From: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
To: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: media: atomisp: reformat code comment blocks
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:47:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210420171729.GB193332@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420084448.GC1411@agape.jhs>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:44:48AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:45:04AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > Reformat code comment blocks according to the coding style guidelines.
> > This resolves different checkpatch script WARNINGs around block comments.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> > ---
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 8 +++----
> > .../atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c | 3 ++-
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c | 22 +++++++++++--------
> > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 3 ++-
> > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> > index 548c572d3b57..a585d73665a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> > @@ -747,10 +747,10 @@ static int startup(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> >
> > if (is_init == 0) {
> > /* force gc2235 to do a reset in res change, otherwise it
> > - * can not output normal after switching res. and it is not
> > - * necessary for first time run up after power on, for the sack
> > - * of performance
> > - */
> > + * can not output normal after switching res. and it is not
> > + * necessary for first time run up after power on, for the sack
> > + * of performance
> > + */
> > power_down(sd);
> > power_up(sd);
> > gc2235_write_reg_array(client, gc2235_init_settings);
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c
> > index b93c80471f22..750b3484eb19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c
> > @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static int set_msr_configuration(struct i2c_client *client, uint8_t *bufptr,
> > * By convention, the first two bytes of actual data should be
> > * understood as an address in the sensor address space (hibyte
> > * followed by lobyte) where the remaining data in the sequence
> > - * will be written. */
> > + * will be written.
> > + */
> >
> > u8 *ptr = bufptr;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c
> > index 465fc4468442..160bb58ce708 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c
> > @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int gpio_ctrl(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, bool flag)
> > /* Note: current modules wire only one GPIO signal (RESET#),
> > * but the schematic wires up two to the connector. BIOS
> > * versions have been unfortunately inconsistent with which
> > - * ACPI index RESET# is on, so hit both */
> > + * ACPI index RESET# is on, so hit both
> > + */
> >
> > if (flag) {
> > ret = dev->platform_data->gpio0_ctrl(sd, 0);
> > @@ -1019,8 +1020,8 @@ static long mt9m114_s_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > dev->first_gain = AnalogGain;
> > dev->first_diggain = DigitalGain;
> > }
> > - /* DigitalGain = 0x400 * (((u16) DigitalGain) >> 8) +
> > - ((unsigned int)(0x400 * (((u16) DigitalGain) & 0xFF)) >>8); */
> > + /* DigitalGain = 0x400 * (((u16) DigitalGain) >> 8) + */
> > + /* ((unsigned int)(0x400 * (((u16) DigitalGain) & 0xFF)) >>8); */
> >
> > /* set frame length */
> > if (FLines < coarse_integration + 6)
> > @@ -1035,7 +1036,8 @@ static long mt9m114_s_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >
> > /* set coarse integration */
> > /* 3A provide real exposure time.
> > - should not translate to any value here. */
> > + * should not translate to any value here.
> > + */
> > ret = mt9m114_write_reg(client, MISENSOR_16BIT,
> > REG_EXPO_COARSE, (u16)(coarse_integration));
> > if (ret) {
> > @@ -1044,7 +1046,7 @@ static long mt9m114_s_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - // set analog/digital gain
> > + * set analog/digital gain
> > switch(AnalogGain)
> > {
> > case 0:
> > @@ -1069,8 +1071,9 @@ static long mt9m114_s_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > */
> > if (DigitalGain >= 16 || DigitalGain <= 1)
> > DigitalGain = 1;
> > - /* AnalogGainToWrite =
> > - (u16)((DigitalGain << 12) | AnalogGainToWrite); */
> > +
> > + /* AnalogGainToWrite = (u16)((DigitalGain << 12) | AnalogGainToWrite);
> > + */
>
> this is best recommended for one line comment:
>
> /* AnalogGainToWrite = (u16)((DigitalGain << 12) | AnalogGainToWrite); */
It then extends beyond 80 character in length. Will that be acceptable?
>
>
>
> > AnalogGainToWrite = (u16)((DigitalGain << 12) | (u16)AnalogGain);
> > ret = mt9m114_write_reg(client, MISENSOR_16BIT,
> > REG_GAIN, AnalogGainToWrite);
> > @@ -1096,7 +1099,8 @@ static long mt9m114_ioctl(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int cmd, void *arg)
> > }
> >
> > /* This returns the exposure time being used. This should only be used
> > - for filling in EXIF data, not for actual image processing. */
> > + * for filling in EXIF data, not for actual image processing.
> > + */
> > static int mt9m114_g_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 *value)
> > {
> > struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> > @@ -1297,7 +1301,7 @@ static int mt9m114_g_ev(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 *val)
> >
> > /* Fake interface
> > * mt9m114 now can not support 3a_lock
> > -*/
> > + */
> > static int mt9m114_s_3a_lock(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 val)
> > {
> > aaalock = val;
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> > index c17615149f46..91dca275a08e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> > @@ -732,7 +732,8 @@ static int gpio_ctrl(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, bool flag)
> > * existing integrations often wire two (reset/power_down)
> > * because that is the way other sensors work. There is no
> > * way to tell how it is wired internally, so existing
> > - * firmwares expose both and we drive them symmetrically. */
> > + * firmwares expose both and we drive them symmetrically.
> > + */
> > if (flag) {
> > ret = dev->platform_data->gpio0_ctrl(sd, 1);
> > usleep_range(10000, 15000);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
>
> multiline comment format should appear this way:
>
> /*
> * This is a comment, a
> * multiline one.
> */
>
> with the first line of the comment empty.
Sounds good. The coding style guide also allows the other style for
specific driver types. I will improve this change according to your
feedback and resubmit.
thank you,
deepak.
>
> thank you,
>
> fabio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 19:11 [PATCH 0/6] staging: media: atomisp: code cleanup fixes Deepak R Varma
2021-04-19 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] staging: media: atomisp: improve function argument alignment Deepak R Varma
2021-04-20 13:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-04-20 17:19 ` Deepak R Varma
2021-04-20 20:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-04-21 10:19 ` Deepak R Varma
2021-04-19 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] staging: media: atomisp: balance braces around if...else block Deepak R Varma
2021-04-19 19:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] staging: media: atomisp: use __func__ over function names Deepak R Varma
2021-04-19 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] staging: media: atomisp: reformat code comment blocks Deepak R Varma
2021-04-20 8:44 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-20 17:17 ` Deepak R Varma [this message]
2021-04-21 7:17 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-28 7:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-19 19:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] staging: media: atomisp: fix CamelCase variable naming Deepak R Varma
2021-04-20 8:39 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-20 13:26 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-04-19 19:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] staging: media: atomisp: use printk with KERN facility level Deepak R Varma
2021-04-20 8:35 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-20 17:13 ` Deepak R Varma
2021-04-21 7:22 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-21 10:16 ` Deepak R Varma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210420171729.GB193332@localhost \
--to=mh12gx2825@gmail.com \
--cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).