linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@assyoma.it>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>,
	Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 22:39:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0e4f2d1cfca0ea32da27b1cb34bf1be@assyoma.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512134157.GA2523@nim>

Il 12-05-2017 15:42 Joe Thornber ha scritto:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:02:58PM +0200, Gionatan Danti wrote:
>> On 02/05/2017 13:00, Gionatan Danti wrote:
>> >>Anyway, I think (and maybe I am wrong...) that the better solution is to
>> >>fail *all* writes to a full pool, even the ones directed to allocated
>> >>space. This will effectively "freeze" the pool and avoid any
>> >>long-standing inconsistencies.
> 
> I think dm-thin behaviour is fine given the semantics of write
> and flush IOs.
> 
> A block device can complete a write even if it hasn't hit the physical
> media, a flush request needs to come in at a later time which means
> 'flush all IOs that you've previously completed'.  So any software 
> using
> a block device (fs, database etc), tends to generate batches of writes,
> followed by a flush to commit the changes.  For example if there was a
> power failure between the batch of write io completing and the flush
> completing you do not know how much of the writes will be visible when
> the machine comes back.
> 
> When a pool is full it will allow writes to provisioned areas of a thin 
> to
> succeed.  But if any writes failed due to inability to provision then a
> REQ_FLUSH io to that thin device will *not* succeed.
> 
> - Joe

True, but the real problem is that most of the failed flushes will *not* 
bring the filesystem read-only, as both ext4 and xfs seems to go 
read-only only when *metadata* updates fail. As this very same list 
recommend using ext4 with errors=remount-ro on the basis that putting 
the filesystem in a read-only state after any error I the right thing, I 
was somewhat alarmed to find that, as far I can tell, ext4 goes 
read-only on metadata errors only.

So, let me reiterate: can we consider thinlvm + xfs as safe as thinlvm + 
ext4 + errors=remount-ro?
Thanks.

-- 
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-14 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-06 14:31 [linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM Gionatan Danti
2017-04-07  8:19 ` Mark Mielke
2017-04-07  9:12   ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-07 13:50     ` L A Walsh
2017-04-07 16:33       ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-13 12:59         ` Stuart Gathman
2017-04-13 13:52           ` Xen
2017-04-13 14:33             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-13 14:47               ` Xen
2017-04-13 15:29               ` Stuart Gathman
2017-04-13 15:43                 ` Xen
2017-04-13 17:26                   ` Stuart D. Gathman
2017-04-13 17:32                   ` Stuart D. Gathman
2017-04-14 15:17                     ` Xen
2017-04-14  7:27               ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-14  7:23           ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-14 15:23             ` Xen
2017-04-14 15:53               ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-14 16:08                 ` Stuart Gathman
2017-04-14 17:36                 ` Xen
2017-04-14 18:59                   ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-14 19:20                     ` Xen
2017-04-15  8:27                       ` Xen
2017-04-15 23:35                         ` Xen
2017-04-17 12:33                         ` Xen
2017-04-15 21:22                     ` Xen
2017-04-15 21:49                       ` Xen
2017-04-15 21:48                     ` Xen
2017-04-18 10:17                       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-18 13:23                         ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-18 14:32                           ` Stuart D. Gathman
2017-04-19  7:22                         ` Xen
2017-04-07 22:24     ` Mark Mielke
2017-04-08 11:56       ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-07 18:21 ` Tomas Dalebjörk
2017-04-13 10:20 ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-13 12:41   ` Xen
2017-04-14  7:20     ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-14  8:24       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-14  9:07         ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-14  9:37           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-14  9:55             ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-22  7:14         ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-22 16:32           ` Xen
2017-04-22 20:58             ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-22 21:17             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-23  5:29               ` Xen
2017-04-23  9:26                 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-24 21:02                   ` Xen
2017-04-24 21:59                     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-26  7:26                       ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-26  7:42                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-26  8:10                           ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-26 11:23                             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-26 13:37                               ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-26 14:33                                 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-26 16:37                                   ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-26 18:32                                     ` Stuart Gathman
2017-04-26 19:24                                     ` Stuart Gathman
2017-05-02 11:00                                     ` Gionatan Danti
2017-05-12 13:02                                       ` Gionatan Danti
2017-05-12 13:42                                         ` Joe Thornber
2017-05-14 20:39                                           ` Gionatan Danti [this message]
2017-05-15 12:50                                             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-05-15 14:48                                               ` Gionatan Danti
2017-05-15 15:33                                                 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-05-16  7:53                                                   ` Gionatan Danti
2017-05-16 10:54                                                     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-05-16 13:38                                                       ` Gionatan Danti
2018-02-27 18:39                       ` Xen
2018-02-28  9:26                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-02-28 19:07                           ` Gionatan Danti
2018-02-28 21:43                             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-01  7:14                               ` Gionatan Danti
2018-03-01  8:31                                 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-01  9:43                                   ` Gianluca Cecchi
2018-03-01 11:10                                     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-01  9:52                                   ` Gionatan Danti
2018-03-01 11:23                                     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-01 12:48                                       ` Gionatan Danti
2018-03-01 16:00                                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-01 16:26                                           ` Gionatan Danti
2018-03-03 18:32                               ` Xen
2018-03-04 20:34                                 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-03 18:17                             ` Xen
2018-03-04 20:53                               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-05  9:42                                 ` Gionatan Danti
2018-03-05 10:18                                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2018-03-05 14:27                                     ` Gionatan Danti
2018-03-03 17:52                           ` Xen
2018-03-04 23:27                             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-22 21:22           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-04-24 13:49             ` Gionatan Danti
2017-04-24 14:48               ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0e4f2d1cfca0ea32da27b1cb34bf1be@assyoma.it \
    --to=g.danti@assyoma.it \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=thornber@redhat.com \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).