linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	mrinalmni@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] checkpatch: Improve SPDX license identifier check for script files
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:46:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911101631.4lylpsbaog5g5jdj@mrinalpandey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKXUXMyh1eVusXc+2DAN9H9WfyXHkTuCuhaiG8dfM54Km+rW4A@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1835 bytes --]

On 20/09/07 09:10AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > I was wondering how should I go about the original patch? Should I keep
> > both the checks or just the executable one and let be the patch as it is
> > as further cleanup can lead to better performance as we have already
> > seen with the evaluations.
> >
> 
> Kees Cook and Andrew Morton pointed out that a tool may not rely on
> the executable flag. So, checkpatch.pl may not rely on the executable
> flag; the patch we created here is misdesigned, now we know that.

Sir,

Yes.
> 
> > Also, I have completed all the tasks related to this project on Community
> > Bridge's site. What are the next steps of mentorship? By when can I
> > expect the results sir/ma'am?
> >
> 
> Mentorship can begin by October 1st. We need to develop a project plan
> for the mentorship, you are in the lead to write that. We need a
> project plan for the mentorship to start.
> 
Eagerly looking forward to writing the plan. How, when and to whom am I
required to submit this plan and what should it broadly contain?

> In the process of the checkpatch.pl patch creation, we identified that
> we can check if we find any invocations that rely on the executable
> flag. This could be a first set of tasks to do in the mentorship.
>
Yes, sure sir.

> Maybe, you can find another aspect to look into the checkpatch.pl
> evaluation? Maybe the check for the line of the SPDX-Identifier was
> not the best case to start with, because it is more complex than
> initially thought.
>
I suggested few patches before, guess they can sip into mentorship if
you find them fit enough.
Apart from those I have a few other observations on checkpatch.pl and I
am continuously evaluating the output file for more.
I will share these evaluations on a different thread.
> 
> Lukas

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 201 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-11 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-03  7:58 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] checkpatch: Improve SPDX license identifier check for script files Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-03 10:59 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-04 15:56   ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-04 19:37     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-09  7:22       ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-20  4:42         ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-22  8:24           ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-22 19:25             ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-24  8:35               ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-24  8:56                 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-25  4:56                   ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-25  5:54                     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-24  8:23             ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-08-24  8:54               ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-25  4:53                 ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-09-06  4:27                   ` Mrinal Pandey
2020-09-07  7:10                     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-09-11 10:16                       ` Mrinal Pandey [this message]
2020-09-11 10:33                         ` Lukas Bulwahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200911101631.4lylpsbaog5g5jdj@mrinalpandey \
    --to=mrinalmni@gmail.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).