
2021-03-16 8:22 ` Auger Eric
2021-03-16 18:10 ` Krishna Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5cc1635-b69b-50a6-404a-5bf667296669@huawei.com \
--to=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).