linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd at arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Subject: Setting monotonic time?
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 09:02:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2cM4AWKQ9VsZFzUu0qJ-fYiLK5fMXRoTsVcgmFwoeJxg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87in2jo8u6.fsf@xmission.com>

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:14 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com> wrote:
>
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Direct access to hardware/drivers and not through an abstraction like
> >> the vfs (an abstraction over block devices) can legitimately be handled
> >> by hotplug events.  I unplug one keyboard I plug in another.
> >>
> >> I don't know if the input layer is more of a general abstraction
> >> or more of a hardware device.  I have not dug into it but my guess
> >> is abstraction from what I have heard.
> >>
> >> The scary difficulty here is if after restart input is reporting times
> >> in CLOCK_MONOTONIC and the applications in the namespace are talking
> >> about times in CLOCK_MONOTONIC_SYNC.  Then there is an issue.  As even
> >> with a fixed offset the times don't match up.
> >>
> >> So a time namespace absolutely needs to do is figure out how to deal
> >> with all of the kernel interfaces reporting times and figure out how to
> >> report them in the current time namespace.
> >
> > So you want to talk to Arnd who is leading the y2038 effort. He knowns how
> > many and which interfaces are involved aside of the obvious core timer
> > ones. It's quite an amount and the problem is that you really need to do
> > that at the interface level, because many of those time stamps are taken in
> > contexts which are completely oblivious of name spaces. Ditto for timeouts
> > and similar things which are handed in through these interfaces.
>
> Yep.  That sounds right.

Let's stay with the input event example for the moment: Here, we have a
character device, and a user calls read() to retrieve one or more records
of type 'struct input_event' using the evdev_read() function. The original
timestamp gets put there using this logic:

        ktime_t time;
        struct timespec64 ts;
        time = client->clk_type == EV_CLK_REAL ?
                        ktime_get_real() :
                        client->clk_type == EV_CLK_MONO ?
                                ktime_get() :
                                ktime_get_boottime();
        ts = ktime_to_timespec64(time);
        ev.input_event_sec = ts.tv_sec;
        ev.input_event_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;

clk_type can get set using an ioctl() to real, monotonic or
boottime. We have to stop using EV_CLK_REAL in the
future because that breaks in y2038, but I guess EV_CLK_MONO
and EV_CLK_BOOK should stay.

If we want this to work correctly in a namespace that has a
user defined CLOCK_MONOTONIC timebase, one way to
do it might be to always call ktime_get() when we record
the timestamp in the kernel-internal CLOCK_MONOTONIC
base, but then convert it to the correct base when copying to
user space.

Note that AFAIU practically all users of evdev do /not/ actually
care about the time base, they only care about the elapsed
time between intervals, e.g. to track how fast a pointer should
move based on input from a trackpad. I don't see any reason
why one would compare this timestamp to a clock_gettime()
value, but of course at the moment this has well-defined
behavior that would break if we change clock_gettime(), and
we have a process in the namespace that opens
/dev/input/eventX and relies on meaningful timestamps
relative to a particular base.

       Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Subject: Setting monotonic time?
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 09:02:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2cM4AWKQ9VsZFzUu0qJ-fYiLK5fMXRoTsVcgmFwoeJxg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181003070200.qInF48U4ZUPHvxgIX2ZRPjoYAkqnOdlp1Lu3JTtZpKE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87in2jo8u6.fsf@xmission.com>

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018@8:14 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Direct access to hardware/drivers and not through an abstraction like
> >> the vfs (an abstraction over block devices) can legitimately be handled
> >> by hotplug events.  I unplug one keyboard I plug in another.
> >>
> >> I don't know if the input layer is more of a general abstraction
> >> or more of a hardware device.  I have not dug into it but my guess
> >> is abstraction from what I have heard.
> >>
> >> The scary difficulty here is if after restart input is reporting times
> >> in CLOCK_MONOTONIC and the applications in the namespace are talking
> >> about times in CLOCK_MONOTONIC_SYNC.  Then there is an issue.  As even
> >> with a fixed offset the times don't match up.
> >>
> >> So a time namespace absolutely needs to do is figure out how to deal
> >> with all of the kernel interfaces reporting times and figure out how to
> >> report them in the current time namespace.
> >
> > So you want to talk to Arnd who is leading the y2038 effort. He knowns how
> > many and which interfaces are involved aside of the obvious core timer
> > ones. It's quite an amount and the problem is that you really need to do
> > that at the interface level, because many of those time stamps are taken in
> > contexts which are completely oblivious of name spaces. Ditto for timeouts
> > and similar things which are handed in through these interfaces.
>
> Yep.  That sounds right.

Let's stay with the input event example for the moment: Here, we have a
character device, and a user calls read() to retrieve one or more records
of type 'struct input_event' using the evdev_read() function. The original
timestamp gets put there using this logic:

        ktime_t time;
        struct timespec64 ts;
        time = client->clk_type == EV_CLK_REAL ?
                        ktime_get_real() :
                        client->clk_type == EV_CLK_MONO ?
                                ktime_get() :
                                ktime_get_boottime();
        ts = ktime_to_timespec64(time);
        ev.input_event_sec = ts.tv_sec;
        ev.input_event_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;

clk_type can get set using an ioctl() to real, monotonic or
boottime. We have to stop using EV_CLK_REAL in the
future because that breaks in y2038, but I guess EV_CLK_MONO
and EV_CLK_BOOK should stay.

If we want this to work correctly in a namespace that has a
user defined CLOCK_MONOTONIC timebase, one way to
do it might be to always call ktime_get() when we record
the timestamp in the kernel-internal CLOCK_MONOTONIC
base, but then convert it to the correct base when copying to
user space.

Note that AFAIU practically all users of evdev do /not/ actually
care about the time base, they only care about the elapsed
time between intervals, e.g. to track how fast a pointer should
move based on input from a trackpad. I don't see any reason
why one would compare this timestamp to a clock_gettime()
value, but of course at the moment this has well-defined
behavior that would break if we change clock_gettime(), and
we have a process in the namespace that opens
/dev/input/eventX and relies on meaningful timestamps
relative to a particular base.

       Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-19 20:50 [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 16/20] selftest: Add Time Namespace test for supported clocks dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-24 21:36   ` shuah
2018-09-24 21:36     ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 17/20] selftest/timens: Add test for timerfd dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 18/20] selftest/timens: Add test for clock_nanosleep dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 19/20] timens/selftest: Add procfs selftest dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 20/20] timens/selftest: Add timer offsets test dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-21 12:27 ` [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace ebiederm
2018-09-21 12:27   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-24 20:51   ` avagin
2018-09-24 20:51     ` Andrey Vagin
2018-09-24 22:02     ` ebiederm
2018-09-24 22:02       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25  1:42       ` avagin
2018-09-25  1:42         ` Andrey Vagin
2018-09-26 17:36         ` ebiederm
2018-09-26 17:36           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-26 17:59           ` 0x7f454c46
2018-09-26 17:59             ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-27 21:30           ` tglx
2018-09-27 21:30             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 21:41             ` tglx
2018-09-27 21:41               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 23:20               ` avagin
2018-10-01 23:20                 ` Andrey Vagin
2018-10-02  6:15                 ` tglx
2018-10-02  6:15                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02 21:05                   ` 0x7f454c46
2018-10-02 21:05                     ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-10-02 21:26                     ` tglx
2018-10-02 21:26                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-28 17:03             ` ebiederm
2018-09-28 17:03               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-28 19:32               ` tglx
2018-09-28 19:32                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01  9:05                 ` ebiederm
2018-10-01  9:05                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-01  9:15                 ` Setting monotonic time? ebiederm
2018-10-01  9:15                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-01 18:52                   ` tglx
2018-10-01 18:52                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02 20:00                     ` arnd
2018-10-02 20:00                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-02 20:06                       ` tglx
2018-10-02 20:06                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  4:50                         ` ebiederm
2018-10-03  4:50                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-03  5:25                           ` tglx
2018-10-03  5:25                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  6:14                             ` ebiederm
2018-10-03  6:14                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-03  7:02                               ` arnd [this message]
2018-10-03  7:02                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-03  6:14                             ` tglx
2018-10-03  6:14                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 20:51                   ` avagin
2018-10-01 20:51                     ` Andrey Vagin
2018-10-02  6:16                     ` tglx
2018-10-02  6:16                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-21  1:41               ` [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace avagin
2018-10-21  1:41                 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-21  3:54                 ` avagin
2018-10-21  3:54                   ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-29 20:33                 ` tglx
2018-10-29 20:33                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 21:21                   ` ebiederm
2018-10-29 21:21                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-29 21:36                     ` tglx
2018-10-29 21:36                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-31 16:26                   ` avagin
2018-10-31 16:26                     ` Andrei Vagin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a2cM4AWKQ9VsZFzUu0qJ-fYiLK5fMXRoTsVcgmFwoeJxg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).