From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 15/23] PCI: Replace pcie_link_state based device list with a pci_dev one
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:03:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200822200358.252967-16-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200822200358.252967-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
- Replace existing pcie_link_state based device list with one
based on struct pci_dev one.
- Remove initialisation and declaration of existing list.
- Replace pcie_link_state.sibling with pci_dev.sibling.
- Remove pcie_link_state.sibling.
Signed-off-by: Saheed O. Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 6f73eb2ca0bd..9ca06f00e98d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ struct pcie_link_state {
struct pci_dev *downstream; /* Downstream component, function 0 */
struct pcie_link_state *root; /* pointer to the root port link */
struct pcie_link_state *parent; /* pointer to the parent Link state */
- struct list_head sibling; /* node in link_list */
/* ASPM state */
u32 aspm_support:7; /* Supported ASPM state */
@@ -74,7 +73,6 @@ struct pcie_link_state {
static int aspm_disabled, aspm_force;
static bool aspm_support_enabled = true;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(aspm_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(link_list);
static LIST_HEAD(pdev_link_list);
#define POLICY_DEFAULT 0 /* BIOS default setting */
@@ -856,7 +854,6 @@ static int alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (!link)
return -1;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->sibling);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->sibling);
link->pdev = pdev;
link->downstream = pci_function_0(pdev->subordinate);
@@ -889,7 +886,6 @@ static int alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pdev->root = pdev->parent->root;
}
- list_add(&link->sibling, &link_list);
list_add(&pdev->sibling, &pdev_link_list);
pdev->link_state = link;
return 0;
@@ -975,20 +971,19 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
}
/* Recheck latencies and update aspm_capable for links under the root */
-static void pcie_update_aspm_capable(struct pci_dev *root_pdev)
+static void pcie_update_aspm_capable(struct pci_dev *root)
{
- struct pcie_link_state *root = root_pdev->link_state;
- struct pcie_link_state *link;
+ struct pci_dev *link;
+
BUG_ON(root->parent);
- list_for_each_entry(link, &link_list, sibling) {
+ list_for_each_entry(link, &pdev_link_list, sibling) {
if (link->root != root)
continue;
link->aspm_capable = link->aspm_support;
- link->pdev->aspm_capable = link->aspm_support;
}
- list_for_each_entry(link, &link_list, sibling) {
+ list_for_each_entry(link, &pdev_link_list, sibling) {
struct pci_dev *child;
- struct pci_bus *linkbus = link->pdev->subordinate;
+ struct pci_bus *linkbus = link->subordinate;
if (link->root != root)
continue;
list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
@@ -1024,7 +1019,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
/* All functions are removed, so just disable ASPM for the link */
pcie_config_aspm_link(parent, 0);
- list_del(&link->sibling);
+ list_del(&link->pdev->sibling);
/* Clock PM is for endpoint device */
free_link_state(parent);
@@ -1177,7 +1172,7 @@ static int pcie_aspm_set_policy(const char *val,
const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
int i;
- struct pcie_link_state *link;
+ struct pci_dev *link;
if (aspm_disabled)
return -EPERM;
@@ -1190,9 +1185,9 @@ static int pcie_aspm_set_policy(const char *val,
down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
aspm_policy = i;
- list_for_each_entry(link, &link_list, sibling) {
- pcie_config_aspm_link(link->pdev, policy_to_aspm_state(link->pdev));
- pcie_set_clkpm(link->pdev, policy_to_clkpm_state(link->pdev));
+ list_for_each_entry(link, &pdev_link_list, sibling) {
+ pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));
+ pcie_set_clkpm(link, policy_to_clkpm_state(link));
}
mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock);
up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
--
2.18.4
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-22 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-22 20:03 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 00/23] Remove struct pcie_link_state and aspm_register_info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 01/23] PCI: Migrate ASPM info from struct pcie_link_state to struct pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 02/23] PCI: Add l1ss_cap and l1ss_cap_ptr " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 03/23] PCI: Rework calc_l*_latency() to take a pci_dev * Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 04/23] PCI: Compute aspm_register_info.support directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 05/23] PCI: Read value of aspm_register_info.l1ss_ctl1 directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 06/23] PCI: Replace aspm_register_info.l1ss_cap* with their pci_dev version Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 07/23] PCI: Compute aspm_register_info.enable directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 08/23] PCI: Remove unused aspm_calc_l1ss_info() arguments Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 09/23] PCI: Remove pcie_get_aspm_reg() and struct aspm_register_info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 10/23] PCI: Relocate call to aspm_calc_l1ss_info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 11/23] PCI: Rework and Rename aspm_calc_l1ss_info() Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 12/23] PCI: Add ASPM and CLOCK PM states to struct pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 13/23] PCI: Initialise and Update values of pci_dev's PCIe link info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 14/23] PCI: Change Return and Argument values from pcie_link_state to pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 16/23] PCI: Remove Exit latencies from struct pcie_link_state Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 17/23] PCI: Remove .clkpm_* " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 18/23] PCI: Remove .aspm_* " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 19/23] PCI: Remove .parent " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 20/23] PCI: Remove .root " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 21/23] PCI: Remove .downstream " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 22/23] PCI: Remove .pdev " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 23/23] PCI: Remove " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200822200358.252967-16-refactormyself@gmail.com \
--to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).